Tag Archives: politics

Iran convenes an emergency meeting of the UN Security Council and can declare the US a war.

Иран созывает экстренное заседание Совета Безопасности ООН.

Последний пакет WikiLeaks, Vault 7, содержал набор документов под кодовым названием «Marble», в которых подробно описана тактика компьютерного взлома, применяемая ЦРУ.

После сравнений исходного кода «Marble» и компьютерного червя Stuxnet иранские инженеры могут официально и доказательно подтвердить то, о чем они догадывались всегда: при администрации Барака Обамы иранские ядерные объекты подверглись хакерской атаке из ЦРУ.

Это было нападение на ЯДЕРНЫЙ потенциал страны, что не просто нарушает многочисленные соглашения ООН и прочие договоренности — это является АКТОМ ВОЙНЫ. Теперь либо ООН очень жестко отреагирует, предложив в отношении США серьезные санкции, либо же Иран не найдя справедливости в ООН сам объявит Соединенным Штатам войну.

Все должно решиться сегодня днем, в 15.00 по Восточному времени США.

(3:00 PM Eastern US time)

Stuxnet — это вредоносный компьютерный червь, впервые обнаруженный в 2010 году и нацеленный на промышленные компьютерные системы. Stuxnet несет ответственность за причинение существенного ущерба ядерной программе Ирана. Программное обеспечение разработано так, что вирус после работы стирает сам себя, не оставляя практически никаких следов. Как давно предполагалось экспертами, червь является совместной американо-израильской разработкой, хотя официальной все и всё всегда отрицали. Анонимные американские официальные лица, выступающие в Washington Post, утверждали, что червь был разработан ещё во время администрации Буша для саботажа ядерной программы Ирана, которая представляет собой целую череду «ошибок» и «несчастных случаев».

Stuxnet предназначен для поражения программируемых логических контроллеров (programmable logic controller , PLC), которые позволяют автоматизировать электромеханические процессы. Такие процессы используются для управления машинами на заводских сборочных линиях, аттракционами или центрифугами для отделения ядерного материала.

Stuxnet запускается с использованием операционной системы Microsoft Windows, а затем через сеть добирает программное обеспечение Siemens Step7. Далее собирая информацию о промышленных системах и разбалансируя центрифуги червь заставлял их взрываться. По сообщениям, Stuxnet разрушил почти пятую часть ядерных центрифуг Ирана.

Stuxnet имеет три модуля: червь, выполняющий все подпрограммы, связанные с основной полезной нагрузкой; файл ссылки, который автоматически выполняет распространенные копии червя; руткит-компонент, отвечающий за скрытие всех вредоносных файлов и процессов, предотвращая обнаружение присутствия Stuxnet.

Stuxnet обычно вводится в целевую среду через зараженный USB-накопитель. Затем червь распространяется по сети, просматривая программное обеспечение Siemens Step7 на компьютерах, управляющих PLC . В отсутствие какого-либо критерия Stuxnet становится бездействующим внутри компьютера. Если оба условия выполнены, Stuxnet вводит зараженный руткит в программное обеспечение PLC и Step7, изменяя коды и выдавая неожиданные команды для PLC, возвращая цикл обратной связи нормальных значений системы операционных систем для пользователей.

 

 

оригинал

перевод

https://cont.ws/@bigone/572542

 

“Sting Millennium” ended.

The last batch of our uranium went overseas.

Russia fully paid indemnity for the US defeat in the Cold War.

Almost none of the Russian media did not pay attention to an event that occurred in August 2016 .. From the port of St. Petersburg on a journey across the Atlantic has gone merchant ship Atlantic Navigator. On board the ship – container with the Russian uranium.
   The deal “Gore – Chernomyrdin”: the true purpose of our American “partners”
  This was the last batch of uranium, which was sent to the United States on the basis of signed 20 years ago, the US-Russian agreement providing for the supply to the United States 500 metric tons of uranium, which Russia undertook to extract from its nuclear weapons and that America intended to be used as fuel for nuclear power plants .

About this uranium deal actively discussed in the 1990s, but today, the theme was “behind the scenes” discussions of the key issues of our lives. A younger generation simply nothing about it heard. Therefore, we must be reminded of its history.

Immediately, I note that this is no ordinary trade and economic transactions, beneficial for both sides. It is an act of the largest Russian robbery, not only in the latest of its history, but also in the entire history of the country. Russia lost the Cold War the West, primarily the United States. She lost to a great extent due to the treacherous policy of our leaders. These tops have continued to take the country in the 1990s. “Uranium deal” – the consent of our treacherous elite pay tribute to the winner in the form of weapons-grade uranium. The principal agreement on this was reached between the then Prime Minister VS Chernomyrdin and US Vice President Albert Gore, so this transaction is often referred to as the transaction Gore – Chernomyrdin. It is also called “the scam of the Millennium” by virtue of an unprecedented scale. In fact, it was the West’s operation, which solves several strategic goals:

a) unilateral nuclear disarmament by depriving Russia of its stocks of weapons-grade uranium, as well as the preparation of conditions for the US withdrawal from the ABM Treaty;

b) applying enormous economic damage to Russia (the accumulated stock of weapons-grade plutonium is an essential part of the national wealth of Russia at the time);

c) deprivation of the huge Russian energy sources in the future after the intended introduction of new technology thorium nuclear power.

The scale of Russia robbery

“Scam Millennium” deal dubbed because, first, it had a huge scale, and secondly, was concluded fraudulently. Many Russian and American media tried to present it as a mediocre commercial agreement. The total purchase price for the supply of 500 tonnes of uranium was set at 11.9 billion dollars. Meanwhile, the value of the specified amount of highly enriched uranium is incomparably higher. To produce this amount of weapons-grade uranium, mining and defense industries of the country have worked for about 40 years, several hundred thousand people. Manufacturing dangerous, tens of thousands of people lost their health and ability to work, shortened his life. These were enormous sacrifices in order to forge a nuclear shield of the country and ensure a calm peaceful life of the USSR and the socialist countries. This uranium provides military-strategic parity in the world, which dramatically reduced the risk of a world war.

    On the other hand, in the US media, there are such assessments: by Russian uranium at the beginning of this century in the US nuclear power plants produce 50% of electricity. Every tenth kilowatt hour of electricity in the entire US economy was ensured at the expense of enriched uranium from Russia. According to the estimates, which were made by experts at the end of the last century, the real value of 500 tonnes of weapons-grade plutonium was at the time of not less than $ 8 trillion. For comparison, the annual average of the annual GDP in Russia, according to Rosstat, in the last decade of the last century there were in the region of $ 400 billion. It turns out that the actual price of the uranium deal was only 0.15% in relation to the minimum real value of the goods. The real price of uranium was equivalent to 20 (twenty) annual GDP!

There have been many wars in the history of mankind. After they defeated often pay reparations and indemnities winners. Recall, for example, the Franco-Prussian War in 1871. “Iron Chancellor” Bismarck defeated France appointed a contribution of about 13% of GDP (5 billion francs). Probably, the biggest in recent history indemnity paid defeated in World War Germany. Media reported that Germany just three years ago, has been paying reparations for the Paris Peace Treaty of 1919. In Germany, reparations were imposed in the amount of 269 billion gold marks. The amount, of course, enormous: it is equivalent to about 100 000 tons of gold. At present the price of the yellow metal would be about $ 4 trillion. in the field of economic history Experts say that to Germany in Paris reparation is about twice the GDP of the then Germany. Among other things, the payment of reparations by Germany stretched for 90 years (with interruptions, carried out for about 70 years in the pure form of payment); the payment of the “uranium reparations” Russia kept within 20 years, with most of the uranium was produced in the US in the 1990s.

     In the history of the early to finish.
  “Uranium deal” was accomplished in total secrecy from the people. Do not even been aware of many “people’s representatives” – for the reason that it is in violation of Russian law, it did not pass the ratification procedure in our parliament. In the second half of the 1990s, a number of MPs have launched an investigation to clarify the terms of the deal, the circumstances of its conclusion, assessment of conformity with the Constitution of the Russian Federation and other normative acts of Russia. As a result of strong pressure from certain influential forces surrounding then-President Boris countries Yeltsin managed to stop the investigation. We are trying to understand the transaction and many of our other policies, or even denunciation of the agreement achieved on the supply of uranium to the United States. Among them, for example, the legendary general L.Rohlin, Yu.Skuratov Attorney General, State Duma Deputy Ilyukhin. Death of Rokhlin and resignation of Skuratov many people associate it with the fact that they showed excessive activity in the investigation, “the uranium deal.”

Even if the supply of uranium in the transaction Gore – Chernomyrdin completed, it does not mean that we should put an end to history. It is necessary to return to serious analysis and investigation of the transaction in the framework of a special inter-ministerial committee with the participation of the nuclear industry specialists, MPs (the State Duma), law enforcement officials, the Foreign Ministry, the Ministry of Defense and other agencies and organizations, independent experts, technical, military, legal and economic issues.

Firstly, there are suspicions that a number of persons involved in that transaction, remain in the “cage” active politicians and government officials. There is no guarantee that they will not continue to work in the US and Western interests.

Secondly, we need to correct and honest understanding of our recent history. Without truthful disclosure of details “uranium deal” and its political, military, moral evaluation is no guarantee that we are again stepping on rakes like. Analysis of the real aims of the US side of the transaction clearly highlights the true aims and interests of those whom we, unfortunately, by inertia continue to call “partners”.

Thirdly, we need informed and detailed assessment of the economic damage which has been inflicted deal Russia and its people.

Any attempt to take the path of Russian economic recovery West will put a spoke in the wheel of our current reform, socio-economic transformation. We must be prepared for the fact that the West will increasingly expose us to a different kind of “bills” – for example, if we try to carry out deofshore our economy. After US courts, the United Kingdom, other European countries inevitably begin disassembling from the owners of offshore companies and / or their representatives with far-fetched claims for “damages”. Approximately the same reaction can be expected in case Russia decides to withdraw from the WTO, the limitation of foreign investment or even restriction of repatriated profits of foreign investors from Russia. We must be prepared for the fact that it may be necessary counterclaim “accounts” our Western “partners”. The largest of all possible counter “accounts” – our requirements to the US giant to compensate damage to Russia “uranium deal.”

VY Katasonov

NATO is preparing the Third World War?

НАТО готовит Третью мировую?

 

NATO defense ministers last week gathered at the two-day meeting in Brussels to finally memorize plans to deploy near Russian borders four combat-ready groups of about 4,000 people.

These border force, if necessary, in a few days will be supported by a rapid response force composed of 40,000 people. This plan represents the largest escalation in the region since the peak of the “cold war” between the United States and the Soviet Union, and brings with it an increased threat of armed confrontation between Washington and Moscow – the two largest nuclear powers in the world.

At the end of the session on Wednesday, 26 October, NATO Jens Stoltenberg Secretary General confirmed that the US, Britain, Germany and Canada have previously agreed to provide the command structure of the combat groups to be placed respectively in Poland and the three former Soviet Baltic republics – Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania . Stoltenberg added that other NATO member states personnel and weapons would contribute to the build-up presence. Describing this location as the “multi-ethnic”, he stressed that this underlines the fact that “an attack on any of the allies will be perceived as an attack on all of us.”

US Secretary Ashton Carter defenses said Washington will send in Eastern Poland “combat-ready battalion-level task force” consisting of approximately 900 people. Personnel will be assigned from the 2nd Cavalry Regiment «Stryker», named for the Stryker armored combat machine. The division has repeatedly directed the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

In addition, the Pentagon is sending manned by tanks and heavy artillery battle group of the 3rd Armoured Brigade of the 4th Infantry Division. The group will be stationed in Poland, but will act on the entire periphery of the western Russian border with the former Soviet republics and Warsaw Pact states. Also sent a shock 10th Aviation Brigade, …

“Gauges” deal a blow to US-led coalition?

«Калибры» наносят удар по американской коалиции

Operations Room) in the Aleppo area, staffed by personnel of the intelligence services. Before the “semi-secret” facility on September 20 has been designated as a target for Russian missiles strike, it operated US intelligence officials, the UK, Israel, Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar.

According to news agency Fars News, a blow to the Intelligence object was caused by the Russian side immediately after the US Air Force air strikes in the area of Deir ez-Zor on the armed forces of Syria in support of terrorists LIH *. “Russian warships positioned off the coast of Syria, fired destroyed aiming and foreign military operations center, killing more than two dozen Israeli and foreign officers.”

Killed 30 Western intelligence officers, but the noise did not raise ?

  “Russian warships fired three missiles” Caliber “for foreign officers coordinating operations center in the area of Dar Ezza (Dar Ezza) in the western part of Aleppo near Mt. Saman (Sam’an), killing 30 Israeli and foreign officers.”

The operations center was located in the western part of Aleppo province near Mount Saman, where there are many ancient caves. The region is located in the depths of the mountain range.

