Tag Archives: Suspect information

“Sting Millennium” ended.

The last batch of our uranium went overseas.

Russia fully paid indemnity for the US defeat in the Cold War.

Almost none of the Russian media did not pay attention to an event that occurred in August 2016 .. From the port of St. Petersburg on a journey across the Atlantic has gone merchant ship Atlantic Navigator. On board the ship – container with the Russian uranium.
   The deal “Gore – Chernomyrdin”: the true purpose of our American “partners”
  This was the last batch of uranium, which was sent to the United States on the basis of signed 20 years ago, the US-Russian agreement providing for the supply to the United States 500 metric tons of uranium, which Russia undertook to extract from its nuclear weapons and that America intended to be used as fuel for nuclear power plants .

About this uranium deal actively discussed in the 1990s, but today, the theme was “behind the scenes” discussions of the key issues of our lives. A younger generation simply nothing about it heard. Therefore, we must be reminded of its history.

Immediately, I note that this is no ordinary trade and economic transactions, beneficial for both sides. It is an act of the largest Russian robbery, not only in the latest of its history, but also in the entire history of the country. Russia lost the Cold War the West, primarily the United States. She lost to a great extent due to the treacherous policy of our leaders. These tops have continued to take the country in the 1990s. “Uranium deal” – the consent of our treacherous elite pay tribute to the winner in the form of weapons-grade uranium. The principal agreement on this was reached between the then Prime Minister VS Chernomyrdin and US Vice President Albert Gore, so this transaction is often referred to as the transaction Gore – Chernomyrdin. It is also called “the scam of the Millennium” by virtue of an unprecedented scale. In fact, it was the West’s operation, which solves several strategic goals:

a) unilateral nuclear disarmament by depriving Russia of its stocks of weapons-grade uranium, as well as the preparation of conditions for the US withdrawal from the ABM Treaty;

b) applying enormous economic damage to Russia (the accumulated stock of weapons-grade plutonium is an essential part of the national wealth of Russia at the time);

c) deprivation of the huge Russian energy sources in the future after the intended introduction of new technology thorium nuclear power.

The scale of Russia robbery

“Scam Millennium” deal dubbed because, first, it had a huge scale, and secondly, was concluded fraudulently. Many Russian and American media tried to present it as a mediocre commercial agreement. The total purchase price for the supply of 500 tonnes of uranium was set at 11.9 billion dollars. Meanwhile, the value of the specified amount of highly enriched uranium is incomparably higher. To produce this amount of weapons-grade uranium, mining and defense industries of the country have worked for about 40 years, several hundred thousand people. Manufacturing dangerous, tens of thousands of people lost their health and ability to work, shortened his life. These were enormous sacrifices in order to forge a nuclear shield of the country and ensure a calm peaceful life of the USSR and the socialist countries. This uranium provides military-strategic parity in the world, which dramatically reduced the risk of a world war.

    On the other hand, in the US media, there are such assessments: by Russian uranium at the beginning of this century in the US nuclear power plants produce 50% of electricity. Every tenth kilowatt hour of electricity in the entire US economy was ensured at the expense of enriched uranium from Russia. According to the estimates, which were made by experts at the end of the last century, the real value of 500 tonnes of weapons-grade plutonium was at the time of not less than $ 8 trillion. For comparison, the annual average of the annual GDP in Russia, according to Rosstat, in the last decade of the last century there were in the region of $ 400 billion. It turns out that the actual price of the uranium deal was only 0.15% in relation to the minimum real value of the goods. The real price of uranium was equivalent to 20 (twenty) annual GDP!

There have been many wars in the history of mankind. After they defeated often pay reparations and indemnities winners. Recall, for example, the Franco-Prussian War in 1871. “Iron Chancellor” Bismarck defeated France appointed a contribution of about 13% of GDP (5 billion francs). Probably, the biggest in recent history indemnity paid defeated in World War Germany. Media reported that Germany just three years ago, has been paying reparations for the Paris Peace Treaty of 1919. In Germany, reparations were imposed in the amount of 269 billion gold marks. The amount, of course, enormous: it is equivalent to about 100 000 tons of gold. At present the price of the yellow metal would be about $ 4 trillion. in the field of economic history Experts say that to Germany in Paris reparation is about twice the GDP of the then Germany. Among other things, the payment of reparations by Germany stretched for 90 years (with interruptions, carried out for about 70 years in the pure form of payment); the payment of the “uranium reparations” Russia kept within 20 years, with most of the uranium was produced in the US in the 1990s.

     In the history of the early to finish.
  “Uranium deal” was accomplished in total secrecy from the people. Do not even been aware of many “people’s representatives” – for the reason that it is in violation of Russian law, it did not pass the ratification procedure in our parliament. In the second half of the 1990s, a number of MPs have launched an investigation to clarify the terms of the deal, the circumstances of its conclusion, assessment of conformity with the Constitution of the Russian Federation and other normative acts of Russia. As a result of strong pressure from certain influential forces surrounding then-President Boris countries Yeltsin managed to stop the investigation. We are trying to understand the transaction and many of our other policies, or even denunciation of the agreement achieved on the supply of uranium to the United States. Among them, for example, the legendary general L.Rohlin, Yu.Skuratov Attorney General, State Duma Deputy Ilyukhin. Death of Rokhlin and resignation of Skuratov many people associate it with the fact that they showed excessive activity in the investigation, “the uranium deal.”

Even if the supply of uranium in the transaction Gore – Chernomyrdin completed, it does not mean that we should put an end to history. It is necessary to return to serious analysis and investigation of the transaction in the framework of a special inter-ministerial committee with the participation of the nuclear industry specialists, MPs (the State Duma), law enforcement officials, the Foreign Ministry, the Ministry of Defense and other agencies and organizations, independent experts, technical, military, legal and economic issues.

Firstly, there are suspicions that a number of persons involved in that transaction, remain in the “cage” active politicians and government officials. There is no guarantee that they will not continue to work in the US and Western interests.

Secondly, we need to correct and honest understanding of our recent history. Without truthful disclosure of details “uranium deal” and its political, military, moral evaluation is no guarantee that we are again stepping on rakes like. Analysis of the real aims of the US side of the transaction clearly highlights the true aims and interests of those whom we, unfortunately, by inertia continue to call “partners”.

Thirdly, we need informed and detailed assessment of the economic damage which has been inflicted deal Russia and its people.

Any attempt to take the path of Russian economic recovery West will put a spoke in the wheel of our current reform, socio-economic transformation. We must be prepared for the fact that the West will increasingly expose us to a different kind of “bills” – for example, if we try to carry out deofshore our economy. After US courts, the United Kingdom, other European countries inevitably begin disassembling from the owners of offshore companies and / or their representatives with far-fetched claims for “damages”. Approximately the same reaction can be expected in case Russia decides to withdraw from the WTO, the limitation of foreign investment or even restriction of repatriated profits of foreign investors from Russia. We must be prepared for the fact that it may be necessary counterclaim “accounts” our Western “partners”. The largest of all possible counter “accounts” – our requirements to the US giant to compensate damage to Russia “uranium deal.”

VY Katasonov

Yakov Kedmi: The first blow will get the United States !

Удар по США


We are once again trying to scare NATO increased in Europe.
Offer see video from Iton.TV Yakov Kedmi, the former head of one of the intelligence services of Israel. More recently, he has not only commented on the situation on the international internet-channel, but has repeatedly been a guest on Russian television.
His opinion in the latest issue of the transfer on the topic “How should Russia respond to the new part of NATO in Europe. (Sm.13min.20sek.) Here is his view:
“… As far as I understand, as Russia refers to this matter … Russia has repeatedly explained, and the US and its European allies that NATO is the problem. Any adventure of NATO towards Russia dress-up will go primarily to the United States.
Any adventure in Europe, the first blow, which will receive for it, get the United States. So constructed Russian doctrine. So Russia is preparing his army.
NATO, too, will get his. On this, too, it will be set aside, some part. But the basic receive, those who control NATO – it is the United States.
Never again will be in the history of what has always been! The war, anywhere, and the Americans are at war anywhere but the United States, their territory out of the war.
Here’s what the Americans explained to the Russian military. Quite clearly. Any war in Europe-will be on American soil. In American cities, the American industry, the American army. Wherever the US military was not.

P.S. Israel, one of the few countries that does not live in the virtual mirages, and in the real world. In my opinion, they correctly evaluate any increase in the level of conflict and the consequences that may ensue.
Source material
Material: Sagamor

German media: Following the Schengen and the euro may disappear

The German government reigns despondency, and the length of the influx of refugees could lead to the restoration of the permanent control of the borders of the EU, writes the German media. And after Schengen may have to bury the euro, journalists said.

Немецкие СМИ: Вслед за Шенгеном может исчезнуть и евро

This year may prove to be one of the most important for the future of the EU and German Chancellor Angela Merkel, the prospect is not encouraging. This writes Der Spiegel.

“Germany and its chancellor Angela Merkel, facing the biggest challenge after the collapse of the Eastern bloc”, – quotes RIA Novosti article.

As noted, the President of the European Commission, Jean-Claude Juncker said that the long list of unsolved problems add new, and warned of a “crisis of confidence” in Europe. Relations within the EU is increasingly aggravated by the influx of refugees.

Other countries, including France and Italy, made it clear that the migratory crisis – this is a problem in Germany, says the author.

In addition, there is the question of Turkey, which, according to the EU, should play a key role in reducing the number of refugees. To do this, Ankara should receive EU € 3 billion, but the decision met with protests in Italy. Vice-Chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany, Sigmar Gabriel, he did not rule out that in the extreme case of Berlin will have to deal with the problem on their own.

The fate of the Schengen area and the euro.

The German government prevails “more disheartening than optimism,” is reflected in the article. There are fears that a further influx of refugees would lead to the restoration of the permanent control of the borders of the EU. If in the near future will ensure a reliable control of the external borders of the block, barriers like dominoes will fall anywhere from the south to the north.”
According to Der Spiegel, in this case, will have to bury the Schengen system, and with it, perhaps, Europe and other achievements. Thus, according to Juncker, without Schengen makes no sense and the euro.

Ultimatum of Bavaria and the Austrian border control.

Recall January 16, Prime Minister of Bavaria and head of the ruling in the Federal Republic of Germany in the coalition party “Christian Social Union” Horst Seehofer has put forward an ultimatum to Chancellor Angela Merkel, if in two weeks will not be provided with the order on the German border, he will file a lawsuit to the Constitutional Court Germany.

On the eve of Austrian Chancellor Werner Faymann said that the authorities have started to enhanced scrutiny of entering the country temporarily thereby limiting the Schengen agreement.

According to Faymann, Austria would be “in the same way as Germany, hard to control borders and expel the refugees”. He stressed that the refugees are not sent on to Germany, from that moment will not be let in Austria.

He said that on the border necessarily need to have an identity card. “If the EU does not, it does not protect the external borders under the Schengen issue as such. Then each country must control its national borders, “- criticized the EU Faymann.




Americans are thinking the exclusion of Latvia from NATO !

Американцы задумались об исключении Латвии из НАТО

On the pages of Forbes magazine was publicly recognized as “meaningless” stay the Baltics into NATO. From the membership of the Baltic countries in NATO greatly affected the security of the United States: as a result of their activities in NATO there is a threat of a nuclear war with Russia because of that damn America. For the Baltic elites, such statements from the ocean – a reminder that the American owners of Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia – emergency ballast, which the United States, if necessary, easily be thrown overboard.

In one of the most famous and influential business media world – the American financial and economic magazine Forbes – earlier this month published “software” analytical article “Why America is a member of NATO?”, To question the appropriateness of the existence of the alliance, which does not guarantee the security of the United States but only puts this safety compromised.

The main idea of ​​the article – taking in new members, who are often weak, worthless and incapable of self-defense of the country, the Alliance forces the Americans to take custody of these new pitiful allies.

It is Washington only a headache, because it makes him get involved in all sorts of regional conflicts on the side of the countries that do not provide the security of the United States.

Countries that America in general, and do not need.

