Mehaanikateadlane Judy Wood: Kuhu kadusid tornid? I osa/ Mechanics Researcher Judy Wood: Where did the towers? part I

Mehaanikateaduste doktor Judy Wood on uurinud põhjalikult Maailma Kaubanduskeskuse kompleksi hävimist 2001. aasta 11. septembri rünnakute tagajärjel ja jõudnud veendumusele, et ametlik teooria katastroofist on vale. Alljärgnev artikkel on kokkuvõte tema intervjuust uuele USA uurivale netipõhisele raadiosaatele “Caravan To Midnight”, mis oli eetris 28. märtsil. Avaldame selle kahes osas.

DSC04297_sbcc2cc-266x300

 

Judy Wood on Virginia tehnikainstituudi doktorikraadiga mehaanika ja masinaehituse teadlane, kes on ekspert materjalide pingetaluvus testide, ehitusmehaanika, lõplike elementide meetodi, interferomeetria ja materjaliteaduse alal. Materjaliteadus on interdistsiplinaarne teadusharu, mis kombineerib keemiat, füüsikat ja inseneriteadust. Oma uurimistöös on Wood puutunud kokku erinevate materjalide testimise, komplekssete materjalide süsteemide (complex material systems), fotomehhaanika ja optiliste parameetrite mõõtmisega, tuvastamaks materjalide mõju üksteisele. Wood on masinaehituse ja konstrueerimise õppejõud ja tema kirjutatud artikleid on avaldatud paljudes rahvusvahelistes teadusajakirjades.

 

Pärast 2001. aasta 11. septembri terrorirünnakuid on Wood rakendanud oma teadmisi ja kogemusi laiaulatusliku uurimistöö läbiviimisse, et selgitada välja, kuidas Maailma Kaubanduskeskuse (World Trade Center, WTC) kompleks New Yorgis hävines. Wood on uurinud üle 40 000 foto, sadu videoklippe ja analüüsinud pealtnägijate tunnistusi rünnakutest. Ta on analüüsinud ka WTC rusude tolmu, seismilisi andmeid ja teisi keskkonnamärke, et mõista, kuidas WTC hooned hävisid. Oma uurimistööle tuginedes on Wood veendunud, et ametlik teooria sellest, mis põhjustas WTC kaksiktornide ja WTC hoone nr 7 hävinemise, on vale.

 

2007. aastal esitas Wood kaebuse töövõtjate vastu, kelle kaasabil loodi Riikliku Standardite ja Tehnoloogia Instituudi (National Institute of Standards and Technology – NIST) ametlik raport WTC kaksiktornide hävinemise selgituseks, süüdistades neid tahtlikus teadusalases pettuses. 2009. aastal jõudis see kaasus ka USA ülemkohtusse, kus see aga tagasi lükati. Kogu uurimuse avaldas Wood oma raamatus “Where Did The Towers Go?: Evidence Of Directed Free-Energy Technology On 9/11″ (“Kuhu kadusid tornid? Tõestusmaterjalid suunatud vabaenergia tehnoloogia kasutusest 11. septembril”). Lühikokkuvõtet Woodi tööst saab ka näha “Ulmefilmi” 13. osas.

 

raamat 726x1024 Mehaanikateadlane Judy Wood: Kuhu kadusid tornid? I osa

 

 

 

11. septembril 2001 valitses tõeline segadus

 

Erinevaid teooriad selle kohta, mis 11. septembril tegelikult juhtus, on ääretult palju: WTC rusude tolmust leitud nanotermiidi osakesed, aatomitehnoloogia, holograafilised lennukid; leidub ka tunnistajaid, kes väidavad, et ükski lennuk tegelikult tornidesse ei lennanud. Ametlik teooria väidab, et terroristid suutsid kaaperdada neli reisilennukit, juhtida need kursilt kõrvale ning lennata üle tunni, ilma et ükski hävitaja nende marsruuti oleks sekkunud. Nad suutsid isegi lennata läbi maailma enim turvatud õhuruumi ja sõita sisse Pentagoni. Ja siis näidatakse meile videoid, kuidas lennuk lendas läbi WTC torni ja target=”_blank”>haihtus sinna sisse. Meile näidatakse videoid, kuidas tornid õhus tolmuks muutuvad, samas kui tornide arhitektid ja ehitajad väidavad, et tornid ehitati teadmisega, et reisilennuk võib sinna sisse sõita. Tornide rajajad on tunnistanud, et tornid olnuks suutelised vastu pidama isegi mitme lennuki sissesõidule, ilma et nad kokku kukuksid.

 

Tähelepanuväärne on ka see, et BBC teatas, et WTC7 on kokku kukkunud, kuigi target=”_blank”>samal ajal paistis WTC7 uudistereporteri selja taga endiselt püsti seismas. See oli hullumeelne päev ja väga palju valeinfot levitati kõikjal. On isegi olemas videolõik, kus uudistes öeldakse, et ka One Liberty Plaza on kokku varisenud, kuigi see hoone on püsti tänase päevani. Teatati, et Valge Maja põleb, kogu pealinn põleb, räägiti, et üks lennuk on lennanud ka Empire State Buildingusse – valitses tõeline segadus.