Fars news agency report leaves the impression that the “operations center” was staffed mainly by Israeli soldiers. In all likelihood, plant managers to the United States, and subject to coordinated the local allies of Washington in close connection with the US military and intelligence agencies.

Except agency Fars and Sputnik Arabic, Russian news about the attack against the intelligence of the object of the coalition led by the United States, do not hit the headlines. In fact, there is a total blackout. Reliability Fars agency posts have yet to be confirmed.

An important fact is that the operations center, located in the area of Aleppo in the territory held by rebels, was manned by personnel of the countries that are major state sponsors LIH and Al-Qaeda in Syria **. Namely: the US, Britain (actively participated in air strikes) and four countries in the region – Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Israel and Qatar. The respective roles of the four countries in the region with regard to the recruitment, training, logistics and financing of terrorism, have been adequately documented.

This operations center (ie, combat information center) in the region of Aleppo as well as field operations centers in other regions (in the territories controlled by the militant forces) are in constant communication with the centers of the military command and control of the United States, Israel and their allies .

It should be recalled that in October 2015, Obama announced that he has sent US special operations forces for action in Syria, allegedly anti-terrorist operations against LIH. These forces US special operations were “include at least 50 special operations advisers, who will work the resistance forces fighting against the Islamic State in the north of Syria, but will not participate directly in hostilities (Washington Post, October 30, 2015).

They will not participate in the fighting, they will be busy «’s advisory” activity – that is, both within the rebel units, and in the field of operational centers.

In recent months, Washington confirmed that an additional 250 personnel of the US special operations forces should be deployed in Syria. A certain number of selected intelligence officers had to be attributed to field operational centers. This sending US special forces coincided with the influx of thousands of newly recruited “jihadist mercenaries” who have joined the ranks of the various terrorist groups. It was reported that “thousands of terrorists” had crossed the Turkish-Syrian border in early May 2016, to accommodate for fighting against government forces in Aleppo area.

The operations center in the region of Aleppo was used to coordinate actions on the ground with intelligence activities drones and air strikes. According to the Fars agency, the personnel of intelligence attributed to the destruction of Russia Operations Centre US-led coalition, also participated in the planning and implementation of the US Air Force attack on the Syrian armed forces (Syrian SAA forces), which was held immediately after the conclusion of the Geneva Agreement on ceasefire .

operational centers based in Syria kept in touch with the American and Allied command, as well as special forces (including Western military personnel employed by private mercenary companies), integrated into the various insurgent and terrorist groups, including LIH and Al-Nusra ***.

The existence and location in the region of Aleppo operations center was to be known as the Russian military and the Syrian government. And (until recently), they put up with it. Until recently, no action has been taken against the center.

According to the news agency Fars News Agency, the matter appears therefore that Moscow has decided to choose an operational headquarters in Aleppo region immediately after the decision of the Pentagon ordered the US Air Force air strikes on Syrian government forces, participated in combat operations against terrorists LIH in Deir ez-Zor .

For message Fars News Agency on the Russian attack against the CIA-NATO object of any other messages in other media is not followed. How not followed and evidence at an official level.

Assuming that the message Fars New Report authentically Russian attack against an operational center coalition led by the United States, has serious implications. Is this a precedent created? Russian attack led by the United States subject to retaliation for the attack on the Syrian armed forces in Deir ez Zor?

This is a potentially dangerous watershed in the evolution of the war in Syria, which must be considered in the broader context of the escalation of hostilities.

However, at the same time, the operational center is undeclared Intelligence object. Washington did not recognize its existence, and Moscow has not given official confirmation of the attack. Russian media are silent on this issue – as well as Washington. Neither party is not interested in making this a public issue.

Author – Michelle Hosudovsky, Professor of Economics, University of Ottawa (Canada), founder and director of the Center for the Study of Globalization (Centre forResearch on Globalization [CRG], Montreal, Canada). He worked as advisor to the governments of developing countries and international organizations. Author of 11 books, participated in the preparation of Encyclopaedia Britannica. In 2014 he was awarded the Gold Medal “For Merit” of the Republic of Serbia for the coverage of the NATO aggression against Yugoslavia.

Copyright © Prof Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research, 2016.

Presidential Proclamation – National Preparedness Month, 2016

BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

A PROCLAMATION.

Барак Обама объявил сентябрь 2016 года — месяцем подготовки к глобальным катастрофам. Presidential Proclamation - National Preparedness Month, 2016

Americans have been tested by trial and tragedy since our earliest days — but year after year, no matter the hardship, we pull through and forge ahead. Fifteen years after the attacks of September 11, we reflect on our strength as a Nation when anything threatens us. Today, as the residents of Louisiana mourn the loss of loved ones and face tremendous damage caused by historic floods, we are reminded of what Americans do in times like these — we see the power of love and community among neighbors who step up to help in extraordinarily difficult circumstances. Preparing ourselves to meet the unknown challenges of tomorrow is a duty we all share, and when confronted with crisis or calamity, we need to have done everything possible to prepare. During National Preparedness Month, we emphasize the importance of readying ourselves and our communities to be resilient in the face of any emergency we may encounter.

Although my Administration continues doing everything we can to keep the American people safe, it is each citizen’s responsibility to be as prepared as possible for emergencies. Whether in the form of natural disasters like hurricanes and earthquakes, or unspeakable acts of evil like terrorism, danger can arise at unexpected times and places. Fortunately, there are many things that individuals, families, and communities can do to improve their readiness. I encourage all Americans to take proactive steps to prepare for any situation that may occur including signing up for local alerts, checking insurance coverage, documenting valuables, creating a plan for emergency communication and evacuation, and having a fully stocked disaster supply kit on hand. And I encourage those in the business community to prepare their employees, develop a business continuity plan, and engage in community-level planning to help ensure our communities and private sector remain strong when faced with an emergency. For information on how to better prepare for emergencies that are common in your area, or to learn about resources that may be available for increasing preparedness, visit www.Ready.gov or www.Listo.gov.

In the face of unpredictable threats and hazards, we are committed to improving access to information and raising awareness of the importance of precautionary measures. Leaders across our country should take the time to review the 2016 National Preparedness Report and find ways to address the vulnerabilities it highlights. All Americans can play a role in fulfilling our National Preparedness Goal by addressing the risks that affect them and participating in preparedness activities across our Nation.

We continue to collaborate with State, local, and tribal partners, along with those in the public and private sectors, to ensure that communities in crisis do not have to face these dangers alone. In addition to coordinating relief efforts and providing rapid response, we have focused on supporting the needs of survivors, investing in affected neighborhoods, and helping them rebuild their communities to be better, stronger, and more resilient. Federal agencies are also working to share resources with the public, promote the tools and technologies that could help during disasters, and offer preparation strategies. We launched America’s PrepareAthon! to bring communities together and help them plan for emergencies, and on September 30, we encourage a national day of action to spur preparedness efforts from coast to coast.

Disasters have become more frequent and severe as our climate changes; both urban and rural areas are already feeling the devastating consequences, including severe droughts and higher sea levels, intense storms and wildfires, and more powerful hurricanes and heat waves. Climate change poses an imminent and lasting threat to our safety and national security, and it is critical that we invest in our infrastructure and integrate the preparedness efforts of our communities to improve our ability to respond to and recover from the effects of our changing climate and extreme weather events.

This month, we pay tribute to the courageous individuals who rush to the scene of disaster for their dedication to our safety and security, no matter the price. Let us recognize that each of us can do our part to prepare for emergencies, help those affected by disasters, and ensure all our people have the necessary resources and knowledge to protect themselves. Together, we will remain strong and resilient no matter what befalls us.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim September 2016 as National Preparedness Month. I encourage all Americans to recognize the importance of preparedness and work together to enhance our resilience and readiness.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this thirty-first day of August, in the year of our Lord two thousand sixteen, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and forty-first.

BARACK OBAMA.

 

US thinking about the exclusion of the Baltic states of NATO !

США задумались об исключении Прибалтики из НАТО

 

On the pages of Forbes magazine was publicly recognized as “meaningless” Baltic stay in NATO. From the membership of the Baltic states into NATO significantly affected the security of the United States: as a result of their activities in NATO there is a threat of a nuclear war with Russia over countries that damn America. For the Baltic elites, such statements from the ocean – a reminder that the US hosts Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia – emergency ballast, which the United States simply thrown overboard, if necessary.

In one of the most famous and influential business media of the planet – the US financial and economic magazine Forbes – earlier this month published “software” analytical article “Why America is a member of NATO?”, To question the feasibility of the existence of the North Atlantic Alliance, which does not guarantee the security of the United States but only puts this security at risk.

The main idea of the article – taking in new members, who are often weak, worthless and incapable of self-defense of the country, the Alliance forces Americans to take custody of these new pitiful allies. This makes Washington only a headache, because it forces him to get involved in all sorts of regional conflicts on the side of the countries that do not ensure the safety of the United States. Countries that America in general, and do not need.

NATO expansion has long been turned into an end in itself – in practice, this extension does not make sense for Americans who do not meet the national interests of the United States, and eventually creates for the Pentagon to the State Department issues. “Add to Montenegro – it’s like to get another mindless friend in Facebook», – begins his article Forbes staffer Doug Bandow.

“The presidents and legislators continue to provide guarantees on the security of money and the lives of American citizens to foreign states, and this occurs even if – as is the case with Montenegro, when they have absolutely no value to the security of the United States», – Forbes writes. Business publication exposes the ruthless criticism of the policy of replenishing the NATO ranks, with caustic sarcasm criticizing the principle of “expansion for expansion”, in which America owes, for example, carry the alliance commitments to Turkey – a “friend-enemy” of the United States, where the government is Islamist Erdogan, fiercely criticized in his speeches “decadent West” and “American imperialism”, but once running for help to the allies after they provoked the conflict with Russia.

However, much more vivid example of useless and pathetic allies that America hoisted on his shoulders and is now forced to defend them, even though they do not need her or Europe – is the Baltic countries, with their merciless straightforwardness named Forbes «helpless nations.”

“The expansion at the expense of the Baltic States turned out to be a colossal mistake, which resulted in the NATO members were helpless nation, protection of which is not interested in the rest of Europe, the countries that have no geopolitical significance to America, however, are involved in acute controversy with Russia, – says the American edition. – If there is something wrong, then America with minimal support from the European “allies” – they are likely to seek refuge in Brussels – will have, apparently, have to deal with having a nuclear weapon Russia over the disputed issues of greater interest for Moscow than to Washington. ”

“Security of the United States significantly affected by the addition of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania”, – concludes of Forbes, and on the basis of this conclusion, urging people not to repeat the Baltic “colossal mistake” in the “Eastern Partnership” countries, taking in Georgia and Ukraine.

It is noteworthy that Forbes said not a word about the “imperial ambitions” or “aggressive neighborhood” – the conflict of Russia and the Baltic countries there is an objective, but the cause of his states “heated debate” between Moscow and the Baltic countries. Who this policy is – a rhetorical question, given that the adoption of the latest Concept of the Russian Federation Foreign Policy (2013), in which on the Baltic States is not a word, legally approved diplomatic Moscow line against Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia is ignoring the whole Trinity. Contemptuous silence – a universal official Russian response to the calls for its international isolation, a comparison with the Third Reich and female hysteria about the “terrorist state.” Only a few months later, without any apparent connection with these public attacks, suddenly found themselves banned Latvian sprats, came under embargo “milk” and Russian transit redirected to the Baltic ports to Russian.

So the Russian conflict with the Baltic blame Baltic states – says a leading US business publication, and by appealing to the most holy – to the “life of American citizens” – wonders why America must expose themselves to the threat of nuclear war with Russia over a verbal incontinence Dalia Grybauskaitė and Edgar Rinkevich?

And this is what the Baltic Allies eventually from it and demand: not a week goes by that of Vilnius did not hear the next call for an increase in the US presence in the region, including the military presence. For the Baltic States, and can be no question that they are fighting for themselves: no, we are small, responsible for our words about a “new Mordor” need allies. Allies must do: they have to increase the presence of NATO in the region, sent to the Baltic countries its military contingents, put them overland NATO base, going for it on a direct conflict with Russia.

Such behavior, by the way, contrary to the fundamentals of Anglo-Saxon culture bases, and the Americans, who are taught from birth to expect in life only for themselves, responsible for his words and be able to stand up for themselves, can only cause revulsion. This aversion to read the publication Forbes between the lines of this aversion, and question why the United States allies in the “helpless nation”? “In the end, since the end of World War II took place 70 years. The European Union’s GDP and a population larger than the corresponding figures in the United States, and much higher than in Russia. Is it not time to rich friends in Washington to begin to defend himself by “- irritated writes American magazine, noting that because of its craven allies, the White House continues to” risk the lives of its citizens, because Europe does not want to worry about is to have a sufficient number of men and women in uniform. ”

For Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia Forbes publication – a reminder that the Baltic States for Washington – is the emergency ballast, which the United States, if necessary, easily be thrown overboard, which is of no value to them, and who exactly the Americans will not fight.