NATO expansion has long been turned into an end in itself – in practice, this expansion does not have any sense for Americans, not in the national interest of the United States, and eventually creates for the Pentagon to the State Department issues.

“Add to Montenegro – it’s like to get one more mindless friend in Facebook», – begins his article staffer Doug Forbes Bendou.

“The presidents and legislators continue to provide guarantees for the security of money and the lives of American citizens to foreign countries, and it happens even when – as is the case with Montenegro, when they have absolutely no value to the security of the United States,” – writes Forbes.

Business publication exposes the ruthless criticism of the policy of recruiting NATO with caustic sarcasm criticizing the principle of “expansion for expansion,” in which America is required, for example, carry the alliance commitments to Turkey – a “friend-enemy” of the United States, where the government is Islamist Erdogan, criticized furiously in his speeches “decadent West” and “American imperialism”, but once running for help to the Allies after they provoked the conflict with Russia.

However, a much more vivid example of useless and pathetic allies that America hoisted on his shoulders and is now forced to defend them, even though they do not need her or Europe – is the Baltic countries, with merciless candor named Forbes «helpless nations.”

“The expansion at the expense of the Baltic States turned a colossal mistake, which resulted in NATO became helpless nation in defense are not interested the rest of Europe, the countries that have no geopolitical significance to America, however, involved in the acute controversy with Russia, – says the American edition. – If there is something bad, then America with minimal support from the European “allies” – they are likely to seek refuge in Brussels – will have, apparently, have to deal with having a nuclear weapons Russia over the disputed issues of greater interest to Moscow than to Washington. ”

“Security of the United States significantly affected by the addition of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania”, – concludes Forbes, and on the basis of this conclusion, urging people not to repeat the Baltic “colossal mistake” in the “Eastern Partnership”, taking in Georgia and Ukraine.

It is noteworthy that Forbes said not a word about the “imperial ambitions” or “aggressive neighborhood” – the conflict between Russia and the Baltic States there is an objective, but the cause of his stated “heated debate” between Moscow and the Baltic countries.

Who this policy is – a rhetorical question, given that the adoption of the latest Foreign Policy Concept of the Russian Federation (2013), in which the Baltic states did not say a word, legally approved diplomatic line in Moscow against Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia is ignoring the whole Trinity.

Contemptuous silence – is a universal Russian official response to calls to its international isolation, the comparison with the Third Reich and female hysteria about the “terrorist state.”

Only a few months later, without any apparent connection with these public attacks, suddenly found themselves banned Latvian sprats, came under embargo “milk” and Russian transit redirected to the Baltic ports in Russia.

So the conflict between Russia and the Baltic states to blame Baltic states – says a leading US business publication, and by appealing to the most holy – to the “life of American citizens” – asks the question: why America must expose themselves to the threat of nuclear war with Russia because of the verbal incontinence Dalia Grybauskaite and Edgar Rinkevich?

Namely this Baltic Allies eventually from her and need: not a week goes by that of Vilnius did not hear the next call for increased US presence in the region, including the military presence.

For the Baltic States, and can be no question that they are fighting for themselves: no, we are small, responsible for our words about a “new Mordor” have allies.

Allies must do: they have to increase the presence of NATO in the region, the Baltic countries send in their military contingents, put them overland NATO base, going for it on a direct conflict with Russia.

This behavior, by the way, contrary to the bedrock of the Anglo-Saxon culture, and Americans are taught from birth that count in life only for themselves, responsible for his words and be able to stand up for themselves, can only cause disgust.
This aversion to read the publication Forbes between the lines, this disgust and question why the United States allies in the “helpless nation”?
“In the end, since the end of World War II, it passed 70 years. GDP and population of the European Union more than the corresponding figures in America, and much more than in Russia. Is it not time for the rich friends of Washington begin to defend themselves yourself? “- Angrily writes American magazine, noting that because of its craven allies, the White House continues to” risk the lives of its citizens, because Europe does not want to worry about is to have a sufficient number of men and women in uniform. ”
For Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia publication Forbes – a reminder that the Baltic Washington – emergency ballast is that the United States, if necessary, easily be thrown overboard, which is not for their value, and that Americans just do not go to war.
Article Forbes – is not just an article, because I Forbes – is not just a business magazine.
Forbes – is one of the mouthpieces of Wall street, this “wall newspaper” the first economy in the world, a voice that says business and political elite of the United States.
Forbes said its valuable than quantity, and quality of the audience about the “best workers” (rating of the richest people in the world) and the problems in the super-corporation called the USA.
Publication of the miserable, useless, and threaten the security of US allies in NATO could not appear in the media like nothing.
The American establishment realized the situation with “helpless nations” as a problem, concluded that no value Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia to the United States do not represent, and publicly made it clear that, if necessary, Washington will hand over the Baltic states.

Run a Ukrainian! Run!

Беги, украинец! Беги!

Let’s go back a few years ago and remember how elegantly global political elite was prepared to overcome the impending second wave of global economic crisis. The scheme was a beautiful and beneficial: the US soft “compressed” to the level of the owner of North and Central America and, in exchange, the world harness (literally, financially) in the process of ensuring a “soft landing” for the US economy. The most important marker of this scenario, in addition to the famous Obama’s “tell Vladimir that after the election, I will be more flexible,” was officially agreed to give the United States control over the rest of the world through the IMF’s refusal to “blocking stake” shares. In many conflict areas have been made compromises: the Americans, to the great joy of China cut its financial support for African politicians and Yanukovych regime invested “special purse” of the Democratic Party of the United States, Mark Mobius. Peace, for the first time in its history, was a more or less organized and bloodless transfer of leadership from one global hegemon in the hands of supporters of a multipolar world. And then everything collapsed.


I’m afraid we’ll never know the details of the invisible revolution in the American elite, which occurred about two years ago. From the visible effects need to emphasize the following: there was a “bow” between the most radical democracy (the so-called “Clinton clan”, to which he belongs and Joe Biden) and the most radical Republicans, ie neocons and “tea party.” Because of Obama’s failed American Gorbachev, and the blessing that has given Obama the presidential election last of the Kennedy clan turned out rather familial curse. As a result, instead of the supporters of the “soft landing”, some of the key points in the American “political MCC” captured supporters of the war to the end, not necessarily victorious, but Obama and what was left of his team may engage in partisan except that, the benefit of some control over economic bloc they still have.


In the new context, the US is trying to implement two plans:

1. Plan a minimum – to rob Europe via the so-called “free trade agreement” (see. Article “We need to Berlin, not Kiev” – http://politrussia.com/world/nam-nuzhen-berlin-779/) and the rest of the world – ignite.

2. Plan a maximum – to rob Europe, set fire to the whole world, to seize power in Russia and to use it as a battering ram against China with a mandatory nuclear war between the two major geopolitical enemies of the United States. And you thought nothing Nemtsov regularly wrote articles that the main enemy of Russia – this is China?

The implementation of these plans Ukraine should fulfill the role of a tool that forever separates the EU from Russia and bury any hope for a “Continental union” between Berlin and Moscow – the eternal fear of Anglo-Saxon civilization. Everything else – the secondary, though pleasant for US bonuses.

Washington’s main problem – a terrible time trouble. Obama negotiated the surrender hegemony not a good life, and also not a good life Americans had to rush to Maidan. They do not have even a few years, to how to play all the games in which they got involved; the economy may fall into a spin at any time.

In terms of implementation of the strategic objectives of the operation in Ukraine failed. If nekononov and Clinton in Washington left at least ten years, it would be a success, but they need a blitzkrieg, and blitzkrieg failed, and most likely will not happen. Despite the enormous pressure and attempts to play scheme “Take us to our economy, and we will protect you from the terrible Russian, who captured the Crimea and is about to take over Kiev ‘Europeans do not want to sign a contract TTIP and destroy its economic elite for the benefit of the United States. Worse, even an embargo on Russian energy could not push. About the seizure of power in Moscow, the Americans still dream, but the chances of them – a little bit, and the clock is ticking and ticking all monotonously counting time before the US economic collapse.

Moscow understands and acts in the wheel logic, “We need a Berlin”, despite the heart-rending cries guard patriots who like to wave a sword and help to ensure that the third time in a hundred years, Russia and Europe clashed in a battle that would benefit only the United States (not tired, huh?)

Highly recommended to see a fragment of the sign from a recent interview with Sergei Lavrov, which clearly explains why Moscow alliance with Germany: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=gJTKN0–PpE#t=2633 (beginning of the frame – 43: 40)

The bottom line: we want to “shake up” the European Union so that it began to actively defend their own interests. Not the fact that the work, but work on it – it is necessary. Even just holding the EU from becoming a “food” for the US economy will be enormous victory, which will not allow the United States to extend its existence due to the European economy, as well as the US extended its existence for two decades due to the plunder of the USSR.

The situation is slowly beginning to level off, and the recent summit Ukraine – EU, was the best proof of that.

Let’s look at the specifics:

1. Has the American radicals to make EU support Ukraine cost? No it failed. For a minimal support of the Ukrainian economy needs tens of billions of euros. They are not and never will. This way, the question of the complete submission of Europe. For a complete subordination? If it was full, the money would be allocated in the last year. No money.

2. Were you able to get tougher sanctions against Russia? No it failed.

Total defeat of Ukraine.

To complete the picture, it is desirable to read about how the Financial Times complains about the behavior of the German and French diplomats who “put pressure on Ukraine,” and rewritten beyond recognition the final document of the summit, which apparently was made in the State Department: http://lenta.ru/news/2015 / 04/27 / ft /

Moreover, moving from the language of diplomacy, the passage:

“Germany and its key European partners put pressure on Ukraine in order to accelerate the implementation of the Minsk Agreement, fearing that Russia will use procrastination to” justify the renewal of aggression “,” should be read as “The Germans and the French said: dear Ukrainians, or you merge in an amicable or we turn away and Putin will do something bad. ”

Against this backdrop, statements by the head of the Office of Trade Policy at the Ministry of Economic Development of Italy’s Federica Ayhberga looks particularly interesting:

“Italy in February is clear and makes it clear that the Council of Ministers will not vote for the extension of sanctions. We believe in Russia, in a prosperous country and a reliable partner,” – said Ayhberg. (Http://www.vestifinance.ru/articles/56613)

Before the victory in the European direction is still far, but reasons for optimism continue to appear, causing nervous American specialists:

“Some European countries have” Trojan horses “Russia:
The apparent inconsistency of some European countries in relation to the Ukrainian crisis is dictated by the national interests and the desire to conclude a lucrative contract with Russia in times of crisis, writes Bulgarian political scientist Ivan Krastev in his article published by The New York Times. “(Http://vz.ru /news/2015/4/27/742498.html)

The position of Kiev and its American curators can not be called a winner. Obama continues to block arms supplies to Ukraine, the EU does not want to save the Ukrainian economy, and direct access to the American printing press in Washington radicals fortunately not, and besides, the machine is moribund – http://fritzmorgen.livejournal.com/723625.html .

Through the IMF was able to push the injection of 5 billion, however, getting the next tranche made dependent on the success of negotiations on restructuring the debt owed to private creditors. But the restructuring of bad, bad to the point that Madame Yaresko hysteria in the pages of the Western media and Western threatened default funds.


Apparently, Ms. Yaresko first encountered financiers for whom receiving a call from Clinton or Bush is not an indication to action. It will be interesting to observe their efforts to prevail upon Mark Mobius and his friends.

No money, no prospects, supply of American weapons are not. Washington “hawks” demand the resumption of hostilities, and the newspaper Le Monde (with reference to the environment Hollande) and European diplomats at the summit Ukraine – EU thick hint at the fact that even the “delay” of the Minsk performance agreements (which Kiev can not perform in principle) It leads to the fact that Kiev will lose significant territory. Unenviable prospects.

Total for Ukraine loom three possible scenarios:

1. If Europe is finally freed from the influence of the United States, the “Ukrainian problem” will be solved Russia are likely LDNR hands. The logic of “it is already possible!”

2. If Europe finally gets full control of the United States, the “Ukrainian problem” will be solved Russia are likely LDNR hands. The logic of “do not care anymore!”

