Tag Archives: energy

Americans recognized: it is impossible to protect the Baltic States.

In America, they say again that NATO will not be able to prevent Russia’s invasion of the Baltic countries. But now there are very different reasons why Americans will not be able to save Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania: bad roads and unreliability of European allies. It is not possible to protect the Baltic from occupation by NATO forces; hence the conclusion inevitably follows: is it not better to immediately give it to Russia?

 

“NATO has forces of reduced composition on the front lines at the borders with Russia. The reserves will have to overcome hundreds of kilometers. And any delays due to bureaucracy, poor planning and dilapidated infrastructure will allow Russia to seize NATO territory in the Baltics even before the US military fills all 17 forms necessary for crossing the border of Germany and Poland, “writes one of the most respectable and influential publications USA – The Washington Post.

Chief of the European Bureau of the Washington Post in Brussels, Michael Birnaum transmits information from Polish Suwalki about one of the White House military games, which analyzed the possibility of responding to Russia’s aggression in the Baltics.

According to the results of the game, NATO will lose to Russia a war for the Baltic states.

And he will lose for discouraging reasons.

“Army ATVs will be dragged along the narrow roads for slow-moving freight wagons, moving eastward across Europe. Rusted bridges can collapse under the weight of American tanks, because they are too weak. And the transfer of troops can be delayed by annoying passport controllers and stubborn railway companies, “writes the Washington Post.

The White House military game, to which the publication refers, proves that the military protection of NATO in the Baltic is useless in principle and this is due to systemic reasons.

In order to effectively protect the Baltic States from possible aggression, the Alliance forces, whose help the allies count on, must first be in the Baltic states.

 

The NATO contingent at Russian borders should be comparable to the US military presence in West Germany at the peak of the Cold War. Then one American grouping, a few kilometers from the border of the eastern bloc, numbered 200,000 people-it’s not for you four rotational battalions of a thousand people each in Poland, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania.

Will the North Atlantic alliance have enough human and material resources for such a military contingent on the Russian border – a controversial issue.

For Americans, a more important and even more controversial question is whether the US should spend enormous resources to ensure the security of countries that do not represent any value to them?

After all, we are talking about the fact that hundreds of thousands of American citizens must settle on the shores of the Baltic Sea and live in countries whose own citizens flock in large numbers. Moreover, to ensure that this entire crowd repulsed the Kremlin’s attack without falling into the road pits and not collapsing into the Daugava and the Niemen from rusty bridges, America must repair the Baltic roads and build new bridges.

Only the United States is not the Soviet Union to deal with such things. Even in the “golden” times for Eastern Europe, the times of Clinton and Bush, when Washington turned the former socialist camp into a “sanitary cordon” from Russia, America did not build ports, bridges and roads for its satellites.

What can we say about the era of Donald’s “America first” Trump, when investing billions of dollars in US allies instead of helping his dying “rusty belt” is considered a crime in the American society against the nation?

So placing hundreds of thousands of American marines in the Baltics in practice is unrealistic. But it is unrealistic and time to help Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia before they are occupied by Putin. And not only because of the “dead” roads of Eastern Europe, rusty bridges and a narrow railway track in the Baltic states, different from the European one.

European allies on NATO can simply betray the Baltic states and prevent the Americans from coming to her aid in time to avoid a full-scale war in Europe.

“So, Germany allows trucks with tanks and other heavy equipment to be transported on motorways only at night and on weekends. Sweden, not part of NATO, but working closely with it, requires notifying it in three weeks about sending troops and military equipment to its territory, “writes the Washington Post and quotes the story of US Major General Stephen Shapiro as to how he fill out 17 forms to obtain permission to transfer troops from the German port of Bremerhaven to their destination in Poland.

Appeal to bureaucracy in the European Union is frankly comical. One can imagine an anecdotal situation: Russian tanks are already approaching Riga and Tallinn, and Americans can not go through border control. Migration services are interested in them for the purpose of the visit, and customs officers ask how many soldiers carry cigarettes with them and do not hide prohibited substances in their “abrams”.

In fact, it’s a different matter. The Germans or Swedes least of all need a big war in the Baltic Sea region, so Europeans can allow Putin to quickly seize Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania and slow down the movement of American troops to the theater of operations in order to avoid a bloody massacre for useless Estonians, Latvians and Lithuanians .

It turns out that NATO is not able to protect the Baltic countries for systemic reasons, and the problem is not solved by strengthening the mana

Iran convenes an emergency meeting of the UN Security Council and can declare the US a war.

Иран созывает экстренное заседание Совета Безопасности ООН.

Последний пакет WikiLeaks, Vault 7, содержал набор документов под кодовым названием «Marble», в которых подробно описана тактика компьютерного взлома, применяемая ЦРУ.

После сравнений исходного кода «Marble» и компьютерного червя Stuxnet иранские инженеры могут официально и доказательно подтвердить то, о чем они догадывались всегда: при администрации Барака Обамы иранские ядерные объекты подверглись хакерской атаке из ЦРУ.

Это было нападение на ЯДЕРНЫЙ потенциал страны, что не просто нарушает многочисленные соглашения ООН и прочие договоренности — это является АКТОМ ВОЙНЫ. Теперь либо ООН очень жестко отреагирует, предложив в отношении США серьезные санкции, либо же Иран не найдя справедливости в ООН сам объявит Соединенным Штатам войну.

Все должно решиться сегодня днем, в 15.00 по Восточному времени США.

(3:00 PM Eastern US time)

Stuxnet — это вредоносный компьютерный червь, впервые обнаруженный в 2010 году и нацеленный на промышленные компьютерные системы. Stuxnet несет ответственность за причинение существенного ущерба ядерной программе Ирана. Программное обеспечение разработано так, что вирус после работы стирает сам себя, не оставляя практически никаких следов. Как давно предполагалось экспертами, червь является совместной американо-израильской разработкой, хотя официальной все и всё всегда отрицали. Анонимные американские официальные лица, выступающие в Washington Post, утверждали, что червь был разработан ещё во время администрации Буша для саботажа ядерной программы Ирана, которая представляет собой целую череду «ошибок» и «несчастных случаев».

Stuxnet предназначен для поражения программируемых логических контроллеров (programmable logic controller , PLC), которые позволяют автоматизировать электромеханические процессы. Такие процессы используются для управления машинами на заводских сборочных линиях, аттракционами или центрифугами для отделения ядерного материала.

Stuxnet запускается с использованием операционной системы Microsoft Windows, а затем через сеть добирает программное обеспечение Siemens Step7. Далее собирая информацию о промышленных системах и разбалансируя центрифуги червь заставлял их взрываться. По сообщениям, Stuxnet разрушил почти пятую часть ядерных центрифуг Ирана.

Stuxnet имеет три модуля: червь, выполняющий все подпрограммы, связанные с основной полезной нагрузкой; файл ссылки, который автоматически выполняет распространенные копии червя; руткит-компонент, отвечающий за скрытие всех вредоносных файлов и процессов, предотвращая обнаружение присутствия Stuxnet.

Stuxnet обычно вводится в целевую среду через зараженный USB-накопитель. Затем червь распространяется по сети, просматривая программное обеспечение Siemens Step7 на компьютерах, управляющих PLC . В отсутствие какого-либо критерия Stuxnet становится бездействующим внутри компьютера. Если оба условия выполнены, Stuxnet вводит зараженный руткит в программное обеспечение PLC и Step7, изменяя коды и выдавая неожиданные команды для PLC, возвращая цикл обратной связи нормальных значений системы операционных систем для пользователей.

 

 

оригинал

перевод

https://cont.ws/@bigone/572542

 

“Sting Millennium” ended.

The last batch of our uranium went overseas.

Russia fully paid indemnity for the US defeat in the Cold War.

Almost none of the Russian media did not pay attention to an event that occurred in August 2016 .. From the port of St. Petersburg on a journey across the Atlantic has gone merchant ship Atlantic Navigator. On board the ship – container with the Russian uranium.
   The deal “Gore – Chernomyrdin”: the true purpose of our American “partners”
  This was the last batch of uranium, which was sent to the United States on the basis of signed 20 years ago, the US-Russian agreement providing for the supply to the United States 500 metric tons of uranium, which Russia undertook to extract from its nuclear weapons and that America intended to be used as fuel for nuclear power plants .

About this uranium deal actively discussed in the 1990s, but today, the theme was “behind the scenes” discussions of the key issues of our lives. A younger generation simply nothing about it heard. Therefore, we must be reminded of its history.

Immediately, I note that this is no ordinary trade and economic transactions, beneficial for both sides. It is an act of the largest Russian robbery, not only in the latest of its history, but also in the entire history of the country. Russia lost the Cold War the West, primarily the United States. She lost to a great extent due to the treacherous policy of our leaders. These tops have continued to take the country in the 1990s. “Uranium deal” – the consent of our treacherous elite pay tribute to the winner in the form of weapons-grade uranium. The principal agreement on this was reached between the then Prime Minister VS Chernomyrdin and US Vice President Albert Gore, so this transaction is often referred to as the transaction Gore – Chernomyrdin. It is also called “the scam of the Millennium” by virtue of an unprecedented scale. In fact, it was the West’s operation, which solves several strategic goals:

a) unilateral nuclear disarmament by depriving Russia of its stocks of weapons-grade uranium, as well as the preparation of conditions for the US withdrawal from the ABM Treaty;

b) applying enormous economic damage to Russia (the accumulated stock of weapons-grade plutonium is an essential part of the national wealth of Russia at the time);

c) deprivation of the huge Russian energy sources in the future after the intended introduction of new technology thorium nuclear power.

The scale of Russia robbery

“Scam Millennium” deal dubbed because, first, it had a huge scale, and secondly, was concluded fraudulently. Many Russian and American media tried to present it as a mediocre commercial agreement. The total purchase price for the supply of 500 tonnes of uranium was set at 11.9 billion dollars. Meanwhile, the value of the specified amount of highly enriched uranium is incomparably higher. To produce this amount of weapons-grade uranium, mining and defense industries of the country have worked for about 40 years, several hundred thousand people. Manufacturing dangerous, tens of thousands of people lost their health and ability to work, shortened his life. These were enormous sacrifices in order to forge a nuclear shield of the country and ensure a calm peaceful life of the USSR and the socialist countries. This uranium provides military-strategic parity in the world, which dramatically reduced the risk of a world war.

    On the other hand, in the US media, there are such assessments: by Russian uranium at the beginning of this century in the US nuclear power plants produce 50% of electricity. Every tenth kilowatt hour of electricity in the entire US economy was ensured at the expense of enriched uranium from Russia. According to the estimates, which were made by experts at the end of the last century, the real value of 500 tonnes of weapons-grade plutonium was at the time of not less than $ 8 trillion. For comparison, the annual average of the annual GDP in Russia, according to Rosstat, in the last decade of the last century there were in the region of $ 400 billion. It turns out that the actual price of the uranium deal was only 0.15% in relation to the minimum real value of the goods. The real price of uranium was equivalent to 20 (twenty) annual GDP!

There have been many wars in the history of mankind. After they defeated often pay reparations and indemnities winners. Recall, for example, the Franco-Prussian War in 1871. “Iron Chancellor” Bismarck defeated France appointed a contribution of about 13% of GDP (5 billion francs). Probably, the biggest in recent history indemnity paid defeated in World War Germany. Media reported that Germany just three years ago, has been paying reparations for the Paris Peace Treaty of 1919. In Germany, reparations were imposed in the amount of 269 billion gold marks. The amount, of course, enormous: it is equivalent to about 100 000 tons of gold. At present the price of the yellow metal would be about $ 4 trillion. in the field of economic history Experts say that to Germany in Paris reparation is about twice the GDP of the then Germany. Among other things, the payment of reparations by Germany stretched for 90 years (with interruptions, carried out for about 70 years in the pure form of payment); the payment of the “uranium reparations” Russia kept within 20 years, with most of the uranium was produced in the US in the 1990s.

     In the history of the early to finish.
  “Uranium deal” was accomplished in total secrecy from the people. Do not even been aware of many “people’s representatives” – for the reason that it is in violation of Russian law, it did not pass the ratification procedure in our parliament. In the second half of the 1990s, a number of MPs have launched an investigation to clarify the terms of the deal, the circumstances of its conclusion, assessment of conformity with the Constitution of the Russian Federation and other normative acts of Russia. As a result of strong pressure from certain influential forces surrounding then-President Boris countries Yeltsin managed to stop the investigation. We are trying to understand the transaction and many of our other policies, or even denunciation of the agreement achieved on the supply of uranium to the United States. Among them, for example, the legendary general L.Rohlin, Yu.Skuratov Attorney General, State Duma Deputy Ilyukhin. Death of Rokhlin and resignation of Skuratov many people associate it with the fact that they showed excessive activity in the investigation, “the uranium deal.”

Even if the supply of uranium in the transaction Gore – Chernomyrdin completed, it does not mean that we should put an end to history. It is necessary to return to serious analysis and investigation of the transaction in the framework of a special inter-ministerial committee with the participation of the nuclear industry specialists, MPs (the State Duma), law enforcement officials, the Foreign Ministry, the Ministry of Defense and other agencies and organizations, independent experts, technical, military, legal and economic issues.

Firstly, there are suspicions that a number of persons involved in that transaction, remain in the “cage” active politicians and government officials. There is no guarantee that they will not continue to work in the US and Western interests.

Secondly, we need to correct and honest understanding of our recent history. Without truthful disclosure of details “uranium deal” and its political, military, moral evaluation is no guarantee that we are again stepping on rakes like. Analysis of the real aims of the US side of the transaction clearly highlights the true aims and interests of those whom we, unfortunately, by inertia continue to call “partners”.

Thirdly, we need informed and detailed assessment of the economic damage which has been inflicted deal Russia and its people.

Any attempt to take the path of Russian economic recovery West will put a spoke in the wheel of our current reform, socio-economic transformation. We must be prepared for the fact that the West will increasingly expose us to a different kind of “bills” – for example, if we try to carry out deofshore our economy. After US courts, the United Kingdom, other European countries inevitably begin disassembling from the owners of offshore companies and / or their representatives with far-fetched claims for “damages”. Approximately the same reaction can be expected in case Russia decides to withdraw from the WTO, the limitation of foreign investment or even restriction of repatriated profits of foreign investors from Russia. We must be prepared for the fact that it may be necessary counterclaim “accounts” our Western “partners”. The largest of all possible counter “accounts” – our requirements to the US giant to compensate damage to Russia “uranium deal.”

VY Katasonov

Czech media: How to win a nuclear war without Russia?

Чешские СМИ: Как победить Россию без ядерной войны?

Despite all efforts in the media war, to impose sanctions and the permanent establishment of a Russian threat to the fore the option of direct military confrontation. War propaganda rather dulled the consciousness of the population, and now remains only to lose the mask and push nations to fight in the name of values.

Spending on arms grow militant education goes to school, and the phrase “contain Russia” entered the everyday vocabulary of the Western media. Nobel Peace Prize winner and organizers colored coups advised fooled the masses not to succumb to Russian propaganda under any circumstances. The plans of the Western powers on Russia – are the same: leave all 15 million (!!!) of Russians in their own territory. For these words of Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher ripped loud applause. Implementation of the plan continues.

Russian resources should be divided.

 

Still need to finally add an image of the world of tyranny in Russia, and then everyone will agree with the murder of the Russian President Vladimir Putin. Putin – a demon, and it is better to kill Saddam Hussein and Muammar Gaddafi. Cost recall frames with Clinton and Albright, on which the ladies were happy tormented president, and one can easily get an idea of the person as the US head of the candidate.

Russia – not Libya, and Putin – the Russian and the Slav. And what to do with its nuclear weapons? A good army, a large area, its own resources, but instead of mercenaries – patriots. mentality of Russians – against a large army of the NATO pact with a good military equipment. All the renowned Europe and its values – a group of corporate magnates, not warriors. And she is going to war with Russia?

The European ruling elites are not able to solve their own problems, the problems of their own peoples. They can not talk about anything except their own benefit. Despite all the agreements signed in the past, they have always betrayed each other. This company is the elite, living in a different reality, has its head overseas. For the world’s policeman, there are no rules – he defines them as well as us appoint enemies. Nothing else but extremely impudent attacks on government and foreign resources assignment, did not occur in world politics, and does not occur.

War in the name of freedom – this is the biggest hypocrisy of the power of economic elites.

Neither of which human rights and democracy, and there is no question! Only the interests of power and control over resources and their distribution.