 

 

 

Mis siis tegelikult sel päeval juhtus?

 

Kriminalistikas me peamegi alustama sellest, mis juhtus. Inimesed oletavad, et tornid varisesid kokku. Me teame, et kunagi olid seal tornid ja enam neid seal pole. Kuidas nad sealt ära kadusid, see on juba omaette küsimus. Nad ei põlenud ära ja nad ei kukkunud ka kokku. Enamik neist muutus tolmuks keset taevast. Kui sa tahad midagi kinni mätsida, siis tuleb inimestele esmalt teatada, mis juhtus. Siis leitakse põhjus, mis inimestele kõige lihtsamini sobib, ja öeldakse, et just sellepärast nii juhtus. Nad kasutavad tagurpidi metoodikat.

 

Meie aga teame, et tornid ei põlenud ära ja nad ei kukkunud ka kokku – nad muutusid tolmuks. Kui nad oleksid kokku varisenud, siis me näeksime tohutut hunnikut riismeid – 110 korrust üksteise otsas.

 

 

 

Kus on 110 korrust?kus on 110 korrust Mehaanikateadlane Judy Wood: Kuhu kadusid tornid? I osa

 

Seda ei juhtunud. Kui nad oleksid kokku kukkunud, oleks kogu Manhattan üle ujutatud, sest oleks hävinud tornide all olevad metrootunnelid ja bassein, mis hoidis kinni Hudsoni jõge. Inimesed ei tea, et WTC tornid olid ehitatud Hudsoni jõe peale, kus oli nende aluskord, mis asus 21 meetrit allpool veepinda. See on bassein, mis ümbritseb jõge, mille peale olid ehitatud tornid. Kui sa kukutad kokku kaks poole miljoni tonnist hoonet, pidanuks see bassein purunema silmapilkselt ja Hudsoni jõgi oleks kogu Manhattani üle ujutanud – seda aga ei juhtunud.

 

bassein 1024x615 Mehaanikateadlane Judy Wood: Kuhu kadusid tornid? I osa

 

Selle oleks pidanud registreerima ka seismomeetrid – aga ka seda ei juhtunud. Seismomeetrid ei registreerinud ka WTC7 kokkukukkumist. See on esmane tõestusmaterjal, millest me peame alustama, kui tahame teada saada, mis juhtus. Tolmu oli kõikjal, seda registreeris isegi Rahvusvaheline Kosmosejaam oma videoklippidel. See tolm levis väga kaugele kuni Delaware’ini – Marylandi, Pennsylvaniasse, New Jerseysse jne.

 

 

 

Mis põhjustaks nende hoonete tolmuks muutumise varisemise asemel?

 

Ei tohi ära unustada seda, kui kiiresti need tornid tolmuks muutusid. Maa värises ainult 8 sekundit, kui WTC põhjatorn ära kadus. Kui sa kasutad konkreetseid termineid, kirjeldamaks miskit, siis su aju lepib sellega ja tihtipeale ei näe sa enam oma silmadega, et tegelikult toimus midagi muud. Kui sa nimetad miskit suitsuks, siis oletad automaatselt, et selle põhjustas tulekahju. Seega, mina nimetaksin seda WTC suitsu pigem vingutossuks. Vaakumis kuluks umbes 9 sekundit, et visata piljardipall WTC katuselt alla. Seega, kuidas on võimalik, et maa värises ainult 8 sekundit, kui tornid ära kadusid? Maavärina puhul registreerib seismomeeter kolme erinevat sorti signaale – pinnalaineid ja veel kahte signaali, mis liigub läbi maapinna: P-lained ja S-lained. Esmalt tuleb P-laine ja kõige lõpuks S-laine, sest see liigub kõige aeglasemalt. Nende lainete analüüsiga saame teada, kui kaugel oli epitsenter. 11. septembril ei tuvastanud seismomeetrid P-ega ka S-laineid, ainult pinnalaineid. See on tõestus, et hooned ei prantsatanud maha. Kui sa lööd haamriga vastu kivi, siis tekib nagu helihark, mis kõlab läbi kivi. Seismomeeter, mis oleks teisel pool kivi, registreeriks selle kohe.

 

Mida tähendab pinnalaine? Kui näiteks King Kong tuleks ja tõstaks need tornid maast õhku, siis ta vabastaks maa surve alt, mille põhjustas tornide mass. See on nagu siis, kui tõused hommikul voodist, siis madrats taastab oma kuju, sest su raskus on selle pealt kadunud. See oli ka ainus signaal, mille seismomeetrid registreerisid. Ja kuna tornid olid ehitatud spetsiaalse basseini peale, siis olnuks veel eriti lihtne sealt laineid tuvastada. Me peame endiselt uurima, mis juhtus.