Article Forbes – is not just an article, because I Forbes – is not just a business magazine. Forbes – is one of the mouthpieces of Wall street, this “wall newspaper” the first economy in the world, a voice that says business and the United States of America’s political elite. Forbes said its valuable than quantity, but the quality of the audience of the “advanced workers” (rating of the richest people in the world) and the problems in the US under the name supercorporation.

Publication of the wretched, worthless and threatening US security allies in NATO could not appear in such media for a reason.

The American establishment realized the situation with the “helpless nations” as a problem, concluded that no value Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia to the United States do not constitute, and publicly made it clear that, if necessary, Washington will hand over the Baltic states.

Brussels has hatched appalling human closing the mouth directive !

Brüsselis on välja hautud õõvastav inimeste suukorvistamise direktiiv

 

The European Union has reached a new level. It has been designed for tolerance to the directive, which is sent to each national parliament for approval soon. Even the Soviet Union, communism contemporary moral code of the builder of this pales next to the document. During the Soviet era was the Iron Curtain, deep poverty and the lack of democracy, but there was so much inequality, as well as the mass migration from Africa and the Arab countries. Thus, the current situation is many times worse, although the degree of imbecility. In addition to the difficult lives of Eastern European countries with low wages, unemployment and coping difficulties, we can now shut down and start to extol the protein in only a third of the world work-shy sex-hungry immigrants, homosexuals, feminists and our rulers. But under the guise of democracy, with the utmost attempt to impose an ideological dictatorship, as in Soviet times, where the poor were not allowed anyone to complain about life, but this was by and a good face on it. This way arrive the “wise heads” think big multiracial, multicultural,multi-ethnic , homosexual and multiperverted, genderless happiness across the surface. Nation-states as a serious obstacle in this way be eliminated. Euro Utopia, however, does not work, however, because the roots are programmed into him eternal and self-destructive conflict between Western and invasive ultraliberal viable third world nations archaic traditions, religion and culture of the past simply destroy weaker than the first. Statute of the consequences of implementing apart (i.e., the culture and the peoples of the disappearance) of its authors, unfortunately, can not be bothered to think about. Make sure the statute itself goof …

The Statute is the promotion of tolerance.

Part of the first.

For the purposes of this statute, the following definitions shall apply:

a) “The Group” means the number of people who share a racial or cultural background, ethnic origin, or religious beliefs, or shared a common language, the same gender identity or any other characteristic similar to connecting them.

b) “group against defamation” means publicly made derogatory comments directed at the group, just as it is defined in paragraph (a) – or a group of members – with a view to incite violence, slander a group of ridicule or group of target group against false accusations.

c) “Hatred of crime” means any personal or property crime against the event, which is the target of becoming a victim of the selected person the actual or presumed membership (or acquisitions) of a group, as that term is defined in paragraph (a).

d) “Tolerance” means a complex and diverse groups, as defined in paragraph (a), a distinct identity, expression, preservation and development of the respect and acceptance. This definition takes preconceived’s diverse groups the possibility of co-existence in society.

Part of the second.

This statute provides:

a) the promotion of tolerance, thereby weakening the ties that hold a society together.

b) To promote tolerance between different societies.

c) to prevent hate crimes, as defined in section 1 c

d) condemns any manifestations of intolerance, which is biased, biased and fanatic.

e) Take concrete steps in the fight against intolerance, especially with a view to eliminating racism, racial prejudice, ethnic discrimination, religious intolerance, totalitarian ideologies, xenophobia, anti-Semitism, homophobia and anti-feminism.

Part of the third.

Right tolerance must be guaranteed to all groups, especially in relation to use of rights, which are enshrined in the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

Part 4. Limitations:

In Part 3, the following restrictions apply to the rights guaranteed and, if they are implemented in a democratic society in a proportionate manner.

a) National and International Security, b) Public order c) Public policy d) Public Morale e) Public Health

f) the protection of the rights and freedoms of other persons

Part 5. Migrants:

a) Tolerance (as that term is defined in Section 1 (d)), must be guaranteed to all groups, whether it be the long-term entrenched social groups or newly formed groups, which have arisen as a result of migration from other countries.

b) Migrants from other countries, in turn, must adhere to the principle of coexistence of different groups in society.

c) If the migrant arrived from another country who has allowed its territory, but who have not been granted citizenship, obviously do not want to meet different groups of society, the principle of co-existence, a person can be expected to expulsion (the application in accordance with international law).

Part 6. Implementation:

In order to ensure the implementation of this statute, the government must:

a) respect the responsibility of vulnerable and disadvantaged groups of special protection.

b) set up a special administrative unit, in order to organize the implementation of this statute, it is the perception bias in existing control mechanisms.

c) Establishing an independent body for the supervision of the tolerance – which is made up of outside independent persons operating in the public service – and having the power to engage in the promotion of tolerance.

The Commission shall have the right to:

a) to issue general guidance and specific recommendations on the application of the relevant measures

b) give an opinion on the extent to which this statute is implemented.

c) the distribution according to the guidelines, recommendations and the views of the media and through other channels.

d) To promote international cooperation with similar institutions in other countries.

Part 7. A criminal record:

The following activities shall be considered a criminal offense and are punishable aggravating circumstances:

a) Anger offense, as that term is defined in Section 1 (c)

b) incitement to violence group, as defined in section 1 (a), a.

c) the group directed against the lime, as it is defined in Section 1 (b).

d) totalitarian ideologies, xenophobia or anti-semitism unequivocal approval.

e) the public denial of the Holocaust or the denial of public acceptance.

f) any other act of genocide by the International Criminal Court to criminalize public approval or denial.

Young people who have been convicted of any criminal offense listed in paragraph (a), shall undergo a rehabilitation program, which has been drawn up to develop tolerance.

Paragraph (a) above offenses are not considered political offenses extradition.

Paragraph (a) victims of crimes listed in the legal basis for the present action against the perpetrator and the right to compensation.

Paragraph (a) above crimes have a right to free legal aid, irrespective of the victim’s economic situation.

The government must ensure that:

a) school programs, the younger to the older grade level, will be introduced to subjects that help students to accept diversity and to foster a climate of tolerance of different cultures and characteristics.

b) Similar courses should be added to the military and law enforcement agencies täiendkoolitusprogrammidesse.

c) refresher courses for tolerance and awareness-raising courses should be available to different social groups, with a focus on professional groups.

d) tolerance awareness courses, educational materials (including curricula) prepares the Board of Education to meet the demands.

e) training providers, in turn, undergo training for trainers to prepare them for their tolerance, awareness-raising courses on the other.

f) Board of Education must ensure that the courses of study materials do not contain any clues or labeling of any part 1 (a), defined as a group.

g) It is desirable to produce a climate of tolerance, the promotion of books, plays, newspaper and magazine articles, films and television programs, which is financially supported by the government, for its part.

9. Part of the Mass Media:

a) The Government shall ensure that the public media (television and radio) separates their programs to the extent prescribed airtime to promote a climate of tolerance.

b) The Government encourages the privately owned mass media (including the written press) to contribute to the promotion of a climate of tolerance.

c) The Government will encourage the mass media (both public and private media) to adopt a code of ethics that prevents the spread of intolerance and monitored by an Ethics Adviser to the press.

 

Excellent” stauudi is prepared: the auspices of the Council of tolerance and tolerance sub group of experts: Yoram Dinstein (Chairman), Ugo Genesio, Rein Mȕllerson (NB Africa), Daniel Thȕrer and Rȕdiger Wolfrum.

This “brilliant” Soviets directive was developed in 2009-2014, right now it is the time to start more decisively implemented. Perhaps many people will now also understand why our mainstream politicians and -meedia is precisely such as they are, after all, seek a special fervor to Brussels mõtelmata be pleasing to his people, and other things. Immigrant major offensive in 2015, this ardor somewhat cooled down already due to the conflict, but still …

Check out the full text of the statute in English here:11_revframework_statute_en-1

Translated by Triin van Doorslaer.

The truth about World War II !

Tõde II maailmasõja kohta

For decades, we have reiterated that the cause of World War II, Adolf Hitler and his plan was to conquer the world. The reality, however, was not far from a war, and the reasons were quite different. The reason was the Treaty of Versailles caused enormous injustice against Germany. The winners will put the entire responsibility for World War I for Germany, which is ridiculous. Germany had to cede vast territories that had historically been a part of Germany and the German inhabitants were displaced. Versailles Peace Treaty was as a ticking time bomb that had been put in place by western countries and exploded in 1939.
The German leadership has not dreamed unleash a war, but dreamed  international banking and arms industrialists, as well as the Soviet Union. Probably not, although World War II, however, the conflict, however. And offered an Englishman in Germany before the war as well as several times during the war, an armistice without any strange clauses. It was not adopted and expanded military action instead.
The war itself is very rewarding activity as
armed industri, credit institutions – where they will stay away from himself. It is also an effective tool for social and political war to maintain control over the large number of people. Martial law has been able to take advantage in order to influence the people to approve the creation of the institutions to which they would normally not agree. Estonia is one of the most prominent military historians Mati Apple: “It seems to me more and more that World War II was put in place baseline scenario European and American financial industry and the geniuses long before the beginning of the war. A new world war Russia was prepared and the preparatory work went to the capital of international joint forces. “Germany was determined by the huge reparation charges to the war-torn Germany would not in any case come to be disbursed. Since this was the case, occupied France the penalty to Düsseldorf and other cities in the Ruhr region, putting yet more difficult economic situation in Germany.

 Austria. Austria’s population consisted of Germans, who spoke German, the Germans thought and felt like Germans. Vienna had been almost ten times more than the German capital of Berlin. Only the periods 1806-1815 and 1866-1938, Austria was not connected to the national level in Germany. After the First World War, Western countries have banned reunification. 1920/1921. a. Held Karten, Tyrol, Styria and Salzburg in a referendum in which 99% participation in voted for reunification, but the Allies banned hunger blockade of threatening to continue voting for democracy, and thus violated the basic principles – self-determination. On 12 November 1928, declared the Austrian Federal Chancellor Dr. Karl Renner publicly: “Let Austrian citizens to vote freely, and they choose the 99% in favor of the reunification of Germany.” When Hitler to Austria on 12 March 1938 with Germany, adding many millions of people in the democratic self-determination finally implemented the way it was called usurpation? Rudolf Hess, accused of Nuremberg, even Austria Anschluss organization! The German leadership had abandoned the sustainability of peace in the interest of South Tyrol, Alsace-Lotringist, EupenMalmedist, North Schleswigist, Poznan, West Prussia and Upper Silesia in the East, the areas that were included in 1914. The German and Austrian sides. Their sole desire was to get back to the city of Danzig and the Polish Corridor connecting establish extraterritorial Germany divorced Great East Prussian province to escape bothersome customs control.
September 1 Germany invades Poland, whereupon England and France declared war on Germany, while the Soviet Union invaded Poland. Britain and France declared war to the Russians. This indicates that there was a significant problem in Poland, but the destruction of Germany. To French and England declared war on Germany attacked Poland penetration after starting as de facto World War II. I wonder why they did not have it at the end of the war in Poland with warm or cold, as it was under the yoke of the Communists?
Many think that the Nazis
dreaming of conquering the world, which is obviously false, but the communists did it. This plan have emerged on the agenda immediately after the takeover of power in Russia. Kisas Lenin: “Socialism in one country achieved the victory can not yet rule out all wars.” Brest-Litovsk, commented Comintern chairman Grigory Zinoviev as: ,,; If Russia enters into peace, the peace that only the cease-fires. The socialist revolution in Russia will win only if he is surrounded by socialist sister republics. Peace concluded imperialist Germany, is a temporary phenomenon. This gives time to breath, after the war breaks out again! “But the real Stalin began to prepare for the advent to power. In 1927, Stalin declared: “The second imperialist war is absolutely inevitable, as well as the inevitable resignation of the Soviet Union in this war.” But Stalin did not want to start a war with yourself and be a party in the earliest days: ,, We are taking the war, but we will proceed by the latter to take a pan whisk, which is able to consider everything. “

 Stalin’s industrialization was initiated, with the primary objective of the military industry of such a level that it is able to keep the course enormous, we can conquer the whole of Europe of armies. The whole country’s economy worked in the military industry to increase capacity for and this contributed actively to the west Financial Tycoons. They knew that the war is extremely costly for fun, and most states, anyone who considers himself to be the ongoing conflicts, needs financial support from the world banking systems. They are forced to borrow in time of war (weapons industry run), and at the end (to restore what has been destroyed). However, for the loans to pay high interest rate. Both are occupied by independent national economies …
When in 1923 the Red Army had 550,000 men, then on 19 August 1939, there were 2 million, and by 21 June 1941 to 5.5 million + NKVD troops! The beginning of the war, Stalin was at the disposal of the world’s most powerful and best-armed army. In 1941, the Soviet Union was the only country which produced heavy tanks. Their mission was to break through the defense and open up easy access to tanks German motorways. In 1940. between June 1941 and June was set up in the USSR 61 new tank divisions, each with 375 tanks .While entered Germany in September 1939 addressed during the second world war just six Panzerdivision. To conquer the world?
1939. In September, the world’s most powerful series production in the fighter weapons designer Polikarpovi I-16th Firepower still exceeded the 16 double-Messerschmidt-109e, and almost three-fold; Speedfighter.1939. September of 1941. June was formed in the USSR 295 New Rifle.From 1940 to 1941 a. was formed in June of 79 new aircraft in the USSR Division, igaühes200-300 aircraft.1940-1941 USSR was formed 30 new motorized division.In June 1939, the Red Army’s Field Artillery composed of 144
artillery Regiment, every 24-36 cannons, but by June 1941 the Red Army was already 900 (!!) artillery Regiment.
On 19 August 1939, the VK (b) P ,, Politburo adopted a Decision on the release. ” Guided by the principle: Pull the war, while remaining neutral, then the opponents have bled, throw into battle throughout the power of the Red Army. At the beginning of August 1939 had a British and French military delegations held talks in Moscow, Stalin information that allowed Stalin to combine in such a way that the outbreak of war to all the advantages of Russia. Namely, they told Stalin that the German attack on Poland in the case of France and Britain declare war on Germany. This is only needed Stalin. On 19 August 1939, Stalin, Hitler declared that if he invades Poland, do not fall of the Soviet Union not only neutral but also assisted Germany. Diplomatic straits staying Hitler
swallowed up hook down. Ribbentrop was in Moscow, and on August 23 he wrote down with Molotov Pact of conquering Poland.