These world’s most terrible criminals abusing the word humanity. Who participated in the wars in Kosovo, and who created hell in Africa? All modern murder – on the conscience of the United States, France, England and Italy. This colonial country in the past and in the present. A UN closed his African campaign silence. Recall and instigators of war, propaganda army of NGOs and political leaders, including the corporate media.

All of them support the war for resources. The one who will control the resources in Russia will be the world’s hegemon in coal distribution and drinking water. The human rights situation in Russia and China – threatening, and properly punish those countries and constantly remind them of what they have tyranny reigns.

Western society is not looking as critical to the United States, France, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar and other Muslim countries, including Turkey.

All these Russians understand. They know what it is, and do not want to take ownership of the corporate model of resources.

They know how to act hypocritically, and which has a double standard western humanity. Those who have their own resources, is not under pressure and may seek his. Russia needs peace, and it will carry a lot of resentment. Russia diligently looking for internal stability and has the power to handle even the coup. The Cold War never ended – it has only changed form

So how do you win Russia?

The sanctions continue, the army is ready. The collapse of the Soviet Union for the second time will not be repeated. All have forgotten that modern Russia – not the USSR Yeltsin.

 Military strategists have developed a plan: the small Baltic states near Russian borders play a key role. In Poland – historical trauma and dream of becoming a European power. Ukraine has not fulfilled the task of beginning of the war, despite the assistance of trained instructors. Not helped by the downed aircraft.
Another attempt of NATO to bring the case before the collision failed in Turkey. And rend the pilots had no effect on Russia’s nerves and not motivated by a desire for revenge.
How do you start a big war and deprive Russia of resources once and for all?
 Plans – much, but the main concern the Russian borders and arson Europe. Proven history of tactics! Provocation as close as possible to the borders of Russia and the mandatory support of the Slavs!

The military encirclement of Russia can not be only in the hands of the Anglo-Saxons. Something that would not be so. The strategy and the Slavic peoples must want to destroy Russia. Plan on NATO enlargement clear about this, as well as the appointment of a Czech general Paul on a high position in NATO, and Tusk, Polish, Head of the EU. Only with the help of Russian Slavic peoples can be the most vulnerable.

The air is filled with another provocation – one that will affect the emotions and cause a desire to start a war. Operation under the false flag – the usual practice of military strategists. Permanent environment Russian NATO Pact, approaching as close as possible to its borders, military exercises, increased tension – all this will sooner or later result in a collision. War between Russia and NATO launched, and it is almost inevitable.

Sanctions never canceled, and the military machine is not so easy to stop. Containing Russia is placing an increasing number of heavy weapons on its borders and the completion of the start-up bases around the whole territory of the Russian Federation.
 One thought about the war the Russians with Europe and the United States is superior to the power of weapons and the consequences of the worst hell.

Another civil war for life and death? The desire to subordinate against his courageous defense of the country?

Destroy Russia!” – But it will have only a couple of minutes.
And what is the reaction of Russia surrounded by NATO pact?
 Tactical nuclear missiles that are listed in readiness, to execute the order. The objectives are known – a US and NATO member countries. Huge numerical advantage, NATO armies impossible to resist for a long time, using traditional weapons. Russia will defend vigorous arsenal.

We calculate the scorched country for five or ten or twenty minutes – it will be the whole of Europe, and a few minutes later and England. Neutralize air defense missile a maximum of 30%, while others will hit the target. After the first mutual nuclear strikes Supreme Commander will try to finish the apocalypse. Emotional paralysis would deprive both sides of the political opportunity to negotiate. Combat system operates without human, and this is done the calculation. Russian submarine hurl all the nuclear missiles on the east coast of the United States. Time – five to ten minutes. The first mutual hitting, as always, will be applied on the bases and command, and then agglomerates, power plants, a strategic industrial facilities. All that is vital for the country, will be destroyed.

Large Russian cities, including Moscow, probably, will kick hydrogen bombs, which are more destructive than nuclear.

Automatic Russian system of nuclear war will strike most powerful ballistic missile “Topol” and “Satan” on selected targets in the EU and the US.

How will China and all of Asia?
Global exchange of blows will be on modern military calculations, the 5300 and 6000 theater missile medium-range missiles at the same time. A similar number of rockets will overload the system of air defense on both sides. In the first 60 minutes to overwhelm Russian tactical missiles in 2500, and the big fireworks will only be completed in five hours.

According to current estimates power of nuclear weapons, blow immediately entail 60-100 million victims. In the following 15 days of radiation and contamination of the environment will be lost even 300-400 million. Within six months from the devastating effects of the destruction of basic vital resources, 800 million will die. None of the state will not be able to bury the corpses. In all affected countries will no longer work infrastructure, industry, the health care system. If you can imagine the chaos and the suffering of all those who survive, the picture in front of you, the reason for and the consequences of action possessed by the power of psychopaths.

All supporters of the sanctions and hostility against Russia may, in addition to mentioning the determination to go to war, tell their children to political lectures will look like a war with Russia. To provoke a nuclear power in the war just, but it is impossible to stop. The military commanders and politicians will get out of the bunkers and will move to Australia, where they will agree on a new world order. Australia and Canada – are those countries that, by decision of the elites, will remain untouched.

Publications about the consequences of a nuclear exchange between NATO and Russia are in the public domain, and anyone can make their own conclusions.

The idea of US military strategy that will be a war that “pat” Russia and make her suffer, has no relation to reality. Russia will not go along the way of defense only on its own territory. She does not have any advantage on the size of the army, nor on the number of machinery. She had no choice, therefore, Russia is making clear that its defense will use the most powerful weapon.

Is Europe so stupid and so waiters have politicians who stubbornly go to his own death? Does anyone of bureaucrats in the European Commission and NATO leadership seriously believes that Russia can starve under sanctions, and after the win by military means without nuclear weapons? Why do they listen to the servile US? Perhaps the reason in their allocated power and profit, and perhaps, in a total nonsense, and it’s all backed up by long-term spy spying for the top leaders of the countries, dominant in Europe, ministers and presidents. The Allies listen allies. Today, all okay. They hug again, and love each other in the same way as yesterday.

What do we answer our generals, including Paul? They deter Russia or preparing a first strike? As Paul himself says Russia – the biggest threat, worse migration. Perhaps they are afraid of information from the past and the fear that it can take advantage of the enemy. Who knows? After years of espionage all his victims have found a common language and a common enemy. Daily spread rumors so-called European values and Western culture – a spectacle and the height of hypocrisy. This union must be reformed, to put on another fair, basis.

It is necessary to remove all the EU leaders and the European Commission to accelerate the proverbial. Modern elite association should be removed from office, from management process at all levels. The peoples of all EU Member States have democratic way to get rid of parasites. In the interests of all the need to lift the sanctions against the Russian Federation and to begin to trade normally and establish connections. Europe must find the courage to reject the dictates of the United States. Pact, NATO has shown that is not a defense, and attacking union hawks, defending the economic interests of the international power elite.

How and what to transform NATO? This is a task for new politicians who are willing to carry out reforms and want to prevent global war. Not replacing the current policy, to find solutions.

As the stories have never been able by any means to prevent war, then most likely, nobody will prevent the one that is scheduled today. And the same end attempts to reform the EU. Is the European elite will be with us until the very end?
The process ends with a controlled mental debilitation, and the abyss.
Will we elect politicians to guess what would happen if our people achieve from the war with Russia and to send the Slavs on the murder of the Slavs under the flag of NATO pact? What will be the reaction of the public, the freedom fighters, the heroes of our past that Russia – the enemy? Brainwashing by the media and the hunt for the so-called pro-Russian sites are gaining momentum, so that even small children are see in Russia a hell with Satan. For the case brought all the boys and girls of NGOs, celebrities, and we must not forget about the self-appointed activists. The media and the stars – a key role. They do an excellent job with the conduct of information warfare.

The enemy is known, but our fellow citizens are still not overwhelmed determination to fight. The elite from the ranks of these journalists barred. Petranek supposedly crazy, so we write political analyzes twenty years activists from foundations and trusts brain. Martin Koller, who is very professional and truly describes the situation may even “obpisatsya” – and in response to silence.

If we compare the circumstances, to take advantage of the knowledge on the structure and mentality of all sections of the population of Bohemia and Moravia, we get material for analysis. Dumb and spoiled young people too lazy to work and spend mental strength. The middle generation is fighting for food, and retired completely lost under the burden of low pensions. Senior bureaucrats just want to do business, and 3.5 million poor people do not want war with Russia. National Army does not exist, and mobilization can find some moral limits, and possibly lead to political changes in the General Staff.

 The same situation with the same tools debilizatsii reigned throughout the EU. In many well-aimed commentary asks: why fight it? For plunder the state for the property of transnational corporations, with the megamillionerov and the ruling elite? For the freedom in which the greed in the first place?
But this issue has been resolved.
 The reluctance of the masses to fight the problem decided to builders of the new world order (NWO). Just start war mercenaries. No negotiations, no surrender – the beginning of the war must be ahead of all the information channels for speed. Russia without nuclear weapons will not be defeated, and nuclear war will not be deployed only on the territory of Russia. The geopolitical situation – much worse than during the Cuban missile crisis. Countries that during the Second World War, attacked the modern Russia, surround her again.

To understand the stability and fragility of the modern system fatal to mention things.

Several natural disasters capable of paralyzing the government and all political bodies and turn them into socially dangerous. Shutting off the water and electricity a month will lead to an apocalyptic state of society. Two months later, completely overwhelm any system – even without a major war, all plunging into chaos. Those who are preparing for war and indirectly supports it, who destroys the stability of the resources of another country, who want to kill people by hunger and thus achieve the overthrow of the government, must take into account the consequences. Russia has nowhere to retreat, and she never retreated. All countries, which it brought freedom, betraying her today and preparing for war. The fragility of the system, depending on the daily supply of all necessary literally terrifying.

For the ruling elites all minor aspects: there are too many people who are eager to resources. Russia will not attack neither any state nor Europe in general – in Russia for many centuries, has its own resources. These are the last the world’s largest resources, and there is only one ally for his defense in Russian – nuclear weapons!

The truth about World War II !

Tõde II maailmasõja kohta

For decades, we have reiterated that the cause of World War II, Adolf Hitler and his plan was to conquer the world. The reality, however, was not far from a war, and the reasons were quite different. The reason was the Treaty of Versailles caused enormous injustice against Germany. The winners will put the entire responsibility for World War I for Germany, which is ridiculous. Germany had to cede vast territories that had historically been a part of Germany and the German inhabitants were displaced. Versailles Peace Treaty was as a ticking time bomb that had been put in place by western countries and exploded in 1939.
The German leadership has not dreamed unleash a war, but dreamed  international banking and arms industrialists, as well as the Soviet Union. Probably not, although World War II, however, the conflict, however. And offered an Englishman in Germany before the war as well as several times during the war, an armistice without any strange clauses. It was not adopted and expanded military action instead.
The war itself is very rewarding activity as
armed industri, credit institutions – where they will stay away from himself. It is also an effective tool for social and political war to maintain control over the large number of people. Martial law has been able to take advantage in order to influence the people to approve the creation of the institutions to which they would normally not agree. Estonia is one of the most prominent military historians Mati Apple: “It seems to me more and more that World War II was put in place baseline scenario European and American financial industry and the geniuses long before the beginning of the war. A new world war Russia was prepared and the preparatory work went to the capital of international joint forces. “Germany was determined by the huge reparation charges to the war-torn Germany would not in any case come to be disbursed. Since this was the case, occupied France the penalty to Düsseldorf and other cities in the Ruhr region, putting yet more difficult economic situation in Germany.

 Austria. Austria’s population consisted of Germans, who spoke German, the Germans thought and felt like Germans. Vienna had been almost ten times more than the German capital of Berlin. Only the periods 1806-1815 and 1866-1938, Austria was not connected to the national level in Germany. After the First World War, Western countries have banned reunification. 1920/1921. a. Held Karten, Tyrol, Styria and Salzburg in a referendum in which 99% participation in voted for reunification, but the Allies banned hunger blockade of threatening to continue voting for democracy, and thus violated the basic principles – self-determination. On 12 November 1928, declared the Austrian Federal Chancellor Dr. Karl Renner publicly: “Let Austrian citizens to vote freely, and they choose the 99% in favor of the reunification of Germany.” When Hitler to Austria on 12 March 1938 with Germany, adding many millions of people in the democratic self-determination finally implemented the way it was called usurpation? Rudolf Hess, accused of Nuremberg, even Austria Anschluss organization! The German leadership had abandoned the sustainability of peace in the interest of South Tyrol, Alsace-Lotringist, EupenMalmedist, North Schleswigist, Poznan, West Prussia and Upper Silesia in the East, the areas that were included in 1914. The German and Austrian sides. Their sole desire was to get back to the city of Danzig and the Polish Corridor connecting establish extraterritorial Germany divorced Great East Prussian province to escape bothersome customs control.
September 1 Germany invades Poland, whereupon England and France declared war on Germany, while the Soviet Union invaded Poland. Britain and France declared war to the Russians. This indicates that there was a significant problem in Poland, but the destruction of Germany. To French and England declared war on Germany attacked Poland penetration after starting as de facto World War II. I wonder why they did not have it at the end of the war in Poland with warm or cold, as it was under the yoke of the Communists?
Many think that the Nazis
dreaming of conquering the world, which is obviously false, but the communists did it. This plan have emerged on the agenda immediately after the takeover of power in Russia. Kisas Lenin: “Socialism in one country achieved the victory can not yet rule out all wars.” Brest-Litovsk, commented Comintern chairman Grigory Zinoviev as: ,,; If Russia enters into peace, the peace that only the cease-fires. The socialist revolution in Russia will win only if he is surrounded by socialist sister republics. Peace concluded imperialist Germany, is a temporary phenomenon. This gives time to breath, after the war breaks out again! “But the real Stalin began to prepare for the advent to power. In 1927, Stalin declared: “The second imperialist war is absolutely inevitable, as well as the inevitable resignation of the Soviet Union in this war.” But Stalin did not want to start a war with yourself and be a party in the earliest days: ,, We are taking the war, but we will proceed by the latter to take a pan whisk, which is able to consider everything. “

 Stalin’s industrialization was initiated, with the primary objective of the military industry of such a level that it is able to keep the course enormous, we can conquer the whole of Europe of armies. The whole country’s economy worked in the military industry to increase capacity for and this contributed actively to the west Financial Tycoons. They knew that the war is extremely costly for fun, and most states, anyone who considers himself to be the ongoing conflicts, needs financial support from the world banking systems. They are forced to borrow in time of war (weapons industry run), and at the end (to restore what has been destroyed). However, for the loans to pay high interest rate. Both are occupied by independent national economies …
When in 1923 the Red Army had 550,000 men, then on 19 August 1939, there were 2 million, and by 21 June 1941 to 5.5 million + NKVD troops! The beginning of the war, Stalin was at the disposal of the world’s most powerful and best-armed army. In 1941, the Soviet Union was the only country which produced heavy tanks. Their mission was to break through the defense and open up easy access to tanks German motorways. In 1940. between June 1941 and June was set up in the USSR 61 new tank divisions, each with 375 tanks .While entered Germany in September 1939 addressed during the second world war just six Panzerdivision. To conquer the world?
1939. In September, the world’s most powerful series production in the fighter weapons designer Polikarpovi I-16th Firepower still exceeded the 16 double-Messerschmidt-109e, and almost three-fold; Speedfighter.1939. September of 1941. June was formed in the USSR 295 New Rifle.From 1940 to 1941 a. was formed in June of 79 new aircraft in the USSR Division, igaühes200-300 aircraft.1940-1941 USSR was formed 30 new motorized division.In June 1939, the Red Army’s Field Artillery composed of 144
artillery Regiment, every 24-36 cannons, but by June 1941 the Red Army was already 900 (!!) artillery Regiment.
On 19 August 1939, the VK (b) P ,, Politburo adopted a Decision on the release. ” Guided by the principle: Pull the war, while remaining neutral, then the opponents have bled, throw into battle throughout the power of the Red Army. At the beginning of August 1939 had a British and French military delegations held talks in Moscow, Stalin information that allowed Stalin to combine in such a way that the outbreak of war to all the advantages of Russia. Namely, they told Stalin that the German attack on Poland in the case of France and Britain declare war on Germany. This is only needed Stalin. On 19 August 1939, Stalin, Hitler declared that if he invades Poland, do not fall of the Soviet Union not only neutral but also assisted Germany. Diplomatic straits staying Hitler
swallowed up hook down. Ribbentrop was in Moscow, and on August 23 he wrote down with Molotov Pact of conquering Poland.