 

Inimestel on kõige raskem aru saada sellest, mis juhtus. Seda on raske mõista, kui sul puudub taustainfo ja tõestusmaterjalid. Kuna kõik muutus tolmuks, siis me leiame tolmu seest erinevaid materjale: terast, alumiiniumi, rauda, puitu… See nimekiri on lõputu.

 

Me peame vaatama destruktiivset mehhanismi ja siis liikuma edasi. Mis oli destruktiivne mehhanism? See ei olnud kuumus, mis selle põhjustas. Hooned muutusid tolmuks, see tolm langes alla, siis tõusis tagasi õhku ja kattis kogu Manhattani. See tolm ei oleks saanud langeda esmalt alla, kui see oli niivõrd kerge, et pärast tagasi õhku tõusta. See viitab sellele, et tolm jätkas lagunemist üha väiksemateks osakesteks. See tolm muutus sada korda väiksemaks, kui on punane verelible.

 

 

Kes ja kuidas seda tolmu niimoodi mõõtis?

 

On läbi viidud erinevaid mõõtmisi ja kõik need erinevad analüüsid tolmust on mu raamatus välja toodud. Kui me vaatame WTC platsi pärast juhtunut, siis näeme, et see on väga hägune, miski põhjustab seda uduvinet. See on tolm, mis tekib dematerialiseeruvatest rusudest. Kui vaatame destruktiivset mehhanismi, siis selleks saab olla kineetiline energia, termiline energia või miskit muud.

 

Kineetiline energia tekib siis, kui näiteks lööd haamriga või kui pomm plahvatab ja miskit lendab õhku; kui midagi liigub ja puutub millegagi kokku. Näiteks raketi tulistamine, aga ka gravitatsiooniline kokkukukkumine või süütelaengutega hoone hävitamine on näited kineetilisest energiast. Aga ükski süütelaeng ei tekita niivõrd pisikesi osakesi kui need, mida me nägime 11. septembril.

 

Termiline energia tähendab palju kuumust, kuid hooned ei hõõgunud kuumusest. Lisaks näeme me piltidelt ja videotest väga palju põlemata paberit. Kuidas saab nii olla, kui väidetavalt oli tegu tohutu kuumusega?

 

Kõige kummalisem on see, et ühe hoone B-trepikojas oli 14 inimest tornide hävinemise ajal seal lõksus. Nad olid veendunud, et hukkuvad seal. Aga kui tolmuvine selgines, nägid nad enda kohal taevast ning ronisid ise välja. Nad ei hukkunud kuumuse käes ja nad ei jäänud ka varingu alla.

 

Öeldakse, et torni riismed langesid kõik keldrisse, aga see pole ju võimalik, kui vahepeale jäid need inimesed, kes ellu jäid. See tähendab, et tornid kadusid nende kohalt ära. 110 korrust kadusid nende pealt ära. Lisaks WTC hoone nr 3, millest eriti ei räägita, ka see kadus suuremas osas ära. See oli 22-korruseline hoone ehk torn. On teada juhtum ühest advokaadist, kes töötas WTC hoone nr 3 viimasel korrusel. Tal kästi hoonest lahkuda, kuid ta keeldus, sest ta töötas olulise kaasuse kallal. Kui teine torn kadus, tulid tuletõrjujad seda meest välja tooma. Tuletõrjuja rääkis hiljem, et kui ta oli 22. korrusel, siis ühel hetkel kadus pool hoonest lihtsalt ära.

 

 

 

Mis mõttes kadus ära? Kas lihtsalt haihtus?

 

No need olid tema sõnad, nad mõlemad jooksid hoonest välja pärast teise torni hävinemist. Ja peale seda kadus ka ülejäänud hoonest nr 3 ja nad nägid enda kohal taevast. See jutt sarnaneb nende inimeste omaga, kes olid lõksus B-trepikojas WTC-s. Tuleb arvestada sellega, et need olid tavalised inimesed, kes polnud teadlased ja nad kirjeldavad sündmust nii, nagu oskavad. Lisaks target=”_blank”>see tuntud videolõik FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency – Föderaalne Kriisihaldamise Agentuur) töötajaga, kes rääkis, et nende terasäärtega saapad sulavad kahe tunni jooksul ära, sest jube kuum oli – ta teeb oletusi. Ta ei mõõtnud temperatuuri termomeetriga. Kui mu terasahi sulab, siis kalkun, mis seal sees küpseb, on juba ammu valmis. Seega, kuidas said päästetöötajad seal olla nii, et nende terasest saapad sulasid, aga nende endi jalad seal sees ei kõrbenud? Jätame selle nüansi meelde. Seega, me välistame kineetilise ja termilise energia. Lisaks kõikvõimalikud meile teadaolevad relvad ja loodusjõud tuleb välistada.