 The big lie is, however, that the then leadership of the Republic of Estonia did not know the secret Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact additional content. It is easier to hide people. Freemason, and a high-paying NKVD collaborator Konstantin Pats, with its tail in the cells was performed in a military coup in 1934, shortly before a democratic election would have come to power through the War of letting the men who were in our country shed the blood of the War of Independence. One of the causes of the War of the repression of the children was that they knew Pätsi and Laidoneri major thefts of the Bank of Estonia and Harju Bank. Pats knew that veterans coming to power would be waiting for him to prison. After the coup did Loaf statement that the Estonian people are sick … but the people received treatment for six years on the eastern border of the back instead. But hit a loaf of traitors appropriate fate. Damage to this Estonians had cost so many innocent lives. A loaf of co Muurlan, US President Roosevelt commented that the Soviet occupation of Estonia, with a special cynicism – When the Estonians do not like communism, they may, after all, to leave Estonia … By the way, patchouli myself had in my pocket US visa, a passport, but their crimes for the consequences she no longer tried to escape is not an accident.
Now the situation was created in which Germany was particularly dangerous. The German authorities started to realize Stalin’s devilish plan. Stalin was preparing an unpleasant surprise for France, which defeated Hitler in 1940. very fast, even though Stalin had hoped that France and Germany sink into a bloody war and exhausting his army will then only scattered remnants of their beat. France was one of the main reasons for the rapid loss to nationalism. Full nationalism slump. Since the British have tended not specifically a fight, the Germans decided to begin withdrawing its troops from the eastern border to concentrate. Here Stalin made his second mistake, which would have been an almost fatal. He did not believe in his intelligence, and the generals, who warned him against Hitler and his troops continued to calmly concentrating the country’s western border. The German leader Hitler knew very well what risks he took for MRP concluding the contract; , only the establishment of relations between Germany and Russia would be an inevitable war. The Prince von Bismarck was warned not only against the war on two fronts, but also one of the fronts, if there’s war with Russia. And yet Hitler attacked. And none of the historian is not his motives expressed interest? But Hitler himself said Earl Schulenbergile: ,, Count, I have no other way out. “

 The fact that the Soviet Union will not be ready for war, and it had hit him suddenly, it is a complete lie. For example, Irakli Toidze patriotic poster which calls on all battle (,, Mother Homeland Calls “), appeared in the streets of Yaroslavl in the evening on June 22, 1941 June 22 Saratov afternoon, Novosibirsk and Habarovsk 23 June. When the artist created it, when it was printed and delivered as a sudden ,, “The Great Patriotic War began on June 22 in the early morning? Minsk military recruitment arrived at these posters, however, already in 1940. December !!! 1941 June 22 radio speech Molotov announced that Germany had declared war on them. The same information can also be found Soviet Marshal Zhukov memoirs. However, on 3 July 1941 there is a radio speech by Stalin, who in the meantime has got over the shock, to prevent Hitler came to him. And this is where we all become the treacherous ,, Germany invaded the Soviet Union on the peace loving “German attacked in self-defense, and thereby breached the advantage of Stalin’s plan of conquering Europe.
During the war the Red Army was spending 427 million artillery shells and mines, and 17 billion rounds of ammunition. This is not included hand grenades, land mines and aircraft bombs. Divide by the number of German soldiers! In war, the Soviet Union used the advantage of the 15% of People’s Commissariat of Munitions production capacity. Stalin, Hitler gave a preemptive strike, destroying or capturing 75% of Russian ammunition. Stalin drove the German troops, on the basis of the People’s Commissariat of Munitions of 15%
vestige of power. We all know the outcome of the war. What would have happened if Stalin had come to attack first?
Hitler had anticipated the communists in just a few weeks, knowing that if Stalin is attacked first, and Europe is not any hope. Breaking the first weeks of the war the huge Russian troops took Hitler to Stalin the opportunity to conquer the whole of Europe.
The world-famous British historian Liddell Hart wrote on September 3, 1949 in the newspaper ,,, Picture Post ‘: ,, Hitler wanted anything else, but not only a world war … After the end of the war the most important German archives fell into our hands, and we can get a clear idea of how extraordinarily there was great fear in the leading circles of the German war front … “

 Gaul Brennus commander said ,, the vanquished Woe! Vae victis! “Really. Only the winners decide what were war crimes. Nuremberg trials were a farce. In many cases, the Germans were attributed to acts which were committed communists. At one hearing, Goering said: “When I sit on this bench, you should sit on my right and left of Stalin, Churchill.” The Nuremberg defendants were beaten, and the interrogator told in advance what he wants to hear. The German defenders were threatened verbally and physically so that they will not produce the crimes of the Allies. But despite this, they did not believe that German statesmen and generals killed Cowardly both ways – by hanging. According to the Geneva Convention, the victim may be sentenced to death but the firing squad! The conditions in which the Germans worked in Nuremberg defenders can read books ,, Len Deightoni Blood, Tears and Folly “Soviet prosecutor Roman Rudenko said in his oral arguments that led the Germans from Russia Fortunes. On top of this, Göring said that Russia got millions of them, yes, but they were mostly Russian-performing. Rudenko grabbed the gun and let (!!!) in the direction of Goring 4-5 shots before the gun was confiscated from him. As Goering bullets did not hit, he said calmly, let the Russians, who in such a short earth knows how to miss. Soviet specialists constructed a special boom for hanging place. Guests to the store very slowly, about 24 minutes after the doctor declared hanging dead. Field Marshal Keitel said before hanging his last words: ,, Let me die ass towards Russia. “Ribbentrop: ,, Hanging us today, but tomorrow you hanging Communists. Our hanging above the future, but a monument. “The Nuremberg process serving 3,000 people since 2400 were Jews!g

 

Everyone likes to talk about the crimes of the Nazis, but what about our allies?
English fire bombs thrown from airplanes in 1943 changed the Hamburg city reduced to rubble.
Fire tornado killed 50,000 civilians.
In September, fire bombs were thrown Darmstadile 250 000 – 12, 000 people dead.
In October, 8,000 people were killed in Kassel. Attacked in Bremerhaven, Braunschweig and Heilbronn.
On 14 February 1945 the Dresden huge crematoria. The city was called Elbe-edge in Florence, this was one of the most beautiful cities in Germany. 13 February, 1945 in Dresden, supposedly lived 950,000 people, including 250,000 war refugees (women and children). Englishmen have passed the two attacks on the substance – a total of 650,000 fire bombs, along with 
land mine Bombings 2659 tons. In the third attack by the United States were the subject of B-17 planes – 771 tons of bombs. The second and third wave was planned so that the bombs would be hit between the buildings rescuers working. Low-flying fighters mowed the machine gun fire of crazed people. Dresden burned for seven days. 90,000 houses were destroyed. The smallest estimated number of deaths was 35,000, the largest of more than 100 000 people. The strategic and military sense, there was no significance Drezdenil !!!
May 31, 1942 in Cologne in 1046 attacked the English bombers. Civilians were killed simply for sowing terror. Second World War in Germany fell by 1.35 million tons of bombs, of which 55.8% of the cities and the junction of 9,3% in the chemical industry, 1.8% in the manufacturing industry, 30.5% and 2.6% points to the military base and other objects.
Civilians killing Englishmen called themselves “comfortable war” – a war comfortable! It also happened in Japan. For example, on 9 March 1945, was the World War II air raid strict Tokyo bombing killed 83,800 people, 41,000 wounded and 1 million homeless. Was destroyed 267,000 houses. Between June and August 1945 passed the 58 Americans in the Japanese city of 60 air strikes and Toyama, Fukui Nazamu and cities were razed to the ground. Americans are not interested in the military, but economic injury. Hundreds of thousands (the exact number can not be determined) were killed in Hiroshima and Nagasaki atomic bomb attacks.
Is the killing of civilians is a war crime only to the Germans? Everything is to blame only the Germans? Nuremberg Tribunals Statute of the sixth article of the war crimes in occupied territories civilians killings, ill-treatment and forced labor deportations, prisoners of war or the sea seized the persons killings or ill-treatment, hostage executions, public or private property, looting, towns or villages unjustified looting or destruction by military necessity can not justify. Would not have had to sit on the dock in Nuremberg, Stalin, Roosevelt and Churchill? The first was organized by the Germans during World War 500 English
various brigades as many as 768 gas attack. However, the school’s only about the Germans.
Twisted history is not history.
If you take a few steps back and watch it all on a large scale it would seem that the two without a war, won most of the Jews who were new to your country and the United States, whose gold fund increased from 1913 until World War II until the end of nine times (!), And who became the world’s powerful economy.

 

BBC: The Third World War – a look through the keyhole.

Третья мировая: две новости, хорошая и не очень

Special topic Southeast Summaries militia Former USSR Military conflicts Your news
The strength in the truth “Analytics information view” the BBC: World War III – a look through the keyhole
BBC: The Third World War – a look through the keyhole
Analyst opinion data
02.08.2016 03:54
MASTER
3744
2
BBC: The Third World War – a look through the keyhole

I would like to thank the British broadcaster BBC on behalf of all Russian citizens and citizens of the Baltic states, for helpful tips and visual footage demonstrated in their film “The Third World War – a view from a staff room” – as himself have to lead when it is absolutely them there pressed ethnographic order enforcers west in these countries. At the practical value of the film actually ends. Most of the meeting of the “headquarters” for the salvation of the Anglo-Saxon world order, at times reminiscent of the ward residents home for the elderly, it is impossible to watch without a smile.

And now seriously. Authors telefilm desperately lost between the propaganda genre loyalty paragraph 5 of NATO and the real exchange blows on the territories of the two nuclear superpowers. There is a vain attempt to this group pull the ears and the UK. But she, with all due respect, does a nuclear superpower is not drawn. She does not have the capacity, which would compete with the US and Russia on this issue on an equal footing.

In fact, nuclear war is not as easy to start as it seems. But even if it starts it will be by no means fatal to the whole of humanity as predicting many skeptics. Russia, with its expanses of war will transfer much easier than the US, but Europe has a chance to move her not at all. A number of experts (both in the West and in Russia) have described in detail the various scenarios possible conflict between NATO and Russia. To summarize their essence with regard to the bottom line we get the following:
1. Start a war with a nuclear exchange in the United States and Russia to each other no one in their right mind would. And not to sound too.
2. Nuclear strikes (tactical) depending on the current military and political situation will be applied only on the third – the non-nuclear countries.

3. Conflict can start with the use of conventional weapons on the territory of third countries. And according to most forecasts and it is likely to be limited to the territories of these countries. Skopje no one on the Russian attack will not be exact. Why do it, say France, Italy, Greece or Germany? These countries are not going to touch anybody, why should they attack first if they are guaranteed to lose after all. In France in the military doctrine even says that it can use nuclear weapons only if there is a direct threat to its territorial integrity, IE, the enemy rushed into the depths of its territory. Russia has no such plans, and has never been (not to be confused with partiality plans in the USSR). Therefore, it is not clear who still might want to launch missiles with nuclear warheads on the Russian territory and under what circumstances.