 The big lie is, however, that the then leadership of the Republic of Estonia did not know the secret Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact additional content. It is easier to hide people. Freemason, and a high-paying NKVD collaborator Konstantin Pats, with its tail in the cells was performed in a military coup in 1934, shortly before a democratic election would have come to power through the War of letting the men who were in our country shed the blood of the War of Independence. One of the causes of the War of the repression of the children was that they knew Pätsi and Laidoneri major thefts of the Bank of Estonia and Harju Bank. Pats knew that veterans coming to power would be waiting for him to prison. After the coup did Loaf statement that the Estonian people are sick … but the people received treatment for six years on the eastern border of the back instead. But hit a loaf of traitors appropriate fate. Damage to this Estonians had cost so many innocent lives. A loaf of co Muurlan, US President Roosevelt commented that the Soviet occupation of Estonia, with a special cynicism – When the Estonians do not like communism, they may, after all, to leave Estonia … By the way, patchouli myself had in my pocket US visa, a passport, but their crimes for the consequences she no longer tried to escape is not an accident.
Now the situation was created in which Germany was particularly dangerous. The German authorities started to realize Stalin’s devilish plan. Stalin was preparing an unpleasant surprise for France, which defeated Hitler in 1940. very fast, even though Stalin had hoped that France and Germany sink into a bloody war and exhausting his army will then only scattered remnants of their beat. France was one of the main reasons for the rapid loss to nationalism. Full nationalism slump. Since the British have tended not specifically a fight, the Germans decided to begin withdrawing its troops from the eastern border to concentrate. Here Stalin made his second mistake, which would have been an almost fatal. He did not believe in his intelligence, and the generals, who warned him against Hitler and his troops continued to calmly concentrating the country’s western border. The German leader Hitler knew very well what risks he took for MRP concluding the contract; , only the establishment of relations between Germany and Russia would be an inevitable war. The Prince von Bismarck was warned not only against the war on two fronts, but also one of the fronts, if there’s war with Russia. And yet Hitler attacked. And none of the historian is not his motives expressed interest? But Hitler himself said Earl Schulenbergile: ,, Count, I have no other way out. “

 The fact that the Soviet Union will not be ready for war, and it had hit him suddenly, it is a complete lie. For example, Irakli Toidze patriotic poster which calls on all battle (,, Mother Homeland Calls “), appeared in the streets of Yaroslavl in the evening on June 22, 1941 June 22 Saratov afternoon, Novosibirsk and Habarovsk 23 June. When the artist created it, when it was printed and delivered as a sudden ,, “The Great Patriotic War began on June 22 in the early morning? Minsk military recruitment arrived at these posters, however, already in 1940. December !!! 1941 June 22 radio speech Molotov announced that Germany had declared war on them. The same information can also be found Soviet Marshal Zhukov memoirs. However, on 3 July 1941 there is a radio speech by Stalin, who in the meantime has got over the shock, to prevent Hitler came to him. And this is where we all become the treacherous ,, Germany invaded the Soviet Union on the peace loving “German attacked in self-defense, and thereby breached the advantage of Stalin’s plan of conquering Europe.
During the war the Red Army was spending 427 million artillery shells and mines, and 17 billion rounds of ammunition. This is not included hand grenades, land mines and aircraft bombs. Divide by the number of German soldiers! In war, the Soviet Union used the advantage of the 15% of People’s Commissariat of Munitions production capacity. Stalin, Hitler gave a preemptive strike, destroying or capturing 75% of Russian ammunition. Stalin drove the German troops, on the basis of the People’s Commissariat of Munitions of 15%
vestige of power. We all know the outcome of the war. What would have happened if Stalin had come to attack first?
Hitler had anticipated the communists in just a few weeks, knowing that if Stalin is attacked first, and Europe is not any hope. Breaking the first weeks of the war the huge Russian troops took Hitler to Stalin the opportunity to conquer the whole of Europe.
The world-famous British historian Liddell Hart wrote on September 3, 1949 in the newspaper ,,, Picture Post ‘: ,, Hitler wanted anything else, but not only a world war … After the end of the war the most important German archives fell into our hands, and we can get a clear idea of how extraordinarily there was great fear in the leading circles of the German war front … “

 Gaul Brennus commander said ,, the vanquished Woe! Vae victis! “Really. Only the winners decide what were war crimes. Nuremberg trials were a farce. In many cases, the Germans were attributed to acts which were committed communists. At one hearing, Goering said: “When I sit on this bench, you should sit on my right and left of Stalin, Churchill.” The Nuremberg defendants were beaten, and the interrogator told in advance what he wants to hear. The German defenders were threatened verbally and physically so that they will not produce the crimes of the Allies. But despite this, they did not believe that German statesmen and generals killed Cowardly both ways – by hanging. According to the Geneva Convention, the victim may be sentenced to death but the firing squad! The conditions in which the Germans worked in Nuremberg defenders can read books ,, Len Deightoni Blood, Tears and Folly “Soviet prosecutor Roman Rudenko said in his oral arguments that led the Germans from Russia Fortunes. On top of this, Göring said that Russia got millions of them, yes, but they were mostly Russian-performing. Rudenko grabbed the gun and let (!!!) in the direction of Goring 4-5 shots before the gun was confiscated from him. As Goering bullets did not hit, he said calmly, let the Russians, who in such a short earth knows how to miss. Soviet specialists constructed a special boom for hanging place. Guests to the store very slowly, about 24 minutes after the doctor declared hanging dead. Field Marshal Keitel said before hanging his last words: ,, Let me die ass towards Russia. “Ribbentrop: ,, Hanging us today, but tomorrow you hanging Communists. Our hanging above the future, but a monument. “The Nuremberg process serving 3,000 people since 2400 were Jews!g

 

Everyone likes to talk about the crimes of the Nazis, but what about our allies?
English fire bombs thrown from airplanes in 1943 changed the Hamburg city reduced to rubble.
Fire tornado killed 50,000 civilians.
In September, fire bombs were thrown Darmstadile 250 000 – 12, 000 people dead.
In October, 8,000 people were killed in Kassel. Attacked in Bremerhaven, Braunschweig and Heilbronn.
On 14 February 1945 the Dresden huge crematoria. The city was called Elbe-edge in Florence, this was one of the most beautiful cities in Germany. 13 February, 1945 in Dresden, supposedly lived 950,000 people, including 250,000 war refugees (women and children). Englishmen have passed the two attacks on the substance – a total of 650,000 fire bombs, along with 
land mine Bombings 2659 tons. In the third attack by the United States were the subject of B-17 planes – 771 tons of bombs. The second and third wave was planned so that the bombs would be hit between the buildings rescuers working. Low-flying fighters mowed the machine gun fire of crazed people. Dresden burned for seven days. 90,000 houses were destroyed. The smallest estimated number of deaths was 35,000, the largest of more than 100 000 people. The strategic and military sense, there was no significance Drezdenil !!!
May 31, 1942 in Cologne in 1046 attacked the English bombers. Civilians were killed simply for sowing terror. Second World War in Germany fell by 1.35 million tons of bombs, of which 55.8% of the cities and the junction of 9,3% in the chemical industry, 1.8% in the manufacturing industry, 30.5% and 2.6% points to the military base and other objects.
Civilians killing Englishmen called themselves “comfortable war” – a war comfortable! It also happened in Japan. For example, on 9 March 1945, was the World War II air raid strict Tokyo bombing killed 83,800 people, 41,000 wounded and 1 million homeless. Was destroyed 267,000 houses. Between June and August 1945 passed the 58 Americans in the Japanese city of 60 air strikes and Toyama, Fukui Nazamu and cities were razed to the ground. Americans are not interested in the military, but economic injury. Hundreds of thousands (the exact number can not be determined) were killed in Hiroshima and Nagasaki atomic bomb attacks.
Is the killing of civilians is a war crime only to the Germans? Everything is to blame only the Germans? Nuremberg Tribunals Statute of the sixth article of the war crimes in occupied territories civilians killings, ill-treatment and forced labor deportations, prisoners of war or the sea seized the persons killings or ill-treatment, hostage executions, public or private property, looting, towns or villages unjustified looting or destruction by military necessity can not justify. Would not have had to sit on the dock in Nuremberg, Stalin, Roosevelt and Churchill? The first was organized by the Germans during World War 500 English
various brigades as many as 768 gas attack. However, the school’s only about the Germans.
Twisted history is not history.
If you take a few steps back and watch it all on a large scale it would seem that the two without a war, won most of the Jews who were new to your country and the United States, whose gold fund increased from 1913 until World War II until the end of nine times (!), And who became the world’s powerful economy.

 

Americans are thinking the exclusion of Latvia from NATO !

Американцы задумались об исключении Латвии из НАТО

On the pages of Forbes magazine was publicly recognized as “meaningless” stay the Baltics into NATO. From the membership of the Baltic countries in NATO greatly affected the security of the United States: as a result of their activities in NATO there is a threat of a nuclear war with Russia because of that damn America. For the Baltic elites, such statements from the ocean – a reminder that the American owners of Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia – emergency ballast, which the United States, if necessary, easily be thrown overboard.

In one of the most famous and influential business media world – the American financial and economic magazine Forbes – earlier this month published “software” analytical article “Why America is a member of NATO?”, To question the appropriateness of the existence of the alliance, which does not guarantee the security of the United States but only puts this safety compromised.

The main idea of ​​the article – taking in new members, who are often weak, worthless and incapable of self-defense of the country, the Alliance forces the Americans to take custody of these new pitiful allies.

It is Washington only a headache, because it makes him get involved in all sorts of regional conflicts on the side of the countries that do not provide the security of the United States.

Countries that America in general, and do not need.

NATO expansion has long been turned into an end in itself – in practice, this expansion does not have any sense for Americans, not in the national interest of the United States, and eventually creates for the Pentagon to the State Department issues.

“Add to Montenegro – it’s like to get one more mindless friend in Facebook», – begins his article staffer Doug Forbes Bendou.

“The presidents and legislators continue to provide guarantees for the security of money and the lives of American citizens to foreign countries, and it happens even when – as is the case with Montenegro, when they have absolutely no value to the security of the United States,” – writes Forbes.

Business publication exposes the ruthless criticism of the policy of recruiting NATO with caustic sarcasm criticizing the principle of “expansion for expansion,” in which America is required, for example, carry the alliance commitments to Turkey – a “friend-enemy” of the United States, where the government is Islamist Erdogan, criticized furiously in his speeches “decadent West” and “American imperialism”, but once running for help to the Allies after they provoked the conflict with Russia.

However, a much more vivid example of useless and pathetic allies that America hoisted on his shoulders and is now forced to defend them, even though they do not need her or Europe – is the Baltic countries, with merciless candor named Forbes «helpless nations.”

“The expansion at the expense of the Baltic States turned a colossal mistake, which resulted in NATO became helpless nation in defense are not interested the rest of Europe, the countries that have no geopolitical significance to America, however, involved in the acute controversy with Russia, – says the American edition. – If there is something bad, then America with minimal support from the European “allies” – they are likely to seek refuge in Brussels – will have, apparently, have to deal with having a nuclear weapons Russia over the disputed issues of greater interest to Moscow than to Washington. ”

“Security of the United States significantly affected by the addition of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania”, – concludes Forbes, and on the basis of this conclusion, urging people not to repeat the Baltic “colossal mistake” in the “Eastern Partnership”, taking in Georgia and Ukraine.

It is noteworthy that Forbes said not a word about the “imperial ambitions” or “aggressive neighborhood” – the conflict between Russia and the Baltic States there is an objective, but the cause of his stated “heated debate” between Moscow and the Baltic countries.

Who this policy is – a rhetorical question, given that the adoption of the latest Foreign Policy Concept of the Russian Federation (2013), in which the Baltic states did not say a word, legally approved diplomatic line in Moscow against Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia is ignoring the whole Trinity.

Contemptuous silence – is a universal Russian official response to calls to its international isolation, the comparison with the Third Reich and female hysteria about the “terrorist state.”

Only a few months later, without any apparent connection with these public attacks, suddenly found themselves banned Latvian sprats, came under embargo “milk” and Russian transit redirected to the Baltic ports in Russia.

So the conflict between Russia and the Baltic states to blame Baltic states – says a leading US business publication, and by appealing to the most holy – to the “life of American citizens” – asks the question: why America must expose themselves to the threat of nuclear war with Russia because of the verbal incontinence Dalia Grybauskaite and Edgar Rinkevich?

Namely this Baltic Allies eventually from her and need: not a week goes by that of Vilnius did not hear the next call for increased US presence in the region, including the military presence.

For the Baltic States, and can be no question that they are fighting for themselves: no, we are small, responsible for our words about a “new Mordor” have allies.

Allies must do: they have to increase the presence of NATO in the region, the Baltic countries send in their military contingents, put them overland NATO base, going for it on a direct conflict with Russia.

This behavior, by the way, contrary to the bedrock of the Anglo-Saxon culture, and Americans are taught from birth that count in life only for themselves, responsible for his words and be able to stand up for themselves, can only cause disgust.
This aversion to read the publication Forbes between the lines, this disgust and question why the United States allies in the “helpless nation”?
“In the end, since the end of World War II, it passed 70 years. GDP and population of the European Union more than the corresponding figures in America, and much more than in Russia. Is it not time for the rich friends of Washington begin to defend themselves yourself? “- Angrily writes American magazine, noting that because of its craven allies, the White House continues to” risk the lives of its citizens, because Europe does not want to worry about is to have a sufficient number of men and women in uniform. ”
For Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia publication Forbes – a reminder that the Baltic Washington – emergency ballast is that the United States, if necessary, easily be thrown overboard, which is not for their value, and that Americans just do not go to war.
Article Forbes – is not just an article, because I Forbes – is not just a business magazine.
Forbes – is one of the mouthpieces of Wall street, this “wall newspaper” the first economy in the world, a voice that says business and political elite of the United States.
Forbes said its valuable than quantity, and quality of the audience about the “best workers” (rating of the richest people in the world) and the problems in the super-corporation called the USA.
Publication of the miserable, useless, and threaten the security of US allies in NATO could not appear in the media like nothing.
The American establishment realized the situation with “helpless nations” as a problem, concluded that no value Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia to the United States do not represent, and publicly made it clear that, if necessary, Washington will hand over the Baltic states.

Word – ancient viruses on the planet !

Слово – древнейший вирус на планете

In this essay, I would like to share with you the concept of the universe. Perhaps it sounds too ambitious, but it’s just my speculation, my understanding of the process under the nickname of “life.” I’ve been trying to understand the puzzle of what is happening and too sure what our eyes see – nothing more than an illusion. To this conclusion I have brought the description of the facts in the previous articles, for example, the impermanence of the universe.

Start like to many well-known term “In the beginning was the word.” To draw an analogy of the term with the launch of the program on any PC, the fact of creation of the world can be reduced to writing and running the program. This program is incredibly versatile, complex and thought-out – it is impossible to understand the idea and appreciate all sides, we have a chance to snatch only a grain of truth in the plan.

We are the particles of the program, which has lived and developed by our thoughts and energy. We are like batteries that feed the structure of the universe and do not allow the sun to fade. Initially, human life on this planet was ideal, disease, warrior, inflation and all that we are now seeing the window. The world has changed significantly, when the program started to introduce the virus. Like the original “word”, which gave rise to all, the malicious code is in the form of the same words, but with a negative message.

Perhaps you’ve noticed how you can influence a person with words. When the child’s upbringing by various methods appear completely different product. Immediately I want to recall the experiences of Japanese scientists on the water, under the influence of abusive and negative words in general, the structure of the water begins to break down and distorted. Do not forget about how we are trying to stultify the use of information on television and radio waves. Under the influence of a variety of information in the human body can create positive or negative background for life. Sometimes it is much easier to endure physical injury than those that gets people perceiving words / information from such wounds can not buy medicines at the pharmacy.

The energy structure of each person has a certain matter, which in the course of life grows and creates the personality of what it fills itself. In order to more clearly present the process, I would call the human hive, and the bees – the matter that is created by words. Initially, the “bees” – an ideal product that has a set of very useful programs. But once a person is born, his hive begins to be subjected to constant attacks from other “bees” that carry malicious code in the form of various temptations, negativity, anger of others, jealousy and a host of other things that are trying to penetrate into the essence of the person and make it a byproduct of the system . Over time, the original clean source of human vitality are increasingly infected with the negative impact of the environment and other people “hives.”