3. If Kiev itself starts fighting the “Ukrainian problem” will be solved Russia are likely LDNR hands. Logic “asked for it!” with a view to use the situation to detach from the EU US

There is another option of continuing agony, but it can not last long. Sooner or later, one of these three options will occur. There are of course exotic scenarios like the all-out nuclear war, but now we do not consider them as in the case of their realization we still alive will be gone. And the text is still written to benefit the living.

Residents of Ukraine, regardless of their political preferences, it is understood that none of the above options is not intended for the territory of the former Ukrainian (net of Donetsk, Lugansk, and can be Odesa and Kharkiv, if you are very lucky) such surprises as the economic recovery and the expense of others restoring order.

No matter how things develop and how it will share or reformat Ukraine, Russia and the EU will not allocate resources to a radical stabilization of the situation in this area, in excess of what is necessary for the protection of the pipe (until 2019) and is armed or deactivation of nuclear power plants. All. In the rest – nothing or minimum wage. Hang around your neck 40 or even 20 million people tolerate their Wishlist and restore order does not want and can not nobody. Simply do not have the resources, and any attempt to “invest” in Ukraine scraps (minus the territories of which wrote above) does not find understanding in the political class, from regional elites and the population of Russia. The Europeans and say nothing.

Hence a simple conclusion for those who are still in the Ukraine: run. Run while you still can.







WHY BALTIC REMOVAL FROM RUSSIA CAUSED Russians have a sigh of relief?

1314706693_0238.250x200 (324x200, 14Kb)

The answer to the question: Why the Baltic disconnection from Russia in the decay of the Soviet Union was a good sign for the Russians themselves and made them a sigh of relief, as if he were finally dropped from the back of a bag full of heavy stones …

Average wages Baltic workers and engineers from the late 40’s and up to the 90th was doubled, and almost three times as higher than in the Russian Federation and Belarus. A collective farmers and state farm workers the difference reaches three times. It is also significant that in the 40-60-ies in the Baltic kolkhoz passport is not seized, as in most Soviet republics.

Not Kaliningrad, namely, Latvian, Estonian and Lithuanian ports were the main western sea gate of the Soviet Union. Built back in the Soviet era ports continue to generate revenue Baltic countries.

In 70-80s to these ports were laid pipelines. Highways in the Baltic States were also at altitude. Their quality is ranked first in the USSR. Second place goes to Western Ukraine, the third – the South Caucasus. RSFSR was 12-13 th place.

We now turn to statistics. Let’s start with a comparison of capital investments. For example, the Lithuanian SSR received capital investment arable area of ​​1 hectare is 3.5 times more than these investments averaged for the Soviet Union. In 1987, the energy capacity for acreage in Lithuania were 2.2 times higher than in the RSFSR, in Latvia – 2.08, and in Estonia – 2.3 times. In this case, if someone believes that Tallinn, Riga and Vilnius were able to implement such energy supply agriculture at the expense of purely republican means that such a person is far from the truth. Union center was distributing fertilizers for agricultural land in such a way that the Lithuanian, Latvian and Estonian SSR fell to 155 kg, 196 kg and 209 kg per hectare of arable 1 respectively, but had to settle for the RSFSR 32.9 kilograms per 1 ha of arable land.
Immediately after the end of the Great Patriotic War, melioration touched 80% of farmland Baltic. Comparable to land reclamation in the whole of the USSR. All-union measure does not go to any comparison with the Baltic. It is only about 7%. As they say, feel the difference. Since the Soviet “invaders” -melioratory “committed atrocities” in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, actually turning the land into a sample of fertility throughout Eastern Europe.
In 1988, the average Latvians, Lithuanians and Estonians consumed per year of meat and meat products 84, 85 and 90 kg, respectively. On average, the Soviet Union, the figure was less than 64 kg. Consumption of milk and dairy products: Lithuania – 438 kg / person per year, Latvia – 471 kg / person per year, Estonia – 481 kg / person per year. The average for the USSR – 341 kg / person per year. In this case, the state budget of the USSR for the elimination of purchase and retail prices for the agricultural sector of the Baltic states is also allocated multimillion-dollar (for the – Soviet money) subsidies. It turns out that for the year the average Soviet citizen ate approximately 20-25 kg of meat and drink 100 liters of milk and dairy products is less than the average Baltic states.

Already in the mid-1950s, Latvia and Estonia became “standard” material well-being in the USSR. In 1961, the share of national income per inhabitant in Estonia was 720 rubles., In Latvia – 717 rubles. Given that the average all-union rate was 547 rubles (Russia – 598 rubles., Ukraine – 559, Lithuania – 489). But there was also the construction of housing, industrial, educational and medical institutions. Was developed processing industry. And all this for a considerable percentage of financed from the Union byudzheta.A here retail prices, electricity tariffs, transportation, rent and other prices in the Baltic (and Caucasus!) Republics were often two times lower than in the Russian Federation and Belarus.

All three “Baltic Sisters” received huge for these days and the cost of financial subsidies from Moscow. It should be noted that Moscow itself willingly went to the Baltic financial assistance, trying by all means to tighten its economy to the level of, for example, neighboring Finland. Like, a showcase of the USSR should look spectacular. And it looked the same.


“North fist” against the United States Russia: Kaliningrad and the threat of nuclear forces.

Leonid Nersisian

After the beginning of the crisis Ukrainian stream anti-Russian propaganda in the world reached a magnitude since the Soviet Union. But if in most EU countries are relatively neutral forces calling for reconciliation, the Nordic countries and the Baltic line towards Russia as much as possible radical and destructive. In these countries, the US influence is constantly growing: in the Baltic Independent States is no longer quite as well in Scandinavia process actively goes in the same direction. Interestingly, of the four Nordic countries (otnesёm them and Finland – it does not always appear in this geographical concept) NATO includes only Norway and Denmark, and Sweden and Finland until adhere to non-aligned status, at least in words. Nevertheless, the wave of anti-Russian hysteria and the militarization of engulfing and these two states.

In the course is disinformation and lies at the highest level: that only cost the story of the Russian nuclear submarine allegedly swim in Swedish territorial waters. But that’s why it took a heavy missile submarines there to swim and how such an object could be missed, no one answered – irresponsibility in politics is now in vogue. Norway is generally constantly pours “crocodile tears” – drawing attention to the flights of Russian strategic aviation (which, incidentally, never violate any boundaries), and most recently put forward a ridiculous assumption that Russian research vessels “spies” for them, Located in a former submarine base Olavsvern. Base, the authorities in Norway a few years ago sold themselves as the cost of its operation was huge, and large military sense it was not – in the war with Russia alone will not save it, though, and really is a powerful refuge for submarines, and the global conflict underwater part of the Navy (Navy) Norway is negligible force – only six diesel-electric submarines class Ula.

Rhetoric in Denmark and Finland is not that hard, and the number of absolutely obvious misinformation voiced by officials, much less. But we of the words. And the actions are no different – Denmark has already agreed to take part in the formation of European missile defense system (Euro-ABM), and Finland is actively developing its interaction Armed Forces (AF) with the armies of other Nordic and Baltic countries (especially Sweden) and, of course, with the US Armed Forces .

Military tandem Sweden – Finland

Most actively goes establish the military tandem Sweden – Finland, and although the intention to establish a military alliance with the participation of these countries have been officially denied, in fact, the opposite occurs. Countries expressed their willingness to establish joint land and naval brigade, and in late March held joint exercises of the Air Force (IAF). They also attended the US Air Force who flew into Estonian Amari airfield. Moreover – Air Force integration of the two countries will continue to grow – instead of 62 aging American fighter F / A-18 is going to Finland to buy or Swedish SAAB JAS-39 Gripen new modification or French Dassault Rafale, moreover most likely choice will fall on “Swedes”. In both cases, the interaction of the Air Force will grow significantly, and in the case of the purchase of JAS-39 will peak – even weapons and spare parts will be unified.

Now, the key challenge for the United States in this area is drawing these countries into NATO. Population of states actively preparing for it – in the case of another escalation of Ukrainian conflict, the entry of Sweden and Finland in NATO could be a matter of time.

Baltic bridgehead

Active placement of US troops on the territory of Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia, as well as going there permanently NATO exercises indicate that these three countries will lay a foundation for NATO forces, including aviation Scandinavian countries. The geographical location of these countries can simultaneously apply a blow out in the direction of the Kaliningrad region surrounded by NATO and in the direction of Leningrad and Pskov regions. The armed forces themselves Baltic countries is extremely weak and few – in the amount they can only put about 23 thousand soldiers, it does not boast any significant amount of military equipment, and the Air Force in these countries are virtually absent. So that the main role of these states – become a springboard for NATO troops and the battlefield – not the most promising prospects, but it can not be interested in anti-national authorities of these countries, “dancing to the tune of” overseas “ally”.

Norway: Arctic Oil bait

Among the Scandinavian countries, Norway is different, perhaps, the highest degree of anti-Russian hysteria. And unlike the Baltic states – there is also a substrate material – namely Arctic oil reserves, which the Norwegians have serious types, however, as we are. It is applied to pressure from the US, leading to a unique “resonance”. In addition, Americans can “warm up” the Arctic appetite Norwegians, killing two birds with this – creating a new enemy for Russia and increasing its supply of arms. Thus, Norway is in a kind of “trap”, which is based her own energy ambitions. With regard to purely military component – that Norway is strong for its Air Force and Navy, as well as a high level of training soldiers. Very soon will begin deliveries of American fighters 5th generation F-35, which will be purchased in the amount of 52 units, in addition to (and in the future – for replacement) to 57 F-16s.

“North fist” against Russia

As we can notice, the above countries increasingly militarized and unite around an anti-Russian ideology. Under the auspices of the US military formed a kind of “fist” threatening the north-western borders of Russia. What forces and in what areas can be brought against the Russian Federation, these states?

1) Powerful air grouping capable of acting from Murmansk to Kaliningrad region – the entire length of the conventional front lines. In total it includes nearly 300 fighters – 62 F-18s, 134 JAS-39 Gripen and 102 F-16s. All planes of easy class, but a good level and in a very serious amount.

2) Two naval force – the first in the “Northern Seas” (North, Norwegian, Barents), represented mainly by the Norwegian Navy. It includes 5 frigates type Fridtjof Nansen, equipped with anti-ship missiles (ASM) Naval Strike Missile and combat information and control system Aegis, 6 missile boats Skjold type with the same rockets and 6 type diesel submarines Ula.

The second – in the Baltic Sea, represented the Navy Finland, Sweden and Denmark. Here, the battle can be thrown: 5 Danish frigates with US Harpoon anti-ship missiles and a good air defense system; 5 Swedish diesel-electric submarines with torpedoes and 9 corvettes with RCC RBS-15, 5 of which class Visby, created by technology “Stealth”; 8 Finnish missile boats with RCC RBS-15 (maximum launch range of 200 km), mine-layers 6 and 13 minesweepers.

3) The Army – Danish forces here, we will not consider because they are geographically more “detached” from the scene. Finland, Sweden and Denmark in the sum can put 31,000 soldiers, 284 German Leopard 2 and about 1,000 units of various artillery. More 23000, however, very much least to start with technology, have the Baltic countries. As you can see, the land forces – the most weak point of these countries.

In addition, there is the American presence in the Baltic States – while small, only a few dozen pieces of equipment and several hundred military personnel, who have officially arrived at the doctrine, but there is not much in a hurry to go back to the US.

Kaliningrad region – the purpose №1

Kaliningrad region, located virtually surrounded by NATO forces, due to the presence of only land borders with Poland and Lithuania is the most vulnerable target for a potential enemy. Already Lithuania often arranges problems in moving goods on its territory, it is theoretically possible to complete the land blockade, as well as energy.

Russian forces stationed in the Kaliningrad region, not very large, but actively rearming, for example, in 2012 there were the most advanced anti-aircraft missile systems S-400. However, a small number of troops – about 10 thousand people.