In the west give in vain euphoria and think – as now we all hit Russia and let her Feeds on the eyelid. Unfortunately, as history shows, the country die in wars, as the people in your life – alone. Therefore, there is still easily make out on the shelves.

Who can actually theoretically hit the Russian nuclear weapons? This is – the US, UK, France. All!
About France, we have already said, it will hit only if Russia decides to bang her or nuclear weapons Russian ground troops will leave France on the border with the intention of it or go cross. But both options utopia. Prior to that, France will not risk their complete destruction.

UK – it has a very limited number of missiles with nuclear weapons and their means of delivery. In addition to the tiny UK to get involved in an exchange of blows with Russian nuclear weapons is like death. If Russian spitting radioactive dust from the teeth will only become angrier, the British simply will not be on their island. Therefore, the striped beetle least of all interested in direct conflict with Russia.

Well, there is the United States. The US goal to weaken Russia (they understand that you can not destroy it completely), but it would not hurt himself. In direct nuclear exchange would have to suffer, and very strong, stronger than the Russian. Hopes on frivolous Washington selfless sacrifice for the sake of a mythical democracy is not exactly in the Baltic mills. Here in the first place will not promote the primacy of the image of a fighter with a “despot” Putin and “revanchist” Russia, as more prosaic desire for self-preservation.

Therefore, as the majority of military experts, everything is reduced to the war on the territory of third countries, not excluding the use of tactical nuclear weapons there. And in such a war the Americans will beat on the territory of its allies, potentially exhaust Russia, massaging and much more carefully than the Russian Armed Forces. Recall the famous bombing of Dresden, the waste in the zone of influence of the Soviet Union. Baltic countries, Poland, Romania – Russia having strategic advantages in the European theater of operations can take control and conventional arms. But, after this, these areas may well be subject to a massive US attack, including the use of tactical nuclear weapons. After all, if you choose between the lives of people in these countries and a desire to harm Russia’s position in Europe “pragmatists” always choose the second in Washington.

 

 

 

 

West Framed pass Estonian fools, and they are happy to try!

Запад подставил под удар эстонских дуралеев, а те рады стараться!

Prime Minister of Estonia, and along with the chairman of the right-wing liberal Reform Party Taavi Rõivas said that the US military presence in the country is important for the security of the region, so the government will do everything to keep the US “an excellent host country.”

Naive fool! He seriously believes that an increase in funding such a presence in the four-fold to US $ 3.4 billion shows that the fate of Estonia to the United States “very important.”

Talking shop “the Washington Regional Committee” for the eccentric takes “good faith”, believing in a pivotal role in the Estonian real deterrent alleged Russian aggression. For the sake of the Estonian government is even ready to cover the costs in case of increasing the presence of allies.

Estonia has already allocated to the 2015-2019 years, 40 million euros to build the infrastructure needed for the allies: the barracks are being built in a military town in the Tape, upgraded central landfill and built the building in Tallinn NATO headquarters element. Military expenses in 2016 will amount to 449 million euros (2.07% of GDP), which exceeds the criteria for NATO.

Western countries are not left behind. Thus, the States have allocated $ 33 million for the purchase of Javelin anti-tank systems. We invested approximately $ 35 million in infrastructure in Tapa and Ämari (northern Estonia).

In the area of ​​special attention allies proved central landfill, which has built a variety of objects, allowing to carry out training exercises. And they will not stop …

The Estonian authorities are increasing power, informational, financial and infrastructural power, forgetting that such activity will not be ignored by Russia. The Russian Defense Ministry has pointed out that in the Baltic States is building up forces air cover, and tensions over the Russian border has increased by an order.

Even last year, the representative of the Russian Ministry of Defense, Army General Yuri Yakubov said that the appearance of US combat equipment in the Baltic States Russia will give an adequate response. group of forces along the perimeter of Russia’s western border will be strengthened (tanks, aircraft, artillery).

Estonia, indulging allies jeopardizes St. Petersburg, which is comparable, according to experts, only the placement of Soviet missiles in Cuba in 1962. This is pure aggression, a military challenge.

Estonian authorities to lick the heels of the Americans, it would seriously consider. The military doctrine of Russia, NATO has called the main geopolitical enemy, which entails certain consequences.

And do not forget that the Americans do not do anything just for beautiful eyes. All their investments in the Estonian military infrastructure, they easily beat off, billed Tallinn in the future for the “post” their military equipment. Intimidation Russia, as well as Estonia’s security (in this case, the imaginary) is well worth it. And do not care what Moscow attempts ridiculous action Reyvasa ..

Up to this point a chic life was relatively calm. Russian strategic missile “flew” through its territory. But now everything has changed: intermediate- and short-range missiles will be aimed at the Estonian town. However, such a fate can not be avoided, and Lithuania and Latvia.

Choosing the path of NATO bridgehead near the Russian border, the Estonian leadership to substitute the country under attack. In the case of NATO’s military aggression against Russia, not Europe, and Estonia will remain in the past … was small West coins forever erasing itself from the political map of the world.

Zolotoy,
especially for Politikus.ru
Source →
Tags: news, politics
Posted 02/04/2016 at 18:18

German media: Following the Schengen and the euro may disappear

The German government reigns despondency, and the length of the influx of refugees could lead to the restoration of the permanent control of the borders of the EU, writes the German media. And after Schengen may have to bury the euro, journalists said.

Немецкие СМИ: Вслед за Шенгеном может исчезнуть и евро

This year may prove to be one of the most important for the future of the EU and German Chancellor Angela Merkel, the prospect is not encouraging. This writes Der Spiegel.

“Germany and its chancellor Angela Merkel, facing the biggest challenge after the collapse of the Eastern bloc”, – quotes RIA Novosti article.

As noted, the President of the European Commission, Jean-Claude Juncker said that the long list of unsolved problems add new, and warned of a “crisis of confidence” in Europe. Relations within the EU is increasingly aggravated by the influx of refugees.

Other countries, including France and Italy, made it clear that the migratory crisis – this is a problem in Germany, says the author.

In addition, there is the question of Turkey, which, according to the EU, should play a key role in reducing the number of refugees. To do this, Ankara should receive EU € 3 billion, but the decision met with protests in Italy. Vice-Chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany, Sigmar Gabriel, he did not rule out that in the extreme case of Berlin will have to deal with the problem on their own.

The fate of the Schengen area and the euro.

The German government prevails “more disheartening than optimism,” is reflected in the article. There are fears that a further influx of refugees would lead to the restoration of the permanent control of the borders of the EU. If in the near future will ensure a reliable control of the external borders of the block, barriers like dominoes will fall anywhere from the south to the north.”
According to Der Spiegel, in this case, will have to bury the Schengen system, and with it, perhaps, Europe and other achievements. Thus, according to Juncker, without Schengen makes no sense and the euro.

Ultimatum of Bavaria and the Austrian border control.

Recall January 16, Prime Minister of Bavaria and head of the ruling in the Federal Republic of Germany in the coalition party “Christian Social Union” Horst Seehofer has put forward an ultimatum to Chancellor Angela Merkel, if in two weeks will not be provided with the order on the German border, he will file a lawsuit to the Constitutional Court Germany.

On the eve of Austrian Chancellor Werner Faymann said that the authorities have started to enhanced scrutiny of entering the country temporarily thereby limiting the Schengen agreement.

According to Faymann, Austria would be “in the same way as Germany, hard to control borders and expel the refugees”. He stressed that the refugees are not sent on to Germany, from that moment will not be let in Austria.

He said that on the border necessarily need to have an identity card. “If the EU does not, it does not protect the external borders under the Schengen issue as such. Then each country must control its national borders, “- criticized the EU Faymann.

 

 

 

Americans are thinking the exclusion of Latvia from NATO !

Американцы задумались об исключении Латвии из НАТО

On the pages of Forbes magazine was publicly recognized as “meaningless” stay the Baltics into NATO. From the membership of the Baltic countries in NATO greatly affected the security of the United States: as a result of their activities in NATO there is a threat of a nuclear war with Russia because of that damn America. For the Baltic elites, such statements from the ocean – a reminder that the American owners of Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia – emergency ballast, which the United States, if necessary, easily be thrown overboard.

In one of the most famous and influential business media world – the American financial and economic magazine Forbes – earlier this month published “software” analytical article “Why America is a member of NATO?”, To question the appropriateness of the existence of the alliance, which does not guarantee the security of the United States but only puts this safety compromised.

The main idea of ​​the article – taking in new members, who are often weak, worthless and incapable of self-defense of the country, the Alliance forces the Americans to take custody of these new pitiful allies.

It is Washington only a headache, because it makes him get involved in all sorts of regional conflicts on the side of the countries that do not provide the security of the United States.

Countries that America in general, and do not need.

NATO expansion has long been turned into an end in itself – in practice, this expansion does not have any sense for Americans, not in the national interest of the United States, and eventually creates for the Pentagon to the State Department issues.

“Add to Montenegro – it’s like to get one more mindless friend in Facebook», – begins his article staffer Doug Forbes Bendou.

“The presidents and legislators continue to provide guarantees for the security of money and the lives of American citizens to foreign countries, and it happens even when – as is the case with Montenegro, when they have absolutely no value to the security of the United States,” – writes Forbes.

Business publication exposes the ruthless criticism of the policy of recruiting NATO with caustic sarcasm criticizing the principle of “expansion for expansion,” in which America is required, for example, carry the alliance commitments to Turkey – a “friend-enemy” of the United States, where the government is Islamist Erdogan, criticized furiously in his speeches “decadent West” and “American imperialism”, but once running for help to the Allies after they provoked the conflict with Russia.

However, a much more vivid example of useless and pathetic allies that America hoisted on his shoulders and is now forced to defend them, even though they do not need her or Europe – is the Baltic countries, with merciless candor named Forbes «helpless nations.”

“The expansion at the expense of the Baltic States turned a colossal mistake, which resulted in NATO became helpless nation in defense are not interested the rest of Europe, the countries that have no geopolitical significance to America, however, involved in the acute controversy with Russia, – says the American edition. – If there is something bad, then America with minimal support from the European “allies” – they are likely to seek refuge in Brussels – will have, apparently, have to deal with having a nuclear weapons Russia over the disputed issues of greater interest to Moscow than to Washington. ”

“Security of the United States significantly affected by the addition of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania”, – concludes Forbes, and on the basis of this conclusion, urging people not to repeat the Baltic “colossal mistake” in the “Eastern Partnership”, taking in Georgia and Ukraine.

It is noteworthy that Forbes said not a word about the “imperial ambitions” or “aggressive neighborhood” – the conflict between Russia and the Baltic States there is an objective, but the cause of his stated “heated debate” between Moscow and the Baltic countries.

Who this policy is – a rhetorical question, given that the adoption of the latest Foreign Policy Concept of the Russian Federation (2013), in which the Baltic states did not say a word, legally approved diplomatic line in Moscow against Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia is ignoring the whole Trinity.

Contemptuous silence – is a universal Russian official response to calls to its international isolation, the comparison with the Third Reich and female hysteria about the “terrorist state.”

Only a few months later, without any apparent connection with these public attacks, suddenly found themselves banned Latvian sprats, came under embargo “milk” and Russian transit redirected to the Baltic ports in Russia.

So the conflict between Russia and the Baltic states to blame Baltic states – says a leading US business publication, and by appealing to the most holy – to the “life of American citizens” – asks the question: why America must expose themselves to the threat of nuclear war with Russia because of the verbal incontinence Dalia Grybauskaite and Edgar Rinkevich?

Namely this Baltic Allies eventually from her and need: not a week goes by that of Vilnius did not hear the next call for increased US presence in the region, including the military presence.

For the Baltic States, and can be no question that they are fighting for themselves: no, we are small, responsible for our words about a “new Mordor” have allies.

Allies must do: they have to increase the presence of NATO in the region, the Baltic countries send in their military contingents, put them overland NATO base, going for it on a direct conflict with Russia.

This behavior, by the way, contrary to the bedrock of the Anglo-Saxon culture, and Americans are taught from birth that count in life only for themselves, responsible for his words and be able to stand up for themselves, can only cause disgust.
This aversion to read the publication Forbes between the lines, this disgust and question why the United States allies in the “helpless nation”?
“In the end, since the end of World War II, it passed 70 years. GDP and population of the European Union more than the corresponding figures in America, and much more than in Russia. Is it not time for the rich friends of Washington begin to defend themselves yourself? “- Angrily writes American magazine, noting that because of its craven allies, the White House continues to” risk the lives of its citizens, because Europe does not want to worry about is to have a sufficient number of men and women in uniform. ”
For Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia publication Forbes – a reminder that the Baltic Washington – emergency ballast is that the United States, if necessary, easily be thrown overboard, which is not for their value, and that Americans just do not go to war.
Article Forbes – is not just an article, because I Forbes – is not just a business magazine.
Forbes – is one of the mouthpieces of Wall street, this “wall newspaper” the first economy in the world, a voice that says business and political elite of the United States.
Forbes said its valuable than quantity, and quality of the audience about the “best workers” (rating of the richest people in the world) and the problems in the super-corporation called the USA.
Publication of the miserable, useless, and threaten the security of US allies in NATO could not appear in the media like nothing.
The American establishment realized the situation with “helpless nations” as a problem, concluded that no value Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia to the United States do not represent, and publicly made it clear that, if necessary, Washington will hand over the Baltic states.

