“Sting Millennium” was finished!

«Афера тысячелетия» завершилась!

The last batch of our uranium went overseas. Russia had paid US indemnity for the defeat in the Cold War.
Almost none of the Russian media did not pay attention to an event that happened in the last month. From the port of St. Petersburg on a journey across the Atlantic sailed merchant ship Atlantic Navigator. On board – containers with Russian uranium.

The deal “Gore – Chernomyrdin”: the true goals of our American “partners”.

This was the last batch of uranium, which was sent to the United States on the basis of signed 20 years ago, the Russian-American agreement providing for the supply to the United States 500 metric tons of uranium, which Russia undertook to extract from its nuclear weapons and that America intended to be used as fuel for nuclear power plants for operation, this uranium deal actively discussed in the 1990s, but today, the theme was “behind the scenes” discussions of the key issues of our lives. A younger generation just did not heard about it. Therefore, we must be reminded of its history. Immediately, I note that this is no ordinary trade and economic deal beneficial to both parties. This act of the biggest robberies in Russia is not only the newest in its history, but also in the entire history of the country. Russia lost the Cold War the West, primarily the United States. He lost in no small part due to the treacherous policy of our leaders. These upper classes continued to take the country in the 1990s. “The uranium deal” – acceptance of our treacherous to pay tribute to the top winner in the form of weapons-grade uranium. The principal agreement on this was reached between the then Prime Minister VS Chernomyrdin and US Vice President Albert Gore, so this transaction is often referred to as transaction Gore – Chernomyrdin. It is also called “scam of the Millennium” by virtue of an unprecedented magnitude. In fact, it was an operation of the West, which solves several strategic goals:

a) unilateral nuclear disarmament by depriving Russia of its stocks of weapons-grade uranium, as well as the preparation of conditions for the US withdrawal from the ABM Treaty;

b) applying a huge economic loss of Russia (the accumulated stock of weapons-grade plutonium is an essential part of the national wealth of Russia at the time);

c) deprivation of the huge Russian energy sources in the future after the intended introduction of new technology thorium nuclear power.

The extent of the robbery in Russia. “Scam Goals” deal dubbed because, firstly, it had a huge scale, and secondly, was concluded fraudulently. Many Russian and American media sought to present it as a mediocre commercial agreement. The total purchase price for the supply of 500 tonnes of uranium was determined to be 11.9 billion dollars. Meanwhile, the value of the specified amount of highly enriched uranium is incomparably higher. To produce this amount of weapons-grade uranium, mining and defense industry worked for about 40 years, several hundred thousand people. Manufacturing dangerous, tens of thousands of people have lost health and disability, shortened his life. It was a huge sacrifice in order to forge the nuclear shield of the country and ensure a calm peaceful life of the USSR and the socialist camp. This uranium provides military-strategic parity in the world, which dramatically reduces the risk of World War II. On the other hand, the American media has such estimates: by Russian uranium at the beginning of this century, at the plant produced 50% of US electricity. One in ten kilowatt hour of electricity in the entire US economy was provided by the uranium from Russia. According to the estimates, which were made by experts at the end of the last century, the real value of 500 tonnes of weapons-grade plutonium was at the time not less than $ 8 trillion. For comparison, the annual average of the annual GDP of Russia, according to Rosstat, in the last decade of the last century there were in the region of $ 400 billion. It turns out that the actual price of the uranium deal was only 0.15% in relation to the minimum real value of the goods. The real cost of uranium was equivalent to 20 (twenty) annual GDP!

There have been many wars in human history. After they defeated often pay reparations and indemnities winners. Recall, for example, the Franco-Prussian War in 1871. “Iron Chancellor” Bismarck appointed defeated France in a contribution of about 13% of GDP (5 billion francs). Probably the biggest indemnity paid in recent history defeated in World War I Germany. Media reported that Germany just three years ago, has been paying reparations under the terms of the Treaty of Paris in 1919. In Germany, reparations were imposed in the amount of 269 billion gold marks. The amount, of course, enormous: it is equivalent to about 100 000 tons of gold. At the current price of the yellow metal is about 4 trillion dollars. Experts in the field of economic history argue that to Germany in Paris reparation is about twice the GDP of the then Germany. Among other things, the payment of reparations by Germany stretched for 90 years (with interruptions, pure payments were made for about 70 years); payment of the “uranium reparations” Russia kept within 20 years, with most of the uranium was delivered to the US in the 1990s.

In the history of the early to finish.

“The uranium deal” was accomplished in total secrecy from the people. We do not even been aware of many of the “people’s representatives” – for the reason that it is in violation of Russian law, did not pass the ratification procedure in our parliament. In the second half of the 1990s, a number of deputies have launched an investigation to clarify the terms of the transaction, the circumstances of its conclusion, assessment of compliance with the Constitution of the Russian Federation and other normative acts of Russia. As a result of strong pressure from certain influential forces surrounding then-President Boris Yeltsin managed to stop the investigation. We are trying to understand the transaction and many of our other policies, or even denunciation of the agreements achieved uranium supplies in the United States. Among them, for example, the legendary general L.Rohlin, Yu.Skuratov Attorney General, State Duma Deputy Ilyukhin. Death of Rokhlin and retired Skuratov many people associate it with the fact that they showed excessive activity in the investigation, “the uranium deal.”

Even if the supply of uranium in the transaction Gore – Chernomyrdin completed, it does not mean that history should be put an end. It is necessary to return to serious analysis and investigation of the transaction in the framework of a special inter-ministerial committee with the participation of specialists of the nuclear industry, the people’s representatives (the State Duma), law enforcement officials, the Foreign Ministry, Defense Ministry, and other agencies and organizations, independent experts in technical, military, legal and economic issues.
Firstly, there are suspicions that a number of persons involved in that transaction, remain in the “cage” current politicians and government officials. There is no guarantee that they will not continue to work in the interests of the US and the West.

Secondly, we need to correct and honest understanding of our recent history. Without truthful disclosure of the details “of the uranium deal” and its political, military, moral evaluation is no guarantee that we will once again stepped on like a rake. Analysis of the real aims of the American side of the deal clearly highlights the true aims and interests of those whom we, unfortunately, by inertia continue to be called “partners.”
Third, we need informed and detailed assessment of the economic damage that was done a deal for Russia and its people. Any attempt to Russia to embark on economic recovery the West will put a spoke in the wheel of our current reforms, socio-economic transformation. We must be prepared for the fact that the West will increasingly expose us to all sorts of “accounts” – for example, if we try to hold before of-shore our economy. Through the courts the US, UK, other European countries, will inevitably begin disassembling from the owners of offshore companies and / or their representatives with far-fetched claims for “damages”. About the same reaction can be expected in case Russia decides to withdraw from the WTO, the restriction of foreign investment or even limiting the repatriation of profits of foreign investors from Russia. We must be prepared for the fact that it may be necessary counterclaim “accounts” our Western “partners”. The largest of all possible counter “accounts” – our requirements to the US giant to compensate damage to Russia ‘uranium deal.

 

There are no responses yet

Leave a Reply

RSS for Posts RSS for Comments