Simultaneously from Poland and the Baltic States in the fight can be thrown up to 80 thousand troops – and that without US support. Force “North fist” can be a powerful air support for ground forces by Polish and try to create a naval blockade of Kaliningrad. Resist this attempt to take full siege in Kaliningrad is the Baltic Fleet of the Russian Navy – his forces are roughly equal the combined forces of the Navy “Northern fist”: 2 destroyers Project 956, 2 modern patrol ship project 11540 (built using the technology of “Stealth”), 4 patrol boats 20380, 12 missile boats, 3 diesel-electric submarines. All these ships are armed with anti-ship missiles of various types, most of which outperforms the Scandinavian and American RCC. So that the victory in this confrontation is more dependent on the level of training of the crew and third-party factors such as intelligence, etc.

The task of the Armed Forces in the event of such an aggressive attempt to take the Kaliningrad region should be an early break through a land corridor through Latvia and Lithuania – there may be something to try to prevent ground forces and aviation Sweden, Norway and Finland, by linking part of the forces of the Western military district (ZVO) in Leningrad region . Of course, the secondary cooling power, which is concentrated to 40% of the personnel of the Armed Forces, is incomparably more powerful, but nevertheless forces “Northern fist” can buy time until the arrival of reinforcements from Western Europe and the United States.

Limited nuclear conflict

Is this realistic scenario of a major European war in the presence of large arsenals of strategic and tactical nuclear weapons from the opposing sides? If the main “battleground” will be the same the Baltic States, Poland, Belarus, Ukraine, Finland, Norway – ie non-nuclear states, it is real. Nuclear strikes will not be applied by states possessing them. Nevertheless, in this scenario, the use of tactical nuclear weapons is little doubt – this is especially important for us, as the number of NATO armies superior to our several times almost all indicators. As a result – the losers in such a war will be precisely those countries that are now the most stand up for the fight against Russia. And the winners will not be in it – both camps will have destroyed hundreds of thousands of soldiers and military equipment destroyed mountains. Nevertheless humanity, as history shows, can not long exist without wars – and their not in Europe (large) since 1945. How many more years of nuclear weapons can deter aggression and hatred? It is clear that the war would be burned in Europe in March, 2014, if not for this constraint.

Conclusions and prospects

1) “Northern Fist” is really formed. Its purpose is yet geopolitical pressure on Russia and endangering the Kaliningrad region.

2) groups of troops in Kaliningrad should be maintained as far as combat-ready state, its number, if possible, should be increased.

3) the United States by creating a “mini” military unit in Scandinavia and the Baltics more compressible ring of military encirclement of Russia.

4) Norway, despite its ambition, is still far from being able to compete with Russia in the Arctic. Russian Northern Fleet is a serious power with which it is impossible to compete with 6 diesel submarines, several frigates and missile boats. In Russia there are 45 submarines, including 23 nuclear power, aircraft carrier “Admiral Kuznetsov”, heavy nuclear cruiser “Peter the Great” and many other ships.

5) In addition to geopolitical reasons and the US struggle with Russia, there is a much more urgent task – to get to work on the military-industrial complex “fullest”, despite the economic problems in most European countries. Now, even conditionally poor Baltic states start to allocate any money for the purchase of military equipment.

6) The Great War in Europe can still occur – the voltage level at some point really close to critical. And the presence of a large number of weapons and active preparations for war can cause extra confidence.

7) The next step is to expand the project can become a European missile defense interceptors accommodation in Scandinavia. Missile defense system GMD (Ground-based Midcourse Defence) will be able to intercept part of Russian intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), flying over the North Pole to the United States. And most importantly, to intercept them before breeding fighting units – in fact most of the modern Russian ICBM has multiple warheads. Such an alignment is quite possible after 2020, when it will be implemented by the present stage of European missile defense and would be “brought to mind» GMD. The temptation to foment war after such a step would be, of course, even higher.

8) The countries included in this new anti-Russian bloc, are not beneficiaries – rather, it, in which case, have the worst of all, since it is they who will be the battleground. Prior to the United States, as before, far away.

9) All countries that are close to Russia and hosts the elements of the US missile defense must be notified at the highest level that they will be the very first target for the strategic nuclear forces of the Russian Federation, and they do not get security, and vice versa – a mortal danger. The application must not be at the level of ambassador, as was done in Denmark, and at the highest. The population of these countries needs to know what their governments are solutions.





NASA: kilometer asteroid threatens Earth !

Giant asteroid flying toward the Earth and will be held at a record close distance to it in the coming days, according to The Mirror, with reference to forecast NASA.

According to experts, the width – about a kilometer, and length – about 990 meters.

The object was naming “2014-YB35”, and is forecast to sweep close to Earth on Friday. It moves at a speed of more than 23,000 miles per hour. The asteroid will fly about 2.8 million miles from us, it’s just a tiny distance in astronomical terms

In that periodically pass by the Earth small meteorites, there is nothing unusual, but the asteroid so large – it is very rare, and it is a very serious threat, according to experts.

Any of its effects on our planet would cause devastating changes in climate, earthquakes and tsunamis.

Bill Napier, a professor of astronomy at the University of Buckinghamshire, said the publication of The Express, that this time there is a “real risk” of negative consequences of the asteroid impact.

НАСА: Километровый астероид угрожает Земле

Experts warn that it is only a matter of time when the Earth will encounter with an asteroid that can change life on our planet.

Object “2014-YB35″ was first seen at the end of last year, and now astronomers are particularly closely watched its movements this week.

If he hit the ground, its debris would fall into the atmosphere and led to such climate changes that would make the planet uninhabitable. The smallest of the consequences of such a possible collision – the destruction of several cities.

NATO has no protection from the operation, the course which fulfills Russia.

У НАТО нет защиты от операции, ход которой отрабатывает Россия

The Russian army during the sudden teachings throws in the Kaliningrad region missiles “Iskander”, as Poland prepares to host the air and missile defense systems. The bad news for NATO is that in this case to oppose anything the Russian counterattack, it can not. Now it does not matter what happened before – the redeployment of Russian “Iskander” or attempt to probe placement in Poland missile defense system of unknown origin. The fact that the territory of the neighboring country with Russian missiles will air and missile defense, has long been known. And the fact that it can not be solved by diplomatic means, too, was known long before the Ukrainian events. It makes no sense to retell and prepositions that the US invented to justify the idea of ​​placing a missile defense system in close proximity to Russian borders. Who’s supposed to, and so they will remember: it was supposed to be protection against a non-existent Iranian threat posed by non-existent Iranian ballistic missiles with non-existent nuclear warheads. The ensuing discussion diplomatic disputes reminiscent of Spanish rabbis with Torquemada: the decision to deploy missile defense (expulsion of the Jews and Marranos) were still made in advance for reasons of mystical character, but still interesting to listen to. At the same time (almost ten years ago) was first told about the response deployment of Russian missile systems “Iskander-M”, precisely in the Kaliningrad region, and not somewhere else. These plans are strategic, they are known in advance – this is not the battalion group of marines, which can be flown anywhere. No one has made no secret of that system “Iskander” just was a response to the deployment of US missile defense systems, and in northern Poland (both on the southern flank of the response to a similar attempt in Romania was the transformation of Crimea into a fortress, teeming with exactly the kind of means of destruction). “Iskander” – “the perfect assassin” is precisely such systems that the US and NATO are trying to arrange a new, reinventing them in real-time theater. That the US “Patriot” that competing with them French counterparts are unable to repel the attack on themselves medium-range cruise missiles. Location in the Kaliningrad region “Iskander” makes a highly publicized NATO missile defense system in another target. In this sense, the remarkable number of mutually planned placement systems: the United States and Poland talking about batteries 9 “Patriot”, while talking about the alleged 10-powered Russian “Iskander”. This may well be true, because Washington does not have a free supply of missile defense systems and defense and the armed forces of the Russian Federation “accumulated” “Iskander” in the two theaters of military operations, which had never been in recent history. Moscow is able to consciously distribute high-precision weapons for several HPT, so even with the stock. In this context it is worth to look at some details of the sudden inspection training, running now in parts of the Western District, Northern and Baltic fleets, Airborne and Special Forces. Ivanovo paratroopers landing work out in the area of ​​Pechenga (ie, on the Norwegian border), Arctic brigade occupies the Franz Josef Land, the Northern Fleet relieve the so-called road Gorshkov – corridor progress in the North Atlantic from the coast of the Barents Sea between Norway and Iceland, and the long-range aviation eyeing Norway, Iceland and the UK. Like it or not, but this is the scenario of the Russian counter-attack in response to a possible NATO aggression. This scenario was developed in draft form in the Soviet period and since then has not lost its relevance. Change only the weapons and tactics of their application, but the meaning has remained virtually unchanged. In short, it is assumed that the collision of European Russia and NATO importantly – it’s a matter of time: how fast can (if he can) go to Europe reinforcements from North America (USA and Canada). The only way to deliver a very large masses of manpower and equipment were and will remain for a long time naval convoys. To stop the convoys, Russia must be brought under control of the North Atlantic area. And it is achievable to comprehensive amphibious operation in northern Norway with the capture airfields NATO, which there a lot, including a key one – Icelandic Keflavik. Keflavik provide control over the Russian Air Force (including strategic bombers) control over the entire Atlantic to the Azores – the southernmost point of the route potential convoys. Thus, the question of destruction of such convoys becomes purely technical. On the northern route, you can forget, the transfer to northern Norway and Iceland Russian special forces and air force will break the whole balance of forces in the European theater as a whole. At the same time, the Northern Fleet, including submarines with nuclear weapons, can freely pass into the Atlantic, then war can be considered complete. At this time, the Poles and 12 American tanks in Latvia can indefinitely (probably an hour and a half) to depict the heroic defense. But to ensure that developments may be, including, and after the opening of the airspace over the Baltic and Scandinavia (ie destruction of airfields and cover them), and for which there are “Iskander” in the Kaliningrad region and on the border with Estonia (in fact there are another Norwegian air defense system in Narvik and Mo i Rana). Special Forces and the Arctic with its quiet landing above the Arctic Circle – as it is now the Ivanovo paratroopers on the Norwegian border. This script is afraid of NATO, when so focuses on long claimed the idea of ​​relocation “Iskander”. The Alliance does not have a mobile defense system, many years of his military-strategic thought or idle at all, or focused on the execution of a foreign country “Tomahawk” without any resistance from the enemy. In our case, once the potential vulnerability of land – the Arctic Ocean – now turned almost into the lake. A group of US in the Persian Gulf has become vulnerable and our fleet (he appeared base in the region), and the response to missile attack. And most importantly: the plan to deal with counter-attacks, as described above, they still can not. That is why the placement of “Iskander” in the Kaliningrad region (even if temporary, as part of the exercise) has attracted much attention. It is, by the way, followed immediately after the final output of Russia from the CFE Treaty, which is formally proposed classifications affected. So the word Shoigu “on our territory where we want, and place there” is no surprise. But many people happy. Eugene Krutikov Source: http://vz.ru/politics/2015/3/17/734911.html

Source: http://politikus.ru/articles/45789-u-nato-net-zaschity-ot-operacii-hod-kotoroy-otrabatyvaet-rossiya.html

The third world war will die first Baltics !

The possibility of the Russian army in the event of a third world war, military experts have estimated at a round table in the RIA “Novosti” on “the Russian army in terms of current challenges and threats.”

According to the director of the Center for Public Policy Research – Head of the Department of the Institute of CIS Vladimir Yevseyev, – in the event of an attack by the US Russia will be able to answer only nuclear weapons, as a non-nuclear has a range of up to 1 thousand. Km and to defeat the United States, we need to place it weapons in Cuba.

Therefore, most likely, says analyst Sergei Mikheyev, that Russia in the event of the Third World will not strike on the US and NATO bases in the Baltic States, which in the near future it is planned to create.