Originally, this planet was not exposed to any kind of evil is somewhere in the sky or under the earth – it does not matter, there was not a war. As we have too many clean energy, which is not indifferent to the different creatures in the universe. And apparently, some of them could find a way to use our unconscious body to steal this energy had to do was right to infect the entire system.

Thus, the word and thought – two cornerstones that are the founders of our lives. You can afford to go too far and imagine that there is no reality, and all around – nothing more than the thoughts of people realized that every day send requests to the source of everything, and he in turn – sends the finished code.

I quite difficult to present all aspects of the process by means of a Word, because not all of that, I think, is the place to be – it is ready to put on the word.

Author: Andersen


The world is on a knife-edge, and the West can not be saved.

In a column for the popular socio-political publications Opednews “the father of ReaganomicsPaul Craig Roberts said – the world will survive only if Russia and China will no longer hold on to the hollow shell of Western civilization.”

Мир находится на лезвии ножа, и Запад уже не спасти

“Before the West began to spread democracy abroad, maybe he should have left her a little for themselves. The US is an oligarchy in which the government is accountable to the six powerful group of private interests. In Europe, governments are accountable to the EU, Washington and private bankers, but not in front of their nations “- wrote a famous writer and economist.

In his view, the United States to impose “democracy” is not a value in itself, but a cover for the aggressive policy of the Western elites governing their countries and intend to continue to do so for their own benefit.

“As far as I can tell, not only democracy left the Western world, but also compassion, empathy for others, morality, honesty, self-respect, respect for truth, justice, loyalty. Western civilization has turned into a hollow shell. It is nothing left except violence , greed, coercion, “- says the former assistant to the president of the USA.

“When I read, hopefully, wrong reports that Russian President Putin wants to be a partner of the West, I wonder why such a powerful country, returning to the light from the darkness, wants to be a partner of Satan. Maybe Putin is acting in the interest of humanity, seeking to defuse a dangerous situation created by Washington and its NATO puppets personal “, – says sincerely Roberts.

“The Western world is on its last legs. Unemployment is a horror for the European and American young people, especially the educated. The young American, moved the burden of student debt, offer the Internet” sponsors “sex for financial support”, – he said.

“The mentality of Wall Street – unlimited greed – picked up in the life of Americans, and now greed is exported to Europe, which today as the United States is a vacant lot opportunities for young people. Greece sacrificed banksters, Spain, Italy and Portugal are waiting in the wings” – shares eksprert. “Instead of independent European countries strengthens the fascist centralization of power. In recent years we have witnessed how banksters, acting through the EU can appoint a supposedly democratic government in Greece and Italy,” – he is going through.

“In the western world is restored aristocracy of wealth. If Russia and China to join the” Partnership “, that billions of people will be managed by a handful of mega-rich elite. The world is on a knife edge. The West does not save,” – concludes Roberts.

“Russia and China could follow after him, as they have suffered from the tyranny and look to the west on the road to freedom and independence. But Western paths lead to the” domination, exploitation and pillage of the peoples of the world “, – he quotes, asking” Will Russia and China to participate in the robbery and they will resist him firmly defending the interests of humanity? “

“Sting Millennium” was finished!

«Афера тысячелетия» завершилась!

The last batch of our uranium went overseas. Russia had paid US indemnity for the defeat in the Cold War.
Almost none of the Russian media did not pay attention to an event that happened in the last month. From the port of St. Petersburg on a journey across the Atlantic sailed merchant ship Atlantic Navigator. On board – containers with Russian uranium.

The deal “Gore – Chernomyrdin”: the true goals of our American “partners”.

This was the last batch of uranium, which was sent to the United States on the basis of signed 20 years ago, the Russian-American agreement providing for the supply to the United States 500 metric tons of uranium, which Russia undertook to extract from its nuclear weapons and that America intended to be used as fuel for nuclear power plants for operation, this uranium deal actively discussed in the 1990s, but today, the theme was “behind the scenes” discussions of the key issues of our lives. A younger generation just did not heard about it. Therefore, we must be reminded of its history. Immediately, I note that this is no ordinary trade and economic deal beneficial to both parties. This act of the biggest robberies in Russia is not only the newest in its history, but also in the entire history of the country. Russia lost the Cold War the West, primarily the United States. He lost in no small part due to the treacherous policy of our leaders. These upper classes continued to take the country in the 1990s. “The uranium deal” – acceptance of our treacherous to pay tribute to the top winner in the form of weapons-grade uranium. The principal agreement on this was reached between the then Prime Minister VS Chernomyrdin and US Vice President Albert Gore, so this transaction is often referred to as transaction Gore – Chernomyrdin. It is also called “scam of the Millennium” by virtue of an unprecedented magnitude. In fact, it was an operation of the West, which solves several strategic goals:

a) unilateral nuclear disarmament by depriving Russia of its stocks of weapons-grade uranium, as well as the preparation of conditions for the US withdrawal from the ABM Treaty;

b) applying a huge economic loss of Russia (the accumulated stock of weapons-grade plutonium is an essential part of the national wealth of Russia at the time);

c) deprivation of the huge Russian energy sources in the future after the intended introduction of new technology thorium nuclear power.

The extent of the robbery in Russia. “Scam Goals” deal dubbed because, firstly, it had a huge scale, and secondly, was concluded fraudulently. Many Russian and American media sought to present it as a mediocre commercial agreement. The total purchase price for the supply of 500 tonnes of uranium was determined to be 11.9 billion dollars. Meanwhile, the value of the specified amount of highly enriched uranium is incomparably higher. To produce this amount of weapons-grade uranium, mining and defense industry worked for about 40 years, several hundred thousand people. Manufacturing dangerous, tens of thousands of people have lost health and disability, shortened his life. It was a huge sacrifice in order to forge the nuclear shield of the country and ensure a calm peaceful life of the USSR and the socialist camp. This uranium provides military-strategic parity in the world, which dramatically reduces the risk of World War II. On the other hand, the American media has such estimates: by Russian uranium at the beginning of this century, at the plant produced 50% of US electricity. One in ten kilowatt hour of electricity in the entire US economy was provided by the uranium from Russia. According to the estimates, which were made by experts at the end of the last century, the real value of 500 tonnes of weapons-grade plutonium was at the time not less than $ 8 trillion. For comparison, the annual average of the annual GDP of Russia, according to Rosstat, in the last decade of the last century there were in the region of $ 400 billion. It turns out that the actual price of the uranium deal was only 0.15% in relation to the minimum real value of the goods. The real cost of uranium was equivalent to 20 (twenty) annual GDP!

There have been many wars in human history. After they defeated often pay reparations and indemnities winners. Recall, for example, the Franco-Prussian War in 1871. “Iron Chancellor” Bismarck appointed defeated France in a contribution of about 13% of GDP (5 billion francs). Probably the biggest indemnity paid in recent history defeated in World War I Germany. Media reported that Germany just three years ago, has been paying reparations under the terms of the Treaty of Paris in 1919. In Germany, reparations were imposed in the amount of 269 billion gold marks. The amount, of course, enormous: it is equivalent to about 100 000 tons of gold. At the current price of the yellow metal is about 4 trillion dollars. Experts in the field of economic history argue that to Germany in Paris reparation is about twice the GDP of the then Germany. Among other things, the payment of reparations by Germany stretched for 90 years (with interruptions, pure payments were made for about 70 years); payment of the “uranium reparations” Russia kept within 20 years, with most of the uranium was delivered to the US in the 1990s.

In the history of the early to finish.

“The uranium deal” was accomplished in total secrecy from the people. We do not even been aware of many of the “people’s representatives” – for the reason that it is in violation of Russian law, did not pass the ratification procedure in our parliament. In the second half of the 1990s, a number of deputies have launched an investigation to clarify the terms of the transaction, the circumstances of its conclusion, assessment of compliance with the Constitution of the Russian Federation and other normative acts of Russia. As a result of strong pressure from certain influential forces surrounding then-President Boris Yeltsin managed to stop the investigation. We are trying to understand the transaction and many of our other policies, or even denunciation of the agreements achieved uranium supplies in the United States. Among them, for example, the legendary general L.Rohlin, Yu.Skuratov Attorney General, State Duma Deputy Ilyukhin. Death of Rokhlin and retired Skuratov many people associate it with the fact that they showed excessive activity in the investigation, “the uranium deal.”

Even if the supply of uranium in the transaction Gore – Chernomyrdin completed, it does not mean that history should be put an end. It is necessary to return to serious analysis and investigation of the transaction in the framework of a special inter-ministerial committee with the participation of specialists of the nuclear industry, the people’s representatives (the State Duma), law enforcement officials, the Foreign Ministry, Defense Ministry, and other agencies and organizations, independent experts in technical, military, legal and economic issues.
Firstly, there are suspicions that a number of persons involved in that transaction, remain in the “cage” current politicians and government officials. There is no guarantee that they will not continue to work in the interests of the US and the West.

Secondly, we need to correct and honest understanding of our recent history. Without truthful disclosure of the details “of the uranium deal” and its political, military, moral evaluation is no guarantee that we will once again stepped on like a rake. Analysis of the real aims of the American side of the deal clearly highlights the true aims and interests of those whom we, unfortunately, by inertia continue to be called “partners.”
Third, we need informed and detailed assessment of the economic damage that was done a deal for Russia and its people. Any attempt to Russia to embark on economic recovery the West will put a spoke in the wheel of our current reforms, socio-economic transformation. We must be prepared for the fact that the West will increasingly expose us to all sorts of “accounts” – for example, if we try to hold before of-shore our economy. Through the courts the US, UK, other European countries, will inevitably begin disassembling from the owners of offshore companies and / or their representatives with far-fetched claims for “damages”. About the same reaction can be expected in case Russia decides to withdraw from the WTO, the restriction of foreign investment or even limiting the repatriation of profits of foreign investors from Russia. We must be prepared for the fact that it may be necessary counterclaim “accounts” our Western “partners”. The largest of all possible counter “accounts” – our requirements to the US giant to compensate damage to Russia ‘uranium deal.

 

Philip Ekozyants 700-strong army of Putin.

Филипп Экозьянц: 700-тысячная армия Путина.

The world is not afraid of the 700,000th army of Putin and his nuclear weapons. The world is afraid that someone would dare to oppose Washington.

The world understands that as long as Washington does not interfere with doing what he does have is quite clear instructions on how to avoid the arrival of US peacekeepers in your house.

Instruction is really very simple: do what Washington says, or those who use his vocal apparatus, to carry out his instructions, and live, and even very fine living. And World War II is not – there is only local, and die just naughty.

And it’s not so scary. Whatever you hold in your mind and in your heart, you can always keep silent about it, accept it, change the view to bow to force majeure, or in extreme cases, move to where the most humbled and can be lost among them, where forage is enough for everyone .

And such places are still very much on the ground.

But if someone as big and menacing begin seriously to resist Washington, then loomed ahead of a new world war.

But this is scary. And most of all on earth will not remain places where you can hide from it.

And knowing that, even if you sympathize with the freedom-loving Putin, even if you have always dreamed that he finally appeared and showed Pindos long-promised gruel, even if you secretly pray for him – you choose … to join the sanctions.

Because it’s safer for you and your family. Because it is better to let the Americans bombed the Koreans, Vietnamese, Serbs, Iraqis, Ukrainians

We’re not there. We do not they.

We are here. We are loyal.

We are tolerant. We agree.

We are silent.

We surrender.

No, the 700,000th you afraid of Putin’s army.

You’re afraid that would break down and joined her.

 

Run a Ukrainian! Run!

Беги, украинец! Беги!

Let’s go back a few years ago and remember how elegantly global political elite was prepared to overcome the impending second wave of global economic crisis. The scheme was a beautiful and beneficial: the US soft “compressed” to the level of the owner of North and Central America and, in exchange, the world harness (literally, financially) in the process of ensuring a “soft landing” for the US economy. The most important marker of this scenario, in addition to the famous Obama’s “tell Vladimir that after the election, I will be more flexible,” was officially agreed to give the United States control over the rest of the world through the IMF’s refusal to “blocking stake” shares. In many conflict areas have been made compromises: the Americans, to the great joy of China cut its financial support for African politicians and Yanukovych regime invested “special purse” of the Democratic Party of the United States, Mark Mobius. Peace, for the first time in its history, was a more or less organized and bloodless transfer of leadership from one global hegemon in the hands of supporters of a multipolar world. And then everything collapsed.

 

I’m afraid we’ll never know the details of the invisible revolution in the American elite, which occurred about two years ago. From the visible effects need to emphasize the following: there was a “bow” between the most radical democracy (the so-called “Clinton clan”, to which he belongs and Joe Biden) and the most radical Republicans, ie neocons and “tea party.” Because of Obama’s failed American Gorbachev, and the blessing that has given Obama the presidential election last of the Kennedy clan turned out rather familial curse. As a result, instead of the supporters of the “soft landing”, some of the key points in the American “political MCC” captured supporters of the war to the end, not necessarily victorious, but Obama and what was left of his team may engage in partisan except that, the benefit of some control over economic bloc they still have.

 

In the new context, the US is trying to implement two plans:

1. Plan a minimum – to rob Europe via the so-called “free trade agreement” (see. Article “We need to Berlin, not Kiev” – http://politrussia.com/world/nam-nuzhen-berlin-779/) and the rest of the world – ignite.

2. Plan a maximum – to rob Europe, set fire to the whole world, to seize power in Russia and to use it as a battering ram against China with a mandatory nuclear war between the two major geopolitical enemies of the United States. And you thought nothing Nemtsov regularly wrote articles that the main enemy of Russia – this is China?

The implementation of these plans Ukraine should fulfill the role of a tool that forever separates the EU from Russia and bury any hope for a “Continental union” between Berlin and Moscow – the eternal fear of Anglo-Saxon civilization. Everything else – the secondary, though pleasant for US bonuses.

Washington’s main problem – a terrible time trouble. Obama negotiated the surrender hegemony not a good life, and also not a good life Americans had to rush to Maidan. They do not have even a few years, to how to play all the games in which they got involved; the economy may fall into a spin at any time.

In terms of implementation of the strategic objectives of the operation in Ukraine failed. If nekononov and Clinton in Washington left at least ten years, it would be a success, but they need a blitzkrieg, and blitzkrieg failed, and most likely will not happen. Despite the enormous pressure and attempts to play scheme “Take us to our economy, and we will protect you from the terrible Russian, who captured the Crimea and is about to take over Kiev ‘Europeans do not want to sign a contract TTIP and destroy its economic elite for the benefit of the United States. Worse, even an embargo on Russian energy could not push. About the seizure of power in Moscow, the Americans still dream, but the chances of them – a little bit, and the clock is ticking and ticking all monotonously counting time before the US economic collapse.

Moscow understands and acts in the wheel logic, “We need a Berlin”, despite the heart-rending cries guard patriots who like to wave a sword and help to ensure that the third time in a hundred years, Russia and Europe clashed in a battle that would benefit only the United States (not tired, huh?)

Highly recommended to see a fragment of the sign from a recent interview with Sergei Lavrov, which clearly explains why Moscow alliance with Germany: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=gJTKN0–PpE#t=2633 (beginning of the frame – 43: 40)

The bottom line: we want to “shake up” the European Union so that it began to actively defend their own interests. Not the fact that the work, but work on it – it is necessary. Even just holding the EU from becoming a “food” for the US economy will be enormous victory, which will not allow the United States to extend its existence due to the European economy, as well as the US extended its existence for two decades due to the plunder of the USSR.

The situation is slowly beginning to level off, and the recent summit Ukraine – EU, was the best proof of that.

Let’s look at the specifics:

1. Has the American radicals to make EU support Ukraine cost? No it failed. For a minimal support of the Ukrainian economy needs tens of billions of euros. They are not and never will. This way, the question of the complete submission of Europe. For a complete subordination? If it was full, the money would be allocated in the last year. No money.

2. Were you able to get tougher sanctions against Russia? No it failed.

Total defeat of Ukraine.