 

Vaatame, millised tõestusmaterjalid meile on teada destruktiivsest mehhanismist. Tuumapommide ja termiidi kasutus tekitab väga palju kuumust, aga miks seda tol päeval ei registreeritud? Mul hakkab alati kõrvus kõlama vana Manfred Manni laul target=”_blank”>“Blinded By The Light”, kui inimesed räägivad mulle termiidist või tuumapommidest, sest me ei näinud, et tornid oleksid hõõgunud või põlenud. Millest termiit üldse koosneb? Termiit on alumiiniumi ja raudoksiidi kõrgel temperatuuril väga reageerimisvõimeline pulbriline segu, mille põlemisel eraldub palju soojust.

 

Kui võtta teraskonstruktsioonhoone, mida ümbritseb alumiiniumkarkass, ja muuta see pulbriks ning võtta selle molekulid lahti, siis mida me sealt leiame? Termiidi peamised koostisosad. Sama hästi võiks öelda, et šokolaadiküpsised hävitasid hoone, sest tolmu seest leiti ka jahu, šokolaadi ja suhkrut. See, et sa leiad tolmu seest neid aineid, ei tähenda, et need ained põhjustasid tornide hävingu. Kõik, mis hoonetes leidus, muutus tolmuks.

 

Sa võid näidata igasuguseid aineid, mis tolmu sees leidub, aga sellest pole mingit kasu, sest sa pead näitama ka destruktiivset mehhanismi.

 

 

 

Mida veidrat sa veel avastanud oled seoses 11. septembril toimunuga?

 

Väga palju kasutuskõlbmatuid autosid. Ma ei ütle, et need on põlenud, sest me ei tea, mis nendega juhtus. Nad näevad välja, nagu oleksid rösterist läbi käinud. Neid ei saa enam parandada, need on kasutuskõlbmatud. Eriti imelikud olid hävinenud autod, mille keskel on ringikujuline laik, mis polnud üldse kahjustada saanud. Tuli ei tekita sellist efekti, et mingi osa on põlenud ja teine osa on täiesti puhas ja rikkumata.

 

See pani mind mõtlema interferentsi peale. Interferents on füüsikaline nähtus, kus kahe laine liitumisel saadakse uus laine, mille amplituud on suurem või väiksem. Oma kogemuste põhjal interferomeetrias tean, et sul võib olla üks komponent, millel pole mingit efekti, võtad teise komponendi, millel samuti pole justkui mingit efekti, aga kui neid omavahel segada, sünnib soovitud tulemus.

 

Mis mind aga kõige rohkem imestama pani, on target=”_blank”>kaader lõunatorni tipust, kui torn hävineb.

 

wtc 2 tipp 1024x694 Mehaanikateadlane Judy Wood: Kuhu kadusid tornid? I osa

 

Torni tipp vajub viltu, siis aga vajumine peatub ning torn kaldub isegi veidi tagasi. See rikub impulsimomendi jäävuse seadust, sest kui kamakas hakkab ümber kukkuma, siis ta ei jää keset kukkumist seisma. Küll aga ei rikuta impulsimomendi jäävuse seadust, kui kõik see, mis on kamaka sees, muutub pisikesteks osakesteks ja nad ei ole enam üks tükk. Sisu muutub tolmuks , sellepärast jääb impulsimomendi jäävuse seadus kehtima. See on üks tõestus, et hoone muutus tolmuks.

 

Teiseks, inimesed kipuvad unustama, et need hooned olid 110-korruselised, üle 400 meetri kõrgused. Kineetiline energia saab tekitada pulbristumist, kui sa midagi keedad ülikõrgel temperatuuril, tekib aurustumine. Aga siin ei juhtunud kumbagi, seega vajame me uut terminit, kirjeldamaks, mis hoonetega toimub – tolmuks muutuma ehk tolmustuma.

 

Kui 110 korrust kukuks üksteise järel kokku ja kõik, mis on korruste vahel, pritsiks ülikiirel hooga välja, peaksid kõrvalolevad hooned olema kõik täiesti sõelapõhjad. Sest tuletame meelde, hooned hävinesid kiiremini, kui on vabalangemise kiirus. WTC hoone nr 7 kõrval oli postkontor ja nende vahele jäi kolmerealine tänav. See postkontor jäi terveks.

 

Läheme korra tagasi hävinenud autode juurde. Patric Connelly oli päästetööline, kes jooksis hoonesse nr 7 peitu, kui üks torn hävines. Ja kui ta välja tagasi läks, oli tolm juba tõusnud tagasi õhku nii, et see blokeeris täielikult päikest. Kõik oli kottpime. “Aga jumal tänatud, et autod lõid särama, nüüd oli mul võimalik näha, kuhu liigun,” kirjeldas ta hiljem. Esmaabitöötaja Patricia Ondrovic ütles, et tema jakk läks justkui põlema ja ta kasutas oma jakki kui taskulampi. Jakk näis põlevat, aga see ei tekitanud kuumust ega ka talle põletushaavu. Selliseid veidrad põlenguid oli tol päeval palju. Inimesed oletavad, et kui midagi särab, siis on see ilmselt kuum. On olemas hõõglamp ja luminofoorlamp, üks on kuum, aga teine mitte, samas mõlemad tekitavad valgust. Seega, kuumad asjad hõõguvad, aga kõik mis hõõgub, ei ole kuum. Need veidrad tulekahjud autodega võisid osaliselt olla ka tavalised tulekahjud, aga mitte tingimata kogu aeg.