“The Baltic countries will be destroyed – describes Sergei Mikheyev possible developments. – They always complained about how Baltics suffered from conflicts of East and West. Now, it would seem, they should stay on the sidelines, but they also want to become a battlefield. Just Unlike wars 300 years ago, modern missiles, these small countries will be destroyed altogether cease to exist. The confrontation with Russia, they are trying to increase their value. They have just lived quietly, and they again rush to the front line. So to them more attention, are some money. But all this can result in the death of these states. “

According to Vladimir Yevseyev, the US did not have a chance to disarm the Russian army, but we are far behind in terms of weapons – and their number and in power.

“What can answer Russia, taking into account the asymmetry of the strategic nuclear forces? America focuses on the marine component of the strategic nuclear forces, it has about 14 nuclear submarines like” Ohio “, equipped with 24 missiles at ten warheads that goes beyond the Prague Treaty of START 2. Russia can not respond symmetrically, because the combat potential of the US and SSBN submarine strategic type “Northwind” is different. On the “Boree” 16 missiles, and the ability to launch manifest them substantially less than US missiles “Traydent- 2 “- said Yevseyev.

In his opinion, “the best steps will be asymmetric responses”. This, for example, the creation of a heavy rocket “Sarmatian”, which will be located in Siberia outside the United States interception. Great Expectations expert assigns to create combat railway missile system (BZHRK). Earlier BZHRK complexes were eliminated due to inefficiency: “In the USSR BZHRK had limitations – it did not provide the missile launch from any location, the missile was severe and led to the overturning of. It was necessary to prepare for the launch of a special area. In addition, the rocket does not fit in car and so it was impossible to disguise. Now the situation has changed, as we have more light missiles “yars”.

Soviet echelon had one drawback – he destroyed a warhead. Now go away from it, will be BZHRK division. “But now there is the danger of a terrorist, which was not in the USSR – continues Yevseyev. – BZHRK goes on rails and rails can be undermined.”

Anyway, at the moment Russia has enough capacity for retaliation, and it can stop NATO from possible military action from the territory of Ukraine, assured the expert.

However, Sergei Mikheyev looking at the situation is not so sure – he said, the United States made good money on the First and Second World War, and have a chance to earn a third. “Americans see the situation in Europe as a laboratory. It is considered that for the United States there are people first and second grade – Papuans they chase and do not regret. But the Europeans supposedly quite another matter. Such ideas are wrong. US and European sacrifice. They spit on them wanted, “- said Mikheyev.

One of the weaknesses of the Russian armed forces – the lack of mobilization reserve, it is already not enough and will still sorely lacking in the future, said Yevseyev.

Russia, he said, need to have in this reserve to half a million people with military experience: “The US Army at about 1.2 million 800 thousand of the National Guard, and, basically, it natsgvardeytsy fought in Iraq. A provision should have a reserve equipment, weapons. bayonets to fight impossible. “


Russia will lose the war for America 360 minutes !

Dmitry Rogozin: “The United States can destroy a few hours up to 90% of our nuclear capability

In addition, he called the five kinds of threats to our country and stated the backlog on a number of critical core technologies from leading Western countries in some areas up to tens of years.”

Россия проиграет Америке войну за 6 часов

“For more than a decade in the United States worked out the concept of Prompt Global Strike. It provides striking non-nuclear weapons at any point on the planet in one hour, “- Rogozin said. According to a war game conducted by the Pentagon at the end of last year, with the help of 3.5-4 thousand. Units of US precision weapons can destroy 6 hours basic infrastructure facilities of the enemy and prevent him to resist,” – he added.

However, their creation is clearly serious problems may occur. “Today the backlog on a number of critical core technologies from leading Western countries is in some areas up to tens of years,” – said Deputy Prime Minister.

According to him, if such a blow will be inflicted on Russia, the main objectives will be the strength of the strategic nuclear deterrence. In essence, the US experts’ estimates, as a result of such an attack can be destroyed from 80 to 90 percent of our nuclear arsenal,” – said Deputy Prime Minister.

And despite the fact that Russia, according to its military doctrine is ready to use nuclear weapons in repelling aggression with conventional weapons, this is not enough. To withstand such a threat, according to Rogozin, can only be created “autonomous weapons” beyond the control of modern telecommunication technologies.

According to him soon catch up and overtake other, especially high-tech Western powers Russia is unlikely to work in all directions. The scientific potential of our country was virtually destroyed during the years of political stagnation,” – he said.

According to Rogozin, the backlog in the field of defense technologies can be eliminated due to the concentration of scientific potential of the military, scientists and technologists. A function of coordinating this work should be assigned to the Military Industrial Commission, which he himself had headed.

With regard to success, the Deputy Prime Minister noted that the growth rate for a number of branches of the military industry are much higher than that of the Russian economy as a whole. In addition, in 2012 nearly 500 defense enterprises were covered by technical re-equipment, 35 of them new facilities already in operation.

The modern threats to the country Rogozin identified 5 types. The first – a conflict with the country, surpassing Russia in terms of technology. Such a war will be waged in a contactless manner (the above example with the United States). The second – a conflict with an equal potential of the country, when you need to fear superiority of the enemy on the important areas of confrontation. The third and fourth local wars, the type of Afghanistan and Chechnya, as well as countering terrorism. According to Rogozin, it is necessary to create such weapons that will destroy the insurgents and terrorists, avoiding civilian casualties. By the way, Deputy Prime Minister said that in order to identify terrorists on the borders of Russia plans to create a fundamentally new information system, the outlines of which are already being worked out. Well, while the fifth is concerned with the development of the Arctic shelf. Active development of the Arctic shelf will inevitably lead to a conflict of interests between the two countries that impose their claims on its resources. It is possible that the opposition will go beyond diplomatic “- said Deputy Prime Minister. According to him, it is likely that the Russian oil and gas production facilities can become targets hidden sabotage on the part of competitors.”

Underestimate the threat to Russia’s security is not just stupid, and criminal, competition will take more aggressive forms. Russia does not intend to participate in the race of military technology as a bystander, “- said Rogozin.

Lethal Rubicon Obama !

Летальный Рубикон Обамы. Рискнут ли США поставить Порошенко тяжелое вооружение?

Whether to risk the US Poroshenko put heavy weapons?

As reported in the resurrection of the American edition of The New York Times, the Obama administration has never been closer to the realization of its long-standing threat. Washington could open for Ukraine “hot military-technical line.” We are talking about the supply of arms and all that can make Donbass capitulate.

However, on Monday, State Department spokesman Jen Psak clarified that the final decision on arms Ukraine yet. At the same time, she stressed that no options are not excluded.” On the question whether the supply of arms Kiev provoke indirect” US war with Russia, the speaker of the State Department said: “Nobody wants to” mediate “the war with Russia.”

Still surrounded Obama lacked unanimity on this issue. Since there was a danger to provoke an “arms race” in Ukraine within the framework of the so-called “Hybrid war”. In addition, it should be recognized that the supply of lethal military equipment, from the point of view of international law, may be regarded as interference in internal Ukrainian opposition. Crafty term “ATO”, invented by Kiev to not call a spade a spade, can hardly mislead international lawyers. Thus, the supply of weapons will be another step towards the escalation of tensions with the prospect of escalating “hybrid” war into a hot (between Russia and NATO under the auspices of the US). The first step in this direction has already been made a few days ago the head of the Ukrainian Defense Ministry Stepan Poltorak confirmed the participation of foreign nationals in the fighting on the side of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. In fairness, it‘s about as long as volunteers.

Chief lobbyist of Ukraine means of warfare acts chief of the armed forces of the US and NATO in Europe, General Philip Breedlove. Until recently, an active opponent of this idea was the Advisor to the President for National Security Affairs Susan Rice. However, according to the publication, it is ready to change their point of view. “The President of the United States has not yet decided on the supply of such lethal aid. However, after a series of serious setbacks that Ukrainian forces have suffered in recent weeks, the Obama administration is considering new military aid, “says NYT. According to the newspaper, officials persuade Obama to send Kiev missiles, armored vehicles and radars worth $ 3 billion. A 2 February, a group of authoritative retirees represented by the former deputy head of the Pentagon Michele Flournoy, a former commander of NATO forces James Stavridis and the former US Ambassador to NATO Ivo Daldera provide justification to supply large quantities of weapons to Ukraine.

Prior to that put out the fire with gasoline in Ukraine, openly called only odious Senator McCain.

As evidence that the fatal Rubicon can be passed, advocates visit US Secretary of State John Kerry in Kiev, which will be held on February 5. In the Ukrainian capital, a senior official will arrive with an impressive backing band consisting of a Chairman Joint Chiefs of Staff US Armed Forces General Martin Dempsey and assistant to the president for national security Susan Rice. According to the American edition of these policies declare the “openness to discuss the issue of granting Ukraine lethal aid.”

Recall still Washington supplied Ukraine so-called non-lethal weapons body armor, night vision devices, medical devices.

In a conversation with “SP” head of the analytical department at the Institute of Political and Military Analysis Alexander Hramchihin questioned the assertion that the heavy weapons of the American or NATO production was supplied to the theater of military operations in the Donbass.

Another thing is that this may be a former Soviet technique, which is still standing armed with Eastern European countries that are members of NATO. Such as Poland or Romania. Say that somewhere in the combat zone was discovered NATO caliber projectile is absurd. The question is, what does it shoot if the Ukrainian Soviet artillery designed to gauge?

A small arms found in Donetsk airport, generally does not prove anything. As you know, in the US it may acquire private person in the store. Ukraine has got it, most likely, with mercenaries from private military companies.

“SP”: Why, despite the bellicose statements, to the question of the supply of heavy weapons Washington fits very carefully?

Obama is in a very difficult position. It strongly presses Congress. On the other hand, the president of the United States understands that the results can be counterproductive. Open delivery of heavy weapons would only worsen the situation in Ukraine. Because Russia will then announce that it is also in this respect no more holding back. As a result of the military situation in Kiev will become not better, but worse.

“SP”: The more that Western weapons still need to learn.

If we are talking about serious art, rather than on small arms from the Soviet relearn on US weapons systems is very difficult. Accordingly, in the Ukraine in large numbers have to bring trainers from the US. That is, it will take time to introduce new technology. But what if these instructors taken prisoner? In addition, virtually guaranteed that the technology will have shtatovskih militias. Obama probably guess what this means. But apparently, the policy is often stronger than common sense.

“SP”: What kind of weapon in the first place asked to Kiev security forces?

They need any advanced weapons. But no one will sell. A cheap and modern does not happen. Even Poland refused to hand over the Soviet technique on grant terms. The only thing that may be involved, it’s about anti-military complex. Air defense Kiev do not need because of a lack of volunteers aviation. As for private aviation, Canada last year offered 20 cars free F-18, but the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine refused. And rightly so. Because in the development of this technology will take several years. And the amount of money will be spent on maintenance. It’s old aircraft. So we’ll have to prepare not only pilots, but also technicians. Plus we have the means to counter militia aviation.

In Ukraine and Soviet aircraft problems. Why would she need the same old, besides import?

“SP”: – And what about small arms and mortars?

This stuff they themselves drown. The only thing missing is the anti-missile systems. This is the most obvious option. But again just a few days after the receipt of the samples will be in the militia, and there may be sent to Russia. I think our military and technical specialists are waiting with bated hope present in the form of, for example, the anti-missile system the US Army Javelin. Any country is very interested in obtaining samples coming from other countries, it helps to develop their own military-industrial complex.

“SP”: The militia set a new goal – to reach the borders of the former Donetsk and Luhansk regions, and only from the position of a new line of contact to negotiate with Kiev. Ukraine satisfied with this option, or she prepares forces to counterattack?

I’m back in September, when they were entered into the Minsk Agreement, said that sooner or later a truce go into another full-scale war. Because both sides clearly “nedovoevali” and are confident that they have “stolen victory”. Right now they are dovoevyvat” as long as the parties are against the limit of their capabilities: human, moral, organizational, financial. Wars end only if at least one of the parties can not fight any more. Then she capitulates. If both can not, then they agree on the world. When this happens, then the war will end.

America does not go to the direct supply of weapons to Ukraine, as in this case Russia will get the moral right to mirror the action in response, said military analyst Michael Tymoshenko.