To complete the picture, it is desirable to read about how the Financial Times complains about the behavior of the German and French diplomats who “put pressure on Ukraine,” and rewritten beyond recognition the final document of the summit, which apparently was made in the State Department: http://lenta.ru/news/2015 / 04/27 / ft /

Moreover, moving from the language of diplomacy, the passage:

“Germany and its key European partners put pressure on Ukraine in order to accelerate the implementation of the Minsk Agreement, fearing that Russia will use procrastination to” justify the renewal of aggression “,” should be read as “The Germans and the French said: dear Ukrainians, or you merge in an amicable or we turn away and Putin will do something bad. ”

Against this backdrop, statements by the head of the Office of Trade Policy at the Ministry of Economic Development of Italy’s Federica Ayhberga looks particularly interesting:

“Italy in February is clear and makes it clear that the Council of Ministers will not vote for the extension of sanctions. We believe in Russia, in a prosperous country and a reliable partner,” – said Ayhberg. (Http://www.vestifinance.ru/articles/56613)

Before the victory in the European direction is still far, but reasons for optimism continue to appear, causing nervous American specialists:

“Some European countries have” Trojan horses “Russia:
The apparent inconsistency of some European countries in relation to the Ukrainian crisis is dictated by the national interests and the desire to conclude a lucrative contract with Russia in times of crisis, writes Bulgarian political scientist Ivan Krastev in his article published by The New York Times. “(Http://vz.ru /news/2015/4/27/742498.html)

The position of Kiev and its American curators can not be called a winner. Obama continues to block arms supplies to Ukraine, the EU does not want to save the Ukrainian economy, and direct access to the American printing press in Washington radicals fortunately not, and besides, the machine is moribund – http://fritzmorgen.livejournal.com/723625.html .

Through the IMF was able to push the injection of 5 billion, however, getting the next tranche made dependent on the success of negotiations on restructuring the debt owed to private creditors. But the restructuring of bad, bad to the point that Madame Yaresko hysteria in the pages of the Western media and Western threatened default funds.

http://top.rbc.ru/finances/15/04/2015/552e22b29a794716276d45bb

Apparently, Ms. Yaresko first encountered financiers for whom receiving a call from Clinton or Bush is not an indication to action. It will be interesting to observe their efforts to prevail upon Mark Mobius and his friends.

No money, no prospects, supply of American weapons are not. Washington “hawks” demand the resumption of hostilities, and the newspaper Le Monde (with reference to the environment Hollande) and European diplomats at the summit Ukraine – EU thick hint at the fact that even the “delay” of the Minsk performance agreements (which Kiev can not perform in principle) It leads to the fact that Kiev will lose significant territory. Unenviable prospects.

Total for Ukraine loom three possible scenarios:

1. If Europe is finally freed from the influence of the United States, the “Ukrainian problem” will be solved Russia are likely LDNR hands. The logic of “it is already possible!”

2. If Europe finally gets full control of the United States, the “Ukrainian problem” will be solved Russia are likely LDNR hands. The logic of “do not care anymore!”

3. If Kiev itself starts fighting the “Ukrainian problem” will be solved Russia are likely LDNR hands. Logic “asked for it!” with a view to use the situation to detach from the EU US

There is another option of continuing agony, but it can not last long. Sooner or later, one of these three options will occur. There are of course exotic scenarios like the all-out nuclear war, but now we do not consider them as in the case of their realization we still alive will be gone. And the text is still written to benefit the living.

Residents of Ukraine, regardless of their political preferences, it is understood that none of the above options is not intended for the territory of the former Ukrainian (net of Donetsk, Lugansk, and can be Odesa and Kharkiv, if you are very lucky) such surprises as the economic recovery and the expense of others restoring order.

No matter how things develop and how it will share or reformat Ukraine, Russia and the EU will not allocate resources to a radical stabilization of the situation in this area, in excess of what is necessary for the protection of the pipe (until 2019) and is armed or deactivation of nuclear power plants. All. In the rest – nothing or minimum wage. Hang around your neck 40 or even 20 million people tolerate their Wishlist and restore order does not want and can not nobody. Simply do not have the resources, and any attempt to “invest” in Ukraine scraps (minus the territories of which wrote above) does not find understanding in the political class, from regional elites and the population of Russia. The Europeans and say nothing.

Hence a simple conclusion for those who are still in the Ukraine: run. Run while you still can.

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

WHY BALTIC REMOVAL FROM RUSSIA CAUSED Russians have a sigh of relief?

1314706693_0238.250x200 (324x200, 14Kb)

The answer to the question: Why the Baltic disconnection from Russia in the decay of the Soviet Union was a good sign for the Russians themselves and made them a sigh of relief, as if he were finally dropped from the back of a bag full of heavy stones …

Average wages Baltic workers and engineers from the late 40’s and up to the 90th was doubled, and almost three times as higher than in the Russian Federation and Belarus. A collective farmers and state farm workers the difference reaches three times. It is also significant that in the 40-60-ies in the Baltic kolkhoz passport is not seized, as in most Soviet republics.

Not Kaliningrad, namely, Latvian, Estonian and Lithuanian ports were the main western sea gate of the Soviet Union. Built back in the Soviet era ports continue to generate revenue Baltic countries.

In 70-80s to these ports were laid pipelines. Highways in the Baltic States were also at altitude. Their quality is ranked first in the USSR. Second place goes to Western Ukraine, the third – the South Caucasus. RSFSR was 12-13 th place.

We now turn to statistics. Let’s start with a comparison of capital investments. For example, the Lithuanian SSR received capital investment arable area of ​​1 hectare is 3.5 times more than these investments averaged for the Soviet Union. In 1987, the energy capacity for acreage in Lithuania were 2.2 times higher than in the RSFSR, in Latvia – 2.08, and in Estonia – 2.3 times. In this case, if someone believes that Tallinn, Riga and Vilnius were able to implement such energy supply agriculture at the expense of purely republican means that such a person is far from the truth. Union center was distributing fertilizers for agricultural land in such a way that the Lithuanian, Latvian and Estonian SSR fell to 155 kg, 196 kg and 209 kg per hectare of arable 1 respectively, but had to settle for the RSFSR 32.9 kilograms per 1 ha of arable land.
Immediately after the end of the Great Patriotic War, melioration touched 80% of farmland Baltic. Comparable to land reclamation in the whole of the USSR. All-union measure does not go to any comparison with the Baltic. It is only about 7%. As they say, feel the difference. Since the Soviet “invaders” -melioratory “committed atrocities” in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, actually turning the land into a sample of fertility throughout Eastern Europe.
In 1988, the average Latvians, Lithuanians and Estonians consumed per year of meat and meat products 84, 85 and 90 kg, respectively. On average, the Soviet Union, the figure was less than 64 kg. Consumption of milk and dairy products: Lithuania – 438 kg / person per year, Latvia – 471 kg / person per year, Estonia – 481 kg / person per year. The average for the USSR – 341 kg / person per year. In this case, the state budget of the USSR for the elimination of purchase and retail prices for the agricultural sector of the Baltic states is also allocated multimillion-dollar (for the – Soviet money) subsidies. It turns out that for the year the average Soviet citizen ate approximately 20-25 kg of meat and drink 100 liters of milk and dairy products is less than the average Baltic states.

Already in the mid-1950s, Latvia and Estonia became “standard” material well-being in the USSR. In 1961, the share of national income per inhabitant in Estonia was 720 rubles., In Latvia – 717 rubles. Given that the average all-union rate was 547 rubles (Russia – 598 rubles., Ukraine – 559, Lithuania – 489). But there was also the construction of housing, industrial, educational and medical institutions. Was developed processing industry. And all this for a considerable percentage of financed from the Union byudzheta.A here retail prices, electricity tariffs, transportation, rent and other prices in the Baltic (and Caucasus!) Republics were often two times lower than in the Russian Federation and Belarus.

All three “Baltic Sisters” received huge for these days and the cost of financial subsidies from Moscow. It should be noted that Moscow itself willingly went to the Baltic financial assistance, trying by all means to tighten its economy to the level of, for example, neighboring Finland. Like, a showcase of the USSR should look spectacular. And it looked the same.

 

“North fist” against the United States Russia: Kaliningrad and the threat of nuclear forces.

Leonid Nersisian

After the beginning of the crisis Ukrainian stream anti-Russian propaganda in the world reached a magnitude since the Soviet Union. But if in most EU countries are relatively neutral forces calling for reconciliation, the Nordic countries and the Baltic line towards Russia as much as possible radical and destructive. In these countries, the US influence is constantly growing: in the Baltic Independent States is no longer quite as well in Scandinavia process actively goes in the same direction. Interestingly, of the four Nordic countries (otnesёm them and Finland – it does not always appear in this geographical concept) NATO includes only Norway and Denmark, and Sweden and Finland until adhere to non-aligned status, at least in words. Nevertheless, the wave of anti-Russian hysteria and the militarization of engulfing and these two states.

In the course is disinformation and lies at the highest level: that only cost the story of the Russian nuclear submarine allegedly swim in Swedish territorial waters. But that’s why it took a heavy missile submarines there to swim and how such an object could be missed, no one answered – irresponsibility in politics is now in vogue. Norway is generally constantly pours “crocodile tears” – drawing attention to the flights of Russian strategic aviation (which, incidentally, never violate any boundaries), and most recently put forward a ridiculous assumption that Russian research vessels “spies” for them, Located in a former submarine base Olavsvern. Base, the authorities in Norway a few years ago sold themselves as the cost of its operation was huge, and large military sense it was not – in the war with Russia alone will not save it, though, and really is a powerful refuge for submarines, and the global conflict underwater part of the Navy (Navy) Norway is negligible force – only six diesel-electric submarines class Ula.

Rhetoric in Denmark and Finland is not that hard, and the number of absolutely obvious misinformation voiced by officials, much less. But we of the words. And the actions are no different – Denmark has already agreed to take part in the formation of European missile defense system (Euro-ABM), and Finland is actively developing its interaction Armed Forces (AF) with the armies of other Nordic and Baltic countries (especially Sweden) and, of course, with the US Armed Forces .

Military tandem Sweden – Finland

Most actively goes establish the military tandem Sweden – Finland, and although the intention to establish a military alliance with the participation of these countries have been officially denied, in fact, the opposite occurs. Countries expressed their willingness to establish joint land and naval brigade, and in late March held joint exercises of the Air Force (IAF). They also attended the US Air Force who flew into Estonian Amari airfield. Moreover – Air Force integration of the two countries will continue to grow – instead of 62 aging American fighter F / A-18 is going to Finland to buy or Swedish SAAB JAS-39 Gripen new modification or French Dassault Rafale, moreover most likely choice will fall on “Swedes”. In both cases, the interaction of the Air Force will grow significantly, and in the case of the purchase of JAS-39 will peak – even weapons and spare parts will be unified.

Now, the key challenge for the United States in this area is drawing these countries into NATO. Population of states actively preparing for it – in the case of another escalation of Ukrainian conflict, the entry of Sweden and Finland in NATO could be a matter of time.

Baltic bridgehead

Active placement of US troops on the territory of Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia, as well as going there permanently NATO exercises indicate that these three countries will lay a foundation for NATO forces, including aviation Scandinavian countries. The geographical location of these countries can simultaneously apply a blow out in the direction of the Kaliningrad region surrounded by NATO and in the direction of Leningrad and Pskov regions. The armed forces themselves Baltic countries is extremely weak and few – in the amount they can only put about 23 thousand soldiers, it does not boast any significant amount of military equipment, and the Air Force in these countries are virtually absent. So that the main role of these states – become a springboard for NATO troops and the battlefield – not the most promising prospects, but it can not be interested in anti-national authorities of these countries, “dancing to the tune of” overseas “ally”.

Norway: Arctic Oil bait

Among the Scandinavian countries, Norway is different, perhaps, the highest degree of anti-Russian hysteria. And unlike the Baltic states – there is also a substrate material – namely Arctic oil reserves, which the Norwegians have serious types, however, as we are. It is applied to pressure from the US, leading to a unique “resonance”. In addition, Americans can “warm up” the Arctic appetite Norwegians, killing two birds with this – creating a new enemy for Russia and increasing its supply of arms. Thus, Norway is in a kind of “trap”, which is based her own energy ambitions. With regard to purely military component – that Norway is strong for its Air Force and Navy, as well as a high level of training soldiers. Very soon will begin deliveries of American fighters 5th generation F-35, which will be purchased in the amount of 52 units, in addition to (and in the future – for replacement) to 57 F-16s.

“North fist” against Russia

As we can notice, the above countries increasingly militarized and unite around an anti-Russian ideology. Under the auspices of the US military formed a kind of “fist” threatening the north-western borders of Russia. What forces and in what areas can be brought against the Russian Federation, these states?

1) Powerful air grouping capable of acting from Murmansk to Kaliningrad region – the entire length of the conventional front lines. In total it includes nearly 300 fighters – 62 F-18s, 134 JAS-39 Gripen and 102 F-16s. All planes of easy class, but a good level and in a very serious amount.

2) Two naval force – the first in the “Northern Seas” (North, Norwegian, Barents), represented mainly by the Norwegian Navy. It includes 5 frigates type Fridtjof Nansen, equipped with anti-ship missiles (ASM) Naval Strike Missile and combat information and control system Aegis, 6 missile boats Skjold type with the same rockets and 6 type diesel submarines Ula.

The second – in the Baltic Sea, represented the Navy Finland, Sweden and Denmark. Here, the battle can be thrown: 5 Danish frigates with US Harpoon anti-ship missiles and a good air defense system; 5 Swedish diesel-electric submarines with torpedoes and 9 corvettes with RCC RBS-15, 5 of which class Visby, created by technology “Stealth”; 8 Finnish missile boats with RCC RBS-15 (maximum launch range of 200 km), mine-layers 6 and 13 minesweepers.

3) The Army – Danish forces here, we will not consider because they are geographically more “detached” from the scene. Finland, Sweden and Denmark in the sum can put 31,000 soldiers, 284 German Leopard 2 and about 1,000 units of various artillery. More 23000, however, very much least to start with technology, have the Baltic countries. As you can see, the land forces – the most weak point of these countries.

In addition, there is the American presence in the Baltic States – while small, only a few dozen pieces of equipment and several hundred military personnel, who have officially arrived at the doctrine, but there is not much in a hurry to go back to the US.

Kaliningrad region – the purpose №1

Kaliningrad region, located virtually surrounded by NATO forces, due to the presence of only land borders with Poland and Lithuania is the most vulnerable target for a potential enemy. Already Lithuania often arranges problems in moving goods on its territory, it is theoretically possible to complete the land blockade, as well as energy.

Russian forces stationed in the Kaliningrad region, not very large, but actively rearming, for example, in 2012 there were the most advanced anti-aircraft missile systems S-400. However, a small number of troops – about 10 thousand people.

Simultaneously from Poland and the Baltic States in the fight can be thrown up to 80 thousand troops – and that without US support. Force “North fist” can be a powerful air support for ground forces by Polish and try to create a naval blockade of Kaliningrad. Resist this attempt to take full siege in Kaliningrad is the Baltic Fleet of the Russian Navy – his forces are roughly equal the combined forces of the Navy “Northern fist”: 2 destroyers Project 956, 2 modern patrol ship project 11540 (built using the technology of “Stealth”), 4 patrol boats 20380, 12 missile boats, 3 diesel-electric submarines. All these ships are armed with anti-ship missiles of various types, most of which outperforms the Scandinavian and American RCC. So that the victory in this confrontation is more dependent on the level of training of the crew and third-party factors such as intelligence, etc.

The task of the Armed Forces in the event of such an aggressive attempt to take the Kaliningrad region should be an early break through a land corridor through Latvia and Lithuania – there may be something to try to prevent ground forces and aviation Sweden, Norway and Finland, by linking part of the forces of the Western military district (ZVO) in Leningrad region . Of course, the secondary cooling power, which is concentrated to 40% of the personnel of the Armed Forces, is incomparably more powerful, but nevertheless forces “Northern fist” can buy time until the arrival of reinforcements from Western Europe and the United States.

Limited nuclear conflict

Is this realistic scenario of a major European war in the presence of large arsenals of strategic and tactical nuclear weapons from the opposing sides? If the main “battleground” will be the same the Baltic States, Poland, Belarus, Ukraine, Finland, Norway – ie non-nuclear states, it is real. Nuclear strikes will not be applied by states possessing them. Nevertheless, in this scenario, the use of tactical nuclear weapons is little doubt – this is especially important for us, as the number of NATO armies superior to our several times almost all indicators. As a result – the losers in such a war will be precisely those countries that are now the most stand up for the fight against Russia. And the winners will not be in it – both camps will have destroyed hundreds of thousands of soldiers and military equipment destroyed mountains. Nevertheless humanity, as history shows, can not long exist without wars – and their not in Europe (large) since 1945. How many more years of nuclear weapons can deter aggression and hatred? It is clear that the war would be burned in Europe in March, 2014, if not for this constraint.