You’ll know when to begin ! ?

2406604

Terror in Paris. Our bomber shot down by Turkey. Crimea without electricity as a result of sabotage … Finally, two things are clear.

First. The world is ruled badly.

Control worthless. Seven, Twenty, UN AZES, EEC, BRICS, the World Council of Churches, UNESCO … All not remember.

Dozens of important organizations, dozens of important presidents, thousands of important ministers, millions of spies, analysts, police, the FBI, the Federal Security Service, MI-6 and so on. And so on. An incredible financial, industrial, intellectual power.

They really rule the world. But the run really bad, obviously. Again, as a hundred or two hundred years ago, the battle begins for the Bosporus and the Dardanelles.

Famine, war, rampant terrorism – is similar to the planet Earth, where power belongs to the sentient beings?

Can foolish people choose smart leaders? They can come to power intelligent and good? Hardly. For smart and good are not ready to walk over corpses, voices produce intimidation and dirty money.

Second. Until now, no one has sold a nuclear bomb to terrorists.

When they shoot in Paris, we know that someone has sold their Kalashnikovs.

When illiterate savages missile surface to air churning modern bomber or helicopter – it means someone sold savages MANPADS and learned where to click.

Once someone will sell them the atomic bomb, we will have time to understand it. All will have time to understand, but those who would be too close …

… America trained and armed thousands of “do not understand someone” – and almost all of them went to the insurgents (the devil knows what to call them and theirs groups). America thought that the arms of friends, allies. The error came.

There are cases much worse. In the first Chechen war (yes, probably in the second), the Chechens fought the Russian Russian weapons. Crew Artyom Borovik (“Top Secret”) managed to take the sale of weapons to the enemy: a) the bargaining between the Russian officer and field commander: how much and what weapons the Chechens get for the specified amount; and b) the requirement of a Russian officer: “Our site is not used!” This officer took care of himself and his soldiers. The fact that the neighboring property will perish fellow soldiers, he, as we see, is not worried.


We certainly hope that the nuclear powers will not use nuclear weapons. The greatest hope we have those who are here on earth, loves girls, boys, skiing, Courchevel … But, alas, there is no hope for those who are here on Earth, does not like anything; to those in the sky joyfully await Allah and houris.

Even the leader of North Korea likes to earthly pleasures. Probably, it should keep him out of the use of the atomic bomb. He knows that will fly back. Yes, and red French wine and white blonde Europe, too, is run out, alas.

– They do not have the means of delivery! – Says durachё.

There is! They have an incredible amount of these funds. The delivery is called a “suicide bomber”. If he detonates explosive belt on himself, then he does not care what sort of amazing elements: nails, screws, or uranium, plutonium …

(Some of the means of delivery, we know even by name. Those, for example, who brought to London a little polonium infected restaurants, hotels, airplanes, the world was stunned.)

… Once the atomic and hydrogen bombs were only in the Soviet Union and the United States; blissful times. Although these powers were responsible in millimeters from nuclear war (Cuban Missile Crisis).

Now there are nuclear weapons in several countries about which we know for sure; and still have a few about whom we guess; and yet some stubbornly working to develop, and it is difficult to say how long they will be tormented more …

But we, unfortunately, do not know what to do, even the most civilized. One minute before Turkey was hit by our bomber, no one had not occurred, that this could happen. Neither we nor the Turks, neither the Americans nor the Europeans. But it happened. And until now, no one knows – why? Why Erdogan left their hotel without our tourists, our country without our customers just what horrible (gold, carpets, coats).

… The most civilized place on earth two thousand years ago was considered Rome. We do not know, as I have done to Nero, if he had an atomic bomb. His own he burned Rome primitive means.

The world looks with horror as savages crowbar and pickaxe shattered priceless masterpieces, unique monuments of culture. But this is a misconception. In fact, these people consume scrap sinful delusion.

Only 90 years ago, here in Russia, we blew up the church, cut icons. They were not thinking: who the architect? painter who? They did not destroy the masterpieces of culture, they struggled with confusion.

Inquisition burned people alive; Well it was not sadistic, it’s to be done for the salvation of the souls of sinners.

That will save us, do not have time to gasp.

* * *

… I do not know whether there had been Taliban fighters ISIL-s and other errors with a nuclear bomb. We do not know whether they have a national anthem. We can give them the best, most appropriate. First, the great poet Alexander Blok wrote:

We are on the mountain all bourgeois
World in Flames blow up,
World fire in the blood –
God bless!

This “God bless!” – Just fine. With this prayer is best to blow up churches and priests … Then hang the Bloc a little corrected and put on a soldier’s music. As it happened:

We are on the mountain all bourgeois
World in Flames blow up!
World fire burning!
The bourgeoisie is trembling!

Whether to .into Arabic, or let the fighters will learn from the errors in Russian. Russian there is now enough

In Europe, 20 000 militants invaded ISIS as refugees

В Европу вторглись 20 тысяч боевиков ИГИЛ под видом беженцев

Lebanese minister says that in Europe under the guise of refugees infiltrated more than 20 thousand militants “Islamic state.” They intend to move the fighting into the EU.

Lebanese Education Minister Elias Bou Saab (Elias Bou Saab) stated that among the 1.1 million refugees who have flooded Europe, tens of thousands of fighters hiding group “Islamic State” (banned in Russia). According to him, about one fiftieth refugee is a member of a terrorist organization. This Lebanese warned British Prime Minister David Cameron during his visit to Lebanon.
Saab recognized that specific data on the number of terrorists among the refugees did not have, but the “gut feeling” tells him that this is what happens. It is concerned that the Islamists used the desperate situation of the refugees for their own purposes.

“The sixth sense tells us that LIH conducting an operation to penetrate into Europe and other regions. We assume (the refugees” – approx. Ed.), Only two percent of the radicals. But this is more than enough – said Saab, reports The Daily Express.

He noted that refugees in Europe penetrate trained militant groups that even outwardly distinguished from the general flow of migrants. In addition, Islamists recruit fighters among the refugees.

Earlier, Pope Francis also warned that with the flood of refugees to Europe terrorists. In an interview with the Portuguese Radio Renascenca, the pope acknowledged that one of the goals of the Islamists could be Vatican.

In recent months, Europe is faced with a huge influx of illegal immigrants from North Africa and the Middle East. Most of them are fleeing from war and mass terror unleashed by the rebels “Islamic state” in the territories under their control.

The situation threatens to spiral out of control. EU countries argue about who and how much should accept refugees, while those thousands of illegally crossing the border. Experts warn that a migration crisis could turn into a catastrophe and the collapse of Europe. This was stated, inter alia, the Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban. In Europe were heard talk about the revision of the Schengen Agreement and calls to abandon the free movement of citizens.

To curb the flow of migrants, some countries used troops. Hungary is building a wall on the border with Serbia. Denmark at the time to stop rail link with Germany. In Germany itself, clashes between opponents of mass migration and anti-fascists. The radicals set fire to shelters for refugees.

Against this background, more often heard the warnings about the penetration of terrorist groups on the territory of European states. British counterintelligence summer warned that the militants “Islamic state” are preparing for a major terrorist attack in Europe, including the use of bombs quadrocopters. Intelligence agencies claim that the leaders of the IG obsessed major terrorist attack that would have rivaled the attacks of 11 September 2001 at the Twin Towers in New York City.

http://www.ridus.ru/news/197392
Published on 09/15/2015 at 15:46

Philip Ekozyants 700-strong army of Putin.

Филипп Экозьянц: 700-тысячная армия Путина.

The world is not afraid of the 700,000th army of Putin and his nuclear weapons. The world is afraid that someone would dare to oppose Washington.

The world understands that as long as Washington does not interfere with doing what he does have is quite clear instructions on how to avoid the arrival of US peacekeepers in your house.

Instruction is really very simple: do what Washington says, or those who use his vocal apparatus, to carry out his instructions, and live, and even very fine living. And World War II is not – there is only local, and die just naughty.

And it’s not so scary. Whatever you hold in your mind and in your heart, you can always keep silent about it, accept it, change the view to bow to force majeure, or in extreme cases, move to where the most humbled and can be lost among them, where forage is enough for everyone .

And such places are still very much on the ground.

But if someone as big and menacing begin seriously to resist Washington, then loomed ahead of a new world war.

But this is scary. And most of all on earth will not remain places where you can hide from it.

And knowing that, even if you sympathize with the freedom-loving Putin, even if you have always dreamed that he finally appeared and showed Pindos long-promised gruel, even if you secretly pray for him – you choose … to join the sanctions.

Because it’s safer for you and your family. Because it is better to let the Americans bombed the Koreans, Vietnamese, Serbs, Iraqis, Ukrainians

We’re not there. We do not they.

We are here. We are loyal.

We are tolerant. We agree.

We are silent.

We surrender.

No, the 700,000th you afraid of Putin’s army.

You’re afraid that would break down and joined her.

 

WHY BALTIC REMOVAL FROM RUSSIA CAUSED Russians have a sigh of relief?

1314706693_0238.250x200 (324x200, 14Kb)

The answer to the question: Why the Baltic disconnection from Russia in the decay of the Soviet Union was a good sign for the Russians themselves and made them a sigh of relief, as if he were finally dropped from the back of a bag full of heavy stones …

Average wages Baltic workers and engineers from the late 40’s and up to the 90th was doubled, and almost three times as higher than in the Russian Federation and Belarus. A collective farmers and state farm workers the difference reaches three times. It is also significant that in the 40-60-ies in the Baltic kolkhoz passport is not seized, as in most Soviet republics.

Not Kaliningrad, namely, Latvian, Estonian and Lithuanian ports were the main western sea gate of the Soviet Union. Built back in the Soviet era ports continue to generate revenue Baltic countries.

In 70-80s to these ports were laid pipelines. Highways in the Baltic States were also at altitude. Their quality is ranked first in the USSR. Second place goes to Western Ukraine, the third – the South Caucasus. RSFSR was 12-13 th place.

We now turn to statistics. Let’s start with a comparison of capital investments. For example, the Lithuanian SSR received capital investment arable area of ​​1 hectare is 3.5 times more than these investments averaged for the Soviet Union. In 1987, the energy capacity for acreage in Lithuania were 2.2 times higher than in the RSFSR, in Latvia – 2.08, and in Estonia – 2.3 times. In this case, if someone believes that Tallinn, Riga and Vilnius were able to implement such energy supply agriculture at the expense of purely republican means that such a person is far from the truth. Union center was distributing fertilizers for agricultural land in such a way that the Lithuanian, Latvian and Estonian SSR fell to 155 kg, 196 kg and 209 kg per hectare of arable 1 respectively, but had to settle for the RSFSR 32.9 kilograms per 1 ha of arable land.
Immediately after the end of the Great Patriotic War, melioration touched 80% of farmland Baltic. Comparable to land reclamation in the whole of the USSR. All-union measure does not go to any comparison with the Baltic. It is only about 7%. As they say, feel the difference. Since the Soviet “invaders” -melioratory “committed atrocities” in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, actually turning the land into a sample of fertility throughout Eastern Europe.
In 1988, the average Latvians, Lithuanians and Estonians consumed per year of meat and meat products 84, 85 and 90 kg, respectively. On average, the Soviet Union, the figure was less than 64 kg. Consumption of milk and dairy products: Lithuania – 438 kg / person per year, Latvia – 471 kg / person per year, Estonia – 481 kg / person per year. The average for the USSR – 341 kg / person per year. In this case, the state budget of the USSR for the elimination of purchase and retail prices for the agricultural sector of the Baltic states is also allocated multimillion-dollar (for the – Soviet money) subsidies. It turns out that for the year the average Soviet citizen ate approximately 20-25 kg of meat and drink 100 liters of milk and dairy products is less than the average Baltic states.

Already in the mid-1950s, Latvia and Estonia became “standard” material well-being in the USSR. In 1961, the share of national income per inhabitant in Estonia was 720 rubles., In Latvia – 717 rubles. Given that the average all-union rate was 547 rubles (Russia – 598 rubles., Ukraine – 559, Lithuania – 489). But there was also the construction of housing, industrial, educational and medical institutions. Was developed processing industry. And all this for a considerable percentage of financed from the Union byudzheta.A here retail prices, electricity tariffs, transportation, rent and other prices in the Baltic (and Caucasus!) Republics were often two times lower than in the Russian Federation and Belarus.