In fact, Ukraine, and without enough military equipment. As they say, a 20-year war without stopping. You just need to put in fighting shape his technique where wiring rotted where seals sagged. It is clear that the tanks, BPM, and so on for a long time stood on the storage bases, nobody renovate.

Aviation is the same story. In his time in Ukraine tank was almost more than we do (3000 pieces). Kharkov Plant. Malyshev produced T-64, produces new BMP.

“SP”: Why Kiev authorities are literally begging the US weapons. What are they missing?

– First of all mind. There’s no one to command. At all levels, starting with the sergeant. And recruits do not want to fight. Why would they put their heads with fools? Just look how people run from mobilization. How much equipment is not supplied, will still fight nobody.

Editor in chief of National Defense Igor Korotchenko not agree with the thesis that the Ukrainian army did not need military equipment.

To make political decisions deliver or not, will be Obama. Legal barriers no longer exist. Congress in December adopted the “Act on the support of Ukraine“, which involves any help until the supply of lethal weapons.

“SP”: This will be enough to break the resistance of the militias?

Immediately say, Ukraine will not deliver US weapons. And above all, of the former Warsaw Pact countries that are now included in NATO. That is, it will not be a new Soviet equipment. Hence, the sum of the US can finance the delivery or Poland or Hungary or the Czech Republic. It is possible that will be used barter schemes. That is, instead of the past in Ukraine Soviet weapons, these countries will receive US.

In addition, Washington can begin deliveries Kiev separate party special weapons, night vision devices, optics, military, communications, navigation, sniper weapons, radar to pinpoint the location of the artillery batteries. The main thing is the anti-tank weapons. Not to mention clothing, gear, body armor. Ukraine can also get American “Hummer”, based on which is mounted firearms.

“SP” a kind of modern “carts” during the Civil War, the beginning of XX century.

This is a much more serious armored vehicle.

“SP”: All of the above will change the balance of forces?

Of course. Because Ukraine will have quite a significant military arsenal, allowing it to better level to conduct military operations. In these circumstances, Russia, of course, will be forced to react. Both politically and practically. If Americans really begin large-scale arms supplies to Ukraine, it unleashes a Russian arms for similar actions against the armies of the DNI and the LC.
Already Ukrainian General Staff provides lists of the necessary equipment in the office of the US military attaché in Kiev. That is, all formal requests are made. It now remains the last word for Barack Obama, his hands are completely untied.


Hijack an aircraft carrier, the history of “Admiral Kuznetsov”.


Carjacking is not a rare event in our lives. Stolen, although much less aircraft. In 1991, Russian sailors hijacked from the Crimea carrier “Admiral Kuznetsov”, which claimed their rights Ukraine.

The first real Soviet aircraft carrier

The ship was built at a shipyard in Nikolayev in 1982. Time of its construction were in violent years of perestroika, which is reflected in the numerous name changes the ship. In the project it was “Soviet Union” lays “Riga” launchable Leonid Brezhnev”, was tested already “Tbilisi”. In October 1990, the cruiser was renamed the 4th and last time, becoming the Admiral Kuznetsov“. In January 1991, the ship was enrolled in the Northern Fleet, it raised a naval flag.

Officially, “Admiral Kuznetsov” aircraft carrier was not the first of the Soviet Navy. Already went swimming “Minsk”, “Kiev”, “Baku” and “Novorossiysk”. However, the ships of the previous series were carriers of aircraft vertical takeoff and landing. In fact, it was the helicopter. In contrast, in the Admiral Kuznetsov” aircraft based traditional scheme of fixed wing. He was the first and still the only full-fledged aircraft carrier in the Russian Navy.

Kravchuk: “This is my aircraft carrier!”

August 24, 1991 the Supreme Soviet adopted the Act that proclaimed Ukraine as an independent state. Together with the Act adopted a resolution to obey all military units stationed on the territory of Ukraine, the newly formed state.

In November 1991, the cruiser was tested at Feodosiya. In one of the last days of autumn commander received a telegram signed by Leonid Kravchuk, Ukraine declares cruiser property and directing him to remain on the roads of Sevastopol, pending the relevant government decisions. Officers were puzzled: why Ukraine with its Black Sea ocean cruiser? And on what basis it claims the right to ship, assigned to the Russian Northern Fleet?

However, there were among the officers and those who are not averse to change Russia’s North Sea to warm Ukrainian Black. Oppressive uncertainty heavy fog covered the cruiser. Accustomed to obey the orders of the military people were waiting for a decision would be policy and the high command. From the North came a telegram that flew in Sevastopol, Vice-Admiral Yuri Volodya first deputy commander of the Northern Fleet. Officers were looking forward to the distinguished guest.

Gone in 60 seconds aircraft carrier

December 1 at about 21:00 Admiral with Ukrainian surname boarded the cruiser. Shaking hands with the crew and disbanding the team, Volodya ordered the captain to the captain I rank Yarygin urgently raise anchor and go to Severodvinsk. To the remark Yarygin that 2/3 of officers and warrant officers are on the shore, the answer By train to catch up.” And our aircraft remaining on coastal airfields?” – “Sami will fly.” Uncertainty over. Someone at the top cruiser Ukraine decided not to give up. At 23:40, without lighting running lights, in pitch darkness “Admiral Kuznetsov” raid left and headed for the Bosphorus.

Diving adventures

Bosphorus went smoothly, and at Gibraltar cruiser met the American carrier battle groups. Yankees began to “put pressure on the psyche“: helicopters and planes flew over the ship, each time simulating combat attack, at the rate of the ship threw the bomb training. Not paying attention to the maneuvers, “Admiral Kuznetsov” was not changing course, but the mood of the officers and men was dirty: none of the officers and men did not know whether all the bombs will be educational and not whether there is another set of American combat aircraft?

The mood improved when near the patrol cruiser appeared Perky”. True to its name, he began to patrol to scare Americans their maneuvers. Baton escort the Russian ship Yankees gave the English frigate, and he – Norwegian patrol. Lasted more than three weeks transition. December 27 “Admiral Kuznetsov” moored in Severodvinsk.

Destiny carriers inherited Ukraine

In Ukrainian media saga cruiser is still referred to as theft Russians Ukrainian ship. But the sailors believe that the “Admiral Kuznetsov” was granted a wonderful destiny. Just look how Ukraine ordered to get her wealth.

Heavy aircraft carrying cruiser “Kiev” Ukraine sold to China, made him a pleasure ride to the hotel and restaurant.

2/3 built “Varyag” was sold to the Chinese for $ 20 million under the world’s largest floating casino. The Chinese did not make the ship gambling house, and added onto the ship and renamed “Liaoning” “Varyag” aircraft carrier became the first Chinese Navy the pride of China and a headache the US Pacific Fleet.

Founded on Nicholas shipyard with the same type of Admiral Kuznetsov” “Ulyanovskthe Ukrainian authorities, and not being able to finish, cut into scrap metal.

And only the “Admiral Kuznetsov” proudly plowed the seas and oceans under the flag of St. Andrew family, and was glad that at one time is not got Ukraine.

Ukraine would be the nuclear button?

Украина окажется ядерной кнопкой?. Горбачев полагает, что между США и Россией может начаться большая война. Многие опасаются того же

Gorbachev believes that the US and Russia could start a major war. Many fear the same!

The first and only president of the USSR Mikhail Gorbachev decided to loud rise from political oblivion. He warned the world that the Cold War between Russia and the United States has reached such a stage that can grow into a real fighting between the most powerful nuclear powers. He said: “Unfortunately, I can not say firmly that the Cold War did not result in a” hot “. I am afraid that they (the US – a comment. “JV”) may take the risk. “

It should be recognized that concerns policy that turned the former Soviet Union in the “thoroughfare” for the “masters of destinies” of world history from the American citadel of democracy,” not unfounded. Actually, the same thing and says the new military doctrine of the Russian Federation, adopted at the end of last year. In this important document for our country contains a provision on the possibility of a retaliatory nuclear strike in response to aggression, attack on the territorial integrity of the State or the protection of the existing political system from attacks from outside.

Recent developments in the South-East of Ukraine did not give a reason for historical optimism.

President of the National Strategy Institute Mikhail Remizov agrees with the assessment of the state of the current level of relations between Russia and the West as the Cold War. However, a direct analogy with the Cold War period of the bipolar world, in his opinion, is inappropriate.
– Now we are not talking about Russia’s claim to the status of second pole of power. Rather, we should talk about trying to fend off the geopolitical strategy of suffocation large, but a single country. In addition to, but not in the best socio-economic situation.

“SP”:(Free Press)– As far as the rights of Gorbachev, who predicts Russia and the West hot” phase of confrontation?
The main risk is not that the US and its Western allies declare open war on Russia. Rather, they can place the red flags” for which Moscow would not dare to go. Including in the form of its military presence on the territory of Ukraine. Option presence of US and NATO troops in Ukraine, this is the factor that will be Rubicon for Moscow.

“SP”: pro-American party in the parliament, which requires Poroshenko declared war on Russia, is controlled by a figure or valid internal logic of confrontation?

– The process is running, it has its own inertia. Therefore it is not so important, choreographed whether these actions directly or not. It is clear that the task of the ruling political class in Ukraine as closely as possible to draw the United States into a direct military confrontation with Russia. This would be an ideal option for them. At the same time these people completely overlook the fact that in this case it would be a battleground for Ukraine itself, from which in this case, there is little left. In fact, they just want to get direct security guarantees. The most obvious expression would be the presence of US military facilities in different regions of Ukraine

“SP”: It is a violation of the “Big Treaty”, and consequently – the abolition of the recognition of the territorial integrity of Ukraine by the Russian Federation?

After the reunification of the Crimea with Russia on this treaty can forget. This path could have been completed script section of Ukraine as a post-war Germany. That is a line from the West “stakeAmericans, we come from the East. And then there will be no reason to deny the recognition of the Donbas.

“SP”: What is the logic of Washington: blackmail RF expulsion from globalized “paradise”, customized for the interests of the United States after World War II, and further squeezed to the end?

– In my opinion, American politicians rather try to punish Moscow than affect its position. From the point of view of the Americans, Moscow has violated the rules of the global game, encroaching on US dominance in the world. And, then, the Russian Federation must be pointedly revealing and punished. It needs to scrub back to modest geopolitical corral”. When it is said that the sanctions would not change Moscow’s position for the United States is not important. The main thing is to show that the perpetrator punished. The second factor is to maintain the glow of the conflict that turns into a constant factor of the watershed between Russia and Europe. As well as creating an ideal area of vulnerability for Russia.

If on the territory of Ukraine will begin the negative dynamics of Washington (such as militias take new regions), it will ensure the presence there of troops of third countries (Poland, Lithuania) as a guarantee that this process will not go further.

Few serious analysts would deny that the Cold War between Russia and the West is, according to the chief of security solutions sector problems Centre for Defence Studies RISS Sergey Ermakov.

I would like to draw attention to something else, that during the Cold War we did not have “hot” touch.

“SP”: Well, what about Vietnam or North Korea in military engagements that involved not just Soviet equipment, but also pilots and instructors? From the United States – the same picture.

In fact, the Soviet Union and the United States then took part in a “hybrid war”. In Ukraine, the situation could reach a direct collision. It is a war in Europe, where we see the American experts, who act as volunteers.” The trend to the fact that the scope of their presence will only expand. The commander of the land forces in Europe, the United States recently visited Kiev. After that, there is talk of sending of American instructors.

“SP”: – How far can the “hot” contact other countries on the territory of Ukraine?

If the supply of arms to begin serious, it will be NATO equipment that Ukrainian recruits hardly learned in a short time. Have to involve the US military personnel. This will provoke Russia to “mirror measures”. In this situation, the probability of an armed clash very high. In a recent article in the Financial Times, former US ambassador to NATO, campaigning for direct delivery of lethal weapons. And the leadership of Poland said he was willing to sell Kiev Soviet heavy machinery.

“SP”: And what will happen if the militia would try to go beyond the NPT and LC, creating Crimean land corridor?” Radicals of Parliament voted for recognition of Russia aggressor country.” In such a situation may direct confrontation between Russia and NATO, going beyond “hybrid war”?