Conclusions and prospects

1) “Northern Fist” is really formed. Its purpose is yet geopolitical pressure on Russia and endangering the Kaliningrad region.

2) groups of troops in Kaliningrad should be maintained as far as combat-ready state, its number, if possible, should be increased.

3) the United States by creating a “mini” military unit in Scandinavia and the Baltics more compressible ring of military encirclement of Russia.

4) Norway, despite its ambition, is still far from being able to compete with Russia in the Arctic. Russian Northern Fleet is a serious power with which it is impossible to compete with 6 diesel submarines, several frigates and missile boats. In Russia there are 45 submarines, including 23 nuclear power, aircraft carrier “Admiral Kuznetsov”, heavy nuclear cruiser “Peter the Great” and many other ships.

5) In addition to geopolitical reasons and the US struggle with Russia, there is a much more urgent task – to get to work on the military-industrial complex “fullest”, despite the economic problems in most European countries. Now, even conditionally poor Baltic states start to allocate any money for the purchase of military equipment.

6) The Great War in Europe can still occur – the voltage level at some point really close to critical. And the presence of a large number of weapons and active preparations for war can cause extra confidence.

7) The next step is to expand the project can become a European missile defense interceptors accommodation in Scandinavia. Missile defense system GMD (Ground-based Midcourse Defence) will be able to intercept part of Russian intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), flying over the North Pole to the United States. And most importantly, to intercept them before breeding fighting units – in fact most of the modern Russian ICBM has multiple warheads. Such an alignment is quite possible after 2020, when it will be implemented by the present stage of European missile defense and would be “brought to mind» GMD. The temptation to foment war after such a step would be, of course, even higher.

8) The countries included in this new anti-Russian bloc, are not beneficiaries – rather, it, in which case, have the worst of all, since it is they who will be the battleground. Prior to the United States, as before, far away.

9) All countries that are close to Russia and hosts the elements of the US missile defense must be notified at the highest level that they will be the very first target for the strategic nuclear forces of the Russian Federation, and they do not get security, and vice versa – a mortal danger. The application must not be at the level of ambassador, as was done in Denmark, and at the highest. The population of these countries needs to know what their governments are solutions.

 

 

 

 

NATO barely restrained !

НАТО еле сдерживается. Столтенберг заподозрил Россию в стремлении восстановить систему сфер влияния
Stoltenberg suspected Russia in an effort to restore the system of spheres of influence.
On the eve of the 66th anniversary of the founding of NATO, which falls on April 4, its current secretary general Jens Stoltenberg spoke in Brussels to MEPs. Spoke mostly about the further development of cooperation between the EU and NATO. But turned his attention to Russia. 

First of all, according to the German business newspaper Handelsblatt, Stoltenberg reassured overly impressionable allies on the block relative to the “Russian threat.” Stating that at present does not come from Moscow no threat to one NATO member country. Because, in the words of NATO Secretary General, “we were able to make a proper deterrence.” But he did not like that the Russian side is trying to restore a system in which the world is divided into spheres of influence. 

“We are opposed to this, as each country is sovereign. And you have to respect the sovereignty and territorial integrity of all States “- quoted by Interfax Stoltenberg. 

How do we relate to such accusations? And that, in fact, does not suit the head of the Alliance? 

– Statement Stoltenberg can be interpreted as anything – said department head of the regional policy of the Institute of Public Administration and Management RANHiGS the Russian president, Doctor of Political Sciences Vladimir Stoll. – But, apparently – and this is no novelty – NATO Secretary General well when the world is under the influence of only the Americans and the North Atlantic Alliance. When there is no competition on the horizon.

Prior to 1991, the world was divided into spheres of influence. That is, until the collapse of the Soviet Union and went into oblivion Warsaw Pact countries as competing or opposing military-political organization in relation to the North Atlantic Treaty. 

In 1991, the confrontation ended. West – in the euphoria. He is represented by the United States dominates absolutely everywhere. Most experts then agree that the collapse of the bipolar system will lead to a “pink-pacifist” state in world politics – when there will be no wars, no confrontations, no spheres of influence. Everything will be fine … 

“SP”(“Svobodnaja Pressa”-A free press): – Did not work out? 

– Peace was not sure. If we recall this period, starting from the very first military operation – “Desert Storm” in 1991, on what is called a train stop at all stops. 

Here we can recall the Yugoslav tragedy involving the Alliance. By the way, was the first time in Europe, NATO troops were present in the territory of a sovereign at the time of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. And it was ok in terms of Western logic. Then there were Afghanistan, again Iraq, Syria, Libya … And that everyone liked. When Russia began to show some signs of independence in the middle of the “zero” (a kind of watershed here as it is Putin’s Munich speech in 2007 at the International Conference on Disarmament) – is our partners actively dislike this. 

That is, when we are “white and fluffy”, all is well. When the Russian army destroyed his hands, in fact, as the Russian leadership under the guise of the so-called reform of the armed forces – that’s good. When there is awareness of national interests – West outraged. With that, he says, every sovereign country should have its own national interests.

“SP”: – Ordinary double standards … 

– Of course. If, for example, take the military doctrine of the United States, there in black and white that the national interests of the United States of America – everywhere. Around the world. That is, the Americans have such a right. No one else such or similar rights can not be. 

Regarding the current situation, I have the impression that since 1991, when the USSR collapsed and ceased to exist a block of the Warsaw Pact, the Alliance for a while was looking for causes and reasons for its preservation. Because logically, if the missing main opponent, then NATO, it would seem, we must cease to exist. Since the external enemy, opponent, rival – somehow it can be called – was gone. However, this did not happen. Moreover, there is a certain transformation conceptually structures and NATO command. And today we have what we have. 

“SP”: – What exactly has changed? 

– Alliance began to behave more actively after the adoption of the end of 2010 at the Lisbon Summit the new strategic concept of the block. Defense, peacekeeping and security – that’s like three postulates on which the activities of the North Atlantic Treaty today. Moreover, the entire activity of NATO after 2010 moved as close to the Russian border. 

Active NATO’s eastward expansion since 1991 has led to the fact that if, prior to 1991, there were 16 countries in the Alliance, but today they have become 28. And it’s not only the former socialist countries, but, most worryingly, the former Soviet republics. And it’s not just about the Baltics. In preparing to join the Alliance Ukraine, Moldova, Georgia.

Therefore, the current secretary general rhetoric remains the same – this is a confrontation. But the paradox of this policy lies in the fact that virtually no serious international problem of NATO today is not able to resolve without Russia.
This is connected with the threats that originate from the so-called “Islamic State” *. This is the current situation in Africa, in particular in Nigeria. This Afghanistan after the withdrawal of the Americans and NATO troops. This is generally the entire Middle East and Central Asia, and many other areas where experience shows that without the alliance with Russia a practical solution to any global issues is simply impossible. 

According to head of the department for European Security, Institute of Europe, the candidate of economic sciences Dmitry Danilov, the theme of spheres of influence – in a Western interpretation of zones of influence – totally new: 

– It is a traditional thesis, which rises when the criticism towards Russia increased – during the crisis of relations between the West and Russia. It is clear that the current Ukrainian crisis is largely the result of the fact that Russia and the West have not been able to agree on so-called common spaces. What was said in the context of space “from Vancouver to Vladivostok”, “from the Atlantic to the Pacific”, etc … 

Clearly, Europe increasingly divided into two parts. One Europe, which is concentrated around the Euro-Atlantic institutions and NATO. Moreover, institutions expanding … 

And another Europe, the center of which is Russia. Which tries to formulate his own philosophy of integration, the Eurasian integration. But in the context of, shall we say, increasing the fault passing in Europe – in Ukraine. 

So when Stoltenberg speaks of spheres of influence, there is, in fact, there is a substitution of concepts. In Russia, there are not only the specific interests of the former Soviet Union, but also its own responsibilities in this area.

Stoltenberg in this case replaces the notion – he talks about spheres of influence. Then how to talk about the area of ​​interest. On special interests of Russia in the post-Soviet space, in the first place. And the scope of responsibility. 

“SP”: – This is the reason of differences between the West and Russia today? 

– I would say, fundamental differences. The danger is that if Stoltenberg repeats these formulas and talks about Russia’s attempts to formulate a national strategy in terms of spheres of influence, which means that organizations such as NATO would have to look for relevant answers. Therefore can not be considered his words only political and diplomatic rhetoric. Such definitions largely lay coordinate system, which will be built in the near term Western policy. Including policies and conceptual installation of NATO. 

And since this way, Russia would be very strange excuses and say that we are not talking about some spheres of influence, and so on … After all well aware that in this case the problem is reduced not only to increased geopolitical rivalry Russia and the West. First of all, the post-Soviet space. We are talking about a serious geopolitical confrontation with all its consequences, with all the components of this collision. Someone might call it “the new edition of the Cold War.” Someone might say that until this matter has not yet reached. But de facto we are talking about a serious geopolitical impact, the return to a relationship of mutual deterrence.

“SP”: – How long? 

– It depends on how Russia and the West will be able to (or try to) go back into the European mainstream. And this, in turn, can only be done on the basis of the settlement of the Ukrainian crisis, where Russia and the West are the main actors who have to negotiate. 

Now, if we (I mean the whole Greater Europe) will continue to think in terms of spheres of influence and accuse the partner that he is acting exactly in this paradigm, then, on this basis is unlikely to be something to negotiate. Especially that one of the components (and this is very important) the normalization of relations is just thawing of relations between Russia and NATO. But if Stoltenberg will repeat the formula, which he said in Brussels that there will be serious obstacles to the establishment of our relationship.

Today launched the mechanism of the collapse of oil and the dollar !

Сегодня был запущен механизм крушения нефте-доллара

No wonder the last US presidential herself Jen Psak constantly confused in their statements of Iraq and Iran – is even symbolic. Smashed Iraq and roll in the dust of Libya, the Americans stumbled on Syria and Iran on rasshibut your stars and stripes forehead.
We have already talked to you about that after the abolition of the Bretton Woods agreement might actually hold the US currency on world petroleum contracts denominated in US dollars. This allows you to print uncontrollably America green pieces of paper and throw them into the world, creating inflation and export rich, in fact, at the expense of the rest of humanity, including us swami. And anyone who tries, not even fight, but at least get out of this system, America punishes quickly and mercilessly.

Let me remind you the story.
After September 11, Iraq, going to abandon dollar in oil contracts, was declared a threat to the free world. Probirochka with baby powder, demonstrated by Colin Powell at the UN meeting, served as a pretext to invade a sovereign Middle Eastern country, the execution of its president, Saddam Hussein, the installation of absolute democracy” and the selection of the main prize – the Iraqi oil fields.

Weapons of mass destruction in Iraq has not been found. But it is not played absolutely no role. As the saying goes: “The war is over Thank you all.”

In 2011, Colonel Muammar Gaddafi, who liked to put their tents in front of the UN headquarters in New York, also announced its intention to sell Libyan oil exclusively for the euro and gold. Immediately becoming shake hands with a dictator and oppressor of democracy, Gaddafi was the Libyan revolution, civil war and NATO intervention was brutally murdered.

Following undemocratic, from the US perspective, the state oil became Syria. Although Assad and is not intended to collapse the petrodollar, there was another reason. And away on thumb scheme – a charge of genocide Bashar al-Assad of the Syrian people, the armed opposition, the attempt of the revolution, the preparation of the intervention of NATO forces But (!)
At this time found the man who would not let the black holder of the Nobel Peace Prize in dust roll another Middle Eastern country in the name of democracy. In 2013, a Russian naval force in the Mediterranean Sea for the first time exceeded in size and combat power similar rates of NATO forces in the region. Since mid-January 2014 the Syrian port of Tartus, where the Russian naval base, were delivered radar equipment for surveillance and electronic warfare as well as private goods. An-124 transferred armored vehicles, spare parts for helicopters, guided air bombs and drones (Reuters). According to anonymous sources in Syria were delivered S-300. The use of the waters of the Mediterranean Sea to organize the invasion of Syria was impossible as it was in the case of Libya, or, at least, conjugate with huge losses because the entire Syrian coastline received a powerful cover.
At the same time, Putin has made a peace initiative on the Syrian issue. And Negro peacekeeper was forced to agree with her. The intervention did not take place.

However, already 27 March 2014 with the participation of US military advisers from Turkey was an attempt to capture part of the coastline of Syrian territory. Detachments of radical extremist Islamist group AlNusra Dzhabgat” with the support of the Turkish artillery and engage Turkish armored vehicles, made the invasion of the border town of Kasab. The operation was access to the coast and take control of the province of Al Ladhiqiyah springboard for the organization that provides the beginning of the offensive along the coastline and take it under control.

This adventure was also failed. During the week, the Syrian army troops completely cleared the militants from the specified area. At an emergency meeting convened by the UN Security Council the United States refrained from official condemnation of terrorists.

At this point, has already happened Crimea and the geopolitical situation in the world has deteriorated. There was a question of anti-Russian sanctions and the US have taken here knight’s move” – lifted sanctions against Iran perennial. It was the first attempt to collapse in oil prices for the purpose of economic pressure on Russia. Although still a couple of months before Obama has threatened to “bring down a pile of bricks on the offender Iranian sanctions.” For many years, Iran has suffered sanctions because of its nuclear program and he had nothing to answer them. Now Negro seemed that he makes himself a loyal Hassan Rouhani and will increase the influence through the south-western Asia. But here he is, as it turned out, already late

Again, it was ahead of the very nosy man” to establish close contact with Iran during its international isolation. He has made the conclusion with the countries of the Caspian region agreement on the neutral status of the Caspian Sea, which made it impossible for the proposed accommodation transshipment NATO base in the Kazakh port of Aktau, and hence the potential threat of Iran on the Caspian Sea. An agreement on military-technical cooperation between Moscow and Tehran. And also signed a contract for the import of Iranian oil to Russia in the amount of 500 thousand. Barrels per day than Rouhani had strong support.

Why buy Russian oil? It would seem more stupid to come up with anything. Time has shown that the action man” turned out to be a very loyal and visionary.

Today, when Iran did not lie down under the America that counted on black again we were talking by the Western democracies about weapons of mass destruction, but in Iran (!) Against this background, we obtain two interesting events.

First – visit Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu to Iran, after which we learn about the resumption of negotiations on the delivery of this country … what do you think? The complex C-300. And here it should be noted that immediately after Iran Shoigu went to India

Second. But the second will make the Negro has to worry seriously.
Yesterday, Iran’s foreign minister made a loud statement that: “All hopes for a deal on the nuclear program will disappear if the US Congress will vote for new sanctions against his country.”
And today, 24 January 2015. at 14:28 Moscow agency “Itar-Tass” reported that Iran cease the use of the US dollar for payments in transactions with foreign countries. In particular: In foreign trade in contracts will now be used other currencies, including the yuan, the euro, the Turkish lira, Russian ruble and the South Korean won,” – said the agency Tasneem Deputy Director of the Central Bank, Gholam Ali Kamyab. And the main thing here that oppose this decision has nothing to America – Iran sells its oil to Russia!

Let me remind you, Russia has already moved to calculations by hydrocarbon contracts in rubles with a number of countries. China – the largest of them. But Iran is today the only state oil exporter, officially completely eliminate the use of the US dollar for international settlements. And something tells me that the IraqiLibyan scenario here is not to be held, it is not held in Syria.

Yes, remember the three paragraphs above I mentioned Shoigu visit to India? I think India is on the waiting list

SOURCE

http://imperiya.by/news.html?id=155182

Philip Giraldi: US is not worth the risk to go to war with Russia.

The US has a lot of chances to play in this war if Russia will play tit for tat” strategy by symmetric responses to rebuff overt and covert attacks on its economy, I’m sure the ex-CIA officer.

Президент России Владимир Путин и президент Соединенных Штатов Америки Барак Обама. Архивное фото

MOSCOW, December 9 RIA Novosti. The flow of anger directed at Russia by the US Congress and the White House with the help of leading media, unreasonable and official Washington should review their mistakes and to back until they are brought up to the current crisis situation that would entail catastrophic consequences for all parties involved, says Philip Giraldi, a former CIA officer, is the executive director of the Council of national interests, writes the American analytical magazine The American Conservative.