All three “Baltic Sisters” received huge for these days and the cost of financial subsidies from Moscow. It should be noted that Moscow itself willingly went to the Baltic financial assistance, trying by all means to tighten its economy to the level of, for example, neighboring Finland. Like, a showcase of the USSR should look spectacular. And it looked the same.

 

NATO barely restrained !

НАТО еле сдерживается. Столтенберг заподозрил Россию в стремлении восстановить систему сфер влияния
Stoltenberg suspected Russia in an effort to restore the system of spheres of influence.
On the eve of the 66th anniversary of the founding of NATO, which falls on April 4, its current secretary general Jens Stoltenberg spoke in Brussels to MEPs. Spoke mostly about the further development of cooperation between the EU and NATO. But turned his attention to Russia. 

First of all, according to the German business newspaper Handelsblatt, Stoltenberg reassured overly impressionable allies on the block relative to the “Russian threat.” Stating that at present does not come from Moscow no threat to one NATO member country. Because, in the words of NATO Secretary General, “we were able to make a proper deterrence.” But he did not like that the Russian side is trying to restore a system in which the world is divided into spheres of influence. 

“We are opposed to this, as each country is sovereign. And you have to respect the sovereignty and territorial integrity of all States “- quoted by Interfax Stoltenberg. 

How do we relate to such accusations? And that, in fact, does not suit the head of the Alliance? 

– Statement Stoltenberg can be interpreted as anything – said department head of the regional policy of the Institute of Public Administration and Management RANHiGS the Russian president, Doctor of Political Sciences Vladimir Stoll. – But, apparently – and this is no novelty – NATO Secretary General well when the world is under the influence of only the Americans and the North Atlantic Alliance. When there is no competition on the horizon.

Prior to 1991, the world was divided into spheres of influence. That is, until the collapse of the Soviet Union and went into oblivion Warsaw Pact countries as competing or opposing military-political organization in relation to the North Atlantic Treaty. 

In 1991, the confrontation ended. West – in the euphoria. He is represented by the United States dominates absolutely everywhere. Most experts then agree that the collapse of the bipolar system will lead to a “pink-pacifist” state in world politics – when there will be no wars, no confrontations, no spheres of influence. Everything will be fine … 

“SP”(“Svobodnaja Pressa”-A free press): – Did not work out? 

– Peace was not sure. If we recall this period, starting from the very first military operation – “Desert Storm” in 1991, on what is called a train stop at all stops. 

Here we can recall the Yugoslav tragedy involving the Alliance. By the way, was the first time in Europe, NATO troops were present in the territory of a sovereign at the time of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. And it was ok in terms of Western logic. Then there were Afghanistan, again Iraq, Syria, Libya … And that everyone liked. When Russia began to show some signs of independence in the middle of the “zero” (a kind of watershed here as it is Putin’s Munich speech in 2007 at the International Conference on Disarmament) – is our partners actively dislike this. 

That is, when we are “white and fluffy”, all is well. When the Russian army destroyed his hands, in fact, as the Russian leadership under the guise of the so-called reform of the armed forces – that’s good. When there is awareness of national interests – West outraged. With that, he says, every sovereign country should have its own national interests.

“SP”: – Ordinary double standards … 

– Of course. If, for example, take the military doctrine of the United States, there in black and white that the national interests of the United States of America – everywhere. Around the world. That is, the Americans have such a right. No one else such or similar rights can not be. 

Regarding the current situation, I have the impression that since 1991, when the USSR collapsed and ceased to exist a block of the Warsaw Pact, the Alliance for a while was looking for causes and reasons for its preservation. Because logically, if the missing main opponent, then NATO, it would seem, we must cease to exist. Since the external enemy, opponent, rival – somehow it can be called – was gone. However, this did not happen. Moreover, there is a certain transformation conceptually structures and NATO command. And today we have what we have. 

“SP”: – What exactly has changed? 

– Alliance began to behave more actively after the adoption of the end of 2010 at the Lisbon Summit the new strategic concept of the block. Defense, peacekeeping and security – that’s like three postulates on which the activities of the North Atlantic Treaty today. Moreover, the entire activity of NATO after 2010 moved as close to the Russian border. 

Active NATO’s eastward expansion since 1991 has led to the fact that if, prior to 1991, there were 16 countries in the Alliance, but today they have become 28. And it’s not only the former socialist countries, but, most worryingly, the former Soviet republics. And it’s not just about the Baltics. In preparing to join the Alliance Ukraine, Moldova, Georgia.

Therefore, the current secretary general rhetoric remains the same – this is a confrontation. But the paradox of this policy lies in the fact that virtually no serious international problem of NATO today is not able to resolve without Russia.
This is connected with the threats that originate from the so-called “Islamic State” *. This is the current situation in Africa, in particular in Nigeria. This Afghanistan after the withdrawal of the Americans and NATO troops. This is generally the entire Middle East and Central Asia, and many other areas where experience shows that without the alliance with Russia a practical solution to any global issues is simply impossible. 

According to head of the department for European Security, Institute of Europe, the candidate of economic sciences Dmitry Danilov, the theme of spheres of influence – in a Western interpretation of zones of influence – totally new: 

– It is a traditional thesis, which rises when the criticism towards Russia increased – during the crisis of relations between the West and Russia. It is clear that the current Ukrainian crisis is largely the result of the fact that Russia and the West have not been able to agree on so-called common spaces. What was said in the context of space “from Vancouver to Vladivostok”, “from the Atlantic to the Pacific”, etc … 

Clearly, Europe increasingly divided into two parts. One Europe, which is concentrated around the Euro-Atlantic institutions and NATO. Moreover, institutions expanding … 

And another Europe, the center of which is Russia. Which tries to formulate his own philosophy of integration, the Eurasian integration. But in the context of, shall we say, increasing the fault passing in Europe – in Ukraine. 

So when Stoltenberg speaks of spheres of influence, there is, in fact, there is a substitution of concepts. In Russia, there are not only the specific interests of the former Soviet Union, but also its own responsibilities in this area.

Stoltenberg in this case replaces the notion – he talks about spheres of influence. Then how to talk about the area of ​​interest. On special interests of Russia in the post-Soviet space, in the first place. And the scope of responsibility. 

“SP”: – This is the reason of differences between the West and Russia today? 

– I would say, fundamental differences. The danger is that if Stoltenberg repeats these formulas and talks about Russia’s attempts to formulate a national strategy in terms of spheres of influence, which means that organizations such as NATO would have to look for relevant answers. Therefore can not be considered his words only political and diplomatic rhetoric. Such definitions largely lay coordinate system, which will be built in the near term Western policy. Including policies and conceptual installation of NATO. 

And since this way, Russia would be very strange excuses and say that we are not talking about some spheres of influence, and so on … After all well aware that in this case the problem is reduced not only to increased geopolitical rivalry Russia and the West. First of all, the post-Soviet space. We are talking about a serious geopolitical confrontation with all its consequences, with all the components of this collision. Someone might call it “the new edition of the Cold War.” Someone might say that until this matter has not yet reached. But de facto we are talking about a serious geopolitical impact, the return to a relationship of mutual deterrence.

“SP”: – How long? 

– It depends on how Russia and the West will be able to (or try to) go back into the European mainstream. And this, in turn, can only be done on the basis of the settlement of the Ukrainian crisis, where Russia and the West are the main actors who have to negotiate. 

Now, if we (I mean the whole Greater Europe) will continue to think in terms of spheres of influence and accuse the partner that he is acting exactly in this paradigm, then, on this basis is unlikely to be something to negotiate. Especially that one of the components (and this is very important) the normalization of relations is just thawing of relations between Russia and NATO. But if Stoltenberg will repeat the formula, which he said in Brussels that there will be serious obstacles to the establishment of our relationship.

Simulation of the Third World War.

Симуляция Третьей мировой. Достаточно ли сил и средств сегодня у России, чтобы противостоять НАТО

Is there enough forces and means today Russia to counter NATO ?

Judging by the area covered and the involved forces, the Russian military exercises serve as a warning to NATO. This was said in a March 19 report, the US private intelligence and analysis company Stratfor.

Russia is interested in a show of force “to dissuade anyone from radical action on Ukraine”, according to the report. US expressed caution – to postpone the deployment of 300 of its military in the west of the country, although they insist that their arrival is still possible and appropriate order may be given in April, says Stratfor.

In addition, conducting exercises of this magnitude, Russia responds to the dynamics of the NATO military exercises in Eastern Europe, the report says. Initially, it was stated that the exercises will focus on the problems of the Northern Fleet in order to check the speed of deployment of Novaya Zemlya and Franz Josef Land, but then maneuvers gained a much larger scale. However, as analysts said the company, the Russian exercises are held in the same territories, which usually holds its NATO exercises.

According to Stratfor, the teaching look like “simulation full-scale confrontation with NATO,” which were involved strategic nuclear forces: Strategic Rocket Forces, strategic bombers and nuclear submarines.

 

The total increase in the rate of Russian military activity, the growth of the presence of NATO and the large number of scientists in Eastern Europe are reminiscent of a show of force times “cold war,” the report said.

Recall March 16 in Russia began one of the largest in recent years large-scale sudden check readiness of the Armed Forces. She touched all five operational-strategic commands and connections under the Central Government. The main focus of the inspection was made on the conduct of hostilities diverse forces in the Arctic zone, but then in the exercises were involved armed forces in all strategic directions. So, March 20 peacekeeping units of the Central Military District have worked to create a buffer zone between the conflicting parties and conditional delivery of humanitarian aid. The exact number of troops involved in the exercises is unknown, but it is clear that the test covers almost the entire country.

According to Gen. Yuri Baluyevsky, head of the General Staff in 2004-2008, “spot checks were always – and during the Soviet era, and in the days of the Russian army since Peter the Great.” However, events of this magnitude, according to Baluyevsky, “imply the presence of additional forces and resources, primarily oil and lubricants (POL).” “In my time, the issue of ensuring the Army POL was really critical, exactly the same as the total financing of the army, so the spot checks, of course, were, but they were carried out according to the capabilities they provide,” he said.

The last three years, Russian military exercises in scope completely incomparable with NATO, says Deputy Director of the Institute of Political and Military Analysis Alexander Hramchihin.

– It happens that some of our maneuvers involved so much effort and money as the Alliance does not attract a whole year. And this despite the fact that all NATO exercises are usually planned and the date of their known almost a year, our own – mostly unannounced. And here it is worth paying attention to one thing: if the teachings are rosy, it means that they actually failed. Hence, they are not and sudden. The greater the problems identified during maneuvers, the better.

“SP»: – Stratfor calls the current exercise “simulating full-scale confrontation with NATO” …

– Generally, any doctrine – is a simulation of the war. It is in the North Atlantic alliance ever since the end of the “cold war” introduced a completely idiotic practice – simulate strange fighting, some peacekeeping peacekeeping operations, which, by and large, are not relevant to the tasks of the armed forces. Therefore, by the way, NATO countries and have fallen since last year in a panic because they understand their unwillingness to war. Our armed forces are normal exercises, such as they should be. The United States on its territory and carry out military maneuvers, but their scope is still with our incomparable, especially for the Army.

“SP”: – In spite of the fact that under the current exercise is also practiced the task of combating terrorism, but, judging by the scale, we are still moving away from the practice of calling all the teachings of anti-terrorism, even if the maneuvers involved SNF …

– Of course, this is absurd on account of the fight against terrorism is gradually disappearing because a few years ago actually exercises the Strategic Missile Forces explained the fight against terrorism that does not climbed in any gate. With regard to mining counter saboteurs, it is quite logical actions as zabroska RDG – an integral part of the war.

The United States are more focused on exercises with its allies. The teachings of this magnitude, which are now in our country, for them is a rare case, the director of the Center for Strategic conditions Ivan Konovalov.

– In general, they planned, but are held frequently. Although the recent deployment of three thousand groups in the Baltic States with the assistance of tanks M1A2 Abrams, M2A3 Bradley armored vehicles and equipment serving looks like an unscheduled event. His goal – to “show of force” in order to, firstly, to show respect to the new members of the Alliance, NATO support them, and secondly, to show the teeth of the Russian Federation. The maneuvers in the United States and Canada also do not differ scale, and by the way, basically called not a scientist, and training.

In the current exercise, which affected all operational-strategic commands, in fact, there is nothing unusual. When Sergei Shoigu in 2012 became minister of defense, unannounced inspections have become quite routine thing for our armed forces, which, incidentally, was not after the collapse of the USSR.

But it should be noted that now the doctrines against the backdrop of a very serious deterioration of relations between the West and Russia. Of course, a demonstration of the combat capability of Russia – this is an extremely important factor. Now NATO military experts are closely monitoring our teachings, and their overall evaluation is to ensure that the Russian army has become a serious force, which is in constant combat readiness. Promise of military maneuvers is the following thesis: “We do not show aggression, but demonstrate its readiness for any eventuality. You can see for themselves what is now Russia’s armed forces and draw appropriate conclusions. “

Leading Research Fellow, Department of regional security RISS Candidate of Military Sciences Vladimir Karjakin notes: the correlation of forces of the Russian Federation and NATO said that the Alliance can not objectively create a significant advantage in the operational areas of land theater.

– The geographical location of our country allows the Armed Forces to increase operational groups in the border areas. For instance, before strikes against Iraq, the Americans two and a half months grouping formed in the Gulf countries, driven aircraft carriers. It is clear that if all of a sudden they start to build up forces for an attack on Russia, this would require quite a long time, during which we will be able to pre-emptive strike. But that’s not the case, and that there is no unity in the alliance, moreover, a syndrome of Germany’s defeat in World War II in one way or another, but there is a European mentality when it comes to confrontation with Russia.

In the United States, despite all the declarations of their leaders and commanders, they will not bind to nuclear power. And they do not want a repeat of Iraq and Afghanistan in Europe. Thus, Americans will continue to conduct exercises with allies, to support anti-Russian sentiments in Eastern Europe. Europeans and do not mind screaming about Russian danger to receive from the United States or that assistance.

In general, the US and Europe will continue to lead us technological and information war against the background of the exercises near our borders, but actual combat it will not come.

NATO has no protection from the operation, the course which fulfills Russia.

У НАТО нет защиты от операции, ход которой отрабатывает Россия

The Russian army during the sudden teachings throws in the Kaliningrad region missiles “Iskander”, as Poland prepares to host the air and missile defense systems. The bad news for NATO is that in this case to oppose anything the Russian counterattack, it can not. Now it does not matter what happened before – the redeployment of Russian “Iskander” or attempt to probe placement in Poland missile defense system of unknown origin. The fact that the territory of the neighboring country with Russian missiles will air and missile defense, has long been known. And the fact that it can not be solved by diplomatic means, too, was known long before the Ukrainian events. It makes no sense to retell and prepositions that the US invented to justify the idea of ​​placing a missile defense system in close proximity to Russian borders. Who’s supposed to, and so they will remember: it was supposed to be protection against a non-existent Iranian threat posed by non-existent Iranian ballistic missiles with non-existent nuclear warheads. The ensuing discussion diplomatic disputes reminiscent of Spanish rabbis with Torquemada: the decision to deploy missile defense (expulsion of the Jews and Marranos) were still made in advance for reasons of mystical character, but still interesting to listen to. At the same time (almost ten years ago) was first told about the response deployment of Russian missile systems “Iskander-M”, precisely in the Kaliningrad region, and not somewhere else. These plans are strategic, they are known in advance – this is not the battalion group of marines, which can be flown anywhere. No one has made no secret of that system “Iskander” just was a response to the deployment of US missile defense systems, and in northern Poland (both on the southern flank of the response to a similar attempt in Romania was the transformation of Crimea into a fortress, teeming with exactly the kind of means of destruction). “Iskander” – “the perfect assassin” is precisely such systems that the US and NATO are trying to arrange a new, reinventing them in real-time theater. That the US “Patriot” that competing with them French counterparts are unable to repel the attack on themselves medium-range cruise missiles. Location in the Kaliningrad region “Iskander” makes a highly publicized NATO missile defense system in another target. In this sense, the remarkable number of mutually planned placement systems: the United States and Poland talking about batteries 9 “Patriot”, while talking about the alleged 10-powered Russian “Iskander”. This may well be true, because Washington does not have a free supply of missile defense systems and defense and the armed forces of the Russian Federation “accumulated” “Iskander” in the two theaters of military operations, which had never been in recent history. Moscow is able to consciously distribute high-precision weapons for several HPT, so even with the stock. In this context it is worth to look at some details of the sudden inspection training, running now in parts of the Western District, Northern and Baltic fleets, Airborne and Special Forces. Ivanovo paratroopers landing work out in the area of ​​Pechenga (ie, on the Norwegian border), Arctic brigade occupies the Franz Josef Land, the Northern Fleet relieve the so-called road Gorshkov – corridor progress in the North Atlantic from the coast of the Barents Sea between Norway and Iceland, and the long-range aviation eyeing Norway, Iceland and the UK. Like it or not, but this is the scenario of the Russian counter-attack in response to a possible NATO aggression. This scenario was developed in draft form in the Soviet period and since then has not lost its relevance. Change only the weapons and tactics of their application, but the meaning has remained virtually unchanged. In short, it is assumed that the collision of European Russia and NATO importantly – it’s a matter of time: how fast can (if he can) go to Europe reinforcements from North America (USA and Canada). The only way to deliver a very large masses of manpower and equipment were and will remain for a long time naval convoys. To stop the convoys, Russia must be brought under control of the North Atlantic area. And it is achievable to comprehensive amphibious operation in northern Norway with the capture airfields NATO, which there a lot, including a key one – Icelandic Keflavik. Keflavik provide control over the Russian Air Force (including strategic bombers) control over the entire Atlantic to the Azores – the southernmost point of the route potential convoys. Thus, the question of destruction of such convoys becomes purely technical. On the northern route, you can forget, the transfer to northern Norway and Iceland Russian special forces and air force will break the whole balance of forces in the European theater as a whole. At the same time, the Northern Fleet, including submarines with nuclear weapons, can freely pass into the Atlantic, then war can be considered complete. At this time, the Poles and 12 American tanks in Latvia can indefinitely (probably an hour and a half) to depict the heroic defense. But to ensure that developments may be, including, and after the opening of the airspace over the Baltic and Scandinavia (ie destruction of airfields and cover them), and for which there are “Iskander” in the Kaliningrad region and on the border with Estonia (in fact there are another Norwegian air defense system in Narvik and Mo i Rana). Special Forces and the Arctic with its quiet landing above the Arctic Circle – as it is now the Ivanovo paratroopers on the Norwegian border. This script is afraid of NATO, when so focuses on long claimed the idea of ​​relocation “Iskander”. The Alliance does not have a mobile defense system, many years of his military-strategic thought or idle at all, or focused on the execution of a foreign country “Tomahawk” without any resistance from the enemy. In our case, once the potential vulnerability of land – the Arctic Ocean – now turned almost into the lake. A group of US in the Persian Gulf has become vulnerable and our fleet (he appeared base in the region), and the response to missile attack. And most importantly: the plan to deal with counter-attacks, as described above, they still can not. That is why the placement of “Iskander” in the Kaliningrad region (even if temporary, as part of the exercise) has attracted much attention. It is, by the way, followed immediately after the final output of Russia from the CFE Treaty, which is formally proposed classifications affected. So the word Shoigu “on our territory where we want, and place there” is no surprise. But many people happy. Eugene Krutikov Source: http://vz.ru/politics/2015/3/17/734911.html

Source: http://politikus.ru/articles/45789-u-nato-net-zaschity-ot-operacii-hod-kotoroy-otrabatyvaet-rossiya.html
Politikus.ru

Signs of the Third World War !

Приметы Третьей мировой. Нарушение Киевом минских соглашений может привести к «опосредованной войне» между Россией и НАТО

Violation of Kiev Minsk agreements can lead to a “proxy war” between Russia and NATO.

In the event of a “pro-Russian separatists” US will begin deliveries of weapons to Ukraine, which will lead to the beginning of a proxy war between Russia and NATO in Europe, says the journalist of the newspaper The Daily Mail James Forsyth.

He supports his conclusions referring to a member of the British government. This can lead to the beginning of the worst “match” between Washington and Moscow since the Cold War. Proxy wars will be fought on the eastern border of Europe, the author points out.

At the top of the British government are worried that such a development is becoming more likely. Senior officials believe that Vladimir Putin is interested in resolving the conflict only on his terms, the author writes. “Putin will do everything not to allow NATO and the EU to expand further to the east” – quoted “Russian Spring” the words of one senior British officials.

The US Congress has a lot of pressure on Obama, urging him to take action.

Meanwhile, on February 26 guide Kiev DNR laid an ultimatum, saying that if they continue shelling by the Ukrainian security officials allotted heavy armed militias will be returned to the position tomorrow. According to the head of DNR Alexander Zakharchenko, the army of the republic already took 90% of their arms, and Kiev reciprocal steps not taken. Zakharchenko said that the attack on the position of APU militias continue. There have been new attacks and Gorlovki Elenovka. If they do not stop, the militia would be considered that the new agreement Ming thwarted. Chapter DNR noted that the text of the ultimatum handed to sign the OSCE representatives.

How likely is it that the fighting resumed? Whether this will lead to a “proxy war” between Russia and NATO?

– Until now, there was reason to believe that the truce gradually established – the director of the Center for Strategic conditions Ivan Konovalov. – The beginning of a real withdrawal of heavy weapons. There was no fierce fighting. However, the line of contact between the militia and the Ukrainian security forces remains. So the military clashes are inevitable.

The question is whether to wait until the full regime of silence. This largely depends on what the wind blows from Kiev. A situation in Kiev is not fully controlled by anybody. There is strong party of war, forced to crouch in front of which Peter Poroshenko. Ukrainian politics is influenced by many power groups. Which one will prevail is uncertain. Take the story of the creation of alternative Staff warlords, which will include the most odious figures: Dmitry Yarosh, Simon Semenchenko. One can not but note that this will create a headquarters in Dnepropetrovsk. And, therefore, it will operate under the control of the governor Kolomoiskiy. It seems that coming a serious struggle for power between the oligarch Kolomoisky and “former” oligarch Poroshenko. In this situation, ensure that no provocation at the front impossible. And only one provocation – and all truce could explode …

“SP”: – If the provocation has done its job, and will resume hostilities begin open US arms deliveries to Ukraine?

– Such a scenario can not be excluded. Although the United States, despite its harsh rhetoric against Russia, cautious. Raises questions list of weapons that American experts suggest supply to Ukraine. It drones, light armored vehicles, anti-tank missiles. Especially strange that it includes air defenses. In Ukraine, its air defense system remained at a relatively good level. While the hostilities in the sky Donbas hardly conducted. Ukrainian aircraft is practically destroyed. And only one militia attack aircraft flies. It turns out that supplied weapons handy little Ukrainian army. Especially in the offensive. That is the purpose of these supplies more psychological: to show that the poor Ukraine is forced to defend itself against aggression. But in general, with regard to arms supplies to Ukraine in the American establishment is no unity. Many – against. And Europe is very worried that the United States will decide to take this step. Second Minsk agreements were largely concluded it was because the Europeans saw that further progress will militias the United States an excuse for arms. I think that in case of failure of the Minsk agreements, Europe will be strengthened to try to influence the United States. Europeans do not need hundreds of thousands of Ukrainian refugees.

“SP”: – Can we expect that in case of resumption of hostilities by militias will be able to take Mariupol?

– Mariupol, most likely, will go under the control of militias. Perhaps it does not need any offensive. In the city could start a rebellion. Residents have extremely negative attitude to the Ukrainian law enforcement officers, especially to parts of the National Guard. Storm the city on the forehead is fraught with serious casualties among the civilian population.

By the way, fighting under Debaltseve showed that the armed forces of New Russia, although winning the Ukrainian army, but still difficult. Therefore, the strength to go on Slavic and Kramators’k have militias, most likely unavailable. Major events can turn on Mariupol direction.

– And then and now political scientists repeated the mantra that “a truce in general preserved” – said the expert of the Association of military, political scientist Alexander Perendzhiev. – But I believe that there is no truce was not long after Minsk-1. No it now. Shelling of cities, clashes small units – all this is obvious. Although we see that kind of terms of agreements are respected. First of all – the militias. However, under the guise of “truce” and she and the other side is preparing for a new round of fighting.

“SP”: – How to behave in the case of the Americans taking militias Mariupol?

– Of course, the degree of the war will increase. But to open intervention by the armies of other countries will not reach. Mariupol in any case – the main strategic object around which the struggle unfold. Sea lanes essential Novorossia. Possession of Mariupol port in terms of the economy will make Novorossia self-sufficient. And geopolitically greatly increase the importance of the DNI and the LC.

Yeah, maybe the US will be opened to supply arms that they already deliver. It is, rather, a psychological step, designed primarily for domestic American consumer. They say, look, we are helping to fight democratic Ukraine with Russian aggression. Russophobia, unfortunately, has become quite profitable political trend, not only in the US but also in some European countries.

In any case, the course of hostilities US supplies will not fundamentally change. Armed Forces of Ukraine show low combat capability. It is evident that the country already live it to the limit of their resources. The economy is collapsing. Military supplies, anyway, someone has to pay. Modern weapons – costs a lot of money, which Ukraine is not, and is not expected.

Most likely, everything will be reduced to supplying obsolete weapons. A sort of “Army consumer goods” in the form of machine guns and mortars, the weather for the Ukrainian army did not do it.

RSS for Posts RSS for Comments