Tag Archives: Foreign Intelligence

Malaysian Minister: Russia is not guilty of plane crash with defaced corpses over Ukraine !

Министр Малайзии: Россия не виновна в крушении самолёта с протухшими трупами над Украиной

 

 

  The Minister of Transport of Malaysia, Anthony Lock, said that Russia should not be considered responsible for the crash of the MH17 flight in the Donbass in 2014. This position is fully consistent with those materials that were published in the newspaper “President” for the past since the time of the disaster.

ChannelNews Asia reports that the minister is confident that there is no evidence of Russia’s involvement in this crime: “There is no evidence to blame Russia on the basis of information from the Joint Investigative Group. You can not just take a finger at Russia. ”

According to the head of the department, further actions will be carried out taking into account the presence of diplomatic relations between Russia and Malaysia and on the basis of evidence.

Recall, the plane “Boeing 777” airline Malaysia Airlines, flying from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur, collapsed to the ground in very strange circumstances. It happened on July 17, 2014 in the east of Ukraine.

And, it is claimed that as a result, 283 passengers and 15 crew members were killed. And the responsibility for “the flight MH17 shot down in 2014 over the Donbas” by the authorities of Australia and the Netherlands was officially placed for some reason not on their own states, but on Russia.

It should be noted that the reports made from the scene of the tragedy immediately after its fulfillment showed that the bodies of “passengers” are swelling like decaying corpses, many parts of the plane were simply not in place at the site of the tragedy. There were other oddities.

It is clear that a piece of fuselage, along with pre-prepared corpses, was simply dropped over Ukraine to organize levers of pressure on Russia. Mixed in this criminal scheme were Israel, where the previously stolen airplane and people were stored, the corpses of which were later dropped on the Ukrainian land; Malaysia, which has been silent all this time; The Netherlands, from whose territory the board took off, and some other countries.

Russia is also among the organizers of the tragedy – for no special Russian department has taken a single step in the defensive direction, provided no satellite imagery, no intelligence, no languages, no documents.

The organization of European persecution of Russia is beneficial, first of all, to the authorities of Russia itself, because in such conditions, victories even over the bogey in the garden seem infinitely grandiose.

Sophia Naiman.

Iran convenes an emergency meeting of the UN Security Council and can declare the US a war.

Иран созывает экстренное заседание Совета Безопасности ООН.

Последний пакет WikiLeaks, Vault 7, содержал набор документов под кодовым названием «Marble», в которых подробно описана тактика компьютерного взлома, применяемая ЦРУ.

После сравнений исходного кода «Marble» и компьютерного червя Stuxnet иранские инженеры могут официально и доказательно подтвердить то, о чем они догадывались всегда: при администрации Барака Обамы иранские ядерные объекты подверглись хакерской атаке из ЦРУ.

Это было нападение на ЯДЕРНЫЙ потенциал страны, что не просто нарушает многочисленные соглашения ООН и прочие договоренности — это является АКТОМ ВОЙНЫ. Теперь либо ООН очень жестко отреагирует, предложив в отношении США серьезные санкции, либо же Иран не найдя справедливости в ООН сам объявит Соединенным Штатам войну.

Все должно решиться сегодня днем, в 15.00 по Восточному времени США.

(3:00 PM Eastern US time)

Stuxnet — это вредоносный компьютерный червь, впервые обнаруженный в 2010 году и нацеленный на промышленные компьютерные системы. Stuxnet несет ответственность за причинение существенного ущерба ядерной программе Ирана. Программное обеспечение разработано так, что вирус после работы стирает сам себя, не оставляя практически никаких следов. Как давно предполагалось экспертами, червь является совместной американо-израильской разработкой, хотя официальной все и всё всегда отрицали. Анонимные американские официальные лица, выступающие в Washington Post, утверждали, что червь был разработан ещё во время администрации Буша для саботажа ядерной программы Ирана, которая представляет собой целую череду «ошибок» и «несчастных случаев».

Stuxnet предназначен для поражения программируемых логических контроллеров (programmable logic controller , PLC), которые позволяют автоматизировать электромеханические процессы. Такие процессы используются для управления машинами на заводских сборочных линиях, аттракционами или центрифугами для отделения ядерного материала.

Stuxnet запускается с использованием операционной системы Microsoft Windows, а затем через сеть добирает программное обеспечение Siemens Step7. Далее собирая информацию о промышленных системах и разбалансируя центрифуги червь заставлял их взрываться. По сообщениям, Stuxnet разрушил почти пятую часть ядерных центрифуг Ирана.

Stuxnet имеет три модуля: червь, выполняющий все подпрограммы, связанные с основной полезной нагрузкой; файл ссылки, который автоматически выполняет распространенные копии червя; руткит-компонент, отвечающий за скрытие всех вредоносных файлов и процессов, предотвращая обнаружение присутствия Stuxnet.

Stuxnet обычно вводится в целевую среду через зараженный USB-накопитель. Затем червь распространяется по сети, просматривая программное обеспечение Siemens Step7 на компьютерах, управляющих PLC . В отсутствие какого-либо критерия Stuxnet становится бездействующим внутри компьютера. Если оба условия выполнены, Stuxnet вводит зараженный руткит в программное обеспечение PLC и Step7, изменяя коды и выдавая неожиданные команды для PLC, возвращая цикл обратной связи нормальных значений системы операционных систем для пользователей.

 

 

оригинал

перевод

https://cont.ws/@bigone/572542

 

“Sting Millennium” ended.

The last batch of our uranium went overseas.

Russia fully paid indemnity for the US defeat in the Cold War.

Almost none of the Russian media did not pay attention to an event that occurred in August 2016 .. From the port of St. Petersburg on a journey across the Atlantic has gone merchant ship Atlantic Navigator. On board the ship – container with the Russian uranium.
   The deal “Gore – Chernomyrdin”: the true purpose of our American “partners”
  This was the last batch of uranium, which was sent to the United States on the basis of signed 20 years ago, the US-Russian agreement providing for the supply to the United States 500 metric tons of uranium, which Russia undertook to extract from its nuclear weapons and that America intended to be used as fuel for nuclear power plants .

About this uranium deal actively discussed in the 1990s, but today, the theme was “behind the scenes” discussions of the key issues of our lives. A younger generation simply nothing about it heard. Therefore, we must be reminded of its history.

Immediately, I note that this is no ordinary trade and economic transactions, beneficial for both sides. It is an act of the largest Russian robbery, not only in the latest of its history, but also in the entire history of the country. Russia lost the Cold War the West, primarily the United States. She lost to a great extent due to the treacherous policy of our leaders. These tops have continued to take the country in the 1990s. “Uranium deal” – the consent of our treacherous elite pay tribute to the winner in the form of weapons-grade uranium. The principal agreement on this was reached between the then Prime Minister VS Chernomyrdin and US Vice President Albert Gore, so this transaction is often referred to as the transaction Gore – Chernomyrdin. It is also called “the scam of the Millennium” by virtue of an unprecedented scale. In fact, it was the West’s operation, which solves several strategic goals:

a) unilateral nuclear disarmament by depriving Russia of its stocks of weapons-grade uranium, as well as the preparation of conditions for the US withdrawal from the ABM Treaty;

b) applying enormous economic damage to Russia (the accumulated stock of weapons-grade plutonium is an essential part of the national wealth of Russia at the time);

c) deprivation of the huge Russian energy sources in the future after the intended introduction of new technology thorium nuclear power.

The scale of Russia robbery

“Scam Millennium” deal dubbed because, first, it had a huge scale, and secondly, was concluded fraudulently. Many Russian and American media tried to present it as a mediocre commercial agreement. The total purchase price for the supply of 500 tonnes of uranium was set at 11.9 billion dollars. Meanwhile, the value of the specified amount of highly enriched uranium is incomparably higher. To produce this amount of weapons-grade uranium, mining and defense industries of the country have worked for about 40 years, several hundred thousand people. Manufacturing dangerous, tens of thousands of people lost their health and ability to work, shortened his life. These were enormous sacrifices in order to forge a nuclear shield of the country and ensure a calm peaceful life of the USSR and the socialist countries. This uranium provides military-strategic parity in the world, which dramatically reduced the risk of a world war.

    On the other hand, in the US media, there are such assessments: by Russian uranium at the beginning of this century in the US nuclear power plants produce 50% of electricity. Every tenth kilowatt hour of electricity in the entire US economy was ensured at the expense of enriched uranium from Russia. According to the estimates, which were made by experts at the end of the last century, the real value of 500 tonnes of weapons-grade plutonium was at the time of not less than $ 8 trillion. For comparison, the annual average of the annual GDP in Russia, according to Rosstat, in the last decade of the last century there were in the region of $ 400 billion. It turns out that the actual price of the uranium deal was only 0.15% in relation to the minimum real value of the goods. The real price of uranium was equivalent to 20 (twenty) annual GDP!

There have been many wars in the history of mankind. After they defeated often pay reparations and indemnities winners. Recall, for example, the Franco-Prussian War in 1871. “Iron Chancellor” Bismarck defeated France appointed a contribution of about 13% of GDP (5 billion francs). Probably, the biggest in recent history indemnity paid defeated in World War Germany. Media reported that Germany just three years ago, has been paying reparations for the Paris Peace Treaty of 1919. In Germany, reparations were imposed in the amount of 269 billion gold marks. The amount, of course, enormous: it is equivalent to about 100 000 tons of gold. At present the price of the yellow metal would be about $ 4 trillion. in the field of economic history Experts say that to Germany in Paris reparation is about twice the GDP of the then Germany. Among other things, the payment of reparations by Germany stretched for 90 years (with interruptions, carried out for about 70 years in the pure form of payment); the payment of the “uranium reparations” Russia kept within 20 years, with most of the uranium was produced in the US in the 1990s.

     In the history of the early to finish.
  “Uranium deal” was accomplished in total secrecy from the people. Do not even been aware of many “people’s representatives” – for the reason that it is in violation of Russian law, it did not pass the ratification procedure in our parliament. In the second half of the 1990s, a number of MPs have launched an investigation to clarify the terms of the deal, the circumstances of its conclusion, assessment of conformity with the Constitution of the Russian Federation and other normative acts of Russia. As a result of strong pressure from certain influential forces surrounding then-President Boris countries Yeltsin managed to stop the investigation. We are trying to understand the transaction and many of our other policies, or even denunciation of the agreement achieved on the supply of uranium to the United States. Among them, for example, the legendary general L.Rohlin, Yu.Skuratov Attorney General, State Duma Deputy Ilyukhin. Death of Rokhlin and resignation of Skuratov many people associate it with the fact that they showed excessive activity in the investigation, “the uranium deal.”

Even if the supply of uranium in the transaction Gore – Chernomyrdin completed, it does not mean that we should put an end to history. It is necessary to return to serious analysis and investigation of the transaction in the framework of a special inter-ministerial committee with the participation of the nuclear industry specialists, MPs (the State Duma), law enforcement officials, the Foreign Ministry, the Ministry of Defense and other agencies and organizations, independent experts, technical, military, legal and economic issues.

Firstly, there are suspicions that a number of persons involved in that transaction, remain in the “cage” active politicians and government officials. There is no guarantee that they will not continue to work in the US and Western interests.

Secondly, we need to correct and honest understanding of our recent history. Without truthful disclosure of details “uranium deal” and its political, military, moral evaluation is no guarantee that we are again stepping on rakes like. Analysis of the real aims of the US side of the transaction clearly highlights the true aims and interests of those whom we, unfortunately, by inertia continue to call “partners”.

Thirdly, we need informed and detailed assessment of the economic damage which has been inflicted deal Russia and its people.

Any attempt to take the path of Russian economic recovery West will put a spoke in the wheel of our current reform, socio-economic transformation. We must be prepared for the fact that the West will increasingly expose us to a different kind of “bills” – for example, if we try to carry out deofshore our economy. After US courts, the United Kingdom, other European countries inevitably begin disassembling from the owners of offshore companies and / or their representatives with far-fetched claims for “damages”. Approximately the same reaction can be expected in case Russia decides to withdraw from the WTO, the limitation of foreign investment or even restriction of repatriated profits of foreign investors from Russia. We must be prepared for the fact that it may be necessary counterclaim “accounts” our Western “partners”. The largest of all possible counter “accounts” – our requirements to the US giant to compensate damage to Russia “uranium deal.”

VY Katasonov

“Gauges” deal a blow to US-led coalition?

«Калибры» наносят удар по американской коалиции

Operations Room) in the Aleppo area, staffed by personnel of the intelligence services. Before the “semi-secret” facility on September 20 has been designated as a target for Russian missiles strike, it operated US intelligence officials, the UK, Israel, Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar.

According to news agency Fars News, a blow to the Intelligence object was caused by the Russian side immediately after the US Air Force air strikes in the area of Deir ez-Zor on the armed forces of Syria in support of terrorists LIH *. “Russian warships positioned off the coast of Syria, fired destroyed aiming and foreign military operations center, killing more than two dozen Israeli and foreign officers.”

Killed 30 Western intelligence officers, but the noise did not raise ?

  “Russian warships fired three missiles” Caliber “for foreign officers coordinating operations center in the area of Dar Ezza (Dar Ezza) in the western part of Aleppo near Mt. Saman (Sam’an), killing 30 Israeli and foreign officers.”

The operations center was located in the western part of Aleppo province near Mount Saman, where there are many ancient caves. The region is located in the depths of the mountain range.

Fars news agency report leaves the impression that the “operations center” was staffed mainly by Israeli soldiers. In all likelihood, plant managers to the United States, and subject to coordinated the local allies of Washington in close connection with the US military and intelligence agencies.

Except agency Fars and Sputnik Arabic, Russian news about the attack against the intelligence of the object of the coalition led by the United States, do not hit the headlines. In fact, there is a total blackout. Reliability Fars agency posts have yet to be confirmed.

An important fact is that the operations center, located in the area of Aleppo in the territory held by rebels, was manned by personnel of the countries that are major state sponsors LIH and Al-Qaeda in Syria **. Namely: the US, Britain (actively participated in air strikes) and four countries in the region – Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Israel and Qatar. The respective roles of the four countries in the region with regard to the recruitment, training, logistics and financing of terrorism, have been adequately documented.

This operations center (ie, combat information center) in the region of Aleppo as well as field operations centers in other regions (in the territories controlled by the militant forces) are in constant communication with the centers of the military command and control of the United States, Israel and their allies .

It should be recalled that in October 2015, Obama announced that he has sent US special operations forces for action in Syria, allegedly anti-terrorist operations against LIH. These forces US special operations were “include at least 50 special operations advisers, who will work the resistance forces fighting against the Islamic State in the north of Syria, but will not participate directly in hostilities (Washington Post, October 30, 2015).

They will not participate in the fighting, they will be busy «’s advisory” activity – that is, both within the rebel units, and in the field of operational centers.