 

 autod1 Mehaanikateadlane Judy Wood: Kuhu kadusid tornid? I osa

 

autod2 Mehaanikateadlane Judy Wood: Kuhu kadusid tornid? I osa

 

Ühel autol oli akna ümber olev vooder täiesti terve, aga auto kere ise täielikult ära kärsanud. Üks auto oli seest täiesti ära põlenud ja pooleldi väljast samuti, aga teine pool paistis tuttuus nagu vahatatud otse pesulast. Paistab, et uste ümber olev tihend peatas selle tulekahju mitmel autol. Mõned autod olid enam kui 400 meetri kaugusel WTC platsist, aga samas piirkonnas jäid täiesti terveks liiklusmärgid, postkastid, inimesed jne.

 

Patric Connelly ütles, et autod läksid nii eredaks, et ta nägi jälle liikuda, see tähendab, et need autod süttisid pärast seda, kui torn hävines.

 

Üks mees, kes töötas põhjatorni 27. korrusel, ütles, et ta otsustas jätta oma töö pooleli ja minna koju, kui häired hakkasid. Ta jalutas hoonest välja, vaatas üles, nägi suitsu, kõik tundus olevat kontrolli all ja liikus otse praami suunas, mis oli vaid mõnesaja meetri kaugusel WTC tornist. Seal tuli talle vastu keegi, kes tundus olevat juhmistunud, sest ta olevat öelnud, et teine torn just kukkus kokku. Ta pidas teda juhmiks, sest ta oli äsja mööda jalutanud WTC teisest tornist ja see seisis ilusti püsti. Tema ja teise torni vahele jäid ainult mõned üksikud hooned, aga ta ei kuulnud ega tajunud maad rappuvat, kui 400 meetri kõrgune torn kokku varises… Sellepärast pidas seda inimest juhmiks. Seega, ta läks praamile ja kui praam oli juba kaugemale sõitnud, siis nad nägid, et ainult üks torn on alles. Sellepärast polnudki tunda ega kuulda miskit, sest torn muutus tolmuks.

 

 

 

Milline seadeldis või milline energia suudab siis niivõrd suured hooned muuta tolmuks ainult mõne sekundiga?

 

Meil on terve tänava jagu ärakõrbenud autosid, samas olid teisel tänaval kõik autod terved. Lisaks olid vahetus läheduses olevas parklas samuti kõik autod ära kõrbenud. On ka teateid politseiautodes plahvatanud padrunitest. Me teame, et päästetöötajate terasäärtega saapad hakkasid sulama, aga jalad saabaste sees jäid terveks. On teateid ka seletamatust hõljumisest, fotograaf David Handschuh kirjeldab, et miski tõstis ta õhku ja target=”_blank”>lennutas teda terve kvartali jagu edasi, selliseid teateid on paljudelt inimestelt.

 

Seega, meil on tõendeid elektrilisest komponendist, magnetilisest komponendist ja gravitatsioonilisest komponendist. Mina ei aja taga ega näita näpuga nende suunas, kes selle korraldasid. Minu meelest on palju olulisem tõsiasi, et selline tehnoloogia eksisteerib. Sest kui me kõrvaldaks ühed korraldajad, siis kindlasti leiduks uusi korraldajaid. Meil on palju tõestusmaterjali, mis kinnitavad tolmustumist ilma suure kuumuseta ja ilma kineetilise energiata. Kasutan terminit suunatud energia, sest seda energiat juhiti, et ta käituks teistmoodi kui tavaliselt. See on kui mateeria seoseenergia – aatomid mitte ei tõmbu üksteisele ligi, vaid tõukuvad üksteisest eemale. Lisaks suunati seda kõike kindlate geograafiliste koordinaatide järgi. Pomm plahvatab igas suunas, aga see energia siin liikus ainult teatud suunas.

 

 

 

Järgneb.Mechanics Doctor Judy Wood has thoroughly researched the destruction of the World Trade Center complex 2,001th the September 11 attacks , and become convinced that the official theory is a disaster . The article below is a summary of his interview with the new U.S. netipõhisele investigative radio program “Caravan to Midnight “, which was aired on March 28 . Publish it in two parts .

Judy Wood ‘s Virginia Institute of Technology and a doctorate degree in mechanical engineering scientist who is an expert in stress tolerance testing of materials , structural mechanics , finite element methods , interferometry and material sciences. Materials science is an interdisciplinary science that combines chemistry, physics and engineering science. In her research on the Wood exposed to different kinds of materials testing , materials of complex systems ( Complex Material Systems) , and photomechanical optical characteristics measurement to detect material effect on each other . Wood is a lecturer in mechanical engineering and design , and he wrote many articles have been published in international scientific journals.