This is difficult to exclude.

“SP”: In the field of conventional arms, we are seriously losing the aggregate potential of the NATO countries. In this situation the nuclear club” our last argument?

I do not tend to hang on NATO derogatory labels such as “paper tiger.” Armaments is a huge potential, is ten times higher than the Russian. Only one US military budget exceeds the combined defense spending of all countries of the world. And if we add the potential of NATO, it is more than a trillion dollars a year.

“SP”: hardly makes sense to try to compete with NATO in the field of conventional arms?

In the new military program of the Russian Federation clearly spelled out the possibility to apply tactical nuclear weapons and strategic forces even if there is a threat of territorial integrity and Gosstroy. There is a certain “red line”, where NATO can use its full potential. This is the fifth article of the Washington Treaty. In fact, to expand all these “paper shelf”, will take time. To Spain, Portugal, Poland and the Baltic states at the same time lined up and made combat schedule.

“SP”: The Pentagon has already announced regrouping their units in areas adjacent to Ukraine NATO countries.

This applies to US forces in Europe (about 60,000 troops). According to Washington, it is the shock body of NATO, which can be use. And, of which 15 thousand – instantly, and the other by rotation.

“SP”: purely quantitative is not impressive.

Why? On a par with the proposed transaction deployment and mobilization. This will apply the most advanced guidance systems, anti-tank missiles that will reach advantage. There are no militias such equipment.

“SP”: How can Russia respond to explicit military intervention in Ukrainian events from the outside?

In military doctrine clearly written as soon as the threat to the territorial integrity and political system in Russia. Currently, the most obvious casus belli (casus belli – approx. Ed.) Is the Crimea. That neither Kiev nor the West do not recognize Russian. Any military operation against the Crimea entail answer all Russian power. Using a last resort – that is tactical (as necessary) and strategic nuclear forces.

“SP”: – How to behave in Turkey in case of aggression against the Crimea because of this power depends on compliance with the Convention of Montreux?

Going into the Black Sea, the Americans may try to implement the concept of rapid global strike using cruise missiles from aircraft carriers. On the other hand, such an escalation are not interested, not only we, but also the West. By the way, Turkey, regardless of their membership in NATO and the distance can not get involved in this conflict. Ankara may refuse to provide the Straits and the airbase.

In Eastern Europe, the US has a number of countries (Poland, the Baltic countries), which is sufficient in terms of military tactics to wage war against Russia. This is a very lucrative foothold. On the other hand, there is not yet placed base for storage of nuclear weapons. Although emergency Brussels will speak about “unforeseen circumstances” that require response. However, the question for the West to respond using tactical nuclear weapons has not been fully resolved.

There are serious concerns that such a turn of events would require the use of strategic nuclear weapons. In response, Russia has no choice but to use its full potential. This is a well-informed Western partners. That’s why they try not to be the escalation of the conflict in this stage.

NATO countries rely on the latest conventional weapons that will knock out the militia to the border with Russia. And this would be sufficient. Talk about how Moscow would react to the military presence of NATO in the Donbass – is from speculation. Incontestable red line– a territory of Russia, part of which appears Crimea.


Today launched the mechanism of the collapse of oil and the dollar !

Сегодня был запущен механизм крушения нефте-доллара

No wonder the last US presidential herself Jen Psak constantly confused in their statements of Iraq and Iran – is even symbolic. Smashed Iraq and roll in the dust of Libya, the Americans stumbled on Syria and Iran on rasshibut your stars and stripes forehead.
We have already talked to you about that after the abolition of the Bretton Woods agreement might actually hold the US currency on world petroleum contracts denominated in US dollars. This allows you to print uncontrollably America green pieces of paper and throw them into the world, creating inflation and export rich, in fact, at the expense of the rest of humanity, including us swami. And anyone who tries, not even fight, but at least get out of this system, America punishes quickly and mercilessly.

Let me remind you the story.
After September 11, Iraq, going to abandon dollar in oil contracts, was declared a threat to the free world. Probirochka with baby powder, demonstrated by Colin Powell at the UN meeting, served as a pretext to invade a sovereign Middle Eastern country, the execution of its president, Saddam Hussein, the installation of absolute democracy” and the selection of the main prize – the Iraqi oil fields.

Weapons of mass destruction in Iraq has not been found. But it is not played absolutely no role. As the saying goes: “The war is over Thank you all.”

In 2011, Colonel Muammar Gaddafi, who liked to put their tents in front of the UN headquarters in New York, also announced its intention to sell Libyan oil exclusively for the euro and gold. Immediately becoming shake hands with a dictator and oppressor of democracy, Gaddafi was the Libyan revolution, civil war and NATO intervention was brutally murdered.

Following undemocratic, from the US perspective, the state oil became Syria. Although Assad and is not intended to collapse the petrodollar, there was another reason. And away on thumb scheme – a charge of genocide Bashar al-Assad of the Syrian people, the armed opposition, the attempt of the revolution, the preparation of the intervention of NATO forces But (!)
At this time found the man who would not let the black holder of the Nobel Peace Prize in dust roll another Middle Eastern country in the name of democracy. In 2013, a Russian naval force in the Mediterranean Sea for the first time exceeded in size and combat power similar rates of NATO forces in the region. Since mid-January 2014 the Syrian port of Tartus, where the Russian naval base, were delivered radar equipment for surveillance and electronic warfare as well as private goods. An-124 transferred armored vehicles, spare parts for helicopters, guided air bombs and drones (Reuters). According to anonymous sources in Syria were delivered S-300. The use of the waters of the Mediterranean Sea to organize the invasion of Syria was impossible as it was in the case of Libya, or, at least, conjugate with huge losses because the entire Syrian coastline received a powerful cover.
At the same time, Putin has made a peace initiative on the Syrian issue. And Negro peacekeeper was forced to agree with her. The intervention did not take place.

However, already 27 March 2014 with the participation of US military advisers from Turkey was an attempt to capture part of the coastline of Syrian territory. Detachments of radical extremist Islamist group AlNusra Dzhabgat” with the support of the Turkish artillery and engage Turkish armored vehicles, made the invasion of the border town of Kasab. The operation was access to the coast and take control of the province of Al Ladhiqiyah springboard for the organization that provides the beginning of the offensive along the coastline and take it under control.

This adventure was also failed. During the week, the Syrian army troops completely cleared the militants from the specified area. At an emergency meeting convened by the UN Security Council the United States refrained from official condemnation of terrorists.

At this point, has already happened Crimea and the geopolitical situation in the world has deteriorated. There was a question of anti-Russian sanctions and the US have taken here knight’s move” – lifted sanctions against Iran perennial. It was the first attempt to collapse in oil prices for the purpose of economic pressure on Russia. Although still a couple of months before Obama has threatened to “bring down a pile of bricks on the offender Iranian sanctions.” For many years, Iran has suffered sanctions because of its nuclear program and he had nothing to answer them. Now Negro seemed that he makes himself a loyal Hassan Rouhani and will increase the influence through the south-western Asia. But here he is, as it turned out, already late

Again, it was ahead of the very nosy man” to establish close contact with Iran during its international isolation. He has made the conclusion with the countries of the Caspian region agreement on the neutral status of the Caspian Sea, which made it impossible for the proposed accommodation transshipment NATO base in the Kazakh port of Aktau, and hence the potential threat of Iran on the Caspian Sea. An agreement on military-technical cooperation between Moscow and Tehran. And also signed a contract for the import of Iranian oil to Russia in the amount of 500 thousand. Barrels per day than Rouhani had strong support.

Why buy Russian oil? It would seem more stupid to come up with anything. Time has shown that the action man” turned out to be a very loyal and visionary.

Today, when Iran did not lie down under the America that counted on black again we were talking by the Western democracies about weapons of mass destruction, but in Iran (!) Against this background, we obtain two interesting events.

First – visit Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu to Iran, after which we learn about the resumption of negotiations on the delivery of this country … what do you think? The complex C-300. And here it should be noted that immediately after Iran Shoigu went to India

Second. But the second will make the Negro has to worry seriously.
Yesterday, Iran’s foreign minister made a loud statement that: “All hopes for a deal on the nuclear program will disappear if the US Congress will vote for new sanctions against his country.”
And today, 24 January 2015. at 14:28 Moscow agency “Itar-Tass” reported that Iran cease the use of the US dollar for payments in transactions with foreign countries. In particular: In foreign trade in contracts will now be used other currencies, including the yuan, the euro, the Turkish lira, Russian ruble and the South Korean won,” – said the agency Tasneem Deputy Director of the Central Bank, Gholam Ali Kamyab. And the main thing here that oppose this decision has nothing to America – Iran sells its oil to Russia!

Let me remind you, Russia has already moved to calculations by hydrocarbon contracts in rubles with a number of countries. China – the largest of them. But Iran is today the only state oil exporter, officially completely eliminate the use of the US dollar for international settlements. And something tells me that the IraqiLibyan scenario here is not to be held, it is not held in Syria.

Yes, remember the three paragraphs above I mentioned Shoigu visit to India? I think India is on the waiting list



German journalists blamed the downed “Boeing” at the Russian military !!!

Немецкие журналисты возложили ответственность за сбитый «Боинг» на российских военных

German journalists from the non-profit organization Correct! V blamed the downed malayzsky “Boeing” at the Russian military. This is stated in the published results of the January 10 disaster independent investigation MH17.

The authors of the investigation, which is made on the basis of various data, including observations and conversations with witnesses at the scene, came to the unequivocal conclusion that the plane was shot down by anti-aircraft missile system Buk-M1″, which is located in snowy. He arrived there to provide cover from the air tank units who fought on the side of the separatists. Presumably, Buk” belonged to the 53rd Brigade Air Defense based in Kursk.

In support of its employees versions Correct! V lead to local residents, as well as other evidence to find a large number of Russian military equipment in the snow, including SAM Buk”:

The man questioned. But begins to speak: “And what do you know? Knocked off his rocket. Rocket fired from there. We have seen how she flew. “He points to the railroad. No, I did not see the car. Others saw. He called me and said there is such garbage four missiles is worth it. They stood in us. “But others, he says, will not say he’s scared. “

In the investigation emphasizes that manage SAM Buk” can only qualified individuals who are not in the military formations of the separatists. So, most likely, a shot fired directly from SAM Russian military.

The authors investigate lay partly responsible for what happened on the Ukrainian authorities, which, according to journalists who used passenger planes as human shields for its combat aircraft, strikes at the positions of the separatists.

“Civil air traffic provides Ukrainian storming precious seconds in their battle with the” beech . Ukrainian attack aircraft can hide behind the passenger plane. Anyone who is aiming to attack aircraft c land threatens to get into civilian “– said in the text.

In particular, the investigation Correct! V implies that SAM Buk” was placed in the snow after the attack on the city from the air July 15th. As a result of an air raid and Ukrainian rocket hit a house, killing 13 people.

Also responsible for what happened lies with the authorities of the European countries, including Germany.

The Government of Germany and other EU countries must share the responsibility. They were afraid of the war in the east of Ukraine called a war and failed to take appropriate action. They are not banned airlines flying over a war zone. They were afraid to provoke Putin’s government. The EU should recognize the placement of Russian tanks and air defense systems, declaring it a no-fly zone. Politicians were busy appeasing Russian, rather than recognizing the truth, “- said in the text.

In the investigation Correct! V widely used materials other resources devoted to citizen journalism – Bellingcat. This site is published version of the involvement of a disaster “Boeing” 53rd Kursk air defense brigades in September 2014. Then no official comment on the matter was not followed.

Earlier, the Russian state-run media has repeatedly published materials, according to which for the catastrophe “Boeing” Ukrainian side is responsible. So the newspaper “Komsomolskaya Pravda” has found a witness who claimed to have seen 17 July stranded at the airport near Dnepropetrovsk Su-25 with ammunition expended missiles “air-to-air.” Witness “KP” even mentioned the name of the pilot, allegedly brought down “Boeing”, but in Kiev said. that called the pilot could not rise into the air on July 17, as his plane was shot down earlier and was repaired.