In the good old days of the Cold War, says Giraldi, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) was ready to do everything conceivable and inconceivable, in order to discredit the Soviet Union. CIA regularly placed in the friendly US media articles about human rights violations in the Soviet Union, sponsored dissident movements like “Solidarity” through front Russian companies introduce technologies that contribute to malfunction conveyor assembly lines for the production and so on. There was a real war, though latent.

After more than 20 years after the collapse of the Soviet Union are many indications that Washington slips into a new completely unnecessary confrontation with Moscow. Only this time it is not “in control” of the CIA, the article says.

Unlike the Cold War with the Soviet Union, according to a former CIA officer, when the operation to discredit and weaken the enemy and were hidden from the development stage to realize their lead CIA, today the majority of new conflicts are conducted openly. Sanctions are imposed, Congress makes statements and adopts resolutions, senior State Department official policy and is regularly visited by unstable regions, hosts a variety of workshops in new media by political organizations funded kvazinekommercheskimi organizations like the National Endowment for Democracy” (the National Endowment for Democracy (NED).

All accusations against Moscow over the Crimea and its policy towards Ukraine throw all and sundry on the forums on the foreign policy. Even if someone sincerely believes that Vladimir Putin is a terrible villain who wants to get their hands on Eastern Europe, it must recognize that the arguments should be weightier slogans with bumper stickers.” And it is this, and is now yuongress and the White House.

In all of this, it is important to note that Moscow has legitimate concerns about threats to its national security, which entails a further expansion of NATO, in particular the latest crude attempt to drive in Kiev “western circle of like-minded people.” In addition, Russia and the Crimea bind the strong historical ties and interests of national security, says a former employee of the CIA.
Здание Конгресса США в Вашингтоне

However, Congress took the path of a further escalation of tensions with Moscow and adopted a resolution HR 758, which, in effect, only added fuel to the fire. It accused Russia in all the most grievous sins. The resolution also calls on President Barack Obama to give the green light for the supply of lethal weapons Kiev, as well as provide military experts and soldiers for the preparation of the Ukrainian army.

“If you ask, what does the US have to relations between Russia and Ukraine, you will be told that Russia’s interest in Ukraine threatens international peace and security” – says Philip Giraldi.

The author believes that many of the accusations against Moscow over its bad behavior would have sounded more credible if they were brought against Washington, who leads a secret war on the global currency markets and against the Russian corporations.

He also notes that even if the sanctions will be strengthened, Moscow will not back down from the Ukraine, because it is a vital interest of Russia.

The US has a lot of chances to play in this war if Russia will play tit for tat” strategy by symmetric responses to rebuff overt and covert attacks on its economy.

Russia is actively cooperating with the US and EU in tracking financial flows to terrorist groups and drug cartels, but now she feels that the West intends to act against its financial institutions and the economy as a whole.

In addition, Russia can answer the US close cooperation with Iran, Syria and North Korea. It can get out of the sanctions against Tehran and start buying Iranian oil, with the same success it can begin to supply arms to Damascus, including air defense system that can not miss in the Syrian airspace single American aircraft. Moscow also can weaken the restrictions on trade with North Korea. At the UN, Russia could with equal success to block all US initiatives.

Use of overt and covert means to drive Russia into a corner from which it can not escape – not smart politics. According to Ron Paul: Do it, then start a war.”

According to former CIA officer, is not wise to provoke powerful enemy if vital national interests are not at stake, and Ukraine and Crimea are not among them. The consequences of inciting conflict can be devastating for all of its participants.

Stop Frau Merkel !

Остановить фрау Меркель. Влиятельные немцы призвали канцлера Германии отказаться от антироссийского курса

Influential Germans called German Chancellor abandon anti-Russian policies.

Subject: Sanctions.

More than 60 influential European politicians and public figures signed a declaration entitled “A new war in Europe? Not in our name “, which was sent to the federal government of Germany, the members of the Bundestag and the largest media Germany. The authors call for treatment Berlin to take on an important mission and begin the process of detente in relations with Russia.

The declaration states that in 1990 the society had hoped that the confrontation of East and West came to an end, and soon established a “new European order of peace and security from Vancouver to Vladivostok“, “common European home”. But politicians quickly forgotten about the need to abandon war as a method of solving conflicts” and now in Europe, people are afraid again.

In the opinion of those who signed the appeal, and among them, the former German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder, former German Interior Minister Otto Schily, the head of the Eastern Committee of German Economy Eckhard Cordes, cosmonaut Sigmund Jahn, Dutch film director Wim Wenders and others, now the West is trying to “oust Russia of Europe “, which is contrary to history and dangerous for the world. After all, “since the days of the Congress of Vienna in 1814, Russia is one of the fundamental European countries“, and “all those who tried to force change this state of affairs, suffered a bloody failure“, including Hitler’s Germany.

The authors of the declaration indicate that NATO’s eastward expansion without deepening the dialogue with Moscow understandably causes concerns Russia. “The need for security is a Russian legal and as serious as that of the Germans, Poles, Balts and Ukrainians,” – the authors write, and as an example of “aggressive expansion of the Westresult in an invitation to Ukraine and Georgia into NATO in 2008. Politicians and public figures have come to the conclusion that the West needs to properly assess the gravity of the situation and resume a constructive dialogue with Russia. They also encourage the media to comply with the duty of convincing unbiased coverage of events as they often demonize whole nations without understanding their history.

In recent years, the rhetoric of Germany, which was considered the main “evroadvokatom” Russia is becoming increasingly fierce and peremptory. Hear whether Angela Merkel‘s call to review their policies?

In Germany, the first week is a discussion about how to deal with Russia as productive sanctions, in which Germany takes a leading role – says a leading researcher at the Department for European Policy Studies IMEMO, Germanic Alexander Kokeyev. There is an opinion of the government, and we must bear in mind that this is the opinion of the two largest parties of Germany: CDU / CSU coalition with the Social Democrats (though the latter in favor of a softer policy toward Russia).

But there is a certain amount of pressure on the government from different circles. This declaration is presented, for example, former Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder, who was appointed to one of the leading positions in the company, which is close to “Gazprom”. His friendly relations with our President. Merkel does not support this so-called “friendship sauna.”

Was named Cordes, industry representatives. Big business in Germany, firms such as Siemens, Adidas, BMW, Daimler-Benz and many other sanctions are concerned, as they bring them substantial losses. The list is also present Shealy, representatives of “green” and just people who pay attention to the fact that the sanctions do not give the West in ideological terms. Russia, by contrast, is increasingly rallying around the president, in the country there are anti-Western sentiment, which only aggravated by the sanctions. Therefore, there are voices and there are letters.

“SP”: How big is the value of such appeals, is there a chance to be heard?

I think it’s important. Germany – a country with the most extensive connections with Russia, which she in general, does not want to break. Yes, government support sanctions. But it must be emphasized that both the government and Merkel, and especially Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier advocated that the dialogue with Russia will not tear, to continue to use all possible diplomatic means. They are opposed to squeeze Russia out of the negotiation process, but at the same time in favor of retaining the sanctions because, in their view, Russia has committed illegal acts.

But, again, there is an opposite point of view. Is there a US pressure? Of course there is. But I would not be so exaggerated. With all the pressure of Germany, along with France during the American invasion of Iraq refused to participate. Unfortunately, now is not the only pressure, but also that the interests and views of the Allies on the Euro-Atlantic bloc largely coincide. Of course, such treatment of the public, where there is a major political figures and representatives of big business to play a role in the fact that Germany tries to not only maintain but also expand the dialogue.

“SP”: – Can Germany and the West to compromise, for example, in the expansion of NATO to the East?

In principle, it is possible. After the Georgian-Ossetian war Berlin, for example, took the position that we should not rush and promise of Georgia‘s membership in NATO. And even today, leading to the policy of sanctions Germany clearly says that Russia needs to be explained: the West is not ready to accept Ukraine into NATO. Another thing that is meant to NATO, saying safeguards.

Very often recall a conversation Helmut Kohl and Mikhail Gorbachev, when Russia allegedly promised not to expand NATO to the East. I will say, as a political scientist: these promises do not exist. Kohl promised to make this request, Gorbachev said that NATO is its understanding. But NATO can not promise anyone anything. The Union is founded on the fact that if someone wants to be a member, the entry ban for relations with third countries, the Alliance can not. If the country will ask NATO membership will be a question on how she is ready for it. Georgia is not ready because it has an internal conflict. Ukraine certainly not ready, there are fights, it still considers its Crimea. On its accession to NATO in the foreseeable future, even out of the question.

“SP”: And in the future be?

In the process of NATO enlargement Russia’s interests must be taken into account. Initially, it was a requirement that the Alliance is not approaching our borders. But he approached and extended. Now the West clearly understands that Russia pressed and under pressure, and that Ukraine may take the unit. Therefore, in the West say they are not ready to join her. In this regard, it was Germany, not the US or weakened France, with all the complexities of the current relationship remains our main partner. Germany’s role in the world in recent years has increased very much. Therefore, Russia is also trying to identify their position. Characteristically, President Putin in his message to the Federal Assembly said “our European friends” and not simply “the European countries.” Russia remains ready to consider them as friends if they are willing to consider our interests. The situation is very difficult, but there are prospects for an agreement, including on sensitive issues such as NATO enlargement is not. But no promises, no guarantees can be expected.

Director of the Center for German Studies, Institute of Europe Vladislav Belov believes that a significant part of German society shares the view expressed in the Declaration. But the government’s position does not coincide with it.

In Germany, have not conducted surveys, which were set to clear questions, not formulated in such a way as to obtain a particular response. Therefore it is difficult to say how German society supports and thinks along the same lines as the authors of the appeal. To some extent you can judge by the blogs and comments to articles. It seems to me that the majority of the discussion participants, in general, agree with this view. Not accidentally closed the Süddeutsche Zeitung comments on articles related to Russian subjects.

If we talk about the official Berlin‘s position here is different. It is extremely tough and condemns Russia’s policy towards Ukraine. This is reflected not only in the criticism of Moscow and support the sanctions, but in excessive rigidity in the Russian top political leadership. While the conflict in Ukraine is not allowed, neither Angela Merkel nor her government‘s position will not change.

“SP”: – Is the German society to accept the position expressed in the declaration, or propaganda has done its job?

– German society is divided. There are actively thinking part of it on their perception of the situation closer to those who signed a petition. Declaration because seeks to strengthen the dialogue on the transition from hard-liners who preach Merkel for talks. There is a call to return the discussion platforms, which closed today an indirect criticism appeal Merkel freeze “Petersburg Dialogue”.

But there is a passive part, which is guided by a propaganda machine. This and television, and print media, which are generally very negatively disposed towards Russia and form a subjective picture, often do not match reality. That part of the society that consumes propaganda cud not accept this treatment. So far I have not seen a large number of references in the German media on this declaration. Quite possibly, it will remain unnoticed.

“SP”: In recent years, we thought our main partner of Germany in Europe. Why is the current tough stance?

This position is associated with a shock that experienced ordinary citizens and politicians in Germany on the speed with which the Crimea moved from one state to another jurisdiction. For the Germans it is unacceptable in view of their historical memory associated with the decoupling and the consequences of the Second World War. They regard the incident as an armed redistribution of boundaries. In Europe and Germany, there is no understanding of the complex processes that occurred after December 1991 is the international legal framework, since the Soviet Union collapsed outside the existing Constitution.

“SP”: The expansion of NATO to the East does not violate the international security system?

The system in general is in deep crisis. Next year marks 40 years of the Helsinki Act. Events in Ukraine became the catalyst that forces a lot of things and discuss the current situation in Europe as a whole. Such a call of politicians and public figures – a good reason to start a comprehensive discussion about the European security system, including Russia’s fears regarding NATO’s eastward expansion.

Generational theory: the world is approaching the tip of another global crisis !

 Generatsioonide teooria: maailm läheneb järjekordse globaalse kriisi tipule

Sorry,Google translation !

Authors William Strauss and Neil Howe has become known for his theory in terms of generations, the mood of the population of certain repetitive cycles. Comparing the history of the theory of these cycles can be noted that the US and the rest of the developed world is increasingly growing in the middle of the global crisis, which reaches a dangerous peak in about fifteen years.
 
In the book The Fourth Turningwrote the authors of the crisis prompted by the amount of precipitation may be something quite ordinary, such as elections or halvaendelist as the economy crashed. This, however, leads to spark a chain reaction in which the basic elements (debt, the disappearance of the middle class, global unrest) connection and lead society to the brink of rupture.
fourth Generatsioonide teooria: maailm läheneb järjekordse globaalse kriisi tipule
Masse led by an invisible government

Strauss and Howe said that the world is a major problem is that those in power to think linearly, making decisions based on their own interests, but in the belief that their actions do not have consequences and that their position does not invalidate anything. In fact, the history and the people running the mood in circular cycles, forming a pattern of a certain regularity. Those who have not taken the time to examine what the consequences of this behavior led, are now struggling with understanding the changes.

Linearly thinkers are accustomed to human advancement can be controlled by various measures, which are described by Edward Bernaysi book “Propaganda”. Namely, the organized habits and opinions of the people conscious and intelligent manipulation of an important element in democratic society. Those who run this mechanism, constitute an invisible government which actually prevails throughout the country. Prevail over the people and their opinions and shape the tastes of the people whom they themselves have never heard of, but who understand the mental processes and social patterns of the masses. This type of control is, however, important to keep a large group of people working together as a functional society.

History repeats itself, the 80-year cycle

However, now come to a new level of cycling history, with the last 70 years, the plan will be worked cracked. Through the media lying, cheating, propaganda transmission, easily available credit, the so-called cheap oil, endless commercial expansion, effortless marketing, ongoing war, the banks and large corporations, elected politicians, high-class in favor of the tax system, and lobbying by the staff of the oligarchs benefit of written laws all of these have been created check the commoners and enrich the modern aristocracy, at least for the 2008 economic crisis. Linear thinkers in government, commerce, banking and the media confirm straightforward triumph of progress, while allowing recovery from the crisis, but in reality, they deliberately ignore the evidence of the history of the situation from a different evolution because they recognize how vulnerable their positions of power.

StraussHowe theory is that history repeats itself in cycles of about 80 years a new crisis comes about 60 years after the previous approach, the crisis peak occurs around 80 years after the last peak of the crisis. Each such a turning point, however, swept away the last of the existing social order. According to this theory, the US kriisitsüklid occurred as follows: first crisis was the American War of Independence (1775-1794 took place, was the peak of the crisis year of 1781), secondly, the US Civil War (from 1861 to 1865, the peak year 1863); thirdly, the Great Depression and World War II (1929-1946 , culminated in 1944), and the fourth global economic crisis (2008 to about 2029, presumably peak of 2025).

Misleading the People’s total

In September 2008, the global economic crisis that started two decades, probably noted the length of the episode begins, whose harsh conditions become progressively worse, the closer we come to the tip of the crisis. This time, most of those in power are trying to implement all kinds of fiscal measures, valeinformeerimise organizing campaigns to keep the attention of the people dispersed and confused houses. Already have managed to convince a large part of the public at 0% interest rates, while the addition of 1 trillion dollars (per year), the already large national debt of the United States, allowing the Federal Reserve to buy Wall Street 3 trillion dollars in debt. It has, however, created a high level of inflation, energy, food, health care and student areas and the real wage decline. All of these changes are advertised as the necessary steps to normalize the situation, but in fact serve only benefit from them the most affluent.

The current state of the US economic, financial, political and legal system indicates a malfunction and does not remember a strong structure to be working properly. This fact, however, masked, and the crowd’s attention is diverted humblest problems – as long as that is not noticed how the state vaesub corporations and bankers skeemitamiste through.

Those in power have no way to sell their arguments on the development, even if the enormous amount of evidence suggests the opposite. In order given to the public’s attention to other issues such as the massacres between the parties nääklused and the constant threat of terrorism in the unseen. A large part of the population is not interested even in these issues and happy to hold it is sufficient mass culture – different contents empty televised fancy celebrity”, independent thinking and discussing foreign films cinema, an obsession with social media, the importance of rapid and short-term rewarding for fast food, etc. The world is filled with trivial problems, unintelligent käpiknukkude, clock propaganda and mindless consumption.

The problems get worse in the world

All of these measures to calm the crowd, however, at some point begin to crack. History repetition of cycles can not be stopped – the people will wake up and demand change that is reshaping the current social and economic environment.

Strauss and Howe wrote his theory in 1997, based on centuries of generations, based on the analysis of non-events, but the mood of crisis in generations, the basic elements. Even before the 2008 economic crisis in the beginning, it was clear that these basic elements – the debt, the disappearance of the middle class, and global unrest and there were ägenemas. Mass media tend to ignore these problems, showing them smaller than they actually are, but if you do a bit of research, it is clear that the problems get worse. Are struggling with debt in the United States, China and several European Union countries, trying to cope with the ever-growing credit debt, student loans, housing bubbles and oil prices.

The disappearance of the middle class does not come as a surprise, given that unemployment is a major problem in the developed countries, and more than 50% of the world’s assets is only 1% of people in. The US is a major problem in the militarization of local police stations, officials preparing for massive unrest, which alienates communities of their rulers, and the so-called defenders. Global anxiety are good examples of Hong Kong, the Middle East and held in Ukraine, as well as the direction of Japan’s more aggressive foreign policy.

Propaganda will not be able to change the course of history

Propaganda can be formed opinions, but can not change the course of history or facts. US national debt has reached a record 17.5 trillion, an increase of 2 billion a day. Consumer debt has risen to new heights, reaching 3.2 trillion. Global debt level exceeds 230 trillion dollars, accounting for 313% of the global GDP. Most of the focus of launching huge corporations earn profits. If countries are trying to solve their debt problems, allowing bankers, politicians and government bureaucrats to determine more debt, reducing interest rates to zero and to enrich the oligarchs, it all ends in disaster. People suffering must be interrupted at some point, and this may occur if the crisis worsens and people are discovering how their assets, hopes and dreams are destroyed.

Given the high percentage of the population is unemployed or working in low-paying part-time job, it is easy to understand how you can grow discontent with the current system. This is how the situation is managed anti meeleavaldamisega, 2011, showed us the Occupy Wall Street protests. Instead, in order to initiate a dialogue with the protesters, the search for solutions that would help ease the situation and take account of their voice, instead of protesters began to oppress the help of the police forces. At the same time it was shown in the media as protesters näotuid, riotously vain young people who just want to cause chaos. In the later stages of the mass media of the United States came into force at the Occupy protests in complete silence – Contribute to the fact that if they do not talk about, it is believed that no protest is taking place, and the whole business will sink into oblivion.

Fight terror waged by the people behind the mask luuratakse

In addition to public voting irregularities Edward Snowden revelations have also shown that the government does not respect people’s right to privacy, at least not if they can justify the violation of privacy, national security issues. If real, these alleged threats to people is, it let everyone decide on their own, but it is certain that the alleged terrorist threat to fight under the guise of a militarized local police forces to monitor citizens’ reluctance to come into, the spread of ideas and potential leaders of the protest.

Global unrest has reached a new level when you look at Brazil, Mexico, Hong Kong, Egypt, Spain, Greece, France and Turkey jerkily demonstrations. It is also lokkamas violence in Ukraine, Iraq and Syria. A number of armed conflicts can be blamed on the decisions of the US armed with various dictators who were useful to them at some point. There are also problems former CIA plans that have undermined the influence of various democratically elected governments. Rampant violence, however, reap the benefits of the war industry and banks can be enormous income from the sale of weapons of war will be financed through borrowing. Contributing to the war is therefore practically equal to the national debt slavery arms and dependence.

What is not discussed in the mass media

The mass media do not talk about how the United States has historically been an armed terrorists who are killing in Syria now massively both soldiers and civilians. It also ignores the fact that, under the reign of Hussein’s Iraq was a modern, stable, non-religious, the oil-producing country, which was not of Al Qaeda or crazily violence. All that changed when the US invaded a sovereign state valeettekäänetel, wasted 1 trillion dollars in state assets, killed more than 100,000 Iraqis and left tallermaaks religious violence in Iraq. Also, do not talk about how the Libya deposed former dictator auxillary leaving the country into chaos and civil war.

The world has reached a point where the heads of the various decisions have an extremely sensitive topics (debt, the disappearance of the middle class, and global anxiety) to high pressure. If the crisis worsens and reaches its peak, the world can be thrown into chaos, which hopefully will not be completed using a nuclear missile of a button. Sooner or later, the debt bubble burst in the world, which leads to the property, labor, rights, and loss of confidence. This process is triggered by the massive civil unrest, which has been quietly preparing for the years of decline of the middle class and the destruction of the current structure of society.

Where in the world are exacerbated by resource wars, religious extremism and the spread of nationalism, the global war becomes an increasing probability. Where would our world and society at the heart of this crisis is moving, it is not yet certain. This could result in a crash if the progress, but it is certain that cooperation, sharing of responsibility, bold positions of peace and co-existence, and inspired leaders are essential to survive the upcoming challenges.

Sources: The Burning Platform (longer article in English, we recommend you read!), Wikipedia.

Timeless: Michael CREMO: The human race has existed for millions of years.

michael cremo 224x300 Ajatu: Michael Cremo: Inimrass on eksisteerinud juba miljoneid aastaid

 

 

 

 

 

Under the heading ‘Timeless’ old publish articles that counting viable. The below story appeared telegrams for the first time on 3 May 2013.

Michael CREMO (64) is an archaeologist and Sanskrit texts researcher, who in 1993 published along with Richard Thompson great work Forbidden Archeology: The Hidden History of the Human Race” (Forbidden Archaeology: the human race Hidden History), whose main hypothesis is that the human race is the Earth top existed for millions of years. CREMO newest book is called “My Science My Religion(In my research, my religion). Telegram published a brief summary of the CREMO recent interview with US radio program “Coast to Coast AM“.

What do the ancient Sanskrit texts UFOs flying in the sky or on the vimana?

Vimana is known under a variety of flying machines in ancient times. Some of them were made of metal and mechanical. North Indian town called Dwarka is believed that 5000 years ago, came down from heaven, vimana, those who attacked the city a variety of weapons straight from heaven. According to Sanskrit texts, Krishna was able to shoot its vimana download vimana and crashed into the sea from the town.

Do you really believe that in ancient times there were these flying machines?

I believe the vimana was different, some were mechanical, and it seems that some of them were interdimensional – they consist of energy and were able to move through the different dimensions. These were the high level of advanced technology built vimana that our perception of reality does not seem to comprehend. The reason why I believe, lies in the fact that thousands of years old Sanskrit texts describe in detail the UFO phenomena, which we are only now beginning to recognize and understand. For example, the vimana their flight patterns are similar to today’s UFO phenomena; they move us against the known laws of physics.

One told a conference of US airline airliner pilot, how he saw the UFO flying in the direction of his tremendous speed immediately before impact and the UFO moved up sharply, the high space. Similar vimanafind descriptions of the ancient texts. They also noted the radar UFOs chaotic trajectory of the movement, and at times, they are also at the same time in different places – for us it remains unclear where the UFO is actually located. Vimana, which attacked the city of Dwarka, at times, appeared to be in different places at the same time feel the sky.

hieroplanes Ajatu: Michael Cremo: Inimrass on eksisteerinud juba miljoneid aastaid
Ancient+Airplane+Vimana+UFO+Precolumbian Ajatu: Michael Cremo: Inimrass on eksisteerinud juba miljoneid aastaid
shakuna Vimana Ajatu: Michael Cremo: Inimrass on eksisteerinud juba miljoneid aastaid
Vimana Where to go?

I guess they have not disappeared, because the UFO phenomena are reported regularly. They did not show himself to everyone, but we have a huge number of credible witnesses who have seen UFOs.

Talk about your latest book, “My Science My Religion(My research, my religion ).

This is a collection of 24 of my written research work, which I have in recent years has presented at major international conferences. Many may think that I am talking about such topics only shows like “Coast to Coast AM“, but actually I‘m talking about this phenomenon in the scientific community, and conferences.

My studies coincide in my spiritual sense and condition. There are people who think that science and spirituality should not be put together. I do not agree. I think that if we want to put together a complete picture of reality, then we must accept the truth no matter where it comes from. I put a book entitled to express it, what is my specific interest in science and spirituality against. Based on the ancient Sanskrit texts, I have created a self-perception of the real history of mankind and the extraterrestrial connection.

Have your studies you are faced with the personal beliefs of the conflict?

I every day I come in contact with new information or new people, or whoever is in my beliefs about conflict. But at the same time, I realized that if, for example, to explore what we can find in books, then we run into conflict often, but when examined all the evidence is absolutely, then the total will go to the bigger picture. When I first started in ancient Sanskrit texts, examination, you got to know that people have existed on Earth for millions of years. It was for me a big contradiction, given all this, I had not yet learned about the history of the university.

So I started to learn all the archaeological history in order to better put together a complete picture. I began to discover other sources of information that supported the Sanskrit texts. I wrote it all in her first major book “Forbidden Archeology(Forbidden Archaeology, 1993).

fa Ajatu: Michael Cremo: Inimrass on eksisteerinud juba miljoneid aastaid

 

Did after the “Forbidden ArchaeologyYou‘re appearing learned something important that at the time did not write this book?

When I Forbidden ArchaeologyI wrote, you are accepting the modern scientific ideas that anatomically modern people are a different species than the history of the famous ahvinimesed” Neanderthals, Homo erectus, etc. But today, I think quite a few of these creatures, whom we believe to be a different species, is actually just a different variety or human-called conversion.

The reason why I think, lies in the fact that anthropologists around the world are discovering the wide variety of human types, even today. We have physical evidence of life of people, some of whom skeletilised details and refer to different features of the ancient human species such as Homo erectus and Neanderthal. If we do not classify the different categories of people today, then we should not do it in the past with people. Perhaps it would be more correct to classify these subcategories.

Tell them a little work, you‘re presented at conferences.

I took the first part of a large international scientific conference in 1994 in New Delhi, India. The work, which was presented, titled “A Time In The Pranic Archeological Record” (prana time according to archaeological data), which describes the Sanskrit texts discovered in people’s existence on Earth millions of years ago. This work was also published in several scientific journals. Archaeological evidence suggests that people have been on this planet for millions of years.

If someone says to you, “Hey, leave a mess, humanity can not be that old,” then what do you say to them?

This is a very important issue. The question “Who we are and where we come from?” Puts a lot of things in place. This is our identity who I am and where I come from. Pondering on such topics helps everyone to set their objectives and goals in this life. If a person does not understand who he is and where he is, he creates for himself and for other problems. These are the topics that you have to explore all the people, not in a way that few scholars lecture somewhere in dispute over how old we are, either 100 or 000 years for millions of years.

The issue is not these specific years, but the fact that we’ve been here so long, it is wrong for our research and education seriously. Most scientists say that people are simply no material machines, which were developed during the evolution from apes themselves a few hundred thousand years. This worldview and self-identity will lead to bad implications, both individually and collectively. For thus become mere materialistlikuteks our goals in life. We are not just machines that are made of matter, but matter made by machines, which are competing with each other for survival.

All of this creates a terrible conflict, we are seeing around the world at the moment. Self-destruction of the planet and the financial crisis, the endless competition, deadly diseases, etc. – all of this because we do not know who we are and where we ourselves really old we are. If we really are so old, you must begin to rethink the origin of a person, and I believe that here in the formula fit in the non-physical elements.

smile Ajatu: Michael Cremo: Inimrass on eksisteerinud juba miljoneid aastaid

 

If we really are so old, why so much of this research has been misunderstood?

The reasons are many. One reason is certainly the fact that today’s education and research in government. Thus, only the idea of a talking point. So something‘s not possible for teachers to doubt it, otherwise they will be your job. Darwin’s theory of evolution can not be doubted! A large role in power. People who are in power do not want to abandon it for any price. Today’s theories of finance, after all, the government monopoly. Thus, they do not immediately recognize it definitely interested in that, perhaps, they are offered by the Knowledge wrong.

All sorts of alternatives is suppressed, so that people will not be able to make decisions on its head. I respect every person’s right to make their own conclusions on human pärinemisloost. But the people who run the education system does not respect this right. They think that only one person ‘origins theory must be applied. This needs to change. They also know that alternative theories are moving towards a much more spiritual.

Would come to be discussed at a higher co-participation of the human race and the creation of non-material consciousness as a part of our body. If such issues would be acceptable, then we would see a very different society than that which dominates today. We would see a society in which the balance between the spiritual and the physical reality would be more in place. People would direct their energy sources consciousness, not physical force to attempt to control the material resources and with a total of Fortunes. Of course, they want the continuation of the previous system.

Suppose that mankind is millions of years old. Have we were brought here, or we somehow evolved into yourself?

We have been here. Our bodies, whether it is the human body, plants or animal body, the soul or consciousness of all interfaces. And it is not tangible. For the soul of the body is just one interface, which they can use for the existence of the material world. Consciousness that all of our own reality, we are much older than any of the material world.

This means that we are all aliens, we are all here inseminated into the universe. We do, however, comes from the soul of immaterial reality. If we can understand this, we are able to achieve collective harmony and cease to exist in competition with various conflicting groups.

What do you think, for example, the moon could be the remnants of previous civilizations who were there before us?

I think so. The universe in which we live, is a multi-level. Here are the different energy levels. We exist at a very close and low frequency energy. We build all of our tools in the material things in large factories. But less dense and high-frequency energy is used for different machines and mental energy. Many ancient texts tell us that the moon and the planets in our solar system have a higher frequency than the Earth, but still tangible. Thus, the technology that they use is different. I think that they are gone before us, not only there, but they are there now.

But what happened to humanity, if we are so old? Have graduated from a disaster of a civilization? Something has happened, possibly even several times.

That’s it. The ancient texts say that the concept of time is cyclical. It reveals that wiped after each cycle of life on planet Earth, and life continues to go above the level of the second reality. Higher densities of physical life, however, there are creatures put on earth to walk again. It‘s like a computer for file storage in the clouds we no longer need large hard drives to keep your files, because we can also do it online within itself. If your device gets damaged, you can re-download your files. I think that the universe is similarly built.

The Sanskrit texts, according to the last 2 billion years, during six hiigelkatastroofi that all life is wiped away. And modern palaeontology says that in the last 2 billion years there has been a huge month caused the extinction event on Earth. Furthermore, it has begun a new cycle. So, if we look at ancient texts or modern science, we see strong parallels.

cremoveritasshow annunakia Ajatu: Michael Cremo: Inimrass on eksisteerinud juba miljoneid aastaid

Additional Sources: Michael CREMO website, Coast to Coast AM

 

 

 

 

China threatens the United States over the Ebola and the Islamic Threat !

Still, China.

Китай угрожает США больше Эбола и Исламской угрозы

What for so long was made silent in Washington, announced at the Center for Special Operations Command Robert Heddik.
Political weight and ambition of China are gaining momentum, and American policymakers are now required to understand that the return of China to the status of a global superpower a challenge for the answer to which may require a lot more effort than during the Cold War, writes Robert Heddik in The National Interest .

The rise of China may have serious consequences for Washington, because it is in the direction of the Asia-Pacific region aimed the strategic aspirations of the American economy. Compete with the Soviet Union during the Cold War was hard, however, to counter the threat from China, you may need to do more– believes the author of the material.

According to columnist Publishing, the American public is not possible to breathe easy” because of continuing threats, including on the part of applying for a revision of the existing geopolitical system.

“The Americans carried the onerous burden of opposition to the Soviet Union for nearly forty years, and now they are involved in an incomprehensible war with radical Islam. Rise of China is not just another challenge for the national interests of the United States, but, perhaps, the most difficult of them” – says Robert Heddik.

According to the International Monetary Fund, the Chinese economy has become the largest in the world in terms of purchasing power, the newspaper writes The Business Insider.

The logic of calculation is that the prices in different countries are not the same. A simple T-shirt will cost you less in Shanghai than in San Francisco, so unreasonable to compare the two economies without considering this factor. The average Chinese citizen earns less than the American, but in normal conversion of Chinese wages in dollar terms underestimated the purchasing power as one Chinese and the whole nation , – stated in the material.

The author draws attention to the fact that the IMF considers as market GDP and purchasing power of the economy, and by this criterion, China’s economy is currently superior to American and becomes the largest in the world.

According to the IMF on the basis of purchasing power parity, by the end of 2014, China’s share of global GDP will be 16.48% (17.632 trillion dollars), while the share of the United States 16.28 (17, 416 trillion),” – says The Business Insider.
For Russia, the transfer of the “center of gravityfrom Russia to China would be a great opportunity to improve the situation in foreign policy. But, alas, the voice of Robert Heddinka so far only one of the few. Should sound a chorus of voices that the vector US policy shifted from Russia to the East, where new red colossus rises, and where did today is the second center of power.

RSS for Posts RSS for Comments