After 2,001th September 11 terrorist attacks in the Wood to apply their knowledge and experience in the conduct comprehensive research to find out how the World Trade Center (World Trade Center, WTC ) complex in New York City was destroyed . Wood has researched over 40 000 photographs , hundreds of video clips and analyze attacks on witness testimony . He has also analyzed the WTC debris, dust , environmental , seismic data and other characters in order to understand how the WTC buildings were destroyed . In his research work is based on Wood believes that the official theory of what caused the WTC Twin Towers and WTC Building 7 of the destruction is wrong.

2007th employee in a complaint filed against Wood , who co- created through the National Institute of Standards and Technology ( National Institute of Standards and Technology – NIST ) report on the official explanation of the WTC Twin Towers destruction , accusing them of deliberately deception in research . 2009th in this case reached the U.S. Supreme Court , where it was rejected , however . Throughout the study published in Wood , in his book ” Where Did The Towers Go? : Evidence of Directed Free- Energy Technology on 9/ 11″ ( ” Where did the towers ? Evidence of directed free energy technologies were introduced on September 11 ” ) . A brief summary of Wood’s work can be seen in ” Sci-Fi Film ‘ Part 13 .

the book 726×1024 Mechanics Researcher Judy Wood : Where did the towers ? part I

September 11, 2001 there was a real mess

A variety of theories about what really happened on September 11 , it is extremely a lot : WTC debris, dust particles found nanotermiidi , ATOMIC , holographic planes ; There are also witnesses who claim that none of the towers really did not fly the plane . The official theory claims that the terrorists were able to hijack four passenger planes and fly to drive them off course for over an hour without any destruction of these routes would have intervened. They even were able to fly through the sky and ride the world’s most secure in the Pentagon . And the videos will show us how the plane flew out of the WTC towers and disappeared inside. We are shown videos of how the towers will become dust in the air , while the towers the architects and builders argue that the towers were built with the knowledge that a passenger jet could fly in there . Towers founders have admitted that the towers would have been able to survive even multiple aircraft in transit without being a total fail.

It is also remarkable that the BBC reported that WTC7 has collapsed, while at the same time, news reporters looked behind WTC7 still standing on end . It was a crazy day and a lot of false information spread everywhere . There is even a video clip in which the news saying that the One Liberty Plaza has collapsed , although the building is standing today. It was reported that the White House is lit , the entire capital of burns , was told that one aircraft is flown into the Empire State Building – there was a real mess.

What really happened that day ?

Criminalist we have to start with what happened . People assume that the towers collapsed . We know that once the towers were there , and they are not there anymore . How do they do then disappeared , it is another matter . They will not be burnt off and they do not fall in total . Most of them turned to dust in the midst of heaven. If you want something to cover it up , you should first inform the people of what happened . Then you found the cause of the people most easily fit , and it is said that just because it happened . They use a backward methodology.

But we know that the towers are not blown away, and they did not work well together – they turned to dust . If they had collapsed , then we would see a huge pile of rice with us – 110 floors each end.

Where is the 110 floors ? With 110 floors Mechanics Researcher Judy Wood : Where did the towers ? part I

It did not happen . If they had collapsed , it would have flooded the entire Manhattan because it would be destroyed towers under the subway tunnels and swimming pool , which took hold in the Hudson River. People do not know that the WTC towers were built in the Hudson River after , which was the basis for the procedure , which was located 21 meters below the water surface . It has a swimming pool , which is surrounded by the river, after which the towers were built . If you drop me a total of half a million tonnes of the two buildings, the pool was supposed to shatter in an instant , and the Hudson River in Manhattan would be flooded throughout – but it did not happen .

1024×615 pool Mechanics Researcher Judy Wood : Where did the towers ? part I

This would have to register with the seismometers – but this did not happen . Seismometers did not record the WTC7 collapse. This is the first evidence of which we need to start if we want to know what happened. Dust was everywhere, even the International Space Station to register your movies. This dust spread very far up the Delaware – Maryland , Pennsylvania , New Jersey , etc. .

What would cause the collapse of the buildings into dust instead of change ?

It must not be forgotten when those towers quickly turned to dust . The earth shook with only eight seconds when the WTC north tower disappeared . If you use specific terms to describe something , your brain will agree with this and you do not often see with their own eyes that really was something else. If you call something to smoke, then you automatically assume that it was caused by the fire. So, I would call it the WTC smoke rather vingutossuks . Vacuum would take about 9 seconds to throw a billiard ball from the roof of the WTC . So, how is it possible that the earth shook with only 8 seconds away when the towers go? An earthquake seismometer records the case of three different types of signals – and two or more substances on the surface of the signal that moves through the ground : the P- waves and S – waves. First, the P – wave and the end of the S – wave as it is moving most slowly . Their analysis of the waves we find out how far away the epicenter . Seismometers on September 11 did not detect the S – and P – waves , only the surface of the materials. This is proof that the buildings do not slam down. If you hit a rock with a hammer , then run like a tuning fork , which sounds out of the stone. Seismometer , which is the other side of the stone , record it immediately.