In November 2014 the Russian “First Channel” showed a satellite image, allegedly made shortly before the fall of the liner. On it in addition to the “Boeing” captured military aircraft and launched from under his wing in the civil side of the rocket. But it soon became clear that the photo shown was the product of a photomontage, before the pop-up on the Internet.

In October 2014 Bundesnachrichtendienst said that the plane was shot down flight MH17 troops separatists. These conclusions scouts came as a result of a detailed analysis of satellite images and various photographs taken in the region. In this case, the agency did not agree with the popular version, according to which the anti-aircraft system Buk”, from which the aircraft was shot down, the militia was raised from Russia. According to German intelligence, the separatists used “Buk” trapped in the past at Ukrainian military base.

The Boeing 777 airline Malaysian Airlines, carrying out flight MH17 from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur, crashed in the Donetsk region of Ukraine on July 17. Killing all 298 people aboard. According to preliminary reports, the plane was shot down from the ground. Kiev and the representatives of the breakaway regions of eastern Ukraine blamed the incident on each other.
Andrei Ponomarev

Passengers Boeing downed Ukrainians flew another flight ?!!

Гибель Боинга - Pictures Break - Terra Incognita. Сайт Рэдрика

All passengers on the flight from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur, check in MH-17 July 17, 2014 took off from Amsterdam Airport within 17 minutes after the shot down further over the territory of Donbass, and aircraft, with a slight delay safely landed at the airport in Kuala Lumpur. This is a human rights activist Marc Ben-Naim said a source in the Ukrainian Security Service. July 17 from the airport of Amsterdam, with a difference of 17 minutes, flew two identical Boeing 777/200. The first of these simulated flight MH-17, but none of the passengers, registered on this flight it did not hit. All passengers check in were invited to the landing and flew in the same plane.

The plane, simulating the flight was sent conventional air corridor through the Donbass, but a real flight was sent to Ukrainian managers through the so-called “southern air corridor“, within the scope of the Kherson dispatcher. This aircraft was registered locators Russian air defense, stationed in the Crimea, while flying near Genichesk. Here it should be noted that the dispatching service of Kherson not received a certificate in 2014 the Ministry of Transport of Ukraine. Kherson and Zaporizhia dispatching services can serve airspace only on systems CNS (communication, navigation, surveillance) and are not able to use more modern ATM and ATS. For this reason, the “southern corridorfor Russia, almost not used for transit flights international flights.

After passing over the Genichesk, the plane has been successfully transferred to Russian dispatchers who took him further – in Kazakhstan. After the flight over the territory of Russia, Kazakh Manager successfully passed the plane on. When accepting the Russian aircraft dispatchers, aircraft “introduced” as a charter flight, but to hide their affiliation to the Malaysian airlines, he naturally could not. However, no timetable Amsterdam Airport charters have been recorded. Charter and did not land at the airport in Malaysia. July 17 at KLIA bore the safe arrival of the flight MH-17 from Amsterdam.

All of this information is at the disposal of Russian security services and aware of this Western countries.

In general, all this provocation was calculated that the stolen in March, immediately after the Crimean referendum, a Boeing-777 Malaysian airlines, fall in Russia and then Western countries declare that the plane was shot down Russian. But Ukrainian “army” once again showed that trust her to perform any task you can not and the plane crashed into the territory of Ukraine.

Provocation had two objectives – to restore badly shaken rating Angela Merkel, who can not explain to the citizens of Germany for which it supports the US and Ukraine against Russia because of the sanctions have affected German manufacturers, losing huge markets in Russia. Need support and Barack Obama, who just can not explain to Americans why he climbed into the conflict.

The true reasons for the creation of the United States Ukrainian crisis associated with the construction of Russia and China Nicaragua Canal and began preparations for the Russian oil off the coast of Cuba and other Latin American countries. But to explain this to the voters, Barack Obama can not, because the average American does not care about the problems of a handful of American oligarchs whose interests is Barack Obama.

However, after the plane crashed in Ukraine and the Russian special services receive all the information about the two planes, Angela Merkel and Barack Obama were in a very difficult situation. Russia will now wait for the official version of the investigation into the causes of the crash and put ace of trumps. Therefore, Merkel and Obama only spread squeaks and squeals,” but no documentary evidence to support Russian” in the trail of downed Ukrainian junta Boeing, present can not.
Author: Mark Ben-Nayim

The Originator: http://www.poluostrov-news.org/2014/08/17.html

Fall Putin’s rating could provoke direct intervention in Ukraine: political scientist !

Intensification of hostilities in the eastern regions of Ukraine may be the only possible way to raise the collapsed rating of Vladimir Putin.

Падение рейтинга Путина может спровоцировать прямое вторжение в Украину: политолог

It is reported Joinfo.ua referring to the statement of Russian political scientist Alexei Gordeev.

The annexation of the Crimea and fighting the Russian army in the Donbas allowed Putin to achieve unprecedented early popularity and support rating of 80%. However, against the backdrop of a severe economic crisis, the Russians express all claims more power. In the context of the risk of mass popular uprising against the background of the economic problems faced Kremlin faces a major challenge to keep the situation in the country and prevent the overthrow of the Arab spring by the formula, “- said the analyst.

Mood of Russians and their degree of loyalty to the Kremlin are currently subject of intense study of Russian special services representatives of these agencies conduct focus groups in the regions of the Russian Federation, in order to determine the level of dissatisfaction with the Russians authorities and readiness to go to the streets to participate in the protests. To switch the attention of the general public with the Russian economic collapse, collapse of the ruble and the general decline in living standards, it can be played decisive map – the map of the war with Ukraine.

“When the war in the neighboring country, people will devote all his time to it, shifting attention from internal problems. In the spring of Kremlin propagandists have tested this option, flooded the news stories about the crimes ofKiev junta. “

After Putin discontent, knots, only the war as a more emotional “story” will allow to block the economic problems of the people and submit again Putin a major geo-strategy“, – concluded Gordeev.

Earlier, we reported that, according to Inosmi, 2015 will be the year for the collapse of Vladimir Putin.

Paul Craig Roberts: Washington is preparing a nuclear attack on Russia and China !!!

Washington thinks that a nuclear war can be won, and plans to launch a first strike against Russia

Пол Крейг Робертс: Вашингтон готовит ядерный удар по России и Китаю

This is a former assistant for economic policy US Treasury warns primarily of their own citizens

Washington believes that a nuclear war can be won, and plans to launch a first strike against Russia, and possibly China, to avoid any challenge Washington’s global hegemony.

The plan is far advanced, and now turns its implementation. As I reported earlier, US strategic doctrine has changed, nuclear missiles, which previously was assigned the role of retaliation, now relegated to the role of the first offensive strike. Base anti-ballistic missiles the US has been deployed in Poland on the border with Russia, in the plans the construction of new bases. When it is completed, Russia will be surrounded by US missile bases.

Anti-ballistic missiles, known as “Star Wars” a weapon designed to intercept and destroy ballistic missiles. According to the military doctrine of Washington, US first strike on Russia, and, regardless of what means of retaliation remain in Russia, they are not able to reach the United States, thanks to the shield of anti-ballistic missiles.

As a reason, which Washington says changing its military doctrine, called the possibility that terrorists will acquire nuclear weapons, with which they can destroy an American city. This explanation is ridiculous. Terrorists – a single or a group of people rather than a country with armed forces that threaten. Use of nuclear weapons against terrorists will lead to the destruction of much more than the actual terrorists, in and of itself is meaningless, since cope with this task and drone with a missile.

For reasons that are explained Washington create a database of anti-ballistic missiles in Poland, was named to protect Europe from Iranian intercontinental ballistic missiles. Washington and any European government knows that Iran has no intercontinental ballistic missiles that Iran and showed no signs of intentions to attack Europe.

Any government is aware that there are reasons for Washington‘s feeble attempts to hide the fact that the creation of opportunities to win a nuclear war on the ground.

The Russian government understands that a change in US military doctrine and the base of anti-ballistic missiles on the borders of the United States directed against Russia and are a sign that Washington is planning to launch a nuclear first strike against Russia.

China also realized that Washington has similar intentions against him. As I wrote a few months ago, in response to a threat to Washington’s China drew the world’s attention to their ability to destroy the United States if Washington will initiate a conflict.

But Washington believes that he can win a nuclear war with little damage and without prejudice to the United States. This belief makes nuclear war possible.

This belief is based on ignorance. In a nuclear war there will be winners. Even if the city will be able to avoid US retaliation because of anti-ballistic missiles, radiation and nuclear winter of the use of weapons against Russia and China and also destroy the United States.

Media that during the corrupt regime Clinton fell into the hands of several people are also complicit in this, as long as do not pay attention to the problem. Governments vassals of Washington in Western and Eastern Europe, Canada, Australia and Japan – also partners, as they have been Washington’s plan and allow you to build a base for its actuation. Distraught Polish government may have signed the death sentence of humanity. US Congress – the same partner as makes no hearings on executive plans to unleash a nuclear war.

Washington has created a dangerous situation. Since it is obvious that the first blow threatens Russia and China, they can decide themselves to strike first. Why Russia and China have to sit and wait for the inevitable, while their opponent creates an opportunity to defend themselves with a shield of anti-ballistic missiles? When Washington will complete construction of the shield, Russia and China will obviously be attacked if not surrender immediately.

Of the 10minute talk channel «Russia Today» it follows that the secret plan of Washington first strike on Russia not a secret. The report also makes it clear that Washington is ready to eliminate all the European leaders who disagree with him.

Readers ask me: “What can we do?And you can do this. You can plug the mouth of the Propaganda Ministry, turning off the TV, “Fox News“, “CNN en“, “Bi-bi-si“, “Hey BBC“, “CNN-BBC“, “sys- CBS, “stop reading” New York Times “,” Voshington Post “,” Los Angeles Times “. Yes, just walking away from the official media. Do not believe a word of the government. Do not vote. Realize that evil is concentrated in Washington. In the XXI-st century Washington completely or partially destroyed several countries. Millions of people are killed, maimed, driven from their homes, and even Washington has never repented. Did not repent and other “Christian” country. Devastation that struck Washington, portrayed as a huge success. Washington triumphs.

Washington aims to triumph, and the evil that is Washington, leads to the destruction of the world.

Ukrainian troops launched an offensive on three fronts !






Late in the evening of December 28 Ukrainian invaders began massive shelling of cities and towns of Donbass. Under fire Donetsk, Gorlovka, half Telmanovskiy district., Dokuchaevsk. Army Novorossia alerted and is preparing to repel the attacks. Advanced unit DNR withstand the onslaught of the enemy, is fighting in the northern sector of Donetsk – mine Butovka.

Details boestolkonoveny and artdueley specified.

Posted by militia Gorlovki:

It is reported from Gorlovki that about 22:30 (by MSK) began bombing. The shells are falling on areas of mines №6, 7, deep, wide beam, mercury, and Kurganka Besarabka. In the second half of the day in Donetsk tense, occasionally heard a volley of heavy weapons around the city.

As a result of the resumption of hostilities, in a house on the street. Luzin 1 in the Kuibyshev region hit by a shell. Destruction are from 5 to 3 floor of the house. No one was injured, emergency workers went to the scene. In the settlement Sands continues shooting battle near the mine Butovka (Donetsk) heard the guns and the dull explosions. According to the radio interception tomorrow morning (29.12.) Is expected artudar from 03:00 to 04:00 and Petrovsky Lugansk, Donetsk, Kiev district. Information is checked. “

According to intelligence militia continues intensive doobespechenie punitive groups in the occupied territories of New Russia.

In the area of Slavyansk (86 km northwest of Donetsk) concentrates a large amount of military equipment, ammunition and food supplies. Over the past day in the area arrived at least 20 units of automotive vehicles with material and technical resources.

In Stanichno-Lugano (12 km north-east of Lugansk) to strengthen the National Guard units arrived battery self-propelled guns.

In the occupied part of the punitive Luhansk region has been a sharp tightening of access control.

RSS for Posts RSS for Comments