In recent months, Washington confirmed that an additional 250 personnel of the US special operations forces should be deployed in Syria. A certain number of selected intelligence officers had to be attributed to field operational centers. This sending US special forces coincided with the influx of thousands of newly recruited “jihadist mercenaries” who have joined the ranks of the various terrorist groups. It was reported that “thousands of terrorists” had crossed the Turkish-Syrian border in early May 2016, to accommodate for fighting against government forces in Aleppo area.

The operations center in the region of Aleppo was used to coordinate actions on the ground with intelligence activities drones and air strikes. According to the Fars agency, the personnel of intelligence attributed to the destruction of Russia Operations Centre US-led coalition, also participated in the planning and implementation of the US Air Force attack on the Syrian armed forces (Syrian SAA forces), which was held immediately after the conclusion of the Geneva Agreement on ceasefire .

operational centers based in Syria kept in touch with the American and Allied command, as well as special forces (including Western military personnel employed by private mercenary companies), integrated into the various insurgent and terrorist groups, including LIH and Al-Nusra ***.

The existence and location in the region of Aleppo operations center was to be known as the Russian military and the Syrian government. And (until recently), they put up with it. Until recently, no action has been taken against the center.

According to the news agency Fars News Agency, the matter appears therefore that Moscow has decided to choose an operational headquarters in Aleppo region immediately after the decision of the Pentagon ordered the US Air Force air strikes on Syrian government forces, participated in combat operations against terrorists LIH in Deir ez-Zor .

For message Fars News Agency on the Russian attack against the CIA-NATO object of any other messages in other media is not followed. How not followed and evidence at an official level.

Assuming that the message Fars New Report authentically Russian attack against an operational center coalition led by the United States, has serious implications. Is this a precedent created? Russian attack led by the United States subject to retaliation for the attack on the Syrian armed forces in Deir ez Zor?

This is a potentially dangerous watershed in the evolution of the war in Syria, which must be considered in the broader context of the escalation of hostilities.

However, at the same time, the operational center is undeclared Intelligence object. Washington did not recognize its existence, and Moscow has not given official confirmation of the attack. Russian media are silent on this issue – as well as Washington. Neither party is not interested in making this a public issue.

Author – Michelle Hosudovsky, Professor of Economics, University of Ottawa (Canada), founder and director of the Center for the Study of Globalization (Centre forResearch on Globalization [CRG], Montreal, Canada). He worked as advisor to the governments of developing countries and international organizations. Author of 11 books, participated in the preparation of Encyclopaedia Britannica. In 2014 he was awarded the Gold Medal “For Merit” of the Republic of Serbia for the coverage of the NATO aggression against Yugoslavia.

Copyright © Prof Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research, 2016.

US thinking about the exclusion of the Baltic states of NATO !

США задумались об исключении Прибалтики из НАТО

 

On the pages of Forbes magazine was publicly recognized as “meaningless” Baltic stay in NATO. From the membership of the Baltic states into NATO significantly affected the security of the United States: as a result of their activities in NATO there is a threat of a nuclear war with Russia over countries that damn America. For the Baltic elites, such statements from the ocean – a reminder that the US hosts Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia – emergency ballast, which the United States simply thrown overboard, if necessary.

In one of the most famous and influential business media of the planet – the US financial and economic magazine Forbes – earlier this month published “software” analytical article “Why America is a member of NATO?”, To question the feasibility of the existence of the North Atlantic Alliance, which does not guarantee the security of the United States but only puts this security at risk.

The main idea of the article – taking in new members, who are often weak, worthless and incapable of self-defense of the country, the Alliance forces Americans to take custody of these new pitiful allies. This makes Washington only a headache, because it forces him to get involved in all sorts of regional conflicts on the side of the countries that do not ensure the safety of the United States. Countries that America in general, and do not need.

NATO expansion has long been turned into an end in itself – in practice, this extension does not make sense for Americans who do not meet the national interests of the United States, and eventually creates for the Pentagon to the State Department issues. “Add to Montenegro – it’s like to get another mindless friend in Facebook», – begins his article Forbes staffer Doug Bandow.

“The presidents and legislators continue to provide guarantees on the security of money and the lives of American citizens to foreign states, and this occurs even if – as is the case with Montenegro, when they have absolutely no value to the security of the United States», – Forbes writes. Business publication exposes the ruthless criticism of the policy of replenishing the NATO ranks, with caustic sarcasm criticizing the principle of “expansion for expansion”, in which America owes, for example, carry the alliance commitments to Turkey – a “friend-enemy” of the United States, where the government is Islamist Erdogan, fiercely criticized in his speeches “decadent West” and “American imperialism”, but once running for help to the allies after they provoked the conflict with Russia.

However, much more vivid example of useless and pathetic allies that America hoisted on his shoulders and is now forced to defend them, even though they do not need her or Europe – is the Baltic countries, with their merciless straightforwardness named Forbes «helpless nations.”

“The expansion at the expense of the Baltic States turned out to be a colossal mistake, which resulted in the NATO members were helpless nation, protection of which is not interested in the rest of Europe, the countries that have no geopolitical significance to America, however, are involved in acute controversy with Russia, – says the American edition. – If there is something wrong, then America with minimal support from the European “allies” – they are likely to seek refuge in Brussels – will have, apparently, have to deal with having a nuclear weapon Russia over the disputed issues of greater interest for Moscow than to Washington. ”

“Security of the United States significantly affected by the addition of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania”, – concludes of Forbes, and on the basis of this conclusion, urging people not to repeat the Baltic “colossal mistake” in the “Eastern Partnership” countries, taking in Georgia and Ukraine.

It is noteworthy that Forbes said not a word about the “imperial ambitions” or “aggressive neighborhood” – the conflict of Russia and the Baltic countries there is an objective, but the cause of his states “heated debate” between Moscow and the Baltic countries. Who this policy is – a rhetorical question, given that the adoption of the latest Concept of the Russian Federation Foreign Policy (2013), in which on the Baltic States is not a word, legally approved diplomatic Moscow line against Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia is ignoring the whole Trinity. Contemptuous silence – a universal official Russian response to the calls for its international isolation, a comparison with the Third Reich and female hysteria about the “terrorist state.” Only a few months later, without any apparent connection with these public attacks, suddenly found themselves banned Latvian sprats, came under embargo “milk” and Russian transit redirected to the Baltic ports to Russian.

So the Russian conflict with the Baltic blame Baltic states – says a leading US business publication, and by appealing to the most holy – to the “life of American citizens” – wonders why America must expose themselves to the threat of nuclear war with Russia over a verbal incontinence Dalia Grybauskaitė and Edgar Rinkevich?

And this is what the Baltic Allies eventually from it and demand: not a week goes by that of Vilnius did not hear the next call for an increase in the US presence in the region, including the military presence. For the Baltic States, and can be no question that they are fighting for themselves: no, we are small, responsible for our words about a “new Mordor” need allies. Allies must do: they have to increase the presence of NATO in the region, sent to the Baltic countries its military contingents, put them overland NATO base, going for it on a direct conflict with Russia.

Such behavior, by the way, contrary to the fundamentals of Anglo-Saxon culture bases, and the Americans, who are taught from birth to expect in life only for themselves, responsible for his words and be able to stand up for themselves, can only cause revulsion. This aversion to read the publication Forbes between the lines of this aversion, and question why the United States allies in the “helpless nation”? “In the end, since the end of World War II took place 70 years. The European Union’s GDP and a population larger than the corresponding figures in the United States, and much higher than in Russia. Is it not time to rich friends in Washington to begin to defend himself by “- irritated writes American magazine, noting that because of its craven allies, the White House continues to” risk the lives of its citizens, because Europe does not want to worry about is to have a sufficient number of men and women in uniform. ”

For Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia Forbes publication – a reminder that the Baltic States for Washington – is the emergency ballast, which the United States, if necessary, easily be thrown overboard, which is of no value to them, and who exactly the Americans will not fight.

Article Forbes – is not just an article, because I Forbes – is not just a business magazine. Forbes – is one of the mouthpieces of Wall street, this “wall newspaper” the first economy in the world, a voice that says business and the United States of America’s political elite. Forbes said its valuable than quantity, but the quality of the audience of the “advanced workers” (rating of the richest people in the world) and the problems in the US under the name supercorporation.

Publication of the wretched, worthless and threatening US security allies in NATO could not appear in such media for a reason.

The American establishment realized the situation with the “helpless nations” as a problem, concluded that no value Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia to the United States do not constitute, and publicly made it clear that, if necessary, Washington will hand over the Baltic states.

The truth about World War II !

Tõde II maailmasõja kohta

For decades, we have reiterated that the cause of World War II, Adolf Hitler and his plan was to conquer the world. The reality, however, was not far from a war, and the reasons were quite different. The reason was the Treaty of Versailles caused enormous injustice against Germany. The winners will put the entire responsibility for World War I for Germany, which is ridiculous. Germany had to cede vast territories that had historically been a part of Germany and the German inhabitants were displaced. Versailles Peace Treaty was as a ticking time bomb that had been put in place by western countries and exploded in 1939.
The German leadership has not dreamed unleash a war, but dreamed  international banking and arms industrialists, as well as the Soviet Union. Probably not, although World War II, however, the conflict, however. And offered an Englishman in Germany before the war as well as several times during the war, an armistice without any strange clauses. It was not adopted and expanded military action instead.
The war itself is very rewarding activity as
armed industri, credit institutions – where they will stay away from himself. It is also an effective tool for social and political war to maintain control over the large number of people. Martial law has been able to take advantage in order to influence the people to approve the creation of the institutions to which they would normally not agree. Estonia is one of the most prominent military historians Mati Apple: “It seems to me more and more that World War II was put in place baseline scenario European and American financial industry and the geniuses long before the beginning of the war. A new world war Russia was prepared and the preparatory work went to the capital of international joint forces. “Germany was determined by the huge reparation charges to the war-torn Germany would not in any case come to be disbursed. Since this was the case, occupied France the penalty to Düsseldorf and other cities in the Ruhr region, putting yet more difficult economic situation in Germany.

 Austria. Austria’s population consisted of Germans, who spoke German, the Germans thought and felt like Germans. Vienna had been almost ten times more than the German capital of Berlin. Only the periods 1806-1815 and 1866-1938, Austria was not connected to the national level in Germany. After the First World War, Western countries have banned reunification. 1920/1921. a. Held Karten, Tyrol, Styria and Salzburg in a referendum in which 99% participation in voted for reunification, but the Allies banned hunger blockade of threatening to continue voting for democracy, and thus violated the basic principles – self-determination. On 12 November 1928, declared the Austrian Federal Chancellor Dr. Karl Renner publicly: “Let Austrian citizens to vote freely, and they choose the 99% in favor of the reunification of Germany.” When Hitler to Austria on 12 March 1938 with Germany, adding many millions of people in the democratic self-determination finally implemented the way it was called usurpation? Rudolf Hess, accused of Nuremberg, even Austria Anschluss organization! The German leadership had abandoned the sustainability of peace in the interest of South Tyrol, Alsace-Lotringist, EupenMalmedist, North Schleswigist, Poznan, West Prussia and Upper Silesia in the East, the areas that were included in 1914. The German and Austrian sides. Their sole desire was to get back to the city of Danzig and the Polish Corridor connecting establish extraterritorial Germany divorced Great East Prussian province to escape bothersome customs control.
September 1 Germany invades Poland, whereupon England and France declared war on Germany, while the Soviet Union invaded Poland. Britain and France declared war to the Russians. This indicates that there was a significant problem in Poland, but the destruction of Germany. To French and England declared war on Germany attacked Poland penetration after starting as de facto World War II. I wonder why they did not have it at the end of the war in Poland with warm or cold, as it was under the yoke of the Communists?
Many think that the Nazis
dreaming of conquering the world, which is obviously false, but the communists did it. This plan have emerged on the agenda immediately after the takeover of power in Russia. Kisas Lenin: “Socialism in one country achieved the victory can not yet rule out all wars.” Brest-Litovsk, commented Comintern chairman Grigory Zinoviev as: ,,; If Russia enters into peace, the peace that only the cease-fires. The socialist revolution in Russia will win only if he is surrounded by socialist sister republics. Peace concluded imperialist Germany, is a temporary phenomenon. This gives time to breath, after the war breaks out again! “But the real Stalin began to prepare for the advent to power. In 1927, Stalin declared: “The second imperialist war is absolutely inevitable, as well as the inevitable resignation of the Soviet Union in this war.” But Stalin did not want to start a war with yourself and be a party in the earliest days: ,, We are taking the war, but we will proceed by the latter to take a pan whisk, which is able to consider everything. “

 Stalin’s industrialization was initiated, with the primary objective of the military industry of such a level that it is able to keep the course enormous, we can conquer the whole of Europe of armies. The whole country’s economy worked in the military industry to increase capacity for and this contributed actively to the west Financial Tycoons. They knew that the war is extremely costly for fun, and most states, anyone who considers himself to be the ongoing conflicts, needs financial support from the world banking systems. They are forced to borrow in time of war (weapons industry run), and at the end (to restore what has been destroyed). However, for the loans to pay high interest rate. Both are occupied by independent national economies …
When in 1923 the Red Army had 550,000 men, then on 19 August 1939, there were 2 million, and by 21 June 1941 to 5.5 million + NKVD troops! The beginning of the war, Stalin was at the disposal of the world’s most powerful and best-armed army. In 1941, the Soviet Union was the only country which produced heavy tanks. Their mission was to break through the defense and open up easy access to tanks German motorways. In 1940. between June 1941 and June was set up in the USSR 61 new tank divisions, each with 375 tanks .While entered Germany in September 1939 addressed during the second world war just six Panzerdivision. To conquer the world?
1939. In September, the world’s most powerful series production in the fighter weapons designer Polikarpovi I-16th Firepower still exceeded the 16 double-Messerschmidt-109e, and almost three-fold; Speedfighter.1939. September of 1941. June was formed in the USSR 295 New Rifle.From 1940 to 1941 a. was formed in June of 79 new aircraft in the USSR Division, igaühes200-300 aircraft.1940-1941 USSR was formed 30 new motorized division.In June 1939, the Red Army’s Field Artillery composed of 144
artillery Regiment, every 24-36 cannons, but by June 1941 the Red Army was already 900 (!!) artillery Regiment.
On 19 August 1939, the VK (b) P ,, Politburo adopted a Decision on the release. ” Guided by the principle: Pull the war, while remaining neutral, then the opponents have bled, throw into battle throughout the power of the Red Army. At the beginning of August 1939 had a British and French military delegations held talks in Moscow, Stalin information that allowed Stalin to combine in such a way that the outbreak of war to all the advantages of Russia. Namely, they told Stalin that the German attack on Poland in the case of France and Britain declare war on Germany. This is only needed Stalin. On 19 August 1939, Stalin, Hitler declared that if he invades Poland, do not fall of the Soviet Union not only neutral but also assisted Germany. Diplomatic straits staying Hitler
swallowed up hook down. Ribbentrop was in Moscow, and on August 23 he wrote down with Molotov Pact of conquering Poland.

 The big lie is, however, that the then leadership of the Republic of Estonia did not know the secret Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact additional content. It is easier to hide people. Freemason, and a high-paying NKVD collaborator Konstantin Pats, with its tail in the cells was performed in a military coup in 1934, shortly before a democratic election would have come to power through the War of letting the men who were in our country shed the blood of the War of Independence. One of the causes of the War of the repression of the children was that they knew Pätsi and Laidoneri major thefts of the Bank of Estonia and Harju Bank. Pats knew that veterans coming to power would be waiting for him to prison. After the coup did Loaf statement that the Estonian people are sick … but the people received treatment for six years on the eastern border of the back instead. But hit a loaf of traitors appropriate fate. Damage to this Estonians had cost so many innocent lives. A loaf of co Muurlan, US President Roosevelt commented that the Soviet occupation of Estonia, with a special cynicism – When the Estonians do not like communism, they may, after all, to leave Estonia … By the way, patchouli myself had in my pocket US visa, a passport, but their crimes for the consequences she no longer tried to escape is not an accident.
Now the situation was created in which Germany was particularly dangerous. The German authorities started to realize Stalin’s devilish plan. Stalin was preparing an unpleasant surprise for France, which defeated Hitler in 1940. very fast, even though Stalin had hoped that France and Germany sink into a bloody war and exhausting his army will then only scattered remnants of their beat. France was one of the main reasons for the rapid loss to nationalism. Full nationalism slump. Since the British have tended not specifically a fight, the Germans decided to begin withdrawing its troops from the eastern border to concentrate. Here Stalin made his second mistake, which would have been an almost fatal. He did not believe in his intelligence, and the generals, who warned him against Hitler and his troops continued to calmly concentrating the country’s western border. The German leader Hitler knew very well what risks he took for MRP concluding the contract; , only the establishment of relations between Germany and Russia would be an inevitable war. The Prince von Bismarck was warned not only against the war on two fronts, but also one of the fronts, if there’s war with Russia. And yet Hitler attacked. And none of the historian is not his motives expressed interest? But Hitler himself said Earl Schulenbergile: ,, Count, I have no other way out. “

 The fact that the Soviet Union will not be ready for war, and it had hit him suddenly, it is a complete lie. For example, Irakli Toidze patriotic poster which calls on all battle (,, Mother Homeland Calls “), appeared in the streets of Yaroslavl in the evening on June 22, 1941 June 22 Saratov afternoon, Novosibirsk and Habarovsk 23 June. When the artist created it, when it was printed and delivered as a sudden ,, “The Great Patriotic War began on June 22 in the early morning? Minsk military recruitment arrived at these posters, however, already in 1940. December !!! 1941 June 22 radio speech Molotov announced that Germany had declared war on them. The same information can also be found Soviet Marshal Zhukov memoirs. However, on 3 July 1941 there is a radio speech by Stalin, who in the meantime has got over the shock, to prevent Hitler came to him. And this is where we all become the treacherous ,, Germany invaded the Soviet Union on the peace loving “German attacked in self-defense, and thereby breached the advantage of Stalin’s plan of conquering Europe.
During the war the Red Army was spending 427 million artillery shells and mines, and 17 billion rounds of ammunition. This is not included hand grenades, land mines and aircraft bombs. Divide by the number of German soldiers! In war, the Soviet Union used the advantage of the 15% of People’s Commissariat of Munitions production capacity. Stalin, Hitler gave a preemptive strike, destroying or capturing 75% of Russian ammunition. Stalin drove the German troops, on the basis of the People’s Commissariat of Munitions of 15%
vestige of power. We all know the outcome of the war. What would have happened if Stalin had come to attack first?
Hitler had anticipated the communists in just a few weeks, knowing that if Stalin is attacked first, and Europe is not any hope. Breaking the first weeks of the war the huge Russian troops took Hitler to Stalin the opportunity to conquer the whole of Europe.
The world-famous British historian Liddell Hart wrote on September 3, 1949 in the newspaper ,,, Picture Post ‘: ,, Hitler wanted anything else, but not only a world war … After the end of the war the most important German archives fell into our hands, and we can get a clear idea of how extraordinarily there was great fear in the leading circles of the German war front … “

 Gaul Brennus commander said ,, the vanquished Woe! Vae victis! “Really. Only the winners decide what were war crimes. Nuremberg trials were a farce. In many cases, the Germans were attributed to acts which were committed communists. At one hearing, Goering said: “When I sit on this bench, you should sit on my right and left of Stalin, Churchill.” The Nuremberg defendants were beaten, and the interrogator told in advance what he wants to hear. The German defenders were threatened verbally and physically so that they will not produce the crimes of the Allies. But despite this, they did not believe that German statesmen and generals killed Cowardly both ways – by hanging. According to the Geneva Convention, the victim may be sentenced to death but the firing squad! The conditions in which the Germans worked in Nuremberg defenders can read books ,, Len Deightoni Blood, Tears and Folly “Soviet prosecutor Roman Rudenko said in his oral arguments that led the Germans from Russia Fortunes. On top of this, Göring said that Russia got millions of them, yes, but they were mostly Russian-performing. Rudenko grabbed the gun and let (!!!) in the direction of Goring 4-5 shots before the gun was confiscated from him. As Goering bullets did not hit, he said calmly, let the Russians, who in such a short earth knows how to miss. Soviet specialists constructed a special boom for hanging place. Guests to the store very slowly, about 24 minutes after the doctor declared hanging dead. Field Marshal Keitel said before hanging his last words: ,, Let me die ass towards Russia. “Ribbentrop: ,, Hanging us today, but tomorrow you hanging Communists. Our hanging above the future, but a monument. “The Nuremberg process serving 3,000 people since 2400 were Jews!g

 

Everyone likes to talk about the crimes of the Nazis, but what about our allies?
English fire bombs thrown from airplanes in 1943 changed the Hamburg city reduced to rubble.
Fire tornado killed 50,000 civilians.
In September, fire bombs were thrown Darmstadile 250 000 – 12, 000 people dead.
In October, 8,000 people were killed in Kassel. Attacked in Bremerhaven, Braunschweig and Heilbronn.
On 14 February 1945 the Dresden huge crematoria. The city was called Elbe-edge in Florence, this was one of the most beautiful cities in Germany. 13 February, 1945 in Dresden, supposedly lived 950,000 people, including 250,000 war refugees (women and children). Englishmen have passed the two attacks on the substance – a total of 650,000 fire bombs, along with 
land mine Bombings 2659 tons. In the third attack by the United States were the subject of B-17 planes – 771 tons of bombs. The second and third wave was planned so that the bombs would be hit between the buildings rescuers working. Low-flying fighters mowed the machine gun fire of crazed people. Dresden burned for seven days. 90,000 houses were destroyed. The smallest estimated number of deaths was 35,000, the largest of more than 100 000 people. The strategic and military sense, there was no significance Drezdenil !!!
May 31, 1942 in Cologne in 1046 attacked the English bombers. Civilians were killed simply for sowing terror. Second World War in Germany fell by 1.35 million tons of bombs, of which 55.8% of the cities and the junction of 9,3% in the chemical industry, 1.8% in the manufacturing industry, 30.5% and 2.6% points to the military base and other objects.
Civilians killing Englishmen called themselves “comfortable war” – a war comfortable! It also happened in Japan. For example, on 9 March 1945, was the World War II air raid strict Tokyo bombing killed 83,800 people, 41,000 wounded and 1 million homeless. Was destroyed 267,000 houses. Between June and August 1945 passed the 58 Americans in the Japanese city of 60 air strikes and Toyama, Fukui Nazamu and cities were razed to the ground. Americans are not interested in the military, but economic injury. Hundreds of thousands (the exact number can not be determined) were killed in Hiroshima and Nagasaki atomic bomb attacks.
Is the killing of civilians is a war crime only to the Germans? Everything is to blame only the Germans? Nuremberg Tribunals Statute of the sixth article of the war crimes in occupied territories civilians killings, ill-treatment and forced labor deportations, prisoners of war or the sea seized the persons killings or ill-treatment, hostage executions, public or private property, looting, towns or villages unjustified looting or destruction by military necessity can not justify. Would not have had to sit on the dock in Nuremberg, Stalin, Roosevelt and Churchill? The first was organized by the Germans during World War 500 English
various brigades as many as 768 gas attack. However, the school’s only about the Germans.
Twisted history is not history.
If you take a few steps back and watch it all on a large scale it would seem that the two without a war, won most of the Jews who were new to your country and the United States, whose gold fund increased from 1913 until World War II until the end of nine times (!), And who became the world’s powerful economy.

 

Russian maneuvers over the Baltic Sea – a warning to the West – the Polish media.

Маневры русских над Балтикой — предупреждение Западу, — польские СМИ

Experts agree that the actions of the Russian aircraft over the Baltic Sea – a deliberate and directed against NATO’s action, writes portal Wirtualna Polska.

Fund representative named Casimir Pulaski Tomas Smouri believes that incidents involving Russian bombers – is the result of political tensions between NATO and Russia, ongoing since the “annexation” of Crimea.
The objectives of this type of action double: on the military level – this is a test of the alliance opportunities, and at the political level – is a signal to Russia that it will continue to be a military power, highlights the Polish portal.
Tomas Smouri draws, however, attention to the fact that such cases affect the NATO decision, contributing to strengthening the alliance’s activities in Eastern Europe. As a result, they help Poland bring to the Western allies about the need to strengthen NATO’s eastern flank.
Expert portal Defence24 Juliusz Sabak notes that the incidents with Russian bombers, despite their military character, are also political goals: they are preceded by a meeting of the Russia – NATO Council, as well as the alliance summit in Warsaw.
According to the expert, Russia seeks a way to demonstrate their presence to put pressure. Juliusz Sabak believes that Russia does not need a dialogue with NATO on the Alliance’s presence in Eastern Europe, and the incidents are addressed to public opinion of the United States and other countries, taking decisions on the placement of troops in Eastern Europe. As Sabak said, it is a signal to the fact that these countries are subjected to certain risks.
In the night from Saturday to Sunday reported that a US reconnaissance aircraft was intercepted Russian bombers over the Baltic Su-27. As the Pentagon said the interception was “dangerous and unprofessional.”
In turn, at the beginning of last week, Russian warplanes in the Baltic Sea a few “close Flight” on the American destroyer “Donald Cook”, which carried out joint exercises with the Polish air force, reminiscent of Wirtualna Polska.

Reader comments on the site:

żarcik: Yes, yes, the Russians, do not cry. You military power :)

expert: There is nothing to play with Russian terrorists, it is necessary to shoot them – and they will learn to respect the West.

historia: Only a united Europe and NATO can be active and to repel force Russia and other threats.

mix: Yeah. Russian planes dare to fly over the Baltic Sea! It’s almost near the border with the United States.

Karkses: Well, yes … Americans swim on the destroyer front of their nose, and they sent against them the bomber. So Russia provokes. In the end, Baltika – is, of course, the United States territorial waters.

Jan: Shoot down. The Russians understand only the language of force.

Tasak: «The actions of Russians over the Baltic Sea – a deliberate action”, but can there be another? Ostensibly by accident they did fly over the US ship?

Nik: That shoot down at least one, then you will see that NATO rules, and then they shot down the plane, the matter was hushed up.

AO: This is the United States and NATO are pushing us to war with Russia … Open your eyes … They make us cannon fodder, we provoke a nuclear power, and, if necessary, we will not help anyone!

Le: Is this stupid world does not understand that the time of peace for Russia – loss, and war – the rise? Unfortunately for them, a profitable business is possible only during the war.

ghur: Split Katsap.

stańczyk: I suggest to the Americans not to poke his nose in the Kaliningrad region, and the Poles did not arrange smokescreens.

Ewa: The Americans deliberately sailed into the Baltic Sea to the Russian border, to arrange baiting.

West Framed pass Estonian fools, and they are happy to try!

Запад подставил под удар эстонских дуралеев, а те рады стараться!

Prime Minister of Estonia, and along with the chairman of the right-wing liberal Reform Party Taavi Rõivas said that the US military presence in the country is important for the security of the region, so the government will do everything to keep the US “an excellent host country.”

Naive fool! He seriously believes that an increase in funding such a presence in the four-fold to US $ 3.4 billion shows that the fate of Estonia to the United States “very important.”

Talking shop “the Washington Regional Committee” for the eccentric takes “good faith”, believing in a pivotal role in the Estonian real deterrent alleged Russian aggression. For the sake of the Estonian government is even ready to cover the costs in case of increasing the presence of allies.

Estonia has already allocated to the 2015-2019 years, 40 million euros to build the infrastructure needed for the allies: the barracks are being built in a military town in the Tape, upgraded central landfill and built the building in Tallinn NATO headquarters element. Military expenses in 2016 will amount to 449 million euros (2.07% of GDP), which exceeds the criteria for NATO.

Western countries are not left behind. Thus, the States have allocated $ 33 million for the purchase of Javelin anti-tank systems. We invested approximately $ 35 million in infrastructure in Tapa and Ämari (northern Estonia).

In the area of ​​special attention allies proved central landfill, which has built a variety of objects, allowing to carry out training exercises. And they will not stop …

The Estonian authorities are increasing power, informational, financial and infrastructural power, forgetting that such activity will not be ignored by Russia. The Russian Defense Ministry has pointed out that in the Baltic States is building up forces air cover, and tensions over the Russian border has increased by an order.

Even last year, the representative of the Russian Ministry of Defense, Army General Yuri Yakubov said that the appearance of US combat equipment in the Baltic States Russia will give an adequate response. group of forces along the perimeter of Russia’s western border will be strengthened (tanks, aircraft, artillery).

Estonia, indulging allies jeopardizes St. Petersburg, which is comparable, according to experts, only the placement of Soviet missiles in Cuba in 1962. This is pure aggression, a military challenge.

Estonian authorities to lick the heels of the Americans, it would seriously consider. The military doctrine of Russia, NATO has called the main geopolitical enemy, which entails certain consequences.

And do not forget that the Americans do not do anything just for beautiful eyes. All their investments in the Estonian military infrastructure, they easily beat off, billed Tallinn in the future for the “post” their military equipment. Intimidation Russia, as well as Estonia’s security (in this case, the imaginary) is well worth it. And do not care what Moscow attempts ridiculous action Reyvasa ..

Up to this point a chic life was relatively calm. Russian strategic missile “flew” through its territory. But now everything has changed: intermediate- and short-range missiles will be aimed at the Estonian town. However, such a fate can not be avoided, and Lithuania and Latvia.

Choosing the path of NATO bridgehead near the Russian border, the Estonian leadership to substitute the country under attack. In the case of NATO’s military aggression against Russia, not Europe, and Estonia will remain in the past … was small West coins forever erasing itself from the political map of the world.

Zolotoy,
especially for Politikus.ru
Source →
Tags: news, politics
Posted 02/04/2016 at 18:18

Americans are thinking the exclusion of Latvia from NATO !

Американцы задумались об исключении Латвии из НАТО

On the pages of Forbes magazine was publicly recognized as “meaningless” stay the Baltics into NATO. From the membership of the Baltic countries in NATO greatly affected the security of the United States: as a result of their activities in NATO there is a threat of a nuclear war with Russia because of that damn America. For the Baltic elites, such statements from the ocean – a reminder that the American owners of Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia – emergency ballast, which the United States, if necessary, easily be thrown overboard.

In one of the most famous and influential business media world – the American financial and economic magazine Forbes – earlier this month published “software” analytical article “Why America is a member of NATO?”, To question the appropriateness of the existence of the alliance, which does not guarantee the security of the United States but only puts this safety compromised.

The main idea of ​​the article – taking in new members, who are often weak, worthless and incapable of self-defense of the country, the Alliance forces the Americans to take custody of these new pitiful allies.

It is Washington only a headache, because it makes him get involved in all sorts of regional conflicts on the side of the countries that do not provide the security of the United States.

Countries that America in general, and do not need.

NATO expansion has long been turned into an end in itself – in practice, this expansion does not have any sense for Americans, not in the national interest of the United States, and eventually creates for the Pentagon to the State Department issues.

“Add to Montenegro – it’s like to get one more mindless friend in Facebook», – begins his article staffer Doug Forbes Bendou.

“The presidents and legislators continue to provide guarantees for the security of money and the lives of American citizens to foreign countries, and it happens even when – as is the case with Montenegro, when they have absolutely no value to the security of the United States,” – writes Forbes.

Business publication exposes the ruthless criticism of the policy of recruiting NATO with caustic sarcasm criticizing the principle of “expansion for expansion,” in which America is required, for example, carry the alliance commitments to Turkey – a “friend-enemy” of the United States, where the government is Islamist Erdogan, criticized furiously in his speeches “decadent West” and “American imperialism”, but once running for help to the Allies after they provoked the conflict with Russia.

However, a much more vivid example of useless and pathetic allies that America hoisted on his shoulders and is now forced to defend them, even though they do not need her or Europe – is the Baltic countries, with merciless candor named Forbes «helpless nations.”

“The expansion at the expense of the Baltic States turned a colossal mistake, which resulted in NATO became helpless nation in defense are not interested the rest of Europe, the countries that have no geopolitical significance to America, however, involved in the acute controversy with Russia, – says the American edition. – If there is something bad, then America with minimal support from the European “allies” – they are likely to seek refuge in Brussels – will have, apparently, have to deal with having a nuclear weapons Russia over the disputed issues of greater interest to Moscow than to Washington. ”

“Security of the United States significantly affected by the addition of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania”, – concludes Forbes, and on the basis of this conclusion, urging people not to repeat the Baltic “colossal mistake” in the “Eastern Partnership”, taking in Georgia and Ukraine.

It is noteworthy that Forbes said not a word about the “imperial ambitions” or “aggressive neighborhood” – the conflict between Russia and the Baltic States there is an objective, but the cause of his stated “heated debate” between Moscow and the Baltic countries.

Who this policy is – a rhetorical question, given that the adoption of the latest Foreign Policy Concept of the Russian Federation (2013), in which the Baltic states did not say a word, legally approved diplomatic line in Moscow against Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia is ignoring the whole Trinity.

Contemptuous silence – is a universal Russian official response to calls to its international isolation, the comparison with the Third Reich and female hysteria about the “terrorist state.”

Only a few months later, without any apparent connection with these public attacks, suddenly found themselves banned Latvian sprats, came under embargo “milk” and Russian transit redirected to the Baltic ports in Russia.

So the conflict between Russia and the Baltic states to blame Baltic states – says a leading US business publication, and by appealing to the most holy – to the “life of American citizens” – asks the question: why America must expose themselves to the threat of nuclear war with Russia because of the verbal incontinence Dalia Grybauskaite and Edgar Rinkevich?

Namely this Baltic Allies eventually from her and need: not a week goes by that of Vilnius did not hear the next call for increased US presence in the region, including the military presence.

For the Baltic States, and can be no question that they are fighting for themselves: no, we are small, responsible for our words about a “new Mordor” have allies.

Allies must do: they have to increase the presence of NATO in the region, the Baltic countries send in their military contingents, put them overland NATO base, going for it on a direct conflict with Russia.

This behavior, by the way, contrary to the bedrock of the Anglo-Saxon culture, and Americans are taught from birth that count in life only for themselves, responsible for his words and be able to stand up for themselves, can only cause disgust.
This aversion to read the publication Forbes between the lines, this disgust and question why the United States allies in the “helpless nation”?
“In the end, since the end of World War II, it passed 70 years. GDP and population of the European Union more than the corresponding figures in America, and much more than in Russia. Is it not time for the rich friends of Washington begin to defend themselves yourself? “- Angrily writes American magazine, noting that because of its craven allies, the White House continues to” risk the lives of its citizens, because Europe does not want to worry about is to have a sufficient number of men and women in uniform. ”
For Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia publication Forbes – a reminder that the Baltic Washington – emergency ballast is that the United States, if necessary, easily be thrown overboard, which is not for their value, and that Americans just do not go to war.
Article Forbes – is not just an article, because I Forbes – is not just a business magazine.
Forbes – is one of the mouthpieces of Wall street, this “wall newspaper” the first economy in the world, a voice that says business and political elite of the United States.
Forbes said its valuable than quantity, and quality of the audience about the “best workers” (rating of the richest people in the world) and the problems in the super-corporation called the USA.
Publication of the miserable, useless, and threaten the security of US allies in NATO could not appear in the media like nothing.
The American establishment realized the situation with “helpless nations” as a problem, concluded that no value Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia to the United States do not represent, and publicly made it clear that, if necessary, Washington will hand over the Baltic states.

You’ll know when to begin ! ?

2406604

Terror in Paris. Our bomber shot down by Turkey. Crimea without electricity as a result of sabotage … Finally, two things are clear.

First. The world is ruled badly.

Control worthless. Seven, Twenty, UN AZES, EEC, BRICS, the World Council of Churches, UNESCO … All not remember.

Dozens of important organizations, dozens of important presidents, thousands of important ministers, millions of spies, analysts, police, the FBI, the Federal Security Service, MI-6 and so on. And so on. An incredible financial, industrial, intellectual power.

They really rule the world. But the run really bad, obviously. Again, as a hundred or two hundred years ago, the battle begins for the Bosporus and the Dardanelles.

Famine, war, rampant terrorism – is similar to the planet Earth, where power belongs to the sentient beings?

Can foolish people choose smart leaders? They can come to power intelligent and good? Hardly. For smart and good are not ready to walk over corpses, voices produce intimidation and dirty money.

Second. Until now, no one has sold a nuclear bomb to terrorists.

When they shoot in Paris, we know that someone has sold their Kalashnikovs.

When illiterate savages missile surface to air churning modern bomber or helicopter – it means someone sold savages MANPADS and learned where to click.

Once someone will sell them the atomic bomb, we will have time to understand it. All will have time to understand, but those who would be too close …

… America trained and armed thousands of “do not understand someone” – and almost all of them went to the insurgents (the devil knows what to call them and theirs groups). America thought that the arms of friends, allies. The error came.

There are cases much worse. In the first Chechen war (yes, probably in the second), the Chechens fought the Russian Russian weapons. Crew Artyom Borovik (“Top Secret”) managed to take the sale of weapons to the enemy: a) the bargaining between the Russian officer and field commander: how much and what weapons the Chechens get for the specified amount; and b) the requirement of a Russian officer: “Our site is not used!” This officer took care of himself and his soldiers. The fact that the neighboring property will perish fellow soldiers, he, as we see, is not worried.


We certainly hope that the nuclear powers will not use nuclear weapons. The greatest hope we have those who are here on earth, loves girls, boys, skiing, Courchevel … But, alas, there is no hope for those who are here on Earth, does not like anything; to those in the sky joyfully await Allah and houris.

Even the leader of North Korea likes to earthly pleasures. Probably, it should keep him out of the use of the atomic bomb. He knows that will fly back. Yes, and red French wine and white blonde Europe, too, is run out, alas.

– They do not have the means of delivery! – Says durachё.

There is! They have an incredible amount of these funds. The delivery is called a “suicide bomber”. If he detonates explosive belt on himself, then he does not care what sort of amazing elements: nails, screws, or uranium, plutonium …

(Some of the means of delivery, we know even by name. Those, for example, who brought to London a little polonium infected restaurants, hotels, airplanes, the world was stunned.)

… Once the atomic and hydrogen bombs were only in the Soviet Union and the United States; blissful times. Although these powers were responsible in millimeters from nuclear war (Cuban Missile Crisis).

Now there are nuclear weapons in several countries about which we know for sure; and still have a few about whom we guess; and yet some stubbornly working to develop, and it is difficult to say how long they will be tormented more …

But we, unfortunately, do not know what to do, even the most civilized. One minute before Turkey was hit by our bomber, no one had not occurred, that this could happen. Neither we nor the Turks, neither the Americans nor the Europeans. But it happened. And until now, no one knows – why? Why Erdogan left their hotel without our tourists, our country without our customers just what horrible (gold, carpets, coats).

… The most civilized place on earth two thousand years ago was considered Rome. We do not know, as I have done to Nero, if he had an atomic bomb. His own he burned Rome primitive means.

The world looks with horror as savages crowbar and pickaxe shattered priceless masterpieces, unique monuments of culture. But this is a misconception. In fact, these people consume scrap sinful delusion.

Only 90 years ago, here in Russia, we blew up the church, cut icons. They were not thinking: who the architect? painter who? They did not destroy the masterpieces of culture, they struggled with confusion.

Inquisition burned people alive; Well it was not sadistic, it’s to be done for the salvation of the souls of sinners.

That will save us, do not have time to gasp.

* * *

… I do not know whether there had been Taliban fighters ISIL-s and other errors with a nuclear bomb. We do not know whether they have a national anthem. We can give them the best, most appropriate. First, the great poet Alexander Blok wrote:

We are on the mountain all bourgeois
World in Flames blow up,
World fire in the blood –
God bless!

This “God bless!” – Just fine. With this prayer is best to blow up churches and priests … Then hang the Bloc a little corrected and put on a soldier’s music. As it happened:

We are on the mountain all bourgeois
World in Flames blow up!
World fire burning!
The bourgeoisie is trembling!

Whether to .into Arabic, or let the fighters will learn from the errors in Russian. Russian there is now enough

“Sting Millennium” was finished!

«Афера тысячелетия» завершилась!

The last batch of our uranium went overseas. Russia had paid US indemnity for the defeat in the Cold War.
Almost none of the Russian media did not pay attention to an event that happened in the last month. From the port of St. Petersburg on a journey across the Atlantic sailed merchant ship Atlantic Navigator. On board – containers with Russian uranium.

The deal “Gore – Chernomyrdin”: the true goals of our American “partners”.

This was the last batch of uranium, which was sent to the United States on the basis of signed 20 years ago, the Russian-American agreement providing for the supply to the United States 500 metric tons of uranium, which Russia undertook to extract from its nuclear weapons and that America intended to be used as fuel for nuclear power plants for operation, this uranium deal actively discussed in the 1990s, but today, the theme was “behind the scenes” discussions of the key issues of our lives. A younger generation just did not heard about it. Therefore, we must be reminded of its history. Immediately, I note that this is no ordinary trade and economic deal beneficial to both parties. This act of the biggest robberies in Russia is not only the newest in its history, but also in the entire history of the country. Russia lost the Cold War the West, primarily the United States. He lost in no small part due to the treacherous policy of our leaders. These upper classes continued to take the country in the 1990s. “The uranium deal” – acceptance of our treacherous to pay tribute to the top winner in the form of weapons-grade uranium. The principal agreement on this was reached between the then Prime Minister VS Chernomyrdin and US Vice President Albert Gore, so this transaction is often referred to as transaction Gore – Chernomyrdin. It is also called “scam of the Millennium” by virtue of an unprecedented magnitude. In fact, it was an operation of the West, which solves several strategic goals:

a) unilateral nuclear disarmament by depriving Russia of its stocks of weapons-grade uranium, as well as the preparation of conditions for the US withdrawal from the ABM Treaty;

b) applying a huge economic loss of Russia (the accumulated stock of weapons-grade plutonium is an essential part of the national wealth of Russia at the time);

c) deprivation of the huge Russian energy sources in the future after the intended introduction of new technology thorium nuclear power.

The extent of the robbery in Russia. “Scam Goals” deal dubbed because, firstly, it had a huge scale, and secondly, was concluded fraudulently. Many Russian and American media sought to present it as a mediocre commercial agreement. The total purchase price for the supply of 500 tonnes of uranium was determined to be 11.9 billion dollars. Meanwhile, the value of the specified amount of highly enriched uranium is incomparably higher. To produce this amount of weapons-grade uranium, mining and defense industry worked for about 40 years, several hundred thousand people. Manufacturing dangerous, tens of thousands of people have lost health and disability, shortened his life. It was a huge sacrifice in order to forge the nuclear shield of the country and ensure a calm peaceful life of the USSR and the socialist camp. This uranium provides military-strategic parity in the world, which dramatically reduces the risk of World War II. On the other hand, the American media has such estimates: by Russian uranium at the beginning of this century, at the plant produced 50% of US electricity. One in ten kilowatt hour of electricity in the entire US economy was provided by the uranium from Russia. According to the estimates, which were made by experts at the end of the last century, the real value of 500 tonnes of weapons-grade plutonium was at the time not less than $ 8 trillion. For comparison, the annual average of the annual GDP of Russia, according to Rosstat, in the last decade of the last century there were in the region of $ 400 billion. It turns out that the actual price of the uranium deal was only 0.15% in relation to the minimum real value of the goods. The real cost of uranium was equivalent to 20 (twenty) annual GDP!

There have been many wars in human history. After they defeated often pay reparations and indemnities winners. Recall, for example, the Franco-Prussian War in 1871. “Iron Chancellor” Bismarck appointed defeated France in a contribution of about 13% of GDP (5 billion francs). Probably the biggest indemnity paid in recent history defeated in World War I Germany. Media reported that Germany just three years ago, has been paying reparations under the terms of the Treaty of Paris in 1919. In Germany, reparations were imposed in the amount of 269 billion gold marks. The amount, of course, enormous: it is equivalent to about 100 000 tons of gold. At the current price of the yellow metal is about 4 trillion dollars. Experts in the field of economic history argue that to Germany in Paris reparation is about twice the GDP of the then Germany. Among other things, the payment of reparations by Germany stretched for 90 years (with interruptions, pure payments were made for about 70 years); payment of the “uranium reparations” Russia kept within 20 years, with most of the uranium was delivered to the US in the 1990s.

In the history of the early to finish.

“The uranium deal” was accomplished in total secrecy from the people. We do not even been aware of many of the “people’s representatives” – for the reason that it is in violation of Russian law, did not pass the ratification procedure in our parliament. In the second half of the 1990s, a number of deputies have launched an investigation to clarify the terms of the transaction, the circumstances of its conclusion, assessment of compliance with the Constitution of the Russian Federation and other normative acts of Russia. As a result of strong pressure from certain influential forces surrounding then-President Boris Yeltsin managed to stop the investigation. We are trying to understand the transaction and many of our other policies, or even denunciation of the agreements achieved uranium supplies in the United States. Among them, for example, the legendary general L.Rohlin, Yu.Skuratov Attorney General, State Duma Deputy Ilyukhin. Death of Rokhlin and retired Skuratov many people associate it with the fact that they showed excessive activity in the investigation, “the uranium deal.”

Even if the supply of uranium in the transaction Gore – Chernomyrdin completed, it does not mean that history should be put an end. It is necessary to return to serious analysis and investigation of the transaction in the framework of a special inter-ministerial committee with the participation of specialists of the nuclear industry, the people’s representatives (the State Duma), law enforcement officials, the Foreign Ministry, Defense Ministry, and other agencies and organizations, independent experts in technical, military, legal and economic issues.
Firstly, there are suspicions that a number of persons involved in that transaction, remain in the “cage” current politicians and government officials. There is no guarantee that they will not continue to work in the interests of the US and the West.

Secondly, we need to correct and honest understanding of our recent history. Without truthful disclosure of the details “of the uranium deal” and its political, military, moral evaluation is no guarantee that we will once again stepped on like a rake. Analysis of the real aims of the American side of the deal clearly highlights the true aims and interests of those whom we, unfortunately, by inertia continue to be called “partners.”
Third, we need informed and detailed assessment of the economic damage that was done a deal for Russia and its people. Any attempt to Russia to embark on economic recovery the West will put a spoke in the wheel of our current reforms, socio-economic transformation. We must be prepared for the fact that the West will increasingly expose us to all sorts of “accounts” – for example, if we try to hold before of-shore our economy. Through the courts the US, UK, other European countries, will inevitably begin disassembling from the owners of offshore companies and / or their representatives with far-fetched claims for “damages”. About the same reaction can be expected in case Russia decides to withdraw from the WTO, the restriction of foreign investment or even limiting the repatriation of profits of foreign investors from Russia. We must be prepared for the fact that it may be necessary counterclaim “accounts” our Western “partners”. The largest of all possible counter “accounts” – our requirements to the US giant to compensate damage to Russia ‘uranium deal.

 

Philip Ekozyants 700-strong army of Putin.

Филипп Экозьянц: 700-тысячная армия Путина.

The world is not afraid of the 700,000th army of Putin and his nuclear weapons. The world is afraid that someone would dare to oppose Washington.

The world understands that as long as Washington does not interfere with doing what he does have is quite clear instructions on how to avoid the arrival of US peacekeepers in your house.

Instruction is really very simple: do what Washington says, or those who use his vocal apparatus, to carry out his instructions, and live, and even very fine living. And World War II is not – there is only local, and die just naughty.

And it’s not so scary. Whatever you hold in your mind and in your heart, you can always keep silent about it, accept it, change the view to bow to force majeure, or in extreme cases, move to where the most humbled and can be lost among them, where forage is enough for everyone .

And such places are still very much on the ground.

But if someone as big and menacing begin seriously to resist Washington, then loomed ahead of a new world war.

But this is scary. And most of all on earth will not remain places where you can hide from it.

And knowing that, even if you sympathize with the freedom-loving Putin, even if you have always dreamed that he finally appeared and showed Pindos long-promised gruel, even if you secretly pray for him – you choose … to join the sanctions.

Because it’s safer for you and your family. Because it is better to let the Americans bombed the Koreans, Vietnamese, Serbs, Iraqis, Ukrainians

We’re not there. We do not they.

We are here. We are loyal.

We are tolerant. We agree.

We are silent.

We surrender.

No, the 700,000th you afraid of Putin’s army.

You’re afraid that would break down and joined her.

 

Run a Ukrainian! Run!

Беги, украинец! Беги!

Let’s go back a few years ago and remember how elegantly global political elite was prepared to overcome the impending second wave of global economic crisis. The scheme was a beautiful and beneficial: the US soft “compressed” to the level of the owner of North and Central America and, in exchange, the world harness (literally, financially) in the process of ensuring a “soft landing” for the US economy. The most important marker of this scenario, in addition to the famous Obama’s “tell Vladimir that after the election, I will be more flexible,” was officially agreed to give the United States control over the rest of the world through the IMF’s refusal to “blocking stake” shares. In many conflict areas have been made compromises: the Americans, to the great joy of China cut its financial support for African politicians and Yanukovych regime invested “special purse” of the Democratic Party of the United States, Mark Mobius. Peace, for the first time in its history, was a more or less organized and bloodless transfer of leadership from one global hegemon in the hands of supporters of a multipolar world. And then everything collapsed.

 

I’m afraid we’ll never know the details of the invisible revolution in the American elite, which occurred about two years ago. From the visible effects need to emphasize the following: there was a “bow” between the most radical democracy (the so-called “Clinton clan”, to which he belongs and Joe Biden) and the most radical Republicans, ie neocons and “tea party.” Because of Obama’s failed American Gorbachev, and the blessing that has given Obama the presidential election last of the Kennedy clan turned out rather familial curse. As a result, instead of the supporters of the “soft landing”, some of the key points in the American “political MCC” captured supporters of the war to the end, not necessarily victorious, but Obama and what was left of his team may engage in partisan except that, the benefit of some control over economic bloc they still have.

 

In the new context, the US is trying to implement two plans:

1. Plan a minimum – to rob Europe via the so-called “free trade agreement” (see. Article “We need to Berlin, not Kiev” – http://politrussia.com/world/nam-nuzhen-berlin-779/) and the rest of the world – ignite.

2. Plan a maximum – to rob Europe, set fire to the whole world, to seize power in Russia and to use it as a battering ram against China with a mandatory nuclear war between the two major geopolitical enemies of the United States. And you thought nothing Nemtsov regularly wrote articles that the main enemy of Russia – this is China?

The implementation of these plans Ukraine should fulfill the role of a tool that forever separates the EU from Russia and bury any hope for a “Continental union” between Berlin and Moscow – the eternal fear of Anglo-Saxon civilization. Everything else – the secondary, though pleasant for US bonuses.

Washington’s main problem – a terrible time trouble. Obama negotiated the surrender hegemony not a good life, and also not a good life Americans had to rush to Maidan. They do not have even a few years, to how to play all the games in which they got involved; the economy may fall into a spin at any time.

In terms of implementation of the strategic objectives of the operation in Ukraine failed. If nekononov and Clinton in Washington left at least ten years, it would be a success, but they need a blitzkrieg, and blitzkrieg failed, and most likely will not happen. Despite the enormous pressure and attempts to play scheme “Take us to our economy, and we will protect you from the terrible Russian, who captured the Crimea and is about to take over Kiev ‘Europeans do not want to sign a contract TTIP and destroy its economic elite for the benefit of the United States. Worse, even an embargo on Russian energy could not push. About the seizure of power in Moscow, the Americans still dream, but the chances of them – a little bit, and the clock is ticking and ticking all monotonously counting time before the US economic collapse.

Moscow understands and acts in the wheel logic, “We need a Berlin”, despite the heart-rending cries guard patriots who like to wave a sword and help to ensure that the third time in a hundred years, Russia and Europe clashed in a battle that would benefit only the United States (not tired, huh?)

Highly recommended to see a fragment of the sign from a recent interview with Sergei Lavrov, which clearly explains why Moscow alliance with Germany: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=gJTKN0–PpE#t=2633 (beginning of the frame – 43: 40)

The bottom line: we want to “shake up” the European Union so that it began to actively defend their own interests. Not the fact that the work, but work on it – it is necessary. Even just holding the EU from becoming a “food” for the US economy will be enormous victory, which will not allow the United States to extend its existence due to the European economy, as well as the US extended its existence for two decades due to the plunder of the USSR.

The situation is slowly beginning to level off, and the recent summit Ukraine – EU, was the best proof of that.

Let’s look at the specifics:

1. Has the American radicals to make EU support Ukraine cost? No it failed. For a minimal support of the Ukrainian economy needs tens of billions of euros. They are not and never will. This way, the question of the complete submission of Europe. For a complete subordination? If it was full, the money would be allocated in the last year. No money.

2. Were you able to get tougher sanctions against Russia? No it failed.

Total defeat of Ukraine.

To complete the picture, it is desirable to read about how the Financial Times complains about the behavior of the German and French diplomats who “put pressure on Ukraine,” and rewritten beyond recognition the final document of the summit, which apparently was made in the State Department: http://lenta.ru/news/2015 / 04/27 / ft /

Moreover, moving from the language of diplomacy, the passage:

“Germany and its key European partners put pressure on Ukraine in order to accelerate the implementation of the Minsk Agreement, fearing that Russia will use procrastination to” justify the renewal of aggression “,” should be read as “The Germans and the French said: dear Ukrainians, or you merge in an amicable or we turn away and Putin will do something bad. ”

Against this backdrop, statements by the head of the Office of Trade Policy at the Ministry of Economic Development of Italy’s Federica Ayhberga looks particularly interesting:

“Italy in February is clear and makes it clear that the Council of Ministers will not vote for the extension of sanctions. We believe in Russia, in a prosperous country and a reliable partner,” – said Ayhberg. (Http://www.vestifinance.ru/articles/56613)

Before the victory in the European direction is still far, but reasons for optimism continue to appear, causing nervous American specialists:

“Some European countries have” Trojan horses “Russia:
The apparent inconsistency of some European countries in relation to the Ukrainian crisis is dictated by the national interests and the desire to conclude a lucrative contract with Russia in times of crisis, writes Bulgarian political scientist Ivan Krastev in his article published by The New York Times. “(Http://vz.ru /news/2015/4/27/742498.html)

The position of Kiev and its American curators can not be called a winner. Obama continues to block arms supplies to Ukraine, the EU does not want to save the Ukrainian economy, and direct access to the American printing press in Washington radicals fortunately not, and besides, the machine is moribund – http://fritzmorgen.livejournal.com/723625.html .

Through the IMF was able to push the injection of 5 billion, however, getting the next tranche made dependent on the success of negotiations on restructuring the debt owed to private creditors. But the restructuring of bad, bad to the point that Madame Yaresko hysteria in the pages of the Western media and Western threatened default funds.

http://top.rbc.ru/finances/15/04/2015/552e22b29a794716276d45bb

Apparently, Ms. Yaresko first encountered financiers for whom receiving a call from Clinton or Bush is not an indication to action. It will be interesting to observe their efforts to prevail upon Mark Mobius and his friends.

No money, no prospects, supply of American weapons are not. Washington “hawks” demand the resumption of hostilities, and the newspaper Le Monde (with reference to the environment Hollande) and European diplomats at the summit Ukraine – EU thick hint at the fact that even the “delay” of the Minsk performance agreements (which Kiev can not perform in principle) It leads to the fact that Kiev will lose significant territory. Unenviable prospects.

Total for Ukraine loom three possible scenarios:

1. If Europe is finally freed from the influence of the United States, the “Ukrainian problem” will be solved Russia are likely LDNR hands. The logic of “it is already possible!”

2. If Europe finally gets full control of the United States, the “Ukrainian problem” will be solved Russia are likely LDNR hands. The logic of “do not care anymore!”

3. If Kiev itself starts fighting the “Ukrainian problem” will be solved Russia are likely LDNR hands. Logic “asked for it!” with a view to use the situation to detach from the EU US

There is another option of continuing agony, but it can not last long. Sooner or later, one of these three options will occur. There are of course exotic scenarios like the all-out nuclear war, but now we do not consider them as in the case of their realization we still alive will be gone. And the text is still written to benefit the living.

Residents of Ukraine, regardless of their political preferences, it is understood that none of the above options is not intended for the territory of the former Ukrainian (net of Donetsk, Lugansk, and can be Odesa and Kharkiv, if you are very lucky) such surprises as the economic recovery and the expense of others restoring order.

No matter how things develop and how it will share or reformat Ukraine, Russia and the EU will not allocate resources to a radical stabilization of the situation in this area, in excess of what is necessary for the protection of the pipe (until 2019) and is armed or deactivation of nuclear power plants. All. In the rest – nothing or minimum wage. Hang around your neck 40 or even 20 million people tolerate their Wishlist and restore order does not want and can not nobody. Simply do not have the resources, and any attempt to “invest” in Ukraine scraps (minus the territories of which wrote above) does not find understanding in the political class, from regional elites and the population of Russia. The Europeans and say nothing.

Hence a simple conclusion for those who are still in the Ukraine: run. Run while you still can.

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

“North fist” against the United States Russia: Kaliningrad and the threat of nuclear forces.

Leonid Nersisian

After the beginning of the crisis Ukrainian stream anti-Russian propaganda in the world reached a magnitude since the Soviet Union. But if in most EU countries are relatively neutral forces calling for reconciliation, the Nordic countries and the Baltic line towards Russia as much as possible radical and destructive. In these countries, the US influence is constantly growing: in the Baltic Independent States is no longer quite as well in Scandinavia process actively goes in the same direction. Interestingly, of the four Nordic countries (otnesёm them and Finland – it does not always appear in this geographical concept) NATO includes only Norway and Denmark, and Sweden and Finland until adhere to non-aligned status, at least in words. Nevertheless, the wave of anti-Russian hysteria and the militarization of engulfing and these two states.

In the course is disinformation and lies at the highest level: that only cost the story of the Russian nuclear submarine allegedly swim in Swedish territorial waters. But that’s why it took a heavy missile submarines there to swim and how such an object could be missed, no one answered – irresponsibility in politics is now in vogue. Norway is generally constantly pours “crocodile tears” – drawing attention to the flights of Russian strategic aviation (which, incidentally, never violate any boundaries), and most recently put forward a ridiculous assumption that Russian research vessels “spies” for them, Located in a former submarine base Olavsvern. Base, the authorities in Norway a few years ago sold themselves as the cost of its operation was huge, and large military sense it was not – in the war with Russia alone will not save it, though, and really is a powerful refuge for submarines, and the global conflict underwater part of the Navy (Navy) Norway is negligible force – only six diesel-electric submarines class Ula.

Rhetoric in Denmark and Finland is not that hard, and the number of absolutely obvious misinformation voiced by officials, much less. But we of the words. And the actions are no different – Denmark has already agreed to take part in the formation of European missile defense system (Euro-ABM), and Finland is actively developing its interaction Armed Forces (AF) with the armies of other Nordic and Baltic countries (especially Sweden) and, of course, with the US Armed Forces .

Military tandem Sweden – Finland

Most actively goes establish the military tandem Sweden – Finland, and although the intention to establish a military alliance with the participation of these countries have been officially denied, in fact, the opposite occurs. Countries expressed their willingness to establish joint land and naval brigade, and in late March held joint exercises of the Air Force (IAF). They also attended the US Air Force who flew into Estonian Amari airfield. Moreover – Air Force integration of the two countries will continue to grow – instead of 62 aging American fighter F / A-18 is going to Finland to buy or Swedish SAAB JAS-39 Gripen new modification or French Dassault Rafale, moreover most likely choice will fall on “Swedes”. In both cases, the interaction of the Air Force will grow significantly, and in the case of the purchase of JAS-39 will peak – even weapons and spare parts will be unified.

Now, the key challenge for the United States in this area is drawing these countries into NATO. Population of states actively preparing for it – in the case of another escalation of Ukrainian conflict, the entry of Sweden and Finland in NATO could be a matter of time.

Baltic bridgehead

Active placement of US troops on the territory of Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia, as well as going there permanently NATO exercises indicate that these three countries will lay a foundation for NATO forces, including aviation Scandinavian countries. The geographical location of these countries can simultaneously apply a blow out in the direction of the Kaliningrad region surrounded by NATO and in the direction of Leningrad and Pskov regions. The armed forces themselves Baltic countries is extremely weak and few – in the amount they can only put about 23 thousand soldiers, it does not boast any significant amount of military equipment, and the Air Force in these countries are virtually absent. So that the main role of these states – become a springboard for NATO troops and the battlefield – not the most promising prospects, but it can not be interested in anti-national authorities of these countries, “dancing to the tune of” overseas “ally”.

Norway: Arctic Oil bait

Among the Scandinavian countries, Norway is different, perhaps, the highest degree of anti-Russian hysteria. And unlike the Baltic states – there is also a substrate material – namely Arctic oil reserves, which the Norwegians have serious types, however, as we are. It is applied to pressure from the US, leading to a unique “resonance”. In addition, Americans can “warm up” the Arctic appetite Norwegians, killing two birds with this – creating a new enemy for Russia and increasing its supply of arms. Thus, Norway is in a kind of “trap”, which is based her own energy ambitions. With regard to purely military component – that Norway is strong for its Air Force and Navy, as well as a high level of training soldiers. Very soon will begin deliveries of American fighters 5th generation F-35, which will be purchased in the amount of 52 units, in addition to (and in the future – for replacement) to 57 F-16s.

“North fist” against Russia

As we can notice, the above countries increasingly militarized and unite around an anti-Russian ideology. Under the auspices of the US military formed a kind of “fist” threatening the north-western borders of Russia. What forces and in what areas can be brought against the Russian Federation, these states?

1) Powerful air grouping capable of acting from Murmansk to Kaliningrad region – the entire length of the conventional front lines. In total it includes nearly 300 fighters – 62 F-18s, 134 JAS-39 Gripen and 102 F-16s. All planes of easy class, but a good level and in a very serious amount.

2) Two naval force – the first in the “Northern Seas” (North, Norwegian, Barents), represented mainly by the Norwegian Navy. It includes 5 frigates type Fridtjof Nansen, equipped with anti-ship missiles (ASM) Naval Strike Missile and combat information and control system Aegis, 6 missile boats Skjold type with the same rockets and 6 type diesel submarines Ula.

The second – in the Baltic Sea, represented the Navy Finland, Sweden and Denmark. Here, the battle can be thrown: 5 Danish frigates with US Harpoon anti-ship missiles and a good air defense system; 5 Swedish diesel-electric submarines with torpedoes and 9 corvettes with RCC RBS-15, 5 of which class Visby, created by technology “Stealth”; 8 Finnish missile boats with RCC RBS-15 (maximum launch range of 200 km), mine-layers 6 and 13 minesweepers.

3) The Army – Danish forces here, we will not consider because they are geographically more “detached” from the scene. Finland, Sweden and Denmark in the sum can put 31,000 soldiers, 284 German Leopard 2 and about 1,000 units of various artillery. More 23000, however, very much least to start with technology, have the Baltic countries. As you can see, the land forces – the most weak point of these countries.

In addition, there is the American presence in the Baltic States – while small, only a few dozen pieces of equipment and several hundred military personnel, who have officially arrived at the doctrine, but there is not much in a hurry to go back to the US.

Kaliningrad region – the purpose №1

Kaliningrad region, located virtually surrounded by NATO forces, due to the presence of only land borders with Poland and Lithuania is the most vulnerable target for a potential enemy. Already Lithuania often arranges problems in moving goods on its territory, it is theoretically possible to complete the land blockade, as well as energy.

Russian forces stationed in the Kaliningrad region, not very large, but actively rearming, for example, in 2012 there were the most advanced anti-aircraft missile systems S-400. However, a small number of troops – about 10 thousand people.

Simultaneously from Poland and the Baltic States in the fight can be thrown up to 80 thousand troops – and that without US support. Force “North fist” can be a powerful air support for ground forces by Polish and try to create a naval blockade of Kaliningrad. Resist this attempt to take full siege in Kaliningrad is the Baltic Fleet of the Russian Navy – his forces are roughly equal the combined forces of the Navy “Northern fist”: 2 destroyers Project 956, 2 modern patrol ship project 11540 (built using the technology of “Stealth”), 4 patrol boats 20380, 12 missile boats, 3 diesel-electric submarines. All these ships are armed with anti-ship missiles of various types, most of which outperforms the Scandinavian and American RCC. So that the victory in this confrontation is more dependent on the level of training of the crew and third-party factors such as intelligence, etc.

The task of the Armed Forces in the event of such an aggressive attempt to take the Kaliningrad region should be an early break through a land corridor through Latvia and Lithuania – there may be something to try to prevent ground forces and aviation Sweden, Norway and Finland, by linking part of the forces of the Western military district (ZVO) in Leningrad region . Of course, the secondary cooling power, which is concentrated to 40% of the personnel of the Armed Forces, is incomparably more powerful, but nevertheless forces “Northern fist” can buy time until the arrival of reinforcements from Western Europe and the United States.

Limited nuclear conflict

Is this realistic scenario of a major European war in the presence of large arsenals of strategic and tactical nuclear weapons from the opposing sides? If the main “battleground” will be the same the Baltic States, Poland, Belarus, Ukraine, Finland, Norway – ie non-nuclear states, it is real. Nuclear strikes will not be applied by states possessing them. Nevertheless, in this scenario, the use of tactical nuclear weapons is little doubt – this is especially important for us, as the number of NATO armies superior to our several times almost all indicators. As a result – the losers in such a war will be precisely those countries that are now the most stand up for the fight against Russia. And the winners will not be in it – both camps will have destroyed hundreds of thousands of soldiers and military equipment destroyed mountains. Nevertheless humanity, as history shows, can not long exist without wars – and their not in Europe (large) since 1945. How many more years of nuclear weapons can deter aggression and hatred? It is clear that the war would be burned in Europe in March, 2014, if not for this constraint.

Conclusions and prospects

1) “Northern Fist” is really formed. Its purpose is yet geopolitical pressure on Russia and endangering the Kaliningrad region.

2) groups of troops in Kaliningrad should be maintained as far as combat-ready state, its number, if possible, should be increased.

3) the United States by creating a “mini” military unit in Scandinavia and the Baltics more compressible ring of military encirclement of Russia.

4) Norway, despite its ambition, is still far from being able to compete with Russia in the Arctic. Russian Northern Fleet is a serious power with which it is impossible to compete with 6 diesel submarines, several frigates and missile boats. In Russia there are 45 submarines, including 23 nuclear power, aircraft carrier “Admiral Kuznetsov”, heavy nuclear cruiser “Peter the Great” and many other ships.

5) In addition to geopolitical reasons and the US struggle with Russia, there is a much more urgent task – to get to work on the military-industrial complex “fullest”, despite the economic problems in most European countries. Now, even conditionally poor Baltic states start to allocate any money for the purchase of military equipment.

6) The Great War in Europe can still occur – the voltage level at some point really close to critical. And the presence of a large number of weapons and active preparations for war can cause extra confidence.

7) The next step is to expand the project can become a European missile defense interceptors accommodation in Scandinavia. Missile defense system GMD (Ground-based Midcourse Defence) will be able to intercept part of Russian intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), flying over the North Pole to the United States. And most importantly, to intercept them before breeding fighting units – in fact most of the modern Russian ICBM has multiple warheads. Such an alignment is quite possible after 2020, when it will be implemented by the present stage of European missile defense and would be “brought to mind» GMD. The temptation to foment war after such a step would be, of course, even higher.

8) The countries included in this new anti-Russian bloc, are not beneficiaries – rather, it, in which case, have the worst of all, since it is they who will be the battleground. Prior to the United States, as before, far away.

9) All countries that are close to Russia and hosts the elements of the US missile defense must be notified at the highest level that they will be the very first target for the strategic nuclear forces of the Russian Federation, and they do not get security, and vice versa – a mortal danger. The application must not be at the level of ambassador, as was done in Denmark, and at the highest. The population of these countries needs to know what their governments are solutions.

 

 

 

 

NATO has no protection from the operation, the course which fulfills Russia.

У НАТО нет защиты от операции, ход которой отрабатывает Россия

The Russian army during the sudden teachings throws in the Kaliningrad region missiles “Iskander”, as Poland prepares to host the air and missile defense systems. The bad news for NATO is that in this case to oppose anything the Russian counterattack, it can not. Now it does not matter what happened before – the redeployment of Russian “Iskander” or attempt to probe placement in Poland missile defense system of unknown origin. The fact that the territory of the neighboring country with Russian missiles will air and missile defense, has long been known. And the fact that it can not be solved by diplomatic means, too, was known long before the Ukrainian events. It makes no sense to retell and prepositions that the US invented to justify the idea of ​​placing a missile defense system in close proximity to Russian borders. Who’s supposed to, and so they will remember: it was supposed to be protection against a non-existent Iranian threat posed by non-existent Iranian ballistic missiles with non-existent nuclear warheads. The ensuing discussion diplomatic disputes reminiscent of Spanish rabbis with Torquemada: the decision to deploy missile defense (expulsion of the Jews and Marranos) were still made in advance for reasons of mystical character, but still interesting to listen to. At the same time (almost ten years ago) was first told about the response deployment of Russian missile systems “Iskander-M”, precisely in the Kaliningrad region, and not somewhere else. These plans are strategic, they are known in advance – this is not the battalion group of marines, which can be flown anywhere. No one has made no secret of that system “Iskander” just was a response to the deployment of US missile defense systems, and in northern Poland (both on the southern flank of the response to a similar attempt in Romania was the transformation of Crimea into a fortress, teeming with exactly the kind of means of destruction). “Iskander” – “the perfect assassin” is precisely such systems that the US and NATO are trying to arrange a new, reinventing them in real-time theater. That the US “Patriot” that competing with them French counterparts are unable to repel the attack on themselves medium-range cruise missiles. Location in the Kaliningrad region “Iskander” makes a highly publicized NATO missile defense system in another target. In this sense, the remarkable number of mutually planned placement systems: the United States and Poland talking about batteries 9 “Patriot”, while talking about the alleged 10-powered Russian “Iskander”. This may well be true, because Washington does not have a free supply of missile defense systems and defense and the armed forces of the Russian Federation “accumulated” “Iskander” in the two theaters of military operations, which had never been in recent history. Moscow is able to consciously distribute high-precision weapons for several HPT, so even with the stock. In this context it is worth to look at some details of the sudden inspection training, running now in parts of the Western District, Northern and Baltic fleets, Airborne and Special Forces. Ivanovo paratroopers landing work out in the area of ​​Pechenga (ie, on the Norwegian border), Arctic brigade occupies the Franz Josef Land, the Northern Fleet relieve the so-called road Gorshkov – corridor progress in the North Atlantic from the coast of the Barents Sea between Norway and Iceland, and the long-range aviation eyeing Norway, Iceland and the UK. Like it or not, but this is the scenario of the Russian counter-attack in response to a possible NATO aggression. This scenario was developed in draft form in the Soviet period and since then has not lost its relevance. Change only the weapons and tactics of their application, but the meaning has remained virtually unchanged. In short, it is assumed that the collision of European Russia and NATO importantly – it’s a matter of time: how fast can (if he can) go to Europe reinforcements from North America (USA and Canada). The only way to deliver a very large masses of manpower and equipment were and will remain for a long time naval convoys. To stop the convoys, Russia must be brought under control of the North Atlantic area. And it is achievable to comprehensive amphibious operation in northern Norway with the capture airfields NATO, which there a lot, including a key one – Icelandic Keflavik. Keflavik provide control over the Russian Air Force (including strategic bombers) control over the entire Atlantic to the Azores – the southernmost point of the route potential convoys. Thus, the question of destruction of such convoys becomes purely technical. On the northern route, you can forget, the transfer to northern Norway and Iceland Russian special forces and air force will break the whole balance of forces in the European theater as a whole. At the same time, the Northern Fleet, including submarines with nuclear weapons, can freely pass into the Atlantic, then war can be considered complete. At this time, the Poles and 12 American tanks in Latvia can indefinitely (probably an hour and a half) to depict the heroic defense. But to ensure that developments may be, including, and after the opening of the airspace over the Baltic and Scandinavia (ie destruction of airfields and cover them), and for which there are “Iskander” in the Kaliningrad region and on the border with Estonia (in fact there are another Norwegian air defense system in Narvik and Mo i Rana). Special Forces and the Arctic with its quiet landing above the Arctic Circle – as it is now the Ivanovo paratroopers on the Norwegian border. This script is afraid of NATO, when so focuses on long claimed the idea of ​​relocation “Iskander”. The Alliance does not have a mobile defense system, many years of his military-strategic thought or idle at all, or focused on the execution of a foreign country “Tomahawk” without any resistance from the enemy. In our case, once the potential vulnerability of land – the Arctic Ocean – now turned almost into the lake. A group of US in the Persian Gulf has become vulnerable and our fleet (he appeared base in the region), and the response to missile attack. And most importantly: the plan to deal with counter-attacks, as described above, they still can not. That is why the placement of “Iskander” in the Kaliningrad region (even if temporary, as part of the exercise) has attracted much attention. It is, by the way, followed immediately after the final output of Russia from the CFE Treaty, which is formally proposed classifications affected. So the word Shoigu “on our territory where we want, and place there” is no surprise. But many people happy. Eugene Krutikov Source: http://vz.ru/politics/2015/3/17/734911.html

Source: http://politikus.ru/articles/45789-u-nato-net-zaschity-ot-operacii-hod-kotoroy-otrabatyvaet-rossiya.html
Politikus.ru

The third world war will die first Baltics !

The possibility of the Russian army in the event of a third world war, military experts have estimated at a round table in the RIA “Novosti” on “the Russian army in terms of current challenges and threats.”

According to the director of the Center for Public Policy Research – Head of the Department of the Institute of CIS Vladimir Yevseyev, – in the event of an attack by the US Russia will be able to answer only nuclear weapons, as a non-nuclear has a range of up to 1 thousand. Km and to defeat the United States, we need to place it weapons in Cuba.

Therefore, most likely, says analyst Sergei Mikheyev, that Russia in the event of the Third World will not strike on the US and NATO bases in the Baltic States, which in the near future it is planned to create.

“The Baltic countries will be destroyed – describes Sergei Mikheyev possible developments. – They always complained about how Baltics suffered from conflicts of East and West. Now, it would seem, they should stay on the sidelines, but they also want to become a battlefield. Just Unlike wars 300 years ago, modern missiles, these small countries will be destroyed altogether cease to exist. The confrontation with Russia, they are trying to increase their value. They have just lived quietly, and they again rush to the front line. So to them more attention, are some money. But all this can result in the death of these states. “

According to Vladimir Yevseyev, the US did not have a chance to disarm the Russian army, but we are far behind in terms of weapons – and their number and in power.

“What can answer Russia, taking into account the asymmetry of the strategic nuclear forces? America focuses on the marine component of the strategic nuclear forces, it has about 14 nuclear submarines like” Ohio “, equipped with 24 missiles at ten warheads that goes beyond the Prague Treaty of START 2. Russia can not respond symmetrically, because the combat potential of the US and SSBN submarine strategic type “Northwind” is different. On the “Boree” 16 missiles, and the ability to launch manifest them substantially less than US missiles “Traydent- 2 “- said Yevseyev.

In his opinion, “the best steps will be asymmetric responses”. This, for example, the creation of a heavy rocket “Sarmatian”, which will be located in Siberia outside the United States interception. Great Expectations expert assigns to create combat railway missile system (BZHRK). Earlier BZHRK complexes were eliminated due to inefficiency: “In the USSR BZHRK had limitations – it did not provide the missile launch from any location, the missile was severe and led to the overturning of. It was necessary to prepare for the launch of a special area. In addition, the rocket does not fit in car and so it was impossible to disguise. Now the situation has changed, as we have more light missiles “yars”.

Soviet echelon had one drawback – he destroyed a warhead. Now go away from it, will be BZHRK division. “But now there is the danger of a terrorist, which was not in the USSR – continues Yevseyev. – BZHRK goes on rails and rails can be undermined.”

Anyway, at the moment Russia has enough capacity for retaliation, and it can stop NATO from possible military action from the territory of Ukraine, assured the expert.

However, Sergei Mikheyev looking at the situation is not so sure – he said, the United States made good money on the First and Second World War, and have a chance to earn a third. “Americans see the situation in Europe as a laboratory. It is considered that for the United States there are people first and second grade – Papuans they chase and do not regret. But the Europeans supposedly quite another matter. Such ideas are wrong. US and European sacrifice. They spit on them wanted, “- said Mikheyev.

One of the weaknesses of the Russian armed forces – the lack of mobilization reserve, it is already not enough and will still sorely lacking in the future, said Yevseyev.

Russia, he said, need to have in this reserve to half a million people with military experience: “The US Army at about 1.2 million 800 thousand of the National Guard, and, basically, it natsgvardeytsy fought in Iraq. A provision should have a reserve equipment, weapons. bayonets to fight impossible. “

 

Russia will lose the war for America 360 minutes !

Dmitry Rogozin: “The United States can destroy a few hours up to 90% of our nuclear capability

In addition, he called the five kinds of threats to our country and stated the backlog on a number of critical core technologies from leading Western countries in some areas up to tens of years.”

Россия проиграет Америке войну за 6 часов

“For more than a decade in the United States worked out the concept of Prompt Global Strike. It provides striking non-nuclear weapons at any point on the planet in one hour, “- Rogozin said. According to a war game conducted by the Pentagon at the end of last year, with the help of 3.5-4 thousand. Units of US precision weapons can destroy 6 hours basic infrastructure facilities of the enemy and prevent him to resist,” – he added.

However, their creation is clearly serious problems may occur. “Today the backlog on a number of critical core technologies from leading Western countries is in some areas up to tens of years,” – said Deputy Prime Minister.

According to him, if such a blow will be inflicted on Russia, the main objectives will be the strength of the strategic nuclear deterrence. In essence, the US experts’ estimates, as a result of such an attack can be destroyed from 80 to 90 percent of our nuclear arsenal,” – said Deputy Prime Minister.

And despite the fact that Russia, according to its military doctrine is ready to use nuclear weapons in repelling aggression with conventional weapons, this is not enough. To withstand such a threat, according to Rogozin, can only be created “autonomous weapons” beyond the control of modern telecommunication technologies.

According to him soon catch up and overtake other, especially high-tech Western powers Russia is unlikely to work in all directions. The scientific potential of our country was virtually destroyed during the years of political stagnation,” – he said.

According to Rogozin, the backlog in the field of defense technologies can be eliminated due to the concentration of scientific potential of the military, scientists and technologists. A function of coordinating this work should be assigned to the Military Industrial Commission, which he himself had headed.

With regard to success, the Deputy Prime Minister noted that the growth rate for a number of branches of the military industry are much higher than that of the Russian economy as a whole. In addition, in 2012 nearly 500 defense enterprises were covered by technical re-equipment, 35 of them new facilities already in operation.

The modern threats to the country Rogozin identified 5 types. The first – a conflict with the country, surpassing Russia in terms of technology. Such a war will be waged in a contactless manner (the above example with the United States). The second – a conflict with an equal potential of the country, when you need to fear superiority of the enemy on the important areas of confrontation. The third and fourth local wars, the type of Afghanistan and Chechnya, as well as countering terrorism. According to Rogozin, it is necessary to create such weapons that will destroy the insurgents and terrorists, avoiding civilian casualties. By the way, Deputy Prime Minister said that in order to identify terrorists on the borders of Russia plans to create a fundamentally new information system, the outlines of which are already being worked out. Well, while the fifth is concerned with the development of the Arctic shelf. Active development of the Arctic shelf will inevitably lead to a conflict of interests between the two countries that impose their claims on its resources. It is possible that the opposition will go beyond diplomatic “- said Deputy Prime Minister. According to him, it is likely that the Russian oil and gas production facilities can become targets hidden sabotage on the part of competitors.”

Underestimate the threat to Russia’s security is not just stupid, and criminal, competition will take more aggressive forms. Russia does not intend to participate in the race of military technology as a bystander, “- said Rogozin.

Lethal Rubicon Obama !

Летальный Рубикон Обамы. Рискнут ли США поставить Порошенко тяжелое вооружение?

Whether to risk the US Poroshenko put heavy weapons?

As reported in the resurrection of the American edition of The New York Times, the Obama administration has never been closer to the realization of its long-standing threat. Washington could open for Ukraine “hot military-technical line.” We are talking about the supply of arms and all that can make Donbass capitulate.

However, on Monday, State Department spokesman Jen Psak clarified that the final decision on arms Ukraine yet. At the same time, she stressed that no options are not excluded.” On the question whether the supply of arms Kiev provoke indirect” US war with Russia, the speaker of the State Department said: “Nobody wants to” mediate “the war with Russia.”

Still surrounded Obama lacked unanimity on this issue. Since there was a danger to provoke an “arms race” in Ukraine within the framework of the so-called “Hybrid war”. In addition, it should be recognized that the supply of lethal military equipment, from the point of view of international law, may be regarded as interference in internal Ukrainian opposition. Crafty term “ATO”, invented by Kiev to not call a spade a spade, can hardly mislead international lawyers. Thus, the supply of weapons will be another step towards the escalation of tensions with the prospect of escalating “hybrid” war into a hot (between Russia and NATO under the auspices of the US). The first step in this direction has already been made a few days ago the head of the Ukrainian Defense Ministry Stepan Poltorak confirmed the participation of foreign nationals in the fighting on the side of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. In fairness, it‘s about as long as volunteers.

Chief lobbyist of Ukraine means of warfare acts chief of the armed forces of the US and NATO in Europe, General Philip Breedlove. Until recently, an active opponent of this idea was the Advisor to the President for National Security Affairs Susan Rice. However, according to the publication, it is ready to change their point of view. “The President of the United States has not yet decided on the supply of such lethal aid. However, after a series of serious setbacks that Ukrainian forces have suffered in recent weeks, the Obama administration is considering new military aid, “says NYT. According to the newspaper, officials persuade Obama to send Kiev missiles, armored vehicles and radars worth $ 3 billion. A 2 February, a group of authoritative retirees represented by the former deputy head of the Pentagon Michele Flournoy, a former commander of NATO forces James Stavridis and the former US Ambassador to NATO Ivo Daldera provide justification to supply large quantities of weapons to Ukraine.

Prior to that put out the fire with gasoline in Ukraine, openly called only odious Senator McCain.

As evidence that the fatal Rubicon can be passed, advocates visit US Secretary of State John Kerry in Kiev, which will be held on February 5. In the Ukrainian capital, a senior official will arrive with an impressive backing band consisting of a Chairman Joint Chiefs of Staff US Armed Forces General Martin Dempsey and assistant to the president for national security Susan Rice. According to the American edition of these policies declare the “openness to discuss the issue of granting Ukraine lethal aid.”

Recall still Washington supplied Ukraine so-called non-lethal weapons body armor, night vision devices, medical devices.

In a conversation with “SP” head of the analytical department at the Institute of Political and Military Analysis Alexander Hramchihin questioned the assertion that the heavy weapons of the American or NATO production was supplied to the theater of military operations in the Donbass.

Another thing is that this may be a former Soviet technique, which is still standing armed with Eastern European countries that are members of NATO. Such as Poland or Romania. Say that somewhere in the combat zone was discovered NATO caliber projectile is absurd. The question is, what does it shoot if the Ukrainian Soviet artillery designed to gauge?

A small arms found in Donetsk airport, generally does not prove anything. As you know, in the US it may acquire private person in the store. Ukraine has got it, most likely, with mercenaries from private military companies.

“SP”: Why, despite the bellicose statements, to the question of the supply of heavy weapons Washington fits very carefully?

Obama is in a very difficult position. It strongly presses Congress. On the other hand, the president of the United States understands that the results can be counterproductive. Open delivery of heavy weapons would only worsen the situation in Ukraine. Because Russia will then announce that it is also in this respect no more holding back. As a result of the military situation in Kiev will become not better, but worse.

“SP”: The more that Western weapons still need to learn.

If we are talking about serious art, rather than on small arms from the Soviet relearn on US weapons systems is very difficult. Accordingly, in the Ukraine in large numbers have to bring trainers from the US. That is, it will take time to introduce new technology. But what if these instructors taken prisoner? In addition, virtually guaranteed that the technology will have shtatovskih militias. Obama probably guess what this means. But apparently, the policy is often stronger than common sense.

“SP”: What kind of weapon in the first place asked to Kiev security forces?

They need any advanced weapons. But no one will sell. A cheap and modern does not happen. Even Poland refused to hand over the Soviet technique on grant terms. The only thing that may be involved, it’s about anti-military complex. Air defense Kiev do not need because of a lack of volunteers aviation. As for private aviation, Canada last year offered 20 cars free F-18, but the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine refused. And rightly so. Because in the development of this technology will take several years. And the amount of money will be spent on maintenance. It’s old aircraft. So we’ll have to prepare not only pilots, but also technicians. Plus we have the means to counter militia aviation.

In Ukraine and Soviet aircraft problems. Why would she need the same old, besides import?

“SP”: – And what about small arms and mortars?

This stuff they themselves drown. The only thing missing is the anti-missile systems. This is the most obvious option. But again just a few days after the receipt of the samples will be in the militia, and there may be sent to Russia. I think our military and technical specialists are waiting with bated hope present in the form of, for example, the anti-missile system the US Army Javelin. Any country is very interested in obtaining samples coming from other countries, it helps to develop their own military-industrial complex.

“SP”: The militia set a new goal – to reach the borders of the former Donetsk and Luhansk regions, and only from the position of a new line of contact to negotiate with Kiev. Ukraine satisfied with this option, or she prepares forces to counterattack?

I’m back in September, when they were entered into the Minsk Agreement, said that sooner or later a truce go into another full-scale war. Because both sides clearly “nedovoevali” and are confident that they have “stolen victory”. Right now they are dovoevyvat” as long as the parties are against the limit of their capabilities: human, moral, organizational, financial. Wars end only if at least one of the parties can not fight any more. Then she capitulates. If both can not, then they agree on the world. When this happens, then the war will end.

America does not go to the direct supply of weapons to Ukraine, as in this case Russia will get the moral right to mirror the action in response, said military analyst Michael Tymoshenko.

In fact, Ukraine, and without enough military equipment. As they say, a 20-year war without stopping. You just need to put in fighting shape his technique where wiring rotted where seals sagged. It is clear that the tanks, BPM, and so on for a long time stood on the storage bases, nobody renovate.

Aviation is the same story. In his time in Ukraine tank was almost more than we do (3000 pieces). Kharkov Plant. Malyshev produced T-64, produces new BMP.

“SP”: Why Kiev authorities are literally begging the US weapons. What are they missing?

– First of all mind. There’s no one to command. At all levels, starting with the sergeant. And recruits do not want to fight. Why would they put their heads with fools? Just look how people run from mobilization. How much equipment is not supplied, will still fight nobody.

Editor in chief of National Defense Igor Korotchenko not agree with the thesis that the Ukrainian army did not need military equipment.

To make political decisions deliver or not, will be Obama. Legal barriers no longer exist. Congress in December adopted the “Act on the support of Ukraine“, which involves any help until the supply of lethal weapons.

“SP”: This will be enough to break the resistance of the militias?

Immediately say, Ukraine will not deliver US weapons. And above all, of the former Warsaw Pact countries that are now included in NATO. That is, it will not be a new Soviet equipment. Hence, the sum of the US can finance the delivery or Poland or Hungary or the Czech Republic. It is possible that will be used barter schemes. That is, instead of the past in Ukraine Soviet weapons, these countries will receive US.

In addition, Washington can begin deliveries Kiev separate party special weapons, night vision devices, optics, military, communications, navigation, sniper weapons, radar to pinpoint the location of the artillery batteries. The main thing is the anti-tank weapons. Not to mention clothing, gear, body armor. Ukraine can also get American “Hummer”, based on which is mounted firearms.

“SP” a kind of modern “carts” during the Civil War, the beginning of XX century.

This is a much more serious armored vehicle.

“SP”: All of the above will change the balance of forces?

Of course. Because Ukraine will have quite a significant military arsenal, allowing it to better level to conduct military operations. In these circumstances, Russia, of course, will be forced to react. Both politically and practically. If Americans really begin large-scale arms supplies to Ukraine, it unleashes a Russian arms for similar actions against the armies of the DNI and the LC.
Already Ukrainian General Staff provides lists of the necessary equipment in the office of the US military attaché in Kiev. That is, all formal requests are made. It now remains the last word for Barack Obama, his hands are completely untied.

 

Ukraine would be the nuclear button?

Украина окажется ядерной кнопкой?. Горбачев полагает, что между США и Россией может начаться большая война. Многие опасаются того же

Gorbachev believes that the US and Russia could start a major war. Many fear the same!

The first and only president of the USSR Mikhail Gorbachev decided to loud rise from political oblivion. He warned the world that the Cold War between Russia and the United States has reached such a stage that can grow into a real fighting between the most powerful nuclear powers. He said: “Unfortunately, I can not say firmly that the Cold War did not result in a” hot “. I am afraid that they (the US – a comment. “JV”) may take the risk. “

It should be recognized that concerns policy that turned the former Soviet Union in the “thoroughfare” for the “masters of destinies” of world history from the American citadel of democracy,” not unfounded. Actually, the same thing and says the new military doctrine of the Russian Federation, adopted at the end of last year. In this important document for our country contains a provision on the possibility of a retaliatory nuclear strike in response to aggression, attack on the territorial integrity of the State or the protection of the existing political system from attacks from outside.

Recent developments in the South-East of Ukraine did not give a reason for historical optimism.

President of the National Strategy Institute Mikhail Remizov agrees with the assessment of the state of the current level of relations between Russia and the West as the Cold War. However, a direct analogy with the Cold War period of the bipolar world, in his opinion, is inappropriate.
– Now we are not talking about Russia’s claim to the status of second pole of power. Rather, we should talk about trying to fend off the geopolitical strategy of suffocation large, but a single country. In addition to, but not in the best socio-economic situation.

“SP”:(Free Press)– As far as the rights of Gorbachev, who predicts Russia and the West hot” phase of confrontation?
The main risk is not that the US and its Western allies declare open war on Russia. Rather, they can place the red flags” for which Moscow would not dare to go. Including in the form of its military presence on the territory of Ukraine. Option presence of US and NATO troops in Ukraine, this is the factor that will be Rubicon for Moscow.

“SP”: pro-American party in the parliament, which requires Poroshenko declared war on Russia, is controlled by a figure or valid internal logic of confrontation?

– The process is running, it has its own inertia. Therefore it is not so important, choreographed whether these actions directly or not. It is clear that the task of the ruling political class in Ukraine as closely as possible to draw the United States into a direct military confrontation with Russia. This would be an ideal option for them. At the same time these people completely overlook the fact that in this case it would be a battleground for Ukraine itself, from which in this case, there is little left. In fact, they just want to get direct security guarantees. The most obvious expression would be the presence of US military facilities in different regions of Ukraine

“SP”: It is a violation of the “Big Treaty”, and consequently – the abolition of the recognition of the territorial integrity of Ukraine by the Russian Federation?

After the reunification of the Crimea with Russia on this treaty can forget. This path could have been completed script section of Ukraine as a post-war Germany. That is a line from the West “stakeAmericans, we come from the East. And then there will be no reason to deny the recognition of the Donbas.

“SP”: What is the logic of Washington: blackmail RF expulsion from globalized “paradise”, customized for the interests of the United States after World War II, and further squeezed to the end?

– In my opinion, American politicians rather try to punish Moscow than affect its position. From the point of view of the Americans, Moscow has violated the rules of the global game, encroaching on US dominance in the world. And, then, the Russian Federation must be pointedly revealing and punished. It needs to scrub back to modest geopolitical corral”. When it is said that the sanctions would not change Moscow’s position for the United States is not important. The main thing is to show that the perpetrator punished. The second factor is to maintain the glow of the conflict that turns into a constant factor of the watershed between Russia and Europe. As well as creating an ideal area of vulnerability for Russia.

If on the territory of Ukraine will begin the negative dynamics of Washington (such as militias take new regions), it will ensure the presence there of troops of third countries (Poland, Lithuania) as a guarantee that this process will not go further.

Few serious analysts would deny that the Cold War between Russia and the West is, according to the chief of security solutions sector problems Centre for Defence Studies RISS Sergey Ermakov.

I would like to draw attention to something else, that during the Cold War we did not have “hot” touch.

“SP”: Well, what about Vietnam or North Korea in military engagements that involved not just Soviet equipment, but also pilots and instructors? From the United States – the same picture.

In fact, the Soviet Union and the United States then took part in a “hybrid war”. In Ukraine, the situation could reach a direct collision. It is a war in Europe, where we see the American experts, who act as volunteers.” The trend to the fact that the scope of their presence will only expand. The commander of the land forces in Europe, the United States recently visited Kiev. After that, there is talk of sending of American instructors.

“SP”: – How far can the “hot” contact other countries on the territory of Ukraine?

If the supply of arms to begin serious, it will be NATO equipment that Ukrainian recruits hardly learned in a short time. Have to involve the US military personnel. This will provoke Russia to “mirror measures”. In this situation, the probability of an armed clash very high. In a recent article in the Financial Times, former US ambassador to NATO, campaigning for direct delivery of lethal weapons. And the leadership of Poland said he was willing to sell Kiev Soviet heavy machinery.

“SP”: And what will happen if the militia would try to go beyond the NPT and LC, creating Crimean land corridor?” Radicals of Parliament voted for recognition of Russia aggressor country.” In such a situation may direct confrontation between Russia and NATO, going beyond “hybrid war”?

This is difficult to exclude.

“SP”: In the field of conventional arms, we are seriously losing the aggregate potential of the NATO countries. In this situation the nuclear club” our last argument?

I do not tend to hang on NATO derogatory labels such as “paper tiger.” Armaments is a huge potential, is ten times higher than the Russian. Only one US military budget exceeds the combined defense spending of all countries of the world. And if we add the potential of NATO, it is more than a trillion dollars a year.

“SP”: hardly makes sense to try to compete with NATO in the field of conventional arms?

In the new military program of the Russian Federation clearly spelled out the possibility to apply tactical nuclear weapons and strategic forces even if there is a threat of territorial integrity and Gosstroy. There is a certain “red line”, where NATO can use its full potential. This is the fifth article of the Washington Treaty. In fact, to expand all these “paper shelf”, will take time. To Spain, Portugal, Poland and the Baltic states at the same time lined up and made combat schedule.

“SP”: The Pentagon has already announced regrouping their units in areas adjacent to Ukraine NATO countries.

This applies to US forces in Europe (about 60,000 troops). According to Washington, it is the shock body of NATO, which can be use. And, of which 15 thousand – instantly, and the other by rotation.

“SP”: purely quantitative is not impressive.

Why? On a par with the proposed transaction deployment and mobilization. This will apply the most advanced guidance systems, anti-tank missiles that will reach advantage. There are no militias such equipment.

“SP”: How can Russia respond to explicit military intervention in Ukrainian events from the outside?

In military doctrine clearly written as soon as the threat to the territorial integrity and political system in Russia. Currently, the most obvious casus belli (casus belli – approx. Ed.) Is the Crimea. That neither Kiev nor the West do not recognize Russian. Any military operation against the Crimea entail answer all Russian power. Using a last resort – that is tactical (as necessary) and strategic nuclear forces.

“SP”: – How to behave in Turkey in case of aggression against the Crimea because of this power depends on compliance with the Convention of Montreux?

Going into the Black Sea, the Americans may try to implement the concept of rapid global strike using cruise missiles from aircraft carriers. On the other hand, such an escalation are not interested, not only we, but also the West. By the way, Turkey, regardless of their membership in NATO and the distance can not get involved in this conflict. Ankara may refuse to provide the Straits and the airbase.

In Eastern Europe, the US has a number of countries (Poland, the Baltic countries), which is sufficient in terms of military tactics to wage war against Russia. This is a very lucrative foothold. On the other hand, there is not yet placed base for storage of nuclear weapons. Although emergency Brussels will speak about “unforeseen circumstances” that require response. However, the question for the West to respond using tactical nuclear weapons has not been fully resolved.

There are serious concerns that such a turn of events would require the use of strategic nuclear weapons. In response, Russia has no choice but to use its full potential. This is a well-informed Western partners. That’s why they try not to be the escalation of the conflict in this stage.

NATO countries rely on the latest conventional weapons that will knock out the militia to the border with Russia. And this would be sufficient. Talk about how Moscow would react to the military presence of NATO in the Donbass – is from speculation. Incontestable red line– a territory of Russia, part of which appears Crimea.

 

Today launched the mechanism of the collapse of oil and the dollar !

Сегодня был запущен механизм крушения нефте-доллара

No wonder the last US presidential herself Jen Psak constantly confused in their statements of Iraq and Iran – is even symbolic. Smashed Iraq and roll in the dust of Libya, the Americans stumbled on Syria and Iran on rasshibut your stars and stripes forehead.
We have already talked to you about that after the abolition of the Bretton Woods agreement might actually hold the US currency on world petroleum contracts denominated in US dollars. This allows you to print uncontrollably America green pieces of paper and throw them into the world, creating inflation and export rich, in fact, at the expense of the rest of humanity, including us swami. And anyone who tries, not even fight, but at least get out of this system, America punishes quickly and mercilessly.

Let me remind you the story.
After September 11, Iraq, going to abandon dollar in oil contracts, was declared a threat to the free world. Probirochka with baby powder, demonstrated by Colin Powell at the UN meeting, served as a pretext to invade a sovereign Middle Eastern country, the execution of its president, Saddam Hussein, the installation of absolute democracy” and the selection of the main prize – the Iraqi oil fields.

Weapons of mass destruction in Iraq has not been found. But it is not played absolutely no role. As the saying goes: “The war is over Thank you all.”

In 2011, Colonel Muammar Gaddafi, who liked to put their tents in front of the UN headquarters in New York, also announced its intention to sell Libyan oil exclusively for the euro and gold. Immediately becoming shake hands with a dictator and oppressor of democracy, Gaddafi was the Libyan revolution, civil war and NATO intervention was brutally murdered.

Following undemocratic, from the US perspective, the state oil became Syria. Although Assad and is not intended to collapse the petrodollar, there was another reason. And away on thumb scheme – a charge of genocide Bashar al-Assad of the Syrian people, the armed opposition, the attempt of the revolution, the preparation of the intervention of NATO forces But (!)
At this time found the man who would not let the black holder of the Nobel Peace Prize in dust roll another Middle Eastern country in the name of democracy. In 2013, a Russian naval force in the Mediterranean Sea for the first time exceeded in size and combat power similar rates of NATO forces in the region. Since mid-January 2014 the Syrian port of Tartus, where the Russian naval base, were delivered radar equipment for surveillance and electronic warfare as well as private goods. An-124 transferred armored vehicles, spare parts for helicopters, guided air bombs and drones (Reuters). According to anonymous sources in Syria were delivered S-300. The use of the waters of the Mediterranean Sea to organize the invasion of Syria was impossible as it was in the case of Libya, or, at least, conjugate with huge losses because the entire Syrian coastline received a powerful cover.
At the same time, Putin has made a peace initiative on the Syrian issue. And Negro peacekeeper was forced to agree with her. The intervention did not take place.

However, already 27 March 2014 with the participation of US military advisers from Turkey was an attempt to capture part of the coastline of Syrian territory. Detachments of radical extremist Islamist group AlNusra Dzhabgat” with the support of the Turkish artillery and engage Turkish armored vehicles, made the invasion of the border town of Kasab. The operation was access to the coast and take control of the province of Al Ladhiqiyah springboard for the organization that provides the beginning of the offensive along the coastline and take it under control.

This adventure was also failed. During the week, the Syrian army troops completely cleared the militants from the specified area. At an emergency meeting convened by the UN Security Council the United States refrained from official condemnation of terrorists.

At this point, has already happened Crimea and the geopolitical situation in the world has deteriorated. There was a question of anti-Russian sanctions and the US have taken here knight’s move” – lifted sanctions against Iran perennial. It was the first attempt to collapse in oil prices for the purpose of economic pressure on Russia. Although still a couple of months before Obama has threatened to “bring down a pile of bricks on the offender Iranian sanctions.” For many years, Iran has suffered sanctions because of its nuclear program and he had nothing to answer them. Now Negro seemed that he makes himself a loyal Hassan Rouhani and will increase the influence through the south-western Asia. But here he is, as it turned out, already late

Again, it was ahead of the very nosy man” to establish close contact with Iran during its international isolation. He has made the conclusion with the countries of the Caspian region agreement on the neutral status of the Caspian Sea, which made it impossible for the proposed accommodation transshipment NATO base in the Kazakh port of Aktau, and hence the potential threat of Iran on the Caspian Sea. An agreement on military-technical cooperation between Moscow and Tehran. And also signed a contract for the import of Iranian oil to Russia in the amount of 500 thousand. Barrels per day than Rouhani had strong support.

Why buy Russian oil? It would seem more stupid to come up with anything. Time has shown that the action man” turned out to be a very loyal and visionary.

Today, when Iran did not lie down under the America that counted on black again we were talking by the Western democracies about weapons of mass destruction, but in Iran (!) Against this background, we obtain two interesting events.

First – visit Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu to Iran, after which we learn about the resumption of negotiations on the delivery of this country … what do you think? The complex C-300. And here it should be noted that immediately after Iran Shoigu went to India

Second. But the second will make the Negro has to worry seriously.
Yesterday, Iran’s foreign minister made a loud statement that: “All hopes for a deal on the nuclear program will disappear if the US Congress will vote for new sanctions against his country.”
And today, 24 January 2015. at 14:28 Moscow agency “Itar-Tass” reported that Iran cease the use of the US dollar for payments in transactions with foreign countries. In particular: In foreign trade in contracts will now be used other currencies, including the yuan, the euro, the Turkish lira, Russian ruble and the South Korean won,” – said the agency Tasneem Deputy Director of the Central Bank, Gholam Ali Kamyab. And the main thing here that oppose this decision has nothing to America – Iran sells its oil to Russia!

Let me remind you, Russia has already moved to calculations by hydrocarbon contracts in rubles with a number of countries. China – the largest of them. But Iran is today the only state oil exporter, officially completely eliminate the use of the US dollar for international settlements. And something tells me that the IraqiLibyan scenario here is not to be held, it is not held in Syria.

Yes, remember the three paragraphs above I mentioned Shoigu visit to India? I think India is on the waiting list

SOURCE

http://imperiya.by/news.html?id=155182

RSS for Posts RSS for Comments