What does the surface of a substance ? If , for example, King Kong , and should raise these towers from the ground into the air , then he would free the land from under the pressure caused by the weight of towers . It’s like when you get up out of bed in the morning , then the mattress recovers its shape , because your weight is the top missing. It was also the only signal which seismometers are recorded. And since the towers were built in a special pool , then, it would have been more particularly easy to identify from the waves . We need to continue to investigate what happened.

Humans are the most difficult to figure out what happened . It is hard to understand if you do not have the background information and evidence. Since all turned to dust , the dust from the inside we find a variety of materials: steel , aluminum, iron, wood … The list is endless.

We need to look at a destructive mechanism , and then move on . What was the destructive mechanism ? It was not the heat that caused it . The buildings turned to dust , the dust fell down, then rose back into the air and covered the whole of Manhattan . This would not have received the dust to fall below the first , if it was so slight that, after the return of air to rise . This suggests that the degradation of the dust continued increasingly smaller particles . This change in the dust a hundred times smaller than a red blood cell is .

WTC collapse SM Mechanics Researcher Judy Wood : Where did the towers ? part I

Who and how is it measured the dust like that ?

There are a variety of measurements are carried out , and all of these different analyzes of dust is indicated in my book . If we look at the WTC site after the incident , you can see that it is very vague, something causes the haze . It is the dust that arises dematerialiseeruvatest rubble . If you look at the destructive mechanism , it can be, kinetic energy , thermal energy , or something else.

The kinetic energy occurs when , for example, if you use a hammer or a bomb explodes and something flies into the air ; As for anything , and if something moves together. For example, the firing of the rocket , as well as the gravitational collapse of a building or süütelaengutega destruction are examples of kinetic energy . But so far none of the primer does not cause tiny particles than the ones we saw on September 11 .

Thermal energy means a lot of heat, but the buildings are hõõgunud heat. In addition , we are seeing a lot of pictures and video from the unburned paper. How can that be , when it is alleged there was a huge heat ?

The most curious is that one of the B- stairwell of the building , 14 people were trapped there during the destruction of the towers . They were convinced that die there. But if tolmuvine cleared , they saw the sky above him , and climbed out of themselves . They did not die in the heat , and they did not remain in the stall down.

It is said that the remains of the tower fell , all in the basement , but it ‘s not possible when they were midway between the people who survived. This implies that the losses in these towers of position . 110 floors off their losses . In addition to the WTC building number 3 , which is not widely spoken , it also lost most of the advantage . It was the 22 – story building or a tower . There is one known case of an advocate , who worked in the WTC building number 3 on the top floor . He was told to leave the building , but he refused because he was working on an important case with . When the second tower disappeared , a man came to the fire fighters to point out . A firefighter told later that when he was on the 22nd floor , the side of the building at one point simply disappeared .

What do you mean disappeared ? Is it simply vanished ?

Well, those were his words , they both ran out of the building after the destruction of the second tower . And after it disappeared from the rest of the building No. 3 , and they saw the sky above him . This story is similar to that of the people who were trapped in the stairwell of the WTC – B -S. It should be borne in mind that these were ordinary people who were not scientists, and they describe the events as they can. In addition, it is known footage of FEMA ( Federal Emergency Management Agency – Federal Crisis Management Agency ) employee who told me that their shoes are melting terasäärtega two hours away, because heat was horrible – she makes assumptions . He did not estimate the temperature with a thermometer . When my terasahi melts , the turkey, which matures in there , has long been ready . So, how could there be so rescue workers that their boots melted steel , but their legs are not parched in there ? We point out that nuance . Therefore , we excluded the kinetic and thermal energy . In addition, known to us all sorts of weapons , and the forces of nature to be ruled out.

Let’s see what the evidence that we have known destructive mechanism. Termites use of nuclear bombs , and generates a lot of heat, but why it was not recorded that day ? I will always resound in the ears old Manfred Mann song ” Blinded By The Light” when people talk to me , or a nuclear bomb in termiidist , because we did not see that the towers would hõõgunud or burned . What are all composed of termite ? The termite is aluminum oxide at high temperature and highly reactive powder blend , to which a lot of heat is released during combustion .

If you take the steel structure of the building , surrounded by alumiiniumkarkass , and turn it into a powder and take it to the molecules go , what we’ll find ? Termites main components. The same could well be said that the chocolate biscuits destroyed the building because of the dust found inside the flour, sugar , and chocolate . The fact that you find dust inside of these substances does not necessarily mean that these substances caused the destruction of towers . All of which were found in buildings , the change to dust.

You can show all kinds of substances that are found in the dust , but it’s no use because you have to show the destructive mechanism .

What’s weird you ‘re still discovering held on September 11 in connection with a knife ?

Very much unusable cars. I’m not saying that they are burnt, because we do not know what happened to them . They look like you have gone through the toaster . They can not be repaired , they are unusable . Especially strange cars were destroyed in the middle of a circular patch, which was not damaged at all . The light does not create an effect that has burned some part and the second part is completely pure and unspoiled .

It made me think about other than the interference . Interference is a physical phenomenon in which the two from joining the wave of new wave, whose amplitude is higher or lower . Interferometry know from experience that you can have a component that does not have any effect , you take the second component , which also do not have any sort of effect , but when they are mixed together , the desired result will be born .

What surprised me most , however, put , the picture is from the tip of the south tower when the tower is destroyed .

WTC 2 1024×694 senior engineering scientist Judy Wood : Where did the towers ? part I

Broach sinking wrong, however, tends to sag stops , and even a little back to the tower . This violates the law of conservation of momentum impulse , because when a hunk starts to topple , he does not stand in the middle of the fall . However, it does not violate the law of conservation of momentum impulse when all that is inside the chunk , it becomes pinpoint the particles , and they are no longer one piece. Content becomes dust , because the law of conservation of momentum impulse force. This is one of the demonstration that the change in the dust of the building .

Second , people tend to forget that they were the 110 – storey buildings over 400 meters in height. Kinetic energy can cause dust formation , when you boil something extremely high temperatures , there is evaporation. But this did not happen either , so we need a new term to describe what takes place buildings – perhaps tolmustuma turn to dust .

If a total of 110 floors fall down one after the other , and all that is in between floors , spilling out of ultra-fast pace , adjacent buildings should be all completely sieve bottoms . For a reminder, the buildings were destroyed faster than the speed of free fall . WTC Building 7 was the next to the post office , and they missed a three-tier street . The post office remained intact.

Let’s go back to the destroyed cars to the regime . Patric Connelly was a rescue worker, who ran a building number 7 into hiding when one of the tower was destroyed . And when he went back out , had already risen to the dust back into the air so that it completely blocked the sun. Everything was pitch black. ” But thank God that created the cars shine , now I was able to see where you got them, ” he said later. First aid worker Patricia Ondrovic said his jacket was on fire , and as if he used his jacket as a flashlight. Jacket seemed burning , but it does not generate heat , or even an injury. Such was the strange fires that day a lot. People assume that if something sparkles , it’s probably hot. There is a fluorescent lamp and an incandescent lamp , one of which is hot, but the other does not , at the same time they produce the light. Thus , burning hot stuff , but all that is hot is not hot . These strange fires in cars could also be a regular part of the fires , but not necessarily all the time .

autod1 Mechanics Researcher Judy Wood : Where did the towers ? part I

autod2 Mechanics Researcher Judy Wood : Where did the towers ? part I

One car had a window into the lining of a perfectly healthy , but the car itself to take full advantage kärsanud . One car was completely burned from the inside and the outside as well as the semi , but the other half looked like brand new waxed directly to the wash load . It seems that the seal around the door stopped the fire on several cars. Some of the cars were more than 400 meters away from the WTC Square , but the region remained completely intact , road signs , mailboxes , etc. people .

Patric Connelly said the cars went so vivid that he saw the move again , this means that these cars caught fire after the tower was destroyed .

One man who worked in the north tower of the 27th floor , said he decided to leave his work unfinished and go home when the disturbance began . He walked out of the building , looked up , saw the smoke , everything seemed to be under control and moved straight towards the ferry , which was only a few hundred meters away from the tower of the WTC . There came to him someone who seemed bemused , as she had told him that the second tower just collapsed . He held her juhmiks because he had just walked past the second WTC tower , and it stood up nicely . He and the other between the towers fell , only a few buildings, but he did not hear or perceive the land shaking , 400 -meter -high tower collapsed … That’s why people considered it a juhmiks . So he went to the barge when the barge and had already traveled farther , they saw that only one tower remains. Following this was not felt or heard something , because the tower became dust.

What kind of device or what it is capable of so much energy to change large buildings into dust in just a few seconds?

We have a whole section ärakõrbenud street cars, while the second had all the cars on the street intact . In addition, in the immediate vicinity as well as all the cars in the parking lot of burnt out . There are also reports of police cars exploded the cartridges . We know that emergency workers terasäärtega boots began to melt , and legs inside the boots remained intact . There are reports of the unexplained floating of photographer David Handschuh describes something that lifted him into the air and tossed him a quarter of a whole , such messages are from many people .

Thus , we have evidence of electrical components , magnetic components and the gravitational component. I’m not over the back or pointing them in the direction which it was organized . I think it’s much more important by the fact that such technology exists . Because if we remove some of the organizers , it will certainly present in the new organizers . We have a lot of evidence that confirm tolmustumist a high heat and without the kinetic energy . I use the term directed energy because this energy was drawn , he behaves in a different way than usual . This is where the binding energy of matter – atoms are not close to each other, will not shrink , but repel away from each other . In addition to direct it to specific geographic coordinates, everything . The bomb explodes in all directions , but here it is moved only between the energy in a particular direction .

Followed .

 

There are no responses yet

Leave a Reply

RSS for Posts RSS